Covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year

Covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year

by Jon Rappoport

August 3, 2014

www.nomorefakenews.com

Medical News Today reports that, in 2011, there was a modest uptick in the number of prescriptions written in the US.

The increase brought the total to: 4.02 billion.

Yes, in 2011, doctors wrote 4.02 billion prescriptions for drugs in America.

That’s an average of roughly 13 prescriptions for each man, woman, and child.

That’s about one new prescription every month for every American.

The Medical News Today article concluded, “…the industry should be heartened by the growth of the number of prescriptions and spending.” Yes, I’m sure the drug industry is popping champagne corks.

We’re talking about prescriptions here. We’re not talking about the number of pills Americans took. We’re also not counting over-the-counter drugs or vaccine shots.

Pharmacopoeia, a 2011 exhibition at the British Museum, estimated that “the average number of pills a person takes in his or her own lifetime in the UK is 14,000.” That’s as a result of prescriptions. Including over-the-counter drugs, the 14,000 number would swell to 40,000 pills taken in a lifetime.

What are the effects of all these drugs?

We are looking at a supreme Trojan Horse that is rotting out America and all other countries from the inside. Wars, no wars, economic deprivation, economic prosperity, the drugs continue to do their work, debilitating and ruining and terminating lives.

Many sources can be cited to confirm this assessment.

On January 8th, 2001, the LA Times published an article by one of the best medical reporters in the business, Linda Marsa: “When Good Drugs Do Harm.” Marsa quoted researcher Dr. David Bates, who indicated that, in the US, there are 36 million serious adverse reactions to medical drugs per year.

On July 26, 2000, the Journal of the American Medical Association published the most stunning mainstream estimate of medical-drug damage in history: “Is US health really the best in the world?” The author was Dr. Barbara Starfield, a respected public-health researcher at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health.

Starfield concluded that medical drugs were killing Americans at the rate of 106,000 per year.

That’s a million deaths per decade.


power outside the matrix


This is a conservative sketch of the Trojan Horse that has been placed in the center of every country in the world.

The pharmaceutical juggernaut will continue, no doubt about it. The only question is, how many people will wake up and seek another way?

The destruction of societies by medical drugs goes far beyond what some people call “over-prescribing.” This isn’t just a tilt in the wrong direction. It isn’t simply errors of judgment compounded by the number of doctors dispensing medicines.

Those are all polite terms suggesting the situation can be corrected through a show of good will and better judgment. That will never happen.

Countries of the world are literally being assaulted by pharmaceutical companies and their foot-soldier doctors. It’s chemical warfare.

To even begin to see light at the end of the tunnel, hundreds of millions of people must add themselves to the rolls of those who already are pursuing better health through natural means.

We need an all-out rebellion against the Pharmacopoeia.

Not even the Nazis and their dearly beloved cartel, the monster IG Farben, dreamed of the day when the citizenry would line up and demand to ingest more and more life-destroying chemicals.

In case anyone thinks the FDA, the single agency responsible for certifying drugs as safe and effective, has “overlooked the problem,” Google “FDA, Why Learn About Adverse Drug Events.” You’ll find the following statements on the FDA’s own site:

“Over 2 MILLION serious ADRs [Adverse Drug Events] yearly; 100,000 DEATHS yearly.”

The only thing missing is: “And we, the FDA, said the drugs were safe.”

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

13 comments on “Covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year

  1. A. Bingham says:

    WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: How does it work? (Global pharmacological governing body)

    http://www.who.int/medicines/services/expertcommittees/pharmprep/ecspp_booklet/en/

  2. […] via Covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year « Jon Rappoport's Blog. […]

  3. It is not ‘economical’ to health an illness. You can’t sell a product that produces health – but it’s easy to sell products that treat symptoms.

  4. The night before, and the morning before, my dog and I were coerced to have her get state mandated rabies shots, and a half hour afterwards, I administered the following antitoxins to her orally, adjusting the human dose to the size of the dog—reduced L glutathione—calcium D glucarate—selenium—beta glucan—B vitamins—colostrum for detoxification and immune system enhancement. Glutathione detoxes, CD glucarate removes pharmaceuticals. Selenium detoxes mercury.

  5. […] Covert chemical warfare: 100,000 deaths a year « Jon Rappoport’s Blog. […]

  6. maulfair says:

    and..drug residues stay in the body for years causing problems never dreamed of. Dr Maulfair says no doctor alive can possibly predict which patient will get which side effect nor predict what the combination of drugs might be doing to their body!!!

  7. Levantine says:

    Yes, Jon. And consider …..:

    …….Documented empirical facts and experimental results from the small but vibrant “hierarchy and health” mainstream medical research community (e.g., [3])* establish a dominant causal relationship between socioeconomic status and human health and mortality; which is not simply due to differences in resource allocation, access to medical care, life-style differences (smoking, drinking, diet, exercise, etc.), work accidents and other such relatively “incidental” whole-population factors but which instead is due to the direct impacts of dominance hierarchy on physiological functions……..

    http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/2011/11/is-establishment-medicine-injurious.html

    (*) I’ll add a few references about that research community: Michael Marmot, Kate Pickett, Richard G. Wilkinson, and the documentary “Stress: Portrait of a Killer.”

  8. Enocia says:

    Thank you! I believe a lot of people are intellectually aware of what pills do or don’t do; that the pharmaceutical business is there to make money; and a lot of people’s livelihood depend on that business. I personally don’t believe in fighting the system but stepping out of it. I did that 15 years ago. It hasn’t been easy but at least I’m not dependent on taking pills any more.
    http://thefutureislight1.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/letting-go-of-miss-polly.html

    Cheers!

  9. lannyboy1 says:

    After having done some research into the creation of nano-particulates, and especially “smart” nano-particulates, also called “nanobots”, it is apparent that many of the symptoms human beings and other biological life forms are suffering from, and are dying from, are directly related to the release of these artificial life forms. Non-replicating nano-particulates are, in and of themselves, toxic to biological life forms. We are biological life forms, aren’t we? Smart nano-particulates are of particular concern because they “self-replicate” by consuming certain elements, such as oxygen, hydrogen, and carbon. They can also carry a “payload” of any substance which has been reproduced at the nano-scale. Basic elements when made at the nano-scale bypass the “blood-brain” barrier. The can get into internal organs and into individual cells to deliver a “payload”. Am no fool when it comes to how this technology has been weaponized. It has also come to my attention that the release of nano-particulates into our environment began back in the late 1990’s, and smart nano-particulates in 2005 in an effort to understand the dynamics of the near earth environment, as well as to manipulate and control the weather for various “purposes”.

  10. misssuzie says:

    I am not sure that these doctors even feel guilty about it, I don’t think they even bat an eyelid.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s