How doctors make fake diagnoses for diseases

How doctors make fake diagnoses for diseases

by Jon Rappoport

March 17, 2014

I never grow tired of explaining this issue, because people write to me with the assumption that they understand disease diagnosis. And they don’t. They’re not off by a little bit. They’re off by a mile.

Two of the most prevalent tests for diagnosing diseases are antibody tests and what’s called the PCR.

Prior to 1984, it was well understood by most doctors that the presence of antibodies specific to a given germ meant: the patient’s body had contacted and successfully thrown off the germ.

Antibodies are scouts for the immune system. They “go hunting” for germ invaders and ID them, so other troops can knock them out. That’s the conventional view.

Therefore, if a test shows that antibodies are present, it’s taken to mean: victory. The body IDed and rejected the germ in question.

That view was turned upside down in the mid-1980s. All of a sudden, the presence of antibodies meant: the patient was ill or would get ill.

Actually, the presence of antibodies simply indicates that the body’s immune system contacted the germ in question. That’s all it means.

To say that a positive antibody test means a patient has a certain disease is fatuous, wrong, and absurd. Yet, that is what doctors do every day.

The PCR diagnostic test takes tiny genetic fragments of what are assumed (but not always proven) to be germs and enlarges them, amplifies them, so they can be observed.

That very fact tells you why the test is useless for diagnosing disease. Even by conventional medical standards, you need lots and lots and lots of a given germ in the body to even begin to assume the germ is causing the patient any harm.

And the PCR test is based on the idea that there is so little of the germ available that you need to enlarge it fantastically, just to be able to see it.

The Matrix Revealed

There is a medical term that refers to the quantity of a given germ in the body: titer. It is usually ignored in today’s medical “science.” But it is vital.

Saying a germ is present in the body is irrelevant to disease, unless you can show there are lots and lots of that germ doing harm.

When researchers say, “We found germ X in the patient,” people tend to assume that means the germ is causing disease, but this isn’t necessarily so.

When researchers are trying to discover whether there is a new disease they haven’t seen before, they must isolate the previously unknown germ as the first step. This isn’t done indirectly by antibody or PCR test.

For example, in my last article about hepatitis C, I mentioned Nick Regush, the late ABC News medical reporter, and his discovery that the so-called virus reputed to cause hepatitis C had never been properly isolated.

Not properly isolated=never really discovered.

Doctors and researchers, in a stunning display of incompetence and/or dishonesty, are misdiagnosing patients every hour of every day. They are using tests that don’t work. They are misinterpreting the meaning of the tests they run. They are lying.

And the general public blithely accepts these false diagnoses.

To put the cherry on the cake, on top of everything I’ve written here, it is really the individual’s immune system that determines whether a germ causes disease. It’s not the germ all by itself. The medical establishment has it backwards.

There may be exceptions to this rule, as in the case of certain bioengineered germs. But for the wide range of typical diseases which are said to plague humankind, it’s all about immune systems, and whether they are strong or weak.

And that is not a medical issue. It’s an issue involving nutrition, environmental toxins, poverty, sanitation, overcrowding.

No conventional doctor deploys tests to assess these vital factors, and he doesn’t have drugs to treat them.

False diagnosis of disease is huge problem and a huge hoax.

Jon Rappoport

The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at

23 comments on “How doctors make fake diagnoses for diseases

  1. Mark says:

    “If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat – diseased tissue – rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue; e.g., mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.” – Rudolph Ludwig Karl Virchow (1821-1902) German doctor, anthropologist, pathologist, prehistorian, biologist and politician. Referred to as “the father of modern pathology”

  2. […] Yea, Jon, the fake diagnoses is a disease in itself. That’s why selling the FEAR card is so im… […]

  3. brusplace says:

    Yea, Jon, the fake diagnoses is a disease in itself. That’s why selling the FEAR card is so important to these mischievous folks, we create as we go.

    These folks are quakes of the highest order. And if money didn’t rule it would be obvious to all.

  4. Good post Jon!
    Anything I would add here, would be redundant.
    More power to you my friend.


    “The most exquisite pleasure in the practice of medicine comes from nudging a layman in the direction of terror, then bringing him back to safety again.” – Kurt Vonnegut

    “Just look at us. Everything is backwards; everything is upside down. Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the major media destroy information and religions destroy spirituality.” -Michael Ellner

  5. This also goes towards the step of disproving the prevailing “Germ Theory” (where the “germ” is blamed for the illness, rather than being seen as symptomatic of something else gone wrong in the body).

    These “germs” are simply “opportunists” that invade when conditions are set for them to do so. A truly healthy body will see very little problem with the occasional encounter. “Diseases” manifest themselves within the bodies of the weak and already sickened. This is WHY a PROBIOTIC solution works best: It helps the body regain strength and vigor to fend off and defeat the onslaught of these opportunists.

    Thank you once again for a fine article!

    – Rev. Dragon’s Eye

    • Elsa says:

      Agreed! The body is totally capable of healing itself when given proper food, clean water and sunshine. Fasting when sick, as seen in animals, is the best way to recover. Note how sunshine is now the demon and parents are told to put sunglasses and sunscreen on toddlers. Absurd!

      • Yes, I know.

        I have been outdoors, in full Sunshine for most of my life. Many of my friends are jealous of the tan I get. ( Heh-heh-heh. )

        I have had my share of sunburns, but they go away quickly with a little help from diluted cider vinegar sprayed directly on the skin.


        The Sun is a natural disinfectant as well as a very natural means of geographically-controlling major epidemics. (Most “germs” do not like the sunlight.)

        I also have not worn sunglasses in years; I keep breaking them in my pockets. Therefore, bright sunlight does not seem to bother my eyes as much as the next guy. Gee! I guess I must be a “medical marvel”, or overly “stupid”, according to the words of the “medical egg-spurts”?!?

  6. paschn says:

    Anything from the medical community in this dying republic makes me suspicious. After all, how or why would a reasoning human being accept the “truth” from an amalgam of witch-doctors with suits who use carcinogens to “cure” cancer? It’s a corporation and a rotten-to-the-core one at that.

  7. Jarrod says:

    Yeah, you could test me and see that I’ve had lifelong contact with global collectivist propaganda and limited conceptions of reality but that by no means indicates that I have the disease. No, I healed myself of that disease, and you see, now i’m a scout, among other things, alerting antibodies to come and heal the greater mindscape. Yes, it’s on a different, larger scale and will perhaps take thousands of years but it is my current perception that we are involved in the same healing process.

  8. Hey Jon, as usual, it’s far worse than you imagine. Let’s suppose a doctor makes a “real diagnosis”. What happens next? Sometimes, it s a correct diagnosis. Possibly even most of the time, but much of the time, the percentage is well known and studied for many illnesses, the diagnosis is wrong. Then what happens? There is no system to detect wrong diagnoses. No system to make the doctor, or the clinic, aware that the diagnosis was wrong. Even if they find out that the diagnosis was wrong, that information does not get collected or used in any way. It’s entirely acceptable for a doctor to make the same ‘wrong diagnosis’ over and over again – and nobody notices. Even if you, the patient figures it out, what do you do you do with this info? Nothing. Your only choice is to sue, or to ignore the error. The entire medical system is not interested in ‘healing’ itself, not interested in teaching doctors to make fewer errors, not interested in challenging the mistakes that doctors make. So they continue. The result, as you have noted, is that some ‘medical errors’ can become a standard part of medical practice and nobody notices. It’s because the system is specifically designed to ignore errors.

    • theodorewesson says:

      “Medical diagnosis (often simply termed diagnosis) refers to both the process of attempting to determine or identify a possible disease or disorder (and diagnosis in this sense can also be termed (medical) diagnostic procedure), and to the opinion reached by this process (also being termed (medical) diagnostic opinion). From the point of view of statistics the diagnostic procedure involves classification tests. It is a major component of, for example, the procedure of a doctor’s visit.”

      In the context of non-accute-trauma allopathy, I simply can not get my brain around what the “medical diagnosis” is and how said term helps the doctor-patient relationship arrive at a speedy ‘healing’. At the end of the day, isn’t it just a fancy name for a “label” assigned to a collection of symptons, or, is it something more?

      Does the concept of “medical diagnosis” exist in the context of herbalists, accupuncturists, chiropracters, homeopothists?

  9. voza0db says:

    WELCOME to the HIV/AIDS “You have non-specific antibodies in your body so YOU ARE DEAD in a near future, but if you take this toxic and cancer drugs you will die anyway” dogmatic THEORY.

    PROFIT, PROFIT, PROFIT is all that really matters 😎

    How not to LOVE the MONETARY SYSTEM and its rules…

  10. Jennifer Frank says:

    It’s not entirely a Doctor’s fault if ever a patient is misdiagnosed. Doctors are humans too and they also make mistakes. According to my dentist in Austin, there are two ways to decide if you need a second opinion: 1.) Is when the diagnosis seems lighter that what you’re actually feeling and 2.) If the treatments are ridiculously expensive then you better make sure that the treatments you’re getting is really for your type of illness. Knowing this, it is our job to ask for a second opinion from a different doctor.

  11. […] Fuente original: […]

  12. Carras Diaz Maria says:

    How can the very poor, Africa and South America for example, help heal their many diseases such as parasites?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.