Update: CDC whistleblower in touch with members of Congress

Update: CDC whistleblower in touch with members of Congress

by Jon Rappoport

August 27, 2014


In a recent video interview with Brian Hooker, Gary Franchi of nextnewsnetwork.com has elicited several pieces of vital information.

Franchi’s interview is headlined: “CDC Responds: Admits Omitting Vaccine Data.” It is available at nextnewsnetwork and at YouTube.

Brian Hooker, PhD, Franchi’s interviewee, is one contact for CDC whistleblower William Thompson. Hooker has published a re-analysis of the CDC’s fraudulent work on the MMR vaccine, showing that the CDC indeed buried the connection between the vaccine and autism.

In the interview, Hooker states that whistleblower Thompson is in touch with members of Congress.

Since Thompson was a co-author on a crucial 2004 study exonerating the vaccine, and since Thompson now readily admits that study was a fraud, a few members of Congress might actually listen to him and then make noises about the need to expose this scandal further.

Hooker states that whistleblower Thompson is still at work at the CDC. This means the CDC doesn’t quite know what to do with him. Firing a whistleblower for telling the truth raises legal issues and further publicizes the scandal.

Interviewer Franchi has made a query to the CDC and obtained a response: the agency admits it did omit data from the 2004 MMR vaccine/autism study.

The justification? Children without birth certificates were dropped from the study, because birth certificates contain important “metadata” needed to judge the true effects of the vaccine—such as birth weight of the child.

This is utter fabrication.

As Hooker has revealed, the African-American boys dropped from the study showed a 300% higher risk for autism after receiving the MMR vaccine.

Omitting those boys allowed the study to give a free pass to the vaccine and conceal rates of vaccine-connected autism in the black community.

A few important things to understand: don’t be lulled into thinking that Congress is the cavalry who will ride in to save the day. But in this age of online reporting, Congressional members can, if they speak up, kick the scandal and the story into a higher gear—because we will report what they say.

If whistleblower Thompson is back at work at the CDC, that doesn’t mean he’s safe. He is still in danger. He still needs to come forward and make a public and definitive statement on CDC fraud.

And lastly, in his interview with Franchi, Brian Hooker states that he is “sitting” on more data sets and will release that information as he publishes his analysis of each set—thus exposing more CDC fraud.

This is a mistake.

For the sake of his own safety and for the sake of the truth, he should post all that raw data online, then analyze and publish. The raw data should be available to everyone now.

Let blogger hounds and PR hounds at the CDC and the sold-out press try to make nothing of this explosive raw data. Hooker and others can refute them.

The hounds have already summarily rejected the one study Hooker has published.

Frankly, Hooker is thinking like a close-to-the-vest scientist. He doesn’t have a clue about how stories gather force and asymmetrically explode. And without knowing it, he is putting us on his time-table.

You’re a hero, Brian. Act like one.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

8 comments on “Update: CDC whistleblower in touch with members of Congress

  1. V gleeson says:

    Truth will always out. Stand Now before you are taken out by the State Police for they obey instructions of the faceless thugs in government. Courage and love send I to thee

  2. winkelr says:

    Another way they fudged the data to obscure the statistics is that they started lumping early and late-onset autism together when they have entirely different etiologies. Early onset is usually caused by asphyxia caused by immediate cord clamping to compensate for pitocin side effects. These bastards are in way over their heads.

  3. maulfair says:

    Reblogged this on Maulfair Medical Center Conversations and commented:
    Jon, the last weeks have brought us vital information from your boundless energy to get at the truth, I thank you. You are the hero in this issue.

  4. Avi says:

    Hi Jon !
    Keep Going !!

    We have a tremendous opportunity to blow up the established cartel and you are nearly the only one real journalist taking the hammer about it !!!

    If you google “vaccine-autism connection” in the last week/month period, you come first place …

    When looking at the Google results, one can see this is a hot ball because the mentioned articles are either pro or against, no middle path.

    I’ve found an extremely well purported article about the link between toxicity in general and of vaccines in particular with autism and other ‘degenerative’ illnesses, although this has been said long ago by Mercola and a few others:


    God bless, Avi

  5. J.C says:

    Hooker’s study has been pulled from public viewing. That says a lot about what he found.

  6. […] Update: CDC whistleblower in touch with members of Congress […]

  7. Reblogged this on littlefolksblog and commented:
    Money and greed…..it doesn’t matter WHO it hurts. More FRAUD, this time, on our children.

  8. Researcher says:

    There are a hell of a lot of unanswered questions regarding the 2004 DeStefano study.
    1) In what year were the children born? Were both groups born in the same year?
    2) what other vaccines did they receive?
    3) when did they receive other vaccines?
    4) since the study was published in February, 2004, the data was likely collected in 2003. The children would therefore have been born 2000 or earlier. Was the vaccine schedule changed after they were born? (Answer: yes. 4 doses of PCV were added during the first year, in 2001. So how does the addition of that vaccine–given at the same time as several other vaccines, with the 4th dose given WITH the MMR–factor into the autism rate?)

    Am I the only one who thinks that the CDC is trying really hard to distract us from something about the vaccine schedule in 2000 and later? DeStefano’s studies have all been shining examples of sleight-of-hand. Take a close look at them–not just the abstract, but the study, in detail. Look at what exactly got studied, at the study subjects, and especially at the “control” groups. Then look at the conclusion, and see if you wonder, as I do, how he could possibly arrive at that conclusion.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.