Manmade global frying with 2 eggs

Manmade global frying with 2 eggs

Who is professor Kari Norgaard?

“This is 21st century book burning.” — Alex Jones, April 5, 2012

And, who is professor Karen Seto?

by Jon Rappoport

April 5, 2012.

YouTube has taken down an Alex Jones video in which he parodies the professor who recently said warming critics have a mental disorder and should be treated.

Well, Professor Kari Norgaard was right about one thing. Anything can be called a psychiatric disorder. Dream up a disorder, name it, and the drug companies will give you a wink and a nod, because they cook up the expensive chemical solutions.

But I digress.

YouTube apparently believes official science can’t be messed with, and also that parody is a crime. In case you hadn’t noticed, criticizing science and government policy is beginning to merge with “politically incorrect speech.” The two streams are coming together, and it isn’t an accident.

Global warming is a key issue, because it’s the premise on which destruction of economies and green everything and cap and trade are based.

As Al Gore’s TV network, run out of the back of a pickup, heads into oblivion, and as the internet flushes one traditional media business after another down the toilet, as the manmade warming hypothesis takes one hit after another, as the science is exposed, the powers-that-be are getting nervous.

They want consensus, and they don’t care how they get it.

When PR dressed up as science doesn’t work, when gaping holes in the manmade warming hypothesis are exposed again and again, when scandals inside the corrupt warming club explode, the Plan B people try to shut down is the truth.

They cite “community standards” on speech, they suddenly interpret the 1st Amendment to mean “inoffensive comments,” they show “concern for potential victims,” they take sides.

It’s quite all right for scientists and government employees to call those who question the manmade warming hypothesis insane, or racist, or dangerous or mentally incompetent, but when the attacks run the other way, it’s impolite and offensive and insensitive. Boo-hoo.

O poor little professor who wrote a paper calling global warming critics sociologically diseased, and in need of treatment. Poor little professor needs defending, poor little professor of sociology who probably knows less climate science than a TV weather android. Poor little professor who wants to debate science by calling the other side demented.

You see, she’s a professor, and she was operating under the delusion that, from her protected perch, she could make sensational pronouncements and cut herself a nice little piece of academic pie and graduate into the land of the famous.

Well, she’s famous now, and I don’t think she likes it. A dose of her own medicine wasn’t what she had in mind. She thought she was inventing a new category of mental disorder.

Students actually put themselves into hock for decades, to come to your college and sit in your classes? Astonishing.

See, Professor Norgaard, let me take you to school for a second:

Science is supposed to work this way. Someone makes a claim based on evidence, and then other scientists use that evidence and decide whether the claim has merit. I know, that’s Pure science, and we rarely see it anymore in many areas of research. But that’s the template. That’s the way it’s supposed to operate.

If you play that game under the cover of academic pretension, based on NOTHING, it’s a giveaway. You’re just quack-quacking. And even some of your colleagues can see it. Your bosses at the college have already said your use of the word “treatment,” as in “needs treatment,” was a mistake. So they’re backing down. They’re running away and hiding. From you.

That must have been a bit of a shocker. There you were, quack-quacking, thinking your superiors would back you up, and they fled into the night. Cowards. They couldn’t take heat. See, they’re fakers, too. When the PR turns against them, they cut you loose in a second and leave you with your wings flapping in the breeze.

Welcome to the real world of academia.

By the way, I just read a letter you wrote to President Obama posted on the Whitman College website—the letter that will probably be scrubbed out in the next 30 seconds. Let me quote you:

At this juncture, we need science more than ever. Fortunately, you have made an excellent choice in commissioning Harvard physicist and Nobel Peace Prize recipient John Holdren as your science adviser.”

Kari? Holdren didn’t win the Nobel Peace Prize. At least not in this galaxy. You didn’t know that? I know some people who’d like to smoke what you’re smoking.

power outside the matrix

I really shouldn’t leave this piece without saying a word or two about another professor, not from the wilds of Oregon, but from Yale, who might be smoking with Skull and Bones types. That would be Karen Seto. The Daily UK Mail mentioned she recently told MSNBC: “We certainly don’t want them (humans) strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely (together).”

My, my. Nothing elitist or arrogant to see here, move along.

This is about “urban land use” and “natural preservation” and “the warming threat” and “environmental stewardship.” All of which mean CENTRAL PLANNING for the planet.

Pack people into the cities (one item on the UN Agenda 21 list), leave the wilds to nature, with a few golf courses for the upper caste, and delegate farming to giant GMO corporations because, well, somebody has to grow food, unless the urban billions are going to be chomping Soylent Green. Or unless, to make this criminal enterprise work, some heavy depopulation must take place.

Quite a vision of the future, and it’s only right that Yale is in the vanguard.

Who’s insane?

But ha-ha, these professors are just fringe jokers and we all know there is no threat to our freedom.

Yeah? Go to Karen Seto’s CV at the Yale site and read the brain-cracking list of organizations she’s connected to. They’re all involved in this Central Planning for the Planet to Save Our Skins op. And you’ve never heard of any of them. They’re networked. And there are many more. They’re working globally, they’re working locally, and I wish I could say they’re all suffering from a sociological disease. But they aren’t. They’re little mad egos and big mad egos who are gathering together to create a future for the rest of us. A future decimation.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at