The vaccine-autism lie

The vaccine-autism lie

by Jon Rappoport

September 24, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

I’ve analyzed this lie before and approached it from many angles. Here I’m going to keep things as simple as possible.

Vaccines can and do cause damage.

Neurological damage, brain damage.

Parents of damaged children know this. There were there. They saw their children before vaccination and after vaccination.

End of story.

Everything else, and I mean everything is diversion. High-class sophisticated deceptive slimy arrogant diversion.

Shuffling various disease and disorder labels; the studies claiming there is no link between vaccines and autism (see also this); the hoops the government makes parents jump through, in order to try to obtain financial compensation; the legal deal allowing vaccine manufacturers to avoid law suits; the invented cover stories claiming autism begins in utero or is a genetic disorder; the pretension that autism has even been defined—there is no defining diagnostic test for it

All lies. All avoidances.

A child gets a vaccine. The child suffers brain damage. That happens.

That’s the truth which the government buries in a mountain of obfuscation.

In general, how much damage do vaccines cause every year in the US?

Unsurprisingly, there is no reliable count.

For a sane reference, see “In the Wake of Vaccines,” by Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center. Her article was published in the Sept./Oct. 2004 issue of Mothering Magazine.

Gathering information from several sources, Fisher makes a reasonable estimate of vaccine damage—actual figures are not available or carefully tracked or vetted. The system for reporting adverse effects is broken.

Fisher:

“But how many children have [adverse] vaccine reactions every year? Is it really only one in 110,000 or one in a million who are left permanently disabled after vaccination? Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler observed in 1993 that less than 1 percent of doctors report adverse events following prescription drug use. [See DA Kessler, ‘Introducing MEDWatch,’ JAMA, June 2, 1993: 2765-2768]

“There have been estimates that perhaps less than 5 or 10 percent of doctors report hospitalizations, injuries, deaths, or other serious health problems following vaccination. The 1986 Vaccine Injury Act contained no legal sanctions for not reporting [via VAERS]; doctors can refuse to report and suffer no consequences.

“Even so, each year about 12,000 reports are made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System [VAERS]; parents as well as doctors can make those reports. [See RT Chen, B. Hibbs, ‘Vaccine safety,’ Pediatric Annals, July 1998: 445-458]

“However, if that number represents only 10 percent of what is actually occurring, then the actual number may be 120,000 vaccine-adverse events. If doctors report vaccine reactions as infrequently as Dr. Kessler said they report prescription-drug reactions, and the number 12,000 is only 1 percent of the actual total, then the real number may be 1.2 million vaccine-adverse events annually.”


power outside the matrix


Then why does the government say, over and over, that vaccines are safe?

Because they want to lie.

What about all the studies that show this vaccine and that vaccine are safe?

The following quote will give you a clue. The writer is an insider’s insider, and a doctor. She’s scrutinized more published medical studies than all the “highly educated” science-blog writers in the world put together.

Dr. Marcia Angell, for 20 years, was the editor of the most prestigious medical journal in America.

On January 15, 2009, the NY Review of Books published Dr. Angell’s devastating assessment of medical literature:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” —(Marcia Angell, MD, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A story of Corruption.” NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)

If the universe were poised on the brink of extinction, and it could only be saved by avoiding one more lie, and you had to choose between believing a distinguished medical expert on vaccines and autism or the mother of a vaccine-damaged child, it would be no contest. You could make your choice in a second without hesitation, and it would be the right one.

Believe the mother.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

8 comments on “The vaccine-autism lie

  1. Just saw this today and it supported my theory and post from last week, (Just Curious 9/17/14) http://www.infowars.com/mysterious-virus-spreading-across-u-s-and-canada-and-primarily-affecting-vaccinated-children/

    Then there was that tragic episode in Columbia with all those poor girls after they received gardasil. http://www.cctv-america.com/2014/09/01/hundreds-of-colombian-girls-been-hospitalized-after-vaccination

  2. Avi says:

    Autism is only the visible aspect of the damage done but we are all fed up with aluminium and mercury, metals that are destroying the ability of the young brain to acquire the possibility of understanding the other and sorting out what is going on around us. So that you get what we have: a population of sheep.

    http://www.livescience.com/47720-why-its-so-hard-to-deceive-children.html
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010027785900228

    • engelsfrance says:

      This could have been my comment too….this is so true!!! The saddest part is when parents are consulting with their neurologically hurt child…and physician are telling them they are mentally disturbed….this is not possible….this autism…or any disorder provoqued by heavy metals….has no link with vaccines…..no link with dental work….This is, for parents….patients….one more huuuuge frustration!!!

  3. Doris Buckle says:

    Saw this today. It reinforces my belief in a vast conspiracy by someone or someones to do us grave, irredeemable harm. I know that they are pumping poison into the air. I know they are filling our kids with horrible chemicals. I just don’t know why. Jon, help me here. Most everyone I know is Ok so it doesn’t look like they are trying to make us sick. People aren’t dying younger – older if anything. What does it mean? Who are they and what are they trying to do to us. Who can I ask? Where can I go? NOWHERE IS SAFE and I’m getting more and more afraid.

  4. kauni26 says:

    Just covered a Special Ed. class out here in WA..and most kids in there autistic…I couldn’t do it..I couldn’t sub for that class..knowing what I know. I felt so sad for those parents,those children…My child had vaccines but survived to become an RN…why me?..why not my daughter?…immune system glitch? I have no idea. I am furious, and Merck needs to be shut down, investigated, CEO jailed…all of it. We MUST RISE UP..we must stop these criminals, ruining lives…sick to death of all this….

  5. Information from vaccine manufacturers: vaccines may cause brain damage.
    Connect the dots….
    ….vaccines ….encephalitis….brain damage…..autism

  6. traaprincess says:

    The first brain implants were surgically inserted in 1974 in the state of Ohio, USA and also in Stockholm, Sweden. Brain electrodes were inserted into the skulls of babies in 1946 without the knowledge of their parents. In the 1950s and 60s, electrical implants were inserted into the brains of animals and humans, especially in the U.S., during research into behavior modification, and brain and body functioning. Mind control (MC) methods were used in attempts to change human behavior and attitudes. Influencing brain functions became an important goal of military and intelligence services.

    Thirty years ago brain implants showed up in X-rays the size of one centimeter. Subsequent implants shrunk to the size of a grain of rice. They were made of silicon, later still of gallium arsenide. Today they are small enough to be inserted into the neck or back, and also intravenously in different parts of the body during surgical operations, with or without the consent of the subject. It is now almost impossible to detect or remove them.

    It is technically possible for every newborn to be injected with a microchip, which could then function to identify the person for the rest of his or her life. Such plans are secretly being discussed in the U.S. without any public airing of the privacy issues involved. In Sweden, Prime Minister Olof Palme gave permission in 1973 to implant prisoners, and Data Inspection’s ex-Director General Jan Freese revealed that nursing-home patients were implanted in the mid-1980s. The technology is revealed in the 1972:47 Swedish state report, Statens Officiella Utradninger (SOU).

    Implanted human beings can be followed anywhere. Their brain functions can be remotely monitored by supercomputers and even altered through the changing of frequencies. Guinea pigs in secret experiments have included prisoners, soldiers, mental patients, handicapped children, deaf and blind people, homosexuals, single women, the elderly, school children, and any group of people considered “marginal” by the elite experimenters. The published experiences of prisoners in Utah State Prison, for example, are shocking to the conscience.

    Today’s microchips operate by means of low-frequency radio waves that target them. With the help of satellites, the implanted person can be tracked anywhere on the globe. Such a technique was among a number tested in the Iraq war, according to Dr. Carl Sanders, who invented the intelligence-manned interface (IMI) biotic, which is injected into people. (Earlier during the Vietnam War, soldiers were injected with the Rambo chip, designed to increase adrenaline flow into the bloodstream.)

    BE VERY careful when you bring your autistic child to a HOSPITAL

  7. Travis says:

    There has to be some kind of conspiracy to cause damage. If you look at the history of thimerosal you are bound to arrive at this conclusion.

    Thimerosal has a very low therapeutic index, and it is 33 times more toxic to human cells than bacteria.

    Thimerosal also binds to sulfhydrl groups, making it a poor choice to preserve biologicals. The protein-bound mercury becomes unavailable to inhibit bacteria.

    Phenol and phenoyxethanol are not only safer preservatives, but they are much less toxic to humans and do not lose efficacy when stored. They are also cheaper to produce per gram.

    There is no chemical justification for using thimerosal. This chemical has been shown to be worse than worthless score of times since the 30’s, but for some dark reason, it has persisted.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.