Who owns your genes? Are they a cure?

Who owns your genes? Are they a cure?

by Jon Rappoport

October 25, 2015

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

“No large institution of society can survive without deploying hundreds or even thousands of cover stories.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

In an October verdict, rendered by the Australian High Court, the purported breast-cancer gene, BRCA1, cannot be patented by any company.

The Court distinguished between an invention, which can be patented, and a discovery of something that is already there, such as a gene in the human body.

The Court’s verdict, hailed as “a victory for the people,” obscures a deeper question: how do genes help cure disease?

Researchers, drug companies, and academic shills will, of course, claim genes are the cutting edge of all future disease therapy; but you or I could claim that toenail clippings are the key to understanding how the universe was built.

In other words, a claim means nothing, unless it is backed up by evidence. There is presently no across-the-board genetic treatment that has been shown to be a cure for any disease.

Quite typical for the biotech sector. They make claims all the time, and promises, and great heraldic statements—in order to keep their money machine turning.

Just examine Monsanto’s claims about higher crop yields with GMOs, and the safety of its number-one pesticide, Roundup, which has now been exposed as a carcinogen.

The biotech industry is all about “fake it ‘til you make it.”

You certainly own your own genes, but that fact doesn’t ensure spectacular cures for what might ail you.

Then there is this: assuming gene damage can cause cancer, suppose the triggering event occurs as a result of coming into contact with environmental toxins? In other words, the toxic effects on genes will continue apace, no matter how much research is done on the composition and disposition of the genes themselves.

Much cancer research does, in fact, discover toxic causes—and it is in the interest of companies that spew those compounds out into the world to cover up their criminal guilt. What better way to achieve that than by asserting: “cancer is all in the genes.”

Look at the giant biotech companies like Monsanto, Bayer, DuPont, Syngenta. In one way or another, they are all involved in chemical and genetic research and production.

So they are in a prime position to deflect the chemical destruction they are wreaking by pushing “the frontiers of gene research.”

“It’s all about the genes.”

Hype. Hype. Hype.

Dr. Samuel Epstein, who devoted a major part of his life to the research of environmental toxins, wrote:

“We are losing the war against cancer. The prohibition of new carcinogenic products, reduction of toxins in use, and right-to-know laws – these are among the legislative proposals which could reverse the cancer epidemic.”

But that would be bad for business. The solution? Promote endlessly the notion that genes and only genes are at the root of cancer.

The big picture? The big con? Imagine a world drowning in pollution of all kinds, and top (bought-off) scientists saying: “Don’t worry, when it comes to cancer we’ve got it covered. Tweak this gene, tweak that gene, and poof, cancer never has a chance. Or if you get cancer, we can go in there and re-position crucial genes and knock out the disease. See, you can live in a chemical soup and never feel adverse effects…”

Genes. High-level, high-flying, high-minded, high-tech answers for the problems we face.

What? The science isn’t solid? The propaganda is wall-to-wall? The shills are everywhere? Don’t worry, be happy. The best minds will come up with solutions. Just wait and see. The great discoveries are right around the corner.

And I have condos for sale on Jupiter.

Step right up.

You can see the same kind of genetic hustle when it comes to autism, which many researchers, based on no real evidence, claim is “surely a genetic disease.”

This assertion covers up the fact that happy and healthy children, soon after receiving a vaccination, experience devastating neurological damage, leading to a diagnosis of autism.

But don’t go there, don’t look there, don’t talk about vaccines. No, instead, listen to the ascendant experts, who say it was just a coincidence that a vaccine was given and a child’s life was destroyed. You see, what really happened was: an errant gene response kicked in at the same moment. Nothing to do with the vaccine. Certainly not.

the matrix revealed

In actuality, the dominant paradigm of this world’s power structure is: float cover stories.

Sell big cover stories and keep selling them. Use them to conceal ongoing crimes.

“It’s the genes” is the latest and greatest cover.

Some of the biggest, best-educated liars on the planet deploy it every day.

Here is the next big thing: genes injected, functioning as vaccines. The hype is over the top. Of course, scientists admit that these injected genes will incorporate themselves in the body and alter its genetic makeup permanently.

If you like and trust that idea, I have condos in the core of the sun for sale. Bargain prices.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

7 comments on “Who owns your genes? Are they a cure?

  1. Theodore says:

    side bar: speaking of Monsanto’s RoundUp — glyphosate…

    Are you putting Monsanto in your vagina? 85% of tampons and feminine hygiene products contaminated with cancer-causing glyphosate herbicide


    Tampons, sterile cotton, sanitary pads contaminated with glyphosate – study


  2. henry says:

    Round up is a poison that kills most plant cells on contact. Some plants with a specific gene are not affected by the poison. So, it follows that, certain genes can affect the sensitivity to certain toxins. Can your genes change? Perhaps. A genetic treatment may change some of your genes to stop you from being negatively impacted by specific toxins. Alternatively, you could avoid coming into contact with the toxins. The long term effects of changing a gene may have other, currently unknown, negative consequences. Therefore, the safer option is to reduce the toxins that you may be exposed to and to get proper nutrients so that your body can eliminate the toxins that you are exposed to.

    Another issue is that if human genes are spliced into animals, are they still animals? If monkeys are spliced with humans, the monkeys might be able to perform jobs that humans do currently. The hybrids could be owned and be de facto slaves. At what point to animals get human rights? If human genes are spliced into rats that make them intelligent, what would happen if they escape and breed?

  3. itsonlyausername says:

    The sole cause of cancer is the toxic environment. Sole cause of the toxic environment is greed of big business. Big business exists because of one policy…..economic growth. Abandon economic growth policy and introduce steady state economic policy and you get rid of toxic environment….over time of course. You also rid the world of deforestation for palm oil in Far East Asia (not profitable) and GM soya in South America (not profitable), huge factory livestock feeding operations in Europe and US so we can eat meat at every meal (not profitable) exotic oil exploration for Tar Sands and fracked gas (definitely will not be profitable), famine in developing nations where we have robbed the people of their natural resources, displaced them from their lands and stopped them carrying on their traditional lifestyles because they were seen as a block to capitalist ambitions (not profitable. Yes I know. It doesn’t sound right. But banks and hedge fund investors make huge fortunes out of famine. When food demand increases so does the price of food and their profits. All since Maggie Thatcher and Ronald Reagan deregulated food amd fuel pricing), wars (people won’t need to fight over money and power and resources so it will not be profitable. Besides there won’t be any need to run or escape from some threat to life), ocean acidification due to carbon dioxide emissions (self explanatory really but if you need to know why its because we won’t be burning huge swathes of rainforest for palm oil or GM soya or burning huge amounts of fossil fuels because none of those things will be profitable) and finally the cherry on the icing on the cake. We will stop stone cold dead the problem of climate change.
    And all because we ditched economic growth.
    Oh and one more thing. The human population will fall. Not because of a loss of capitalist greed or investment or opportunities to expand our existence but because there won’t be that make believe motivation to breed like rabbits because its seen as somehow profitable to have huge families or that survival will be jeopardised by lack of food or disease or wars or climate change. In fact destroy economicgrowth policy and people will benefit from a fairer share or all natural resources…..because its not profitable not to.

    • I am glad a few others are beginning to decode the “industrialists’ cycle of greed”.

      They do not understand genes nor will they if they stick to their spirituality free- automaton atheist-materialist paradigms.

      Good article, Jon, as always.


  4. mervyn caplan says:

    These learned ignoramus arrogant liars and dogmatic materialists don’t seem to have any understanding about anything living. Their wicked biotechnology is going to destroy most of humanity. The fact of the matter is that the human being is a relection of the cosmos and when the female is fertilized the stars and planets form the body, the nerve senses and the internal organs. Spiritual Science and medicine by Dr. R. Steiner […]

  5. Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
    Good question.

  6. From Québec says:

    Who owns your genes?

    Well, I hope it’s me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.