The rule of law, language, and the invention of fact from fiction

The rule of law, language, and the invention of fact from fiction

Making solid bodies from vaporous ghosts

by Jon Rappoport

June 9, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

This piece is about how language is used in the matrix. Here I present notes from a work-in-progress, The Underground:

“Previously, I have established that psychiatry, a government-protected group, exists on the basis of pseudoscience. None of the 300 officially certified mental disorders has a defining laboratory test for diagnosis. Instead, committees of psychiatrists meet and consider clusters of behaviors, group them, and assign labels, which are arbitrary nouns: bipolar, clinical depression, ADHD, and so on. Because people feel they may ‘have these conditions,’ they accept the unproven assertion that they are suffering from ‘a chemical imbalance’ in the brain. By and large, the public resents interference with this faith-based conviction.

“Psychiatric researchers use terms like ‘breakthrough’, ‘possible link’, ‘enormous progress’, ‘emerging theory’, all of which are fictional. These words don’t denote authentic science; they are advertisements. Prostitutes trolling for grant money.”

“The government has no legal basis for supporting the pseudoscience called psychiatry. It arbitrarily issues licenses to practice. These licenses merely express a preference for one kind of diagnosis and drugging. With the same degree of legal propriety, licenses could be granted to card readers, astrologists, dowsers, and channelers. However, the government has no legal basis for issuing permission to any group that diagnoses mental states. In this area, the word ‘license’ is a fraud.”

“Currently, the federal government, through its trade representatives, is negotiating a secret 12-nation treaty called the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Since the US Congress must vote in favor of the TPP in order for it to pass, the term ‘secret treaty’ is a self-contradiction. Congress does not legally vote on measures whose contents are secret. Staging such a vote is a crime. All Representatives and Senators who participate are acting outside their defined duties and responsibilities and are committing a major felony. Citizens have no obligation to accept the vote or the legitimacy of those who cast a vote.”

“The notion that government can invent a term, fail to define it clearly, and yet use it to adopt and legally enforce draconian measures, is a promoted illusion. Unfortunately, most people accept the illusion. Take the term “National Security.” Its definition is sufficiently vague to render it useless. Yet government invokes it every day and acts on it. Refusing to clarify it in any given situation, and refusing to justify its use automatically takes government out of the realm of ‘Republic’ or even ‘Democracy’, and into the realm of Autocracy.”

“Case law, precedent, and the Constitution rely on language, and language relies on definition of terms. However, lawyers (in and out of government) depend on vague terms, in order to make their living. They can argue about meanings, change meanings, ‘update’ meanings, in an endless debate billed at hourly wages.”

“A proper characterization of government work would sound something like this: ‘A US Senator, John Smith, acting outside his Constitutional description and therefore surrendering his role as a legitimate elected representative, cast an illegal vote for a Treaty whose language has yet to be fully revealed, because “National Security,” a term vague enough to be useless, has been invoked to maintain the secret contents of the Treaty which is, owing to its secrecy, no Treaty at all. Senator Smith could seek psychiatric help for his “condition”. However, no defining scientific test exists for any so-called psychiatric disorder, all such disorders being invented fictions utilizing non-scientific terms.’”

“We all use terms which are pure illusions, vague enough to be useless, or self-contradictory. We could, on occasion, preface these terms with an “f”, to denote “fiction” and remind ourselves who and what we’re dealing with. For example: ‘Citing fNational Security, fCongressman John Smith explained why he couldn’t discuss the terms of the fTPP in public. fPresident Obama defended his need for fFast Track Authority, stating that famendments to the fTreaty would stall and disrupt fnegotiations.”

“Notice that many fictional terms turn out to be nouns. This is no accident. Nouns denote people, places, and things. The invention (or gross distortion) of people, places, and things serves the function of expanding the number of signposts populating the map of consensus reality. Thus, ‘writing an endless work of fiction’ becomes ‘describing what exists’.


power outside the matrix


“There is a range of diseases whose names are fictions, because no known cause has been identified. Parkinson’s, for instance, is said to have several types. Idiopathic, meaning the cause is not known, and secondary, which is usually ascribed to the effects of various toxins. The secondary form should be called ‘poisoning’, which is not a disease. The former world heavyweight boxing champion, Muhammad Ali, has been diagnosed with Parkinson’s, whereas his condition should be labeled: ‘hit too many times by Joe Frazier’.”

“If you look up the official definition of autism, you’ll see there is no definitive test that diagnoses it. Instead, there is a menu of behaviors. Therefore, how can the US government claim there is no causative connection between vaccines and autism? Parents seeking government compensation after their children have been damaged by vaccination (happy child withdraws from the world, doesn’t speak, etc.) are in a quandary. If they claim their children have ‘autism’, the government will refuse payment. If, however, the parents claim their children have ‘encephalopathy’, which is a more general (and uselessly vague) term for ‘brain disease’, the parents stand a chance of compensation. All this word manipulation is a cover to obscure the fact that children are severely damaged by vaccines—and that’s what the label should be: ‘damaged by vaccination’. It’s simple, it’s accurate, it’s an unmistakable characterization.”

“The father of General Semantics, Alfred Korzybski, stated that humans have the unique ability of ‘time-binding’. By that he meant the capacity to pass down, to future generations, gained knowledge, and also to generate higher and higher levels of abstraction. Additionally, Korzybski famously pointed out a chronic misunderstanding: “The map is not the territory.” In other words, a series of connected symbols referring to objects or processes in the physical world is not the same thing as those objects and processes. Add to that the following: untold numbers of fictional terms represented as fact are transmitted from one generation of humans to another. The overall result? A titanic piling up of inherited language falsely pretending to describe reality. That language forms a networked perception which is entirely misguided.”

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

14 comments on “The rule of law, language, and the invention of fact from fiction

  1. L. Tobias says:

    You are a brilliant man. Thank you for you insightful contributions to the New Consciousness.

  2. mary says:

    The more these articles get into our consciences then more and more will wake up..many are making contributions to humanity. Lets think it and put it out..thanks jon

  3. From Québec says:

    They are trying to push the TPP as a PARTNERSHIP that only requires a majority vote. But the TPP is really a TREATY.

    “The Constitution gives the President the power to commit the United States to treaties – but only with the advice and consent of two-thirds of the US Senate, and only if the agreement does not contravene the Constitution.”

  4. BDBinc says:

    Yes it is a treaty, the TPP is the “one global govt (corporation )” secret document.

    I thought the constitution was invented by the freemasons (founding fathers) to take the inherent freedom as sovereign men and woman we all order to rule us, which means we give up our autonomy and the law which is written in our hearts . The “Constitution” word spell promised rights in place of our divine birthright. I read the bankster cabal suspended it.

    The TPP is unlawful and cannot be agreed to no matter how many corrupt treasonous politicos sign it — in as there is no disclosure to the people.

    In New Zealand, the Crown has a treaty that is not valid, they use this to rule and govern the people, to do this (by keeping people believing) it keeps groups/ iwi of Maori paid off to support its claim on the land and over people.

    The bankster need people to believe the TPP is a valid document — it is not.

    Corporations (as they are without minds — they are legal fictions) can’t even make/sign valid contracts.

    The TPP fails on all counts of being a legal treaty/agreement.

  5. Jame says:

    Thank-you for this! I agree totally, if we do not accept the reality those in “power” create then it does not exist. Saying No or just ignoring their created reality and creating our own is the only way out of the mess that we are being handed. The reality really is there are a group of people who could care less about us, are saying words, writing them down on paper and then signing their words and stating that those words that they wrote down and signed are now a “law,” a “treaty,” etc that we all must follow, even if it destroys our country. In particular, I want to remind everyone that treaties signed or not are optional, always have been always will be. Further if the singed document is against the Constitution for the united states (not of the united states For, the For the united states is the correct document, the small lettering is also accurate) then that document is invalid. Jon I would love if you would address the Constitution issue about the For and the Of, it is so important and so many are confused.

    • Michael Burns says:

      @ Jame
      I’m not confused… a ‘Constitution’ is a legal document drawn up as the fundamentals, the laws by which a corporation agrees to live by…you are neither a owner, nor stockholder or for that matter of fact, an employee.
      You are property of a cogporation, assigned a property number.
      You are property of the United States of America Inc.
      You think you have rights?

      You have Miranda Rights…

      “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you? With these rights in mind, do you wish to speak to me?”

      • BDBinc says:

        @Jame you are not property you are a sovereign man with a soul not a legal person and you need to tell the govt that and that you are not a govt agent or employee.
        You need to know who you really are and it is not what M Burns says.
        You did not sign your birth certificate and your parent did without disclosure.
        This is a good site for information on the debt slavery you were unknowingly born into .http://omnithought.org/

        In response to Michael Burns characters you would say “NO I do not stand under you “(understand ).

        • Michael Burns says:

          @BDBinc
          Yeah ok believe what you wish…but you still property, the amount that you can produce in tax has been promised to the owners. Your work has been promised. You live in an oligarchy.

          http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oligarchy

          You have owners. The constitution isn’t there to protect you its there to protect your owners.
          I empathize with you, I do I don’t like it either.
          This is someone else’s reality…you didn’t create it. You simply were born into it.
          But I say rage against that machine.
          BTW become enough of a pain in ass to them and they will persecute you.

          “In response to Michael Burns characters you would say “NO I do not stand under you “(understand ).”
          -BDBinc

          I do not understand this…

  6. thomaspoa says:

    Please excuse if this is a duplicate.
    Jon, regarding language, do you have any thoughts about this movement to replace written English? http://www.unspell.it

  7. jacobite2015 says:

    Excellent post Jon! I particularly liked the analysis on the fictitious names of various diseses. We now have so many different diseases; subsets of cancers, bacterial strains, etc. And of course, no known causes of these diseases, particularly when diagnosed in otherwise healthy people, and regrettably very little cures.

    Sadly, if you have misfortune of being diagnosed with one of these diseases with “no known cause,” you won’t get many answers other than the infamous “idiopathic”or “genetic predisposition” from the medical system. If you ask the physician if a vaccine(s) or a current/previous usage of a medical drug(s) could have caused the disease, the usual response is “highly unlikely” and/or “correlation doesn’t imply causation.” I often wonder if these doctors really don’t know the answers or if they’re hiding something and if so, why? Again, so many “no known causes” of the myriad of diseases these days with very little cures (but plenty of pharmaceuticals for symptom control!).

    In the realm of the official definition of autism you discussed, that got my thinking about the very informative “Age of Autism” site. They should, like you Jon, be commended for the fine research you all do in the battle against the pro-vaxx tyrants. But….maybe they should be retitled “Age of Vaccine-Induced Brain Damage?”

  8. From Québec says:

    The Most Evil Quotes From Bilderberg Insiders
    http://www.infowars.com/the-most-evil-quotes-from-bilderberg-insiders/

  9. Tracy says:

    From this article – http://www.naturalnews.com/049988_psych_meds_cancer_mental_health.html#

    “Published in the Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, the paper revealed the following about psych meds:

    • 63.6% of antidepressants are associated with carcinogenicity, specifically mirtazapine (Remeron), sertraline (Zoloft), paroxetine (Paxil), citalopram (Celexa), escitalopram (Lexapro), duloxetine (Cymbalta) and bupropion (Wellbutrin).

    • 90% of antipsychotics agents are associated with carcinogenicity, including aripiprazole (Abilify), quetiapine (Seroquel) and all others in this class except for clozapine (Clozaril).

    • 70% of benzodiazepines/hypnotics are associated with carcinogenicity, specifically clonazepam (Klonopin), zolpidem (Ambien), zaleplon (Sonata), diazepam (Valium), eszopiclone (Lunesta), oxazepam (Serax) and midazolam (Versed).

    • 25% of amphetamines/stimulants are associated with carcinogenicity, specifically methylphenidate (Ritalin).

    • 85.7% of anti-convulsants (“mood stabilizers”) are associated with carcinogenicity, specifically valproate (Depacon), carbamazepine (Tegretol), gabapentin (Neurontin), pregabalin (Lyrica), oxcarbazepine (Trileptal) and topiramate (Topamax).

    WHO, IARC warned 15 years ago that psych meds can cause cancer in humans”.

    Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/049988_psych_meds_cancer_mental_health.html#ixzz3ciiaOBmV

  10. “General Semantics”

    Very choice subject to explore further.

    “Perception Management”

    The subtle process and mechanics of control.

    The interesting thing is, here, we really do have that ability to redefine “reality” to whatever we wish to make of it. When a reality is defined through falsehoods, conjecture, “gratuitous assertions”, and the like, then it is a reality that is based on false premise, and stands on a weak foundation. – It’s all a prison of the mind, constructed for us, and BY us.

    Time for a mental “jailbreak”!

    – Rev. Dragon’s Eye

  11. BDBinc says:

    How the PTB use words to control this site may be of interest- omni thought .
    *Use a reasoning mind with all information, not sure about the “ascention theory posted” as I thought it was a negative and positive polarity harvest of the soul. Negachows stay in NWO reality and positive move to another dimension(GOS).As a co creator you are choosing.

    There is a power beyond words and if you can break the spell they cast over you are home and hosed.
    This site omni thought also points out the corruption of the “legal system” and how they operate, though as Dean Clifford and many know freeing minds is undesired by the alien negs.
    http://omnithought.org/word-magic-power-of-words-seminar/1890

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s