UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no

UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no

by Jon Rappoport

September 18, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Read it.

It’s a shocking 321-page report assembled by The Climate Depot:

“More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims.”

It names names. It lists reasons for the dissent.

Reality is engineered consensus. But when that doesn’t work, “experts” just assert there is a consensus when there isn’t.

“What the hell, let’s just say that ‘everybody agrees’ manmade warming is destroying Earth and we have ten minutes to solve it, and let’s get our friends in the press to shut out the naysayers. You know, media blackout.”

Science is supposed to be about evidence and proof, not consensus. But that idea is now laughed out of court. Science is about PR and who sits on the important thrones.

Which is why the UN is holding Climate Summit 2014 in New York in a few days. Yes, the city that never sleeps will be hosting the gala and also kicking off Climate Week NYC 2014.

And then there is this. The UN Secretary General has appointed Leonardo DiCaprio a “…Messenger of Peace with a special focus on climate change.” Messenger of Peace. Wow. Will Leo appear out of a cloud hovering above the Chrysler Building? Will an angel anoint Leo? Will anybody call the Ghostbusters?

Will Obama show up and read from the teleprompter, “The science is settled, the science is settled…”

Will a CIA drone zoom over Times Square and launch gluten-free electromagnetic love bombs on the adoring crowds?

Will a blimped-out Al Gore waddle into the UN General Assembly hall, trailing fumes from his jet and casting oil leases to a few favored ambassadorial hustlers?

The latest climate science tells us that upcoming freezing weather or boiling hot weather are both reasonable inferences from the basic Climate Change hypothesis. This is, logically speaking, a new brand of tautological “research.” Round and round it goes, inside its bubble.

“Useful predictions? We don’t need no stinkin’ useful predictions. We just need dupes, and we got plenty of them.”


Here are a few excerpts from the boggling Climate Depot report:

“We’re not scientifically there yet. Despite what you may have heard in the media, there is nothing like a consensus of scientific opinion that this is a problem. Because there is natural variability in the weather, you cannot statistically know for another 150 years.”
— UN IPCC’s Tom Tripp, a member of the UN IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] since 2004 and listed as one of the lead authors and serves as the Director of Technical Services & Development for U.S. Magnesium.

“Please remain calm: The Earth will heal itself — Climate is beyond our power to control…Earth doesn’t care about governments or their legislation. You can’t find much actual global warming in present-day weather observations. Climate change is a matter of geologic time, something that the earth routinely does on its own without asking anyone’s permission or explaining itself.”
— Nobel Prize-Winning Stanford University Physicist Dr. Robert B. Laughlin, who won the Nobel Prize for physics in 1998, and was formerly a research scientist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

“The dysfunctional nature of the climate sciences is nothing short of a scandal. Science is too important for our society to be misused in the way it has been done within the Climate Science Community.” The global warming establishment “has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the [UN] IPCC.”
— Swedish Climatologist Dr. Hans Jelbring of the Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics Unit at Stockholm University.

“The whole idea of anthropogenic global warming is completely unfounded. There appears to have been money gained by Michael Mann, Al Gore and UN IPCC’s Rajendra Pachauri as a consequence of this deception, so it’s fraud.”
— South African astrophysicist Hilton Ratcliffe, a member of the Astronomical Society of Southern Africa (ASSA) and the Astronomical Society of the Pacific and a Fellow of the British Institute of Physics.

“In December 8 2009, 166 scientists from around the world wrote an Open Letter to the UN Secretary-General rebuking the UN and declaring that ‘the science is NOT settled.’”

“On May 1, 2009, the American Physical Society (APS) Council decided to review its current climate statement via a high-level subcommittee of respected senior scientists. The decision was prompted after a group of over 80 prominent physicists petitioned the APS [to] revise its global warming position and more than 250 scientists urged a change in the group’s climate statement in 2010. The physicists wrote to APS governing board: ‘Measured or reconstructed temperature records indicate that 20th – 21st century changes are neither exceptional nor persistent, and the historical and geological records show many periods warmer than today.’”


power outside the matrix


Consensus on manmade global warming? Are you kidding?

The “consensus” is in favor of something else: staging and maintaining a media blackout to conceal the dissenters, to pretend they don’t exist, to pretend “the science is settled.”

Leo DiCaprio, messenger of peace. We’re living in a cartoon of a cartoon.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com.

26 comments on “UN climate change: 1000 scientists say no

  1. brad says:

    Thanks for bringing this report to light; hadn’t seen it before. It’ll be a useful reference for ongoing debates with my ‘man-made carbon is destroying everything’ friends, several of whom are highly trained PhD scientists and should know better than to jump on a ‘the science is settled’ bandwagon but yet are true believers.

    • tommytcg says:

      Your PhD buddies need the cash, to heck with integrity. Also tell ’em..

      The original basis for the 97 % ‘scientists concur’ claim was Margaret Zimmerman’s paper. She sent some heavily loaded questions to 10,257 earth scientists. 3,146 thought it was important enough to reply, the rest chucked it in the bin.

      For the question “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”, she excluded all but 77 of the responses. Of those 75 answered Yes, hence her 97 % assertion, whereas it is actually 2.4 %,

    • How The Hard Science PhDs Have Wrecked The World [includes chemtrail photo documentary] http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=3774

    • Eileen K. says:

      Many of these PhD scientists who have jumped on the “science is settled” bandwagon, did it for money. As you said, Brad, these scientists should have known better. They’ve given climate science a bad name with this lunacy and should resign their posts, to say the least.

    • CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE MEN WHO CAUSED IT!—BY STEVE FINNELL

      Do men have the ability to effect climate change on the planet earth? Are heat waves, cooling temperatures, earth quakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, droughts, gale-force winds, and snow storms the result of man’s mismanagement of the planet?

      Is it not naive and arrogant to assume that puny man can effect climate change? Man-made climate change is a grand hoax, at best.

      HAVE MEN BEEN RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGES IN WEATHER PATTERNS? YES, HOWEVER, THEY HAVE HAD NO POWER TO EFFECT THE CHANGES THAT OCCURRED.

      Genesis 6:13 The God said to Noah, “The end of all flesh has come before Me; for the earth is filled with violence because of them; and behold, I am about to destroy them with the earth.

      Were men responsible for the change in the weather pattern? Yes. Did men effect the change of the weather? No, God caused it to rain for 40 days and 40 nights, not men.

      Genesis 18:20 And the Lord said, :The outcry of Sodom and Gomorrah is indeed great, and their sin is exceedingly grave.

      Genesis 19:24 Then the Lord rained on Sodom and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven,

      Were men responsible for the weather change in Sodom and Gomorrah? Yes. Did men cause the weather to change? No, God effected the change in the climate.

      1 Kings 8:35 “When the heavens are shut up and there is no rain; because they have sinned against You….

      Men are sometimes responsible for droughts, however, God effects the weather changes.

      Matthew 27: 51,54 And behold , the veil of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom; and the earth shook and the rocks were split. 54 Now the centurion, and those who were with him keeping guard over Jesus, when they saw the earthquake and the things that were happening, became very frightened and said, “Truly this was the Son of God!”

      Notice, the centurion did not attribute the earth quake to man-made climate change.

      2 Peter 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up.

      Men are responsible for the global warming that is coming.

      No amount of green initiatives will stop the final global warming. Puny men will have no effect on the final climate change.

      THE MAN-MADE CLIMATE CHANGE HOAX WAS INVENT BY 1.DISHONEST MEN 2.NAIVE MEN 3.ARROGANT MEN 4.OR ALL OF THE ABOVE.

      GOD IS IN CONTROL OF THE WEATHER.

      YOU ARE INVITED TO FOLLOW MY BLOG. http://steve-finnell.blogspot.com

  2. That Hartman choad on RT was being a climate zombie wednesday. Blathering about we have to do something soon. What a girl.

  3. Linda Sky says:

    Forget man-made pollution and carbon footprints. Yes we need to stop poisoning our world. But any discussion of climate change without recognizing and factoring in the geo-engineering component IS POINTLESS.

  4. johnmarkmcguire says:

    “Global warming” is pseudo-science at its most outspoken, and has served the two-fold purpose of providing leverage for imposing legislation and as diversion to the root issue of what is really causing much of nature’s various recent upheavals and anomalies: HAARP and chemtrails.

    Can anyone really be considered an environmental scientist, if they refuse to even question the impact of routinely shooting millions of watts of Extreme Low Frequency (ELF) waves into the earth’s atmosphere? … and what of the daily saturation of chemtrails all over the planet? Is it not ‘scientific’ to question how this protocol affects temperatures and weather patterns?

    “Modern science” — as presented through the mainstream media — seems to only serve the purpose of furthering political agendas. There’s nothing remotely scientific about discarding or ignoring evidence which conflicts with a given (or, especially, “promoted”) hypothesis. “Global warming” ignores scientific logic and provides a digestible alternative to the reality that our planet is being destroyed by corporate and political entities. It is diversionary propaganda at its most efficient.

  5. victoryintruth says:

    Living in a cartoon of a cartoon…..indeed.

  6. Lee says:

    That’s all well and good, but as people have woken up globally, thanks to the tireless efforts of alternative news exposure via the internet, a strong percentage know that good ideas promoted are still being used by elites to benefit elites. This is a no-brainer for a lot of society now. What needs to be looked at here is the bigger picture that is surrounding and encircling the little picture – that is, what has this Climate Change Idea been a catalyst for? How has the Climate Change Hooplah indirectly incubated a massive sideline global movement for positive changes to our ecosystem?

    I swallowed the cool-aid years ago and thought “Al Gore and Co” were hero’s, then I switched drinks, but after recently studying Sustainable Development I was able to gain far greater insight by going into the belly of the beast and looking at its historical track; from a true heroic activist, Rachel Carson whose life was threatened because she was bringing the world’s attention to the dangers of synthetic pesticides in the 1950’s, to now. We shifted from environmentalism, which used to just be about saving pretty, picturesque natural wonders for privileged humans to enjoy, to an integrated true sustainable development paradigm for our ecosystems. Sure the elites ride and attempt to control popular waves for their own personal gain when they know they have no other choice because the people power behind the movements are unstoppable, but what is worth looking at here is that over the past 50 years there has been an incredible shift within the psyche and practice of humanity resurrecting its true indigenous knowledge of planetary, human and animal biodiversity and mutual sustainable cohabitation. (I witnessed staggering percentages of our youth simply unable to grasp how their parents/grandparents could be so limited in vision of where one thing affected another thing which caused their blindness to behavior, usage, and waste – this is a monumental, generational paradigm shift!)

    For sure, this movement has surged, stalled, surged, stalled, surged, (due to the capitalist economic power base), but it HAS sustained itself and the internet became its greatest comrade. There are literally thousands of organizations globally with billions of supporters that are practicing, inventing, and promoting sustainable eco-development – and it is working and it is growing! The evidence is there if one cares to dig deeper. For sure our economic controllers are still the noisiest and look like they have everyone in their palms, but the reality is that this incubated awareness has blossomed and is infecting people everywhere from those that ignorantly choose to recycle in their homes, or switch to natural products, or are growing their own food garden without knowing the impact, to break-away communities/towns/cities, large and small, living as independently as currently possible of the capitalist/destructive ideology.

    So although “Al Gore and Co” may have had ulterior motives they could not predict the unprecedented spin-off that has arisen. They made their bed and have to lie in it – they can’t walk out. But the reality is that they are cornered on a global stage that is surrounded by old and young who are actually behind the scenes steering this movement toward producing far greater results globally than “weather control”. In other words this movement has unwittingly fuelled a global revolution . . . in another direction . . . which is demonstrating tremendous benefits for humanities shift away from industrialization and capitalism . . . and it is not going away!

    I think it is well past the time that we shift our position of waking people up into something more than just “see, here ya go, here’s another bad boy move” to “see, this is how the elites muscle in on genuine people power movements, but, look again, here is the counter movement of humanity also – here is the power and creativity of humanity to tirelessly persist with what it knows is true and fair, even in the face of constant mainstream attempts to suppress the reality in the hearts of humanity. Mainstream journalism is naturally not giving news time to the true reality and positive power of this global movement because it continues with the “stage distraction” of “the weather” as this is designed to render people powerless, complacent and therefore desperate to fall back into and sustain the bosom of Capitalist Destruction.

    THEY KNOW YOU KNOW THIS IS A FICTIONAL STAGE – please don’t support their agenda by only seeing and reporting what they want you to see and report!

    Maybe try celebrating/capitalizing on their stage act by applauding it for how it has turned around and bitten them in the arse! LOOK AT WHAT THE MAGICIAN DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE!!!

    • Across the world people are taking to the streets this Sunday Sept 21.14 in the largest climate mobilisation in history. https://secure.avaaz.org/en/event/climate/?cl=5862418007&v=46188

      People’s climate march key points http://treealerts.org/type/alerts/2014/08/the-peoples-climate-march-everything-you-need-to-know-to-change-everything/

      Cut The Military SAVE The Planet | There is $2 trillion annually that could be invested in a major effort to protect the climate, were it not being invested in war and preparations for war. http://act.rootsaction.org/p/dia/action3/common/public/index.sjs?action_KEY=10370

      THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING Capitalism Vs. The Climate. Naomi Klein “tackles the most profound threat humanity has ever faced: the war our economic model is waging against life on earth” http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/09/16/3567322/this-changes-everything-naomi-klein-capitalism-climate

      Fractivist Guide to the People’s Climate Weekend. Click link for the full listing: https://madmimi.com/p/fd6c45?fe=1&pact=25120530506#

      The ‘Quantum Energy Generator’ based on Tesla’s patents eliminates energy costs, and substantially increases disposable income for everyone. http://www.fixtheworldproject.net/what-is-the-qeg-.html

    • laurabruno says:

      Thanks for this comment. It’s true, too. I have seen it play out in our town, which was set to be one of the APA’s Agenda 21 “Pilot Cities.” Trouble is, people here either a) know about Agenda 21 or b) want to find ways off grid, live in harmony with the land and to protect organic farmland. APA thought they could just muscle through with their usual vagaries and land grabs, but some outreach occurred between both groups and with the planners. Informed people also participated in the orchestrated meetings using non-confrontational means to voice both the need to protect rights and the desire to have greater food security and local sovereignty through eco endeavors that bring power and money back to the local economy rather than the big energy corporations and banks.

      Our Comprehensive Plan turned out much less general, with much less room for abuse by NGO’s and sweetheart deal contractors. Whereas many cities are persecuting front yard gardens, instead, we’ve got “support edible landscaping and front yard gardens” written into our city plan. We’ve got *encouragement* (not prohibition) to collect rainwater. We’ve got an emphasis on local food security and a specific agenda to protect/support rather than undermine the farmland.

      It’s not perfect, but it definitely turned out way better than it initially looked like it would when I saw the APA guidelines for pilot cities to implement. What’s funny is that the other APA pilot cities liked how our town did things and ended up putting specific, publicly voiced, desired local initiatives into their plans instead of the “green” vagaries that tend to provide the back doors to totalitarianism.

      I still get frustrated that most of the inventive, potentially independent individuals here have complete cognitive dissonance when it comes to climate change, but if you “look at what the magician doesn’t want you to see,” there’s plenty of extremely creative, non-corporate, git ‘er done action here. A lot of it is fueled by climate change orthodoxy; however, the results are focusing much more on local credit unions, individual and community gardens, off-grid exploration and alternative economies. I suspect a lot of that is NOT what Monsanto and the BigBanks funding “sustainable development” had in mind.

  7. Gary says:

    Having just sailed 2000 miles out from the US, there has been a almost solid chem trail layer at about 30,000* ft.over me. The planes spray day and night*you can see them in full moon in clear areas. The result 1. about one in ten days has some blue sky, the rest is grey goo at 30,000 ft. 2. Little if any lower trade-wind clouds or any larger rain squalls, little up take of water vapor. 3. Result major drought of Central American and its ability to grow food. Offshore islands are drying up with wells going salty, some islands already trying to run desalinate-rs but powers a huge cost. 4. Sea level rising due to no cloud water uptake by the blocked sunlight. 5. High concentration of UV by its ability to penetrate the chem trails. 6.. Violent storms and winds that are out of date with the usual seasons, very little rain in huge black UFO shaped clouds. Lots of horizontal lighting high up. 7. The Latin peoples of these areas have little knowledge of whats being done to them.
    Another disturbing report is the lab testing on chem trail spray, its showing dangers pathogens and other harmful chemicals. Is this a slow genocide to reduce world populations?
    It appears that this geoengineering is going on world wide. Who is behind this immense enterprise?

    • theodorewesson says:

      Thanks for your post. Where i live, when there are ‘clear days’, it is usually only ’36 full hours of clear’, and, never more than ’48 full hours of clear’ — and then the man-made clouds are back again.

      Where i live, ‘clear’ means ‘no clouds what-so-ever’ or real clouds that are ‘low flying and billowy’. Relatively speaking, i am an ‘old-timer’, so, i am able to distinguish beteween real and man-made clouds. There was none of this going on when I was a child….

      The children of America need to respect their Amercian elders.

      P.S. I’ve started keeping a ‘chemtrail almanac’. Mapping the daily chemtrail activity with the moon phases to see if there is a coorelation.

  8. It doesn’t matter who says this or who says that.

    As to whether or not the Earth is warming has already been declared by the arctic permafrost. If the permafrost is continuing to thaw, then the Earth is warming. If the permafrost is now refreezing, then the Earth isn’t warming.

    Why is it that everyone misses the completely obvious?

    And… the phrase “drink the Kool-Aid” is wrong. It was Flavor Aid that was used at Jonestown.

    So many people say the wrong thing, feeling smugly self-righteous that they’re really correct even though they’re not.

  9. wjs says:

    can’t trust politicians, can’t trust scientists, forget journalists and churches, life is great…

  10. It is I only says:

    Don’t confuse me with facts ! My mind’s made up ! The “science” is settled !
    I am a “respected” scientist. Winner of multiple “nobel” prizes !

    Note. Since Saint Al of the Gore & Obomber have received a “nobel” prize I don’t use a capital letter for “nobel” It doesn’t deserve it !

  11. Curmudgeon says:

    Does anyone have lights on? Is there a motor, electric or otherwise, running somewhere? Are wheels turning, gears meshing, or furnaces firing? If the answer to any one of these is yes, then these man made activities are contributing to warming. How much it contributes is a different question.
    As Joe Dead Horse states the permafrost is thawing. The Inuit are now seeing a bird they have no name for – the robin. I live in Canada where Northern Cardinals were rarely, if ever, seen. Now I see them annually. Geese are staying longer in autumn. Something is going on.

    • christoph says:

      Yes…as stated natural variability. A few hundred years ago we had the maunder minimum or little ice age that lasted about 80 years. It does not mean that humans had anything to do with it. When I read years ago about the Club of Rome stating that they needed a new enemy now that the Soviet Union was going, that humanity itself is the perfect enemy, and that global warming was it. It started a Anthropogenic warming, then global warming and now “Climate Change”…so if it gets cold its still humanity’s fault.

      This has allowed all sorts of environmental damage to be done all in the cause of stopping climate change…especially the [chemtrail] spraying. The brain washing of the masses is easy and people have to wake up. Mann stated that the sun did not have anything to do with climate….wow!

  12. ozziethinker says:

    I think you have missed the drift on this, Jon, as have commenters.

    Global warming is not about global warming. It is about industrialists that cause pollution changing their ways. Carbon Tax merely created a new finance market.

    These scientists have given the call to deflect the issue; POLLUTION. As this planet is at “tipping point”, we may have a visitation from those not of this world or, rather, they may “reveal themselves” very abruptly and with great might.

    One of things they can do is switch off our oxygen supply (or alter it enough for a universal kill) globally; so if industrialists’ agents read this blog, request your peers decelerate the rape of this planet with expediency.

  13. global worming maddness = NWR (new world religion) was made up by HUMAN – the same creature who is (in the meaning of those acolytes) “the main problem” of the planet. So! Let us all make suicide for our good 😉 But first let us all vote (yeah why not! it will be another good “compromise”) that natural climate cycles not exists, and so called “year seasons” are only our imagination 😀 Or! Let us admit that someone wants to make a fool of us all, for OUR money… Science is not a matter of so called “democracy” or other “consensus”. (sorry for my english its not my primary language greets to all people who dont agree to live in Matrix made by thieves and liers)…

  14. Sept 21.14 people’s climate march omitted chemtrails, geo-engineering the weather, catastrophic corporatism a.k.a. weather wars, because it is a CO-OPTED Corporate Hoax.

    http://real-agenda.com/2014/09/19/peoples-climate-march-a-co-opted-corporate-hoax/

  15. TZM says:

    Read the Monster Climate Change Essay here:
    http://guymcpherson.com/2014/01/climate-change-summary-and-update/

    If you feel you can simply dismiss all of this evidence, well then, there is no talking to you about it.

    I, probably like all of you here, do not want this “politicized and oligachized,” but that does not mean ignoring it for what it is.

  16. Larry says:

    When I open the .pdf “More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims,” none of the hyperlinks work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s