The Devious Matrix Called Psychiatry

The Devious Matrix Called Psychiatry

The war on free consciousness

Pushing the individual into a blind alley

Pushing society into a blind alley

Concealed facts exposed

by Jon Rappoport

June 15, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

“Psychiatry does more than define mental disorders. It purports to describe actual states of mind, and it coalesces and freezes those descriptions in such a way that people believe these states of mind exist. They don’t. They’re fictions. Fantasies. This is an enormous landscape of consciousness-programming. It’s actually reduction. Like many systems before it, psychiatry tries to reduce the possibilities of wide-ranging free consciousness. Throughout history, people have always been afraid of mind freedom. ‘What will people with free minds do?’ ‘What will society become if people’s minds are free?’ I can tell you: society would change radically, right down to its foundations.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Over the past 30 years, my work has always returned to freedom of the individual.

Not only Constitutional freedom and Bill-of-Rights freedom, but liberation of the power of individual thought and imagination and invention. Because those qualities are unpredictable, open-ended, and limitless. This is where long-term revolution begins.

So naturally, I’ve investigated the premier “science” that claims to have the best understanding of the mind: psychiatry.

I was neither surprised nor shocked to discover that psychiatry is a fraud, a pseudoscience.

Yet, this “science” is accorded special treatment and licensure and favored status by governments around the world. Why? Because untold numbers of patients can be diagnosed and drugged with highly toxic substances, and even held against their will in closed wards. Dissidents can be contained. Whole populations can be convinced they are either “mentally healthy” or “mentally ill,” as if those two fictional categories described some highly significant status.

If psychiatry were merely recognized as an experimental hypothesis, and so-called professionals diagnosed one another and applied labels to one another and drugged one another, in order to assess the outcome, as any scientist would, before subjecting the public to his idiosyncratic notions…well, fine. I could understand that.

But of course, this is not where we find ourselves. Psychiatrists are considered lofty authorities. They are called as expert witnesses in criminal trials. Then can, in many cases, arbitrarily force their will on patients. They are called upon by media to render their analyses. They occupy sanctified chairs at universities.

So…with that introduction, let me present information which has not been broadly communicated to the public.

The bible of the psychiatric profession, the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), published by the American Psychiatric Association, is now in its 5th edition. It lists some 300 official mental disorders by name, as well as the criteria which allow licensed psychiatrists to diagnose these disorders in patients.

And yet, in the DSM, there is not one defining laboratory test for any of those 300 disorders. No blood test, no urine test, no antibody test, no brain scan, no genetic assay.

This is supposed to be a science.

But there are no defining tests. Instead, there are groupings and clusters of behaviors, which committees of psychiatrists have decided constitute specific mental disorders.

Does this seem outrageous? Impossible? Let me prove it to you.

On April 29, 2013, at the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) website, Director Thomas Insel, the highest ranking federal mental-health official in the US, published a blog commentary: “Transforming Diagnosis.” Insel wrote (4/29/2013):

“In a few weeks, the American Psychiatric Association will release its new edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)…

“The strength of each of the editions of DSM has been ‘reliability’ – each edition has ensured that clinicians use the same terms in the same ways. The weakness is its lack of validity. Unlike our definitions of ischemic heart disease, lymphoma, or AIDS, the DSM diagnoses are based on a consensus about clusters of clinical symptoms, not any objective laboratory measure.”

Not any objective laboratory measure.

Again: Not any objective laboratory measure.

That’s called a death sentence.

If anyone paid attention to it.

It’s on the order of the US Attorney General holding a press conference and admitting that every one of its criminal prosecutions, going back 70 years, was based on fraudulent cooked evidence.

If you or your child is ever in the presence of a psychiatrist who gets up on his high horse, makes a diagnosis, and tries to foist drugs on you, you might pay attention to Thomas Insel’s statement, tell the psychiatrist who Insel is, and read his statement out loud, in the sober and somber style of a mortician.

Ditto if you’re dealing with a teacher, school counselor, psychologist, or principal who thinks he knows anything at all about “mental health.”

Courtesy of Dr. Fred Baughman (, I have two more smoking guns.

The first is a letter, dated November 10, 2008, sent from Supriya Sharma, MD, a director general of Health Canada, to a private citizen (name withheld).

Health Canada is the equivalent of the FDA in America.

Dr. Sharma is “responding on the Minister’s behalf”—the Health Minister of Canada, a post roughly comparable to the US Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Here is Dr. Sharma’s key passage:

“For mental/psychiatric disorders in general, including depression, anxiety, schizophrenia, and ADHD, there are no confirmatory gross, microscopic or chemical abnormalities that have been validated for objective physical diagnosis.”

Dr. Sharma is readily admitting that the diagnosis of mental disorders has no basis in actual science.

The second smoking gun is an email sent from the FDA, dated March 12, 2009, to Dr. Baughman. It was written by Donald Dobbs, Consumer Safety Officer, Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. It refers back to Health Canada and smoking gun #1:

“I consulted with the FDA new drug review division responsible for approving psychiatric drug products and they concurred with the response you [Dr. Baughman] enclosed from Health Canada.

“Psychiatric disorders (as Health Canada refers) are diagnosed based on a patient’s presentation of symptoms that the larger psychiatric community has come to accept as real and responsive to treatment.”

Could there be a better description of unscientific consensus?

Psychiatrists can tap dance all they want to about “remarkable progress,” “new breakthroughs,” “the need for more research money,” “chemical imbalances,” but they’re just blowing smoke.

Perhaps psychiatry qualifies for status as a speculative hypothesis, on the level of “Jesus studied healing in Atlantis”— but in what universe does the profession deserve the unqualified backing of the federal government; the ability, under certain conditions, to have citizens placed in psych-ward lockdowns; and the indulgence of courts to hear testimony from “experts” about the mental state of defendants?

Yes, there are certainly people with severe problems. They show all sorts of signs of these problems. But the causes can stem from a variety of circumstances, and any health practitioner worthy of the name would approach each unique patient to find out what is relevant.

A deep nutritional deficit? A toxic drug or environmental chemical? Physical abuse? Extreme poverty? An ongoing threat to safety? Isolation? Confusion about the future? A disastrously poor education? Hormone imbalance? A praiseworthy refusal to accept cultural norms and the consensus of friends? Unemployment? Etc.

No need to invent 300 so-called mental disorders.

Here are two more pieces of information that attest to the unconscionable fraud that is psychiatry.

Dr. Ronald Pies, the editor-in-chief emeritus of the Psychiatric Times, laid the chemical-imbalance theory of mental disorders to rest in the July 11, 2011, issue of the Times — in Psychiatry’s New Brain-Mind and the Legend of the “Chemical Imbalance” (behind pay wall) — with this staggering admission:

“In truth, the ‘chemical imbalance’ notion was always a kind of urban legend — never a theory seriously propounded by well-informed psychiatrists.”

For decades, the whole basis of psychiatric drug research, drug prescription, and drug sales has been: “we’re correcting a chemical imbalance in the brain.”

The problem was, researchers had never established a normal baseline for chemical balance. So they were shooting in the dark. Worse, they were faking a theory. Pretending they knew something when they didn’t. That’s still the case.

In his 2011 piece in Psychiatric Times, Dr. Pies tries to cover his colleagues in the psychiatric profession with this fatuous remark:

“In the past 30 years, I don’t believe I have ever heard a knowledgeable, well-trained psychiatrist make such a preposterous claim [about chemical imbalance in the brain], except perhaps to mock it…the ‘chemical imbalance’ image has been vigorously promoted by some pharmaceutical companies, often to the detriment of our patients’ understanding.”

Absurd. First of all, many psychiatrists have explained and do explain to their patients that the drugs are there to correct a chemical imbalance.

And second, if all well-trained psychiatrists have known, all along, that the chemical-imbalance theory is a fraud…

…then why on earth have they been prescribing tons of drugs to their patients…

…since those drugs are developed on the false premise that they correct an imbalance?

Here’s another nail in the coffin: It’s a statement made by a prominent expert on an episode of PBS’ Frontline series. The episode was: “Does ADHD Exist?”

PBS Frontline Interviewer: Skeptics say that there’s no biological marker—that it [ADHD] is the one condition out there where there is no blood test, and that no one knows what causes it.

Barkley: (Dr. Russell Barkley, professor of psychiatry and neurology at the University of Massachusetts Medical Center): That’s tremendously naïve, and it shows a great deal of illiteracy about science and about the mental health professions. A disorder doesn’t have to have a blood test to be valid. If that were the case, all mental disorders would be invalid…There is no lab test for any mental disorder right now in our science. That doesn’t make them invalid.

Rarely will you hear a scientist make as bold and definitive a statement against his own interests as that one. And Barkley was so egregiously ignorant about what science is that he spoke with blithe confidence.

Science, as opposed to a preferred special interest, demands confirmation of its assertions. That means physical tests. Definitive tests. You claim a disorder exists in the brain, you present a physical test that confirms it.

Again, you can search the entire DSM, the bible of psychiatry, and try to find one such defining test for a diagnosis of any of the 300 so-called mental disorders, including the old standby, schizophrenia, and you’ll go begging. You’ll come up empty.

Think of the range and influence and power of psychiatry. Think about its partnership with central governments and pharmaceutical companies. Think about its ability to pronounce people insane or mentally ill, and what it can then coercively visit on such persons.

Think about all the politicians and pundits who blithely refer society’s problems to the “need for more psychiatric treatment” and “earlier intervention” (with toxic drugs).

You’re interested in staged events? The entire profession of psychiatry, from top to bottom, is a staged event.

It claims that millions and millions of people, including very young children, are suffering from disorders that have never been proven to exist.

As disturbing as this fact may be to some people, there it is.

Of course, many will respond with disbelief. “A total fraud? That couldn’t be because there are professionals who know science and they say…”

I don’t care what they say. I don’t care what the consensus is. You want to play the game called science? You play by the rules of the scientific method. Otherwise, get out and play another game. Read tea leaves in restaurants. Buy a Ouija board. Interpret the wrinkles on an elephant.

Or just admit you’re doing preliminary research and haven’t found your way.

But don’t push people around with the claim that you’re engaged in science.

Here is a mind-boggling twist. One of the great psychiatric leaders, who has been out in front inventing mental disorders, went public. He blew the whistle on himself and his colleagues.

His name is Dr. Allen Frances, and he made VERY interesting statements to Gary Greenberg, author of a Wired article: “Inside the Battle to Define Mental Illness,” (Dec.27, 2010).

Major media never picked up on it in any serious way. It never became a scandal. It managed to fly below the radar.

Dr. Allen Frances is the man who, in 1994, headed up the project to write the then-latest edition of the psychiatric bible, the DSM-IV.

In an April 19, 1994, New York Times piece, “Scientist At Work,” Daniel Goleman called Frances “Perhaps the most powerful psychiatrist in America at the moment…”

Well, sure. If you’re sculpting the entire canon of diagnosable mental disorders for your colleagues, for insurers, for the government, for pharma (who will sell the drugs matched up to the 297 DSM-IV diagnoses), you’re right up there in the pantheon.

Long after the DSM-IV had been put into print, Dr. Frances talked to Wired’s Greenberg and said the following:

“There is no definition of a mental disorder. It’s bullshit. I mean, you just can’t define it.”


That’s on the order of the designer of the Hindenburg, looking at the burned rubble on the ground, remarking, “Well, I knew there would be a problem.”

After a suitable pause, Dr. Frances remarked to Greenberg, “These concepts [of distinct mental disorders] are virtually impossible to define precisely with bright lines at the borders.”

Obliquely, Frances might have been referring to the fact that his baby, the DSM-IV, had rearranged earlier definitions of ADHD and Bipolar to permit many more diagnoses, leading to a vast acceleration of drug-dosing with highly powerful and toxic compounds.

Finally, at the end of the Wired interview, Frances went off on a quite intriguing foray, advocating what amounts to a mass-population placebo effect which would justify the existence of the entire psychiatric profession.

“Diagnosis [as spelled out in the DSM-IV] is part of the magic…you know those medieval maps? In the places where they didn’t know what was going on, they wrote ‘Dragons live here’…we have a dragon’s world here. But you wouldn’t want to be without the map.”

Translation: People need to hope for the healing of their troubles; so even if we psychiatrists are shooting blanks and pretending to know one kind of mental disorder from another, even if we’re inventing these mental-disorder definitions based on no biological or chemical diagnostic tests—since the tests don’t exist and we’re just juggling lists of behaviors—we’re still doing a good thing, because people will then believe there is hope for them; they’ll believe it because we place a name on their problems…

Yes, a name, but also, with that name come the drugs.

For example:

Adverse effects of Valproate (given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:

* acute, life-threatening, and even fatal liver toxicity;

* life-threatening inflammation of the pancreas;

* brain damage.

Adverse effects of Lithium (also given for a Bipolar diagnosis) include:

* intercranial pressure leading to blindness;

* peripheral circulatory collapse;

* stupor and coma.

Adverse effects of Risperdal (given for “Bipolar” and “irritability stemming from autism”) include:

* serious impairment of cognitive function;

* fainting;

* restless muscles in neck or face, tremors (may be indicative of motor brain damage).

What about ADHD? What about Ritalin?

In 1986, The International Journal of the Addictions published a most important literature review by Richard Scarnati. It was called “An Outline of Hazardous Side Effects of Ritalin (Methylphenidate)” [v.21(7), pp. 837-841].

Scarnati listed a large number of adverse effects of Ritalin and cited published journal articles which reported each of these symptoms.

For every one of the following (selected and quoted verbatim) Ritalin effects, there is at least one confirming source in the medical literature:

* Paranoid delusions

* Paranoid psychosis

* Hypomanic and manic symptoms, amphetamine-like psychosis

* Activation of psychotic symptoms

* Toxic psychosis

* Visual hallucinations

* Auditory hallucinations

* Can surpass LSD in producing bizarre experiences

* Effects pathological thought processes

* Extreme withdrawal

* Terrified affect

* Started screaming

* Aggressiveness

* Insomnia

* Since Ritalin is considered an amphetamine-type drug, expect amphetamine-like effects

* Psychic dependence

* High-abuse potential DEA Schedule II Drug

* Decreased REM sleep

* When used with antidepressants one may see dangerous reactions including hypertension, seizures and hypothermia

* Convulsions

* Brain damage may be seen with amphetamine abuse.

In the US alone, there are at least 300,000 cases of motor brain damage incurred by people who have been prescribed so-called anti-psychotic drugs (aka “major tranquilizers”). Risperdal (mentioned above as a drug given to people diagnosed with Bipolar) is one of those major tranquilizers. (source: Toxic Psychiatry, Dr. Peter Breggin, St. Martin’s Press, 1991)

This psychiatric drug plague is accelerating across the land. See the website SSRI Stories for accounts of people committing suicide and homicide while on (or dangerously withdrawing from) drugs like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil.

And Dr. Frances is somehow let off the hook. He’s admitted in print that the whole basis of his profession is throwing darts at labels on a wall, and implies the “effort” is rather heroic—when, in fact, the effort leads to more and more poisonous drugs being dispensed to adults and children, to say nothing of the effect of being diagnosed with “a mental disorder.” I’m not talking about “the mental-disease stigma,” the removal of which is one of Hillary Clinton’s missions in life. No, I’m talking about MOVING A HUMAN INTO THE SYSTEM, the medical apparatus, where the essence of the game is trapping that person to harvest his money, his time, his energy, and of course his health—as one new diagnosis follows on another, and one new toxic treatment after another is undertaken, from cradle to grave. The result is a severely debilitated human being (if he survives), whose major claim to fame is his list of diseases and disorders, which he learns to wear like badges of honor.

Thank you, Dr. Frances.

Psychiatry. Not a science.

It pretends to be.

By any definition, that makes it a hoax.

The Matrix Revealed

Imagine this: “Mrs. Jones, your son has a heart-valve problem. How do I know? A few colleagues and I looked at his eyebrows, got together over drinks, and decided we should wheel him into surgery right away. Diagnostic tests? Why no. We don’t test. We chew the fat. We concur. We collude.”

In the arena of “mental health,” that’s the method of psychiatry.

If you feel confident that new frontier research will lead to a better system, look up some of the brain-projects DARPA, the technology arm of the Pentagon, is forwarding.

Here is one: sdtimes, February 17, 2015, “DARPA’s Brain interface…”:

“The U.S. Defense Research Projects Agency (DARPA) announced it is developing a brain interface to inject images directly into the human visual cortex via a ‘cortical modem’ chip implanted in the brain.

“…DARPA Biological Technologies chief Phillip Alvelda, the project’s lead scientist, explained that the implant is the size of two stacked nickels. The direct neural interface would eliminate the need for augmented or virtual reality glasses or headsets. The technology is in early development, currently with the ‘visual fidelity of something like an early LED digital clock,’ according to Alvelda.”

In other words, this research is aimed at altering human perception in real time. You are looking at X in the physical world, but you’re seeing Y. And the programmers decide what Y will be.

From there, researchers will surely try to accomplish the same feat with memories.

These scientists are working for the Pentagon. What could you possibly worry about?

Instead of utilizing the enormous amount of coercive programming outlined in Orwell’s 1984, an alteration closer to the source (the brain) is performed.

Now you see it, now you don’t.

Under this program, what faculty would be dumped at the side of the road, like some useless appendage that might, at one time, have been considered useful?


What need for it now, when programmers can change, at will, within the visual cortex, what people see?

“Yes, at one time we had psychiatry, which, to be frank, was an absurd cartoon of a science. But we did manage to codify it and license it under the aegis of government, which was the real accomplishment. It gave us considerable control over the population. Then we took a natural next step. We applied far more precision to the study of the brain, and we moved that research from civilian government agencies into the military, where it truly belongs. Programming the brain in great detail is too important to be left in the hands of people who retain some shred of conscience…”

Forewarned is forearmed.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

16 comments on “The Devious Matrix Called Psychiatry

  1. Senatssekretär FREISTAAT DANZIG says:

    Reblogged this on Aussiedlerbetreuung und Behinderten – Fragen.

  2. Gökmen says:

    I was literally waiting for new entry while refreshing the blog in every 30 seconds, checking timezone of east coast and difference to Turkey..and this piece dropped..I’m smiling. Can’t be more happy. This is great! THANK YOU JON!

  3. mary says:

    Jon, no convincing needed here… I have been in an ongoing light battle with my granddaughter’s mother for years, as my granddaughter was “diagnosed” as ADD some years back and has been on these medications for years… the more I point out insights, facts ad this article, the more she fights back… my son was similar but I never had him medicated. The mother of my granddaughter is a nurse so she claims to know all. It is heart breaking but people, some just will not open up to these truths…

  4. Michael Burns says:

    Ok now I am starting to take exception to these articles, every time I start paying attention to your blog, you post an article on mental illness. Now I am not sure if you are making a suggestion or making fun of me. Are you making a suggestion? What do you think have?…is it contagious? Is it fatal? Am I the only with it?

    I have been dealing with my little problems. Really I am.
    In the alphabetical context of my problems I am lessening the numbers in each of the alphabetical categories.

    For instance the A’s are down…a lot! Like a super duper alot! Maybe all the medications I am taking is having a synergistic effect. Like a sum of the parts sort of thing. Whadya think?
    My psychiatrist tells me than my biting my nails is not a form of ‘Autophagia’. I beg to defer as I bit my toenails too. That’s like double.
    My ‘Reboulia’ is starting to come under control, I am seeing positive signs…I am walking my dog Angus every day now, we’ll sorta, if I am in a fugue, he walks me…man he’s talkative and he’s learning a new language.

    My Atelophobia, I think is my shrink’s delusion; I mean I am better that this, way better, an besides I don’t like how it’s spelled.

    My ‘Celebrity Worship Syndrome’ is ok, I have fits and starts. I have only been arrested four times this week for stalking Caity Jenners new website…can dogs be tranny’s? I think Angus is a girl.

    Still having problems with the F’S category, I have them all… now! Jeez.
    This disability of being in a Fugue state during my bath time, is causing my water bill to be totally unmanageable.
    Personally I don’t think I have ‘Factitious Disorder’, but I have to trust my doctor he has been right on all my other ‘little problems’. My little bumps and lumps. I mean everybody has them right? Bumps and lumps that is…

    Do you think me constantly writing comments to you blog is ‘Histrionic Personality Disorder’ (HPD). I mean, I like what you write…except when you allude to my mental faculties in your articles. I mad at you for that.

    My ‘Dyscalculia’ has caused me to lose a lot of money this week at the liquor store. I think the clerk (a nice young guy) is screwing me up in my counting on purpose, of course that could be my ‘Persecutory delusion Disorder kicking in…I have to be careful of cross-overs.
    And finally who knew I would be one of the only five people in the world to get ‘White Coat Syndrome”. The anxiety and “masked hypertension” is raising my blood pressure.
    And I have to wear it when I pick up the dog poo in the back. Its a ‘have too’. Angus refuses to do it…self esteem issue.

    Anyway Jon I understand your first job is to educate first…but, do you have to write those secret messages to me between the lines in your post.

    Best leahcim…*wink wink*

    “I told my psychiatrist that everyone hates me. He said I was being ridiculous – everyone hasn’t met me yet.”
    -Rodney Dangerfield

    • From Québec says:

      “Two psychiatrists pass in the hall. The first says, “Hello.”
      The other thinks, “I wonder what he meant by that.”


      So Michael, you bite your finger and toe nails. That could be an asset for a new carrier for you. Maybe you could also try to bite Angus nails, your dog.
      If it feels good, then you could open a dog manicure boutique, satisfy your taste for nails and at the same time, become very rich.

      You could also offer your clients an extra option and become very famous: A new miniature painting of your own on their dog nails. And don’t forget to sign it, for posterity.

      Make the best out of your wildest insanity! We have now solved two problems:

      1- nail biting,

      2: Celebrity Worship Syndrome’

      Also talk to your shrink and ask him if he has a dog. You never know, he might be your first customer.

      Good luck!

      I don’t know if your constant writing comments to this blog is ‘Histrionic” or not, but who cares? Keep writing. I enjoy it.

      • From Québec says:

        Nothing I like better that to help a poor soul get out of his misery.
        He can keep writing all he wants, I’ll come out each time with more brilliant solutions…lol

  5. mothman777 says:

    The answer of the power mad elite; If it doesn’t march in line, hit it on the head.

    • bob klinck says:

      And they have the centralized control of monetary resources (which are inherently the property of the population, and inherently easily divisible for distribution) that allows them to enforce their will. The nub of the problem of a power-mad elite having their way is the matter of the ownership of money, the vast majority of which is created as credit by the banks and loaned to the population on the banks’ terms. Flowing of new money into the economy by a National Credit Authority in the form of universal, unconditional dividends is the solution to the problem of freeing the individual from institutional domination. Vide “Social Credit”.

  6. Hypertiger says:

    Yes I checked myself into a mental health facility and it is just like you spell out…University trained mind rapists.

  7. Gökmen says:

    Reading stuff from Jon is like; Imagine you are in the belly of a giant whale. This whale is now deep down under the ocean, depths, bottom. You are in It’s stomach, there is no hope what so ever, you completely let go..and then you find strength, now you find some tools, you blast your way out from stomach of that whale, this lousy whale tried to eat you without even having decent teeth to chew you so, you don’t feel bad for putting it down. Then you rush up to the surface from deep deep darkness of the ocean. A breathe of fresh air. You keep going, there is no stopping now, out of the atmosphere to space. You stop and look: new reality. Totally new perspective.

    I’ve had my share from this psychiatric fraud. Not me personally, but the girl I was in love with and then other people around me. It’s very painful to watch someone you love and care, building giant walls around them just to ignore reality totally so they can feel ‘happy’..they are not happy because this doctor tells ‘well my dear, you have obsessive compulsive disorder, and that’s very serious thing which happens to be I have just the perfect medication for it..’.. It’s completely connected to all this other matters like collectivism, or Jon’s previous article about social media, being star in your own Truman show..everything. A giant assault on the mind.

    People who use these toxic SSRI drugs, become totally disconnected beings from their own core so they can now melt into the collective, smooth. they can look at themselves and say ‘I am ok now, I become somebody who is a part of the good society and they say I’m ok, so I should be ok’..Completely ignoring the inner work, totally ignoring your own self. “correcting myself? destroying myself? creating myself? crafting myself? spending time for exploring the self? well who does that..forget it. I will go into this circus, they have plenty toys there, lights, free rides, great colors, everyone seems happy there which I also become”…

    Jon, brilliantly as usual, connects all this to projects of darpa and the implants to visual cortex which is EXACTLY where It’s headed. A total manufactured, pseudo, synthetic environment for the good old people so they can be ‘happy’..cuz its all about being happy, ads on TV telling so..

    What will happen? All this self-murdered creatures will rush in to get those implants. They need constant stimulation because they are not aware, they disconnected themselves from the natural unfolding IMAGINATION (not reality, reality doesn’t exist until you invent It) before their eyes.

    So I think, problem is not the power elite. Not some hidden hand manipulating the lives of millons or manufactured wars, I am sure If we get rid of the current power elite the popes the rockafellers the bushes or rothschilds etc, nothing will ever change until people learn to swim.

    • From Québec says:

      Brilliant post Gökmen!

      You should post a comment on Jon new story: Atlas ~a short story~, on his new site:

      You seem to have a lot of imagination.

      Usually, I’m one of the first person to post on that site. But now, I’m sort of stuck. I read his story about 5 times, and still cannot comment on it. My mind seems frozen and my imagination seems to melt… what a contradicting bizarre effect! .

      Maybe it’s because I’m moving next month, so I’m packing my stuff and throwing half of it away. I’m clearing the way to a much lighter path for my future. Less stuff equal to freer, more vitality, imagination, creativity and actions. I guess my brain is concentrated right now on what I keep and what I throw away.

      But, eventually, I will find something to post on that article. I can’t force it, it will come unexpectingly while doing something that has nothing to do with the subject. It is just waiting to find an open spot in my mind to pour out from an unknown energy floating around.

      • Gökmen says:

        Thanks for your compliment.

        It did the same effect on me as well, Jon did his magic trick on that story. Reading something that’s never been written unleashes the imagination. The story Jon wrote outsiderealitymachine is a painting with text and like you said It has the “contradicting bizarre effect!”

        I dropped my thoughts about It replying your comment there.

        Again, good luck with moving. Throw what ever unnecessary! Don’t carry all that ‘stuff’ like George Carlin said.

  8. Tracy says:

    This is an excellent article Jon. There is plenty of ammo packed in there!

    I have an unresolved matter to take up with a psychiatrist and I will be quoting from this article. I bet I won’t even get to finish Insel’s statement… again..

    Having been “treated” by several different psychiatrists over the past four and a half years, I have no doubt in my mind that their mission is to destroy people. Mentally and psychically. They want to own you. Put restrictions on freedom. Cause conflict within your family. Service with a smile.

    When simply questioning what is happening in the world turns into a crime, the punishment being involuntary commitment (also known as imprisonment) and toxic drugs given against your will. Also being told you are ill simply because you do not agree to accept their diagnosis or “medicine”.

    As Will Hall said “there is a part of us, a part of each of us, deep inside of us that is absolutely untouched by trauma, that has never, ever been hurt, never been hurt by psychiatry. They never could touch it, never, it’s untouched and it’s inside of us and we still have it”.

  9. Luke says:

    very interesting article. I heard an interview with you on a Peace Revolution podcast.

    Have you heard of or seen the book !Nutrient Power: Heal Your Biochemistry and Heal Your Brain” by William J. Walsh

    In this book he goes over many cases of “mental disorders” that have been cured because of nutrient deficiencies and has a list fo what nutrient deficiencies trigger what symptoms. very interesting.

    I think there is a Bulletproof exec podcast that interviews him, it might be of interest to you.

    Thanks for all your work, I look forward to doing your Logic course soon and reading more of your articles.

  10. R. Hawthorne says:

    Reblogged this on Tales from a Awakened Mind and commented:
    It’s done, founded by persons like Edward Bernays who told us: ‘If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without them knowing it.’
    So picking up outlaws and degrade them back to the required norm is key for programmed behaviour of the people.

    Thanks Jon

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.