The era of programming the mind

The era of programming the mind

by Jon Rappoport

February 22, 2013

If you want to track a civilization as it collapses, watch what happens to the concept of the rebel.

On a profound level, mass shootings and assassinations (whether staged or not) are used to define the ever-present “lone assassin” as the REPRESENTATION AND THE SYMBOL OF WHAT THE INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL IS.

You’re a separate and distinct individual? An outsider? Watch out. Overnight, you could turn into a raging killer.

You happen to know an outsider, a loner? He’s dangerous. He doesn’t live by the rules the rest of us accept. He’s deranged. Stay away from him. Shun him. And if you see the slightest indication of (insert your own term here), report him to the authorities.

See a rebel, say something,” to paraphrase the DHS motto.

Any human being who has courage, intelligence, eyes to see, and a determination to express his power in uncompromising terms can now be redefined as a potential threat to the stability of society—if he criticizes the prevailing Authority.

From the 1960s onward—starting with Lee Oswald and the assassination of JFK—the whole idea of “the rebel” with power has been sequentially updated and repackaged. This is intentional.

The objective is to equate “rebel” with a whole host of qualities—e.g., runaway self-serving paranoia; random destruction; out-of-control drug use; generalized hatred; the commission of crimes—qualities that will defeat the very notion of honorable and righteous and powerful opposition to fascist authority:

On a lesser, “commercialized” level, the new rebel can define himself by merely showing up at a concert to scream and drink heavily and break something, having already dressed to make a dissident fashion statement. He can take an afternoon off from college classes and have his arms tattooed. All the while, of course, he functions as an avid consumer of mainstream corporate products.

You even have people who, considering themselves rebels of the first order, support a government that spies on its people 24/7, launches military attacks all over the world, and now funds a Manhattan Project to map every move of the 100 billion neurons of the brain, for the ultimate purpose of controlling it.

More than ever, the individual has to explore and discover, with intelligence, a position that is FOR himself and AGAINST the concocted and sustained illusion called consensus reality.

When the individual embarks on this path, the external false definitions of him as rebel or outsider or mentally ill or criminal no longer matter. Instead, what matters is his deepest nature.

Even going back as far as the 1950s, the so-called decade of conformity, psyops professionals sculpted notions of The Rebel: He was the person who didn’t want to take part in the emerging bland corporate culture.

He was presented as troubled and morose, a wobbly unfocused JD Salinger Holden Caulfield, or a beatnik, a Madison Avenue caricature of somebody who opposed Madison Avenue.

In other words, the people who were shaping the consumer culture were programming the image of the rebel as a cartoon figure who just didn’t want to buy into “the good life.”

Time Magazine ran a cover story on the beatniks, and characterized them as a disaffected trend. Marlon Brando, heading up a bunch of moronic motorcycle riders, invaded a town of pleasant clueless citizens and took it over, wreaking destruction. The 1953 movie was The Wild One. James Dean, who had the same trouble Brando did in getting out a complete sentence, was “the rebel without a cause” in the “iconic film” of the same name. He raced cars toward cliffs because his father couldn’t understand him.

These were all puff pieces designed to make rebels look ridiculous, and they worked. They also functioned to transmit the idea to young people that being a rebel should be a showbiz affectation. That worked, too.

Then the 1960s arrived. Flower children, in part invented by the major media, would surely take over the world and dethrone fascist authority with rainbows. San Francisco was the epicenter. But Haight-Ashbury, where the flowers and the weed were magically growing out of the sidewalks, turned into a speed, acid, and heroin nightmare, a playground for psychopaths to cash in and steal and destroy lives. The CIA, of course, gave the LSD culture a major push.

For all that the anti-war movement eventually accomplished in ending the Vietnam war crime, in the aftermath all those college students who had been in the streets—once the fear of being drafted was gone—scurried into counselors’ offices to see where they might fit into the job market after graduation. The military industrial complex took its profits and moved on, undeterred.

The idea of the rebel was gone. It later resurfaced as The Cocaine Dealer, the archangel of the 1980s.

And so forth and so on. All these incarnations of The Rebel were artificially created and sustained as psyops, for the purpose of deflating attempts at genuine and powerful rebellion. And, at bottom, the idea was to discredit the Individual, in favor of The Group.

Now, in our collectivist society of 2013, The Group, as a rapidly expanding victim class, is the government’s number one project. While extolling this group as heroic and in constant need of help, the government is doing everything it can to crash the economy and widen the population of victims. It’s a straight con. “We’re here to make you worse off while we lift you up.”

In the psyop to demean, distort, and squash the rebel, there is a single obvious common denominator: the establishment media are doing the defining; they are the ones who are setting the parameters and making the descriptions; they are the ones who build and program the cartoons; looking down their noses, pretending to a degree of sympathy, they paint one unflattering picture after another of what the rebel is and does and says; they have co-opted the whole game.

These days, the ultimate rebels, the media would have you believe, are the Tea Party and their affiliated “gun-toting racist bitter clingers who have religion.” Another distorted unflattering portrait, meant not only to drive people away from the Tea Party, but also to prove the guilt, by association, of any person who says the federal government is unconstitutional and out of control.

All the fascism is on the political Right. There can be no fascism on the Left.” This is the major domestic policy of this administration—this absurd assertion.

The Rebel is real. But he has been covered up by media fabrications and caricatures.

You can take a whole host of political films and television series of the past 50 years, and look at them for signs of the Rebel: Seven Days in May, Advise and Consent, The Candidate, The Seduction of Joe Tynan, Dave, Primary Colors, The Contender, Good Night and Good Luck, The American President, West Wing, Scandal, The Newsroom…

Good acting, bad acting, drama, message—at the end you’re looking for the core. What do the rebel heroes really stand for? What are their principles? It’s all bland. It’s vague. It has the posturing of importance, but little else. It’s not meant to have real substance, only undefined affectation. The rebel takes action, but it’s based on superficial slogan. It’s another deflating caricature.

The Matrix Revealed

As I was finishing this piece, a friend wrote with a quote attributed to Robert Anton Wilson: “The universe is a war between reality programmers.”

This is exactly where the real rebel enters the scene. He’s not trying to program people. Freedom means cutting loose from programming.

The rebel dismantles inhibiting and artificial structures.

He doesn’t go to the market and choose which reality program he wants. They’re all used up as soon as they come out of the package.

The political fancy or trend or program of the moment is a hardened dream somebody borrowed to make mince meat out of the population. The rebel has no allegiance to any of this.

Albert Camus one wrote: “The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants, and it provides the further advantage of giving the servants of tyranny a good conscience.It would be easy, however, to destroy that good conscience by shouting to them: if you want the happiness of the people, let them speak out and tell what kind of happiness they want and what kind they don’t want! But, in truth, the very ones who make use of such alibis know they are lies; they leave to their intellectuals on duty the chore of believing in them and of proving that religion, patriotism, and justice need for their survival the sacrifice of freedom.”

THIS or THAT” is the modern history of civilization: choose reality program A or B. The choice was always a con.

We’re well into a time period when the experts and scientific authorities are settling on the human being as a biological machine that can only respond to programming. That’s their view and their default position.

It’s sheer madness, of course, but what else do you expect? We’re in an intense technological age, and people are obsessed with making things run smoother. They treat their precious little algorithms for control like the Crown Jewels. They’re terribly enthusiastic about the problem they’re solving, and that problem is us.

We’re the wild cards, a fact which they take to be result of our improper and incomplete conditioning. They aim to fix that.

There is—and has been, for a long time—a blended sequence in operation: a) observe; b) predict; c) control; d)re-create. “Well, we can see many patterns in this society. So we can make some predictions about what is going to happen. Actually, if we covertly introduce certain elements from the outside, we can control what happens. Why not stop diddling around and just make the whole thing over? Why not reshape humans?”

Having decided that, the battle begins between competing programmers of the mind. Which program for humans is better?

The rebel is against all such programming, no matter how “good and right” it sounds. Good and right are the traps:

Well, certainly we could make a list of qualities we want all people to have. You know, the best qualities, like bravery and determination. Who could be against that? So suppose we could actually program such qualities into humans? Wouldn’t that be a fine thing? Then people would just BE that way…”

The ultimate rebellion is against programming, whatever it looks like, wherever it occurs.

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at

15 comments on “The era of programming the mind

  1. joanie says:

    Group think never seems “right” for the most part. Born the 6th child of 9, I was always “being me”, not happy doing what the group was doing and for that, I was labeled the black sheep and dissed by family. Little did I know I was always fighting programming, a rebel with an objective of “being me”…

  2. Chippos says:

    You are the real deal Jon. Know that other men of power are on that wave you ride. Ones like us trump a million blue pill swallowing nincompoops. This message is from Theta State A. Be strong brother.

  3. zonsb says:

    The arch-criminal, Abraham Lincoln said: “Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed.”

    Aside from sociopaths that violate the non aggression principle, all individuals — roughly 98% of the populace — are each holding a royal straight flush while corporate media and government are totally bluffing. This is NOT what Lincoln had in mind in the above quote.

  4. Elliot Nesspa says:

    Hi Jon! Great article. Clear, to the point and very much on track with today’s issues. Any chance you might come on my radio program? Its called Truth Talk, and airs every other Wednesday night on WEFT in Champaign Illinois.

    Let me know!
    Jack Bailey
    [email address withheld]

  5. Mike says:

    When the superheros of the new society drink blood I think we are facing a strange turn of culture. Then again, when psychopaths rule a nation one can only expect bad outcomes.

  6. Sean says:

    We’ve seen what happens to a true rebel in Amerika, he gets suicided in his apartment.

  7. MachtNichts says:

    Cast into the role of a rebel, James Dean, must have been aware of the phonyness of it all and so decided to take an early exit. You know, whom the gods love … Just my musings.

    Hammering people’s awareness into squares, not to be deviated from has most people going along to get along. Oh, you can’t do that, what if everybody else would. Conformity all around? What a nightmare.

    I’m happy, I don’t have to use a wash board anymore to get my laundry done or to read at night without a candle. Technology has it’s advantages. But it only goes so far. When Prof. Julian Savulescu states that creating ‘designer babies’ is almost a moral obligation to parents to provide ethically better children, I wonder what kind of ethics he is talking about. I also wonder if bitchin’ Sitchin was right when he said that we have been tampered with.

  8. Trisolo says:

    “It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society” – J Krishnamurti.

  9. Dear Mr. Rappoport:

    Your piece today on psyche-Iatry has been emailed to my father. He is 82, a retired pediatric surgeon, as I may have said a few times.

    He thinks that my mom and he created a women like me, who is brilliant and unstable.

    It is my fervent wish that my father fully understands what happened to medicine while he quietly did his job. By the way, he always favored the older drugs by habit, yet had been assuming that the newer ones are ‘better.”

    I had asked him about barbiturates, and he said they were great! I asked, why gone? He said he assumed the SSRIs had replaced barbies because they were better.
    So, he is highly educable, and once he groks what’s happened to my mind as a result of brain, maybe even liver/metabolic alterations to my tissues, he will join me morally in my fight to have the FDA dismantled by hand by its workers, those who knew.

    Or not! I’ve got an appt at a neurology/epilepsy clinic and will be reporting through one medium or another as my attempt to self-treat for PsychotropoGenic Mind Fuck proceeds. I do think there is hope; I have read about using Carnitine, Tramodol, and even Alleve, along with nurtitional stuff, to get a grip on this process.

    Hang in there, I think the streams are convergning. You work is the river, and the streams are finding you.

    Indeed, every athlete who shoots his girlfriend probably had Vicodin the day before.

    I think the famous director, Mr. Scott, who jumped off the bridge in Pedro a while ago was a Vicodin case. The quotes by his friends in the papers said he had been having hip or lower back trouble, and that he was especially effusive in the days leading up to his death.


  10. George Tirebiter says:

    Jon, Your comments on the Rebel are dead on.
    One rebel that has all but been deliberately defamed and written out of history is Osho, who emphasized the notion of being a rebel and not a revolutionary. The revolutionary can be relatively easily manipulated and controlled, but this is much more difficult to do to a rebel…
    As you stated, the controllers have successfully re-framed the idea of the rebel as being someone who presents no threat to their authorized reality.

  11. bleak says:

    Hi Jon, although this article is highly interesting (as yours always are), the title of this article was slightly misleading to me. I thought you were going to talk about “mind control” rather than “programming the mind.” My bad, I hadn’t thought of them as separate categories before.

    With that said, I have been researching mind control because of all the recent purported false-flag events like Aurora and Sandy Hook. It is my belief that what we are witnessing (and have been for long while) are repeated cases of the robotic control of a person’s mind by an outside source. The death of Chris Kyle is the case that pushed it over the top for me. Let me explain.

    With Sandy Hook came the latest and greatest threat to our Constitution this country has ever faced. Many oath keepers, citizens and patriots will not stand for it and are prepared to fight. Therefore, I became highly suspicious of the death of Mr. Kyle not only because of the circumstances, but because of who Chris Kyle was. Namely, the most effective sniper in US military history (!!!). Was that a freakin coincidence or what?

    I believe his death (as well as that of Keith Ratliff, another outspoken gun advocate) were made as examples of what could and would happen to anyone who gets in the way of their wannabe fascist government. So the person who killed Mr. Kyle, Eddie Ray Routh, was nothing less than a programmed killer, a Manchurian Candidate. So were James Holmes and Adam Lanza (if Lanza had a part in it at all that is) and so many others too numerous to mention.

    What led me to this “theory” was watching a video of Cathy O’Brien, the former victim of the MKUltra program gone whistle blower with her husband and rescuer, Mark Phillips. Before watching “Mind Control Out of Control-Cathy O’Brien,” I had no idea of the depth and sophistication that went into the MKUltra operation.

    BTW, I’d like to add a film to the list of Rebel films: Black Sunday directed by none other than John Frankenheimer, who also directed… The Manchurian Candidate. But this is silly and it’s all a coincidence, right? Thanks and keep up the good work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.