Trump vs. Pope: the cowboy vs. the head of Pedophile Central

Trump vs. Pope: the cowboy vs. the head of Pedophile Central

by Jon Rappoport

February 19, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Let’s try to assess US immigration policy vs. Vatican immigration policy.

Just a thought. Might turn up something. Who knows?

I notice the Vatican has a wall. A big high wall. It’s probably just a decorative feature, but I’ll take a wild guess and say it also tends to keep people out. Walls sometimes have that effect. I’m not sure why. It’s one of the enduring mysteries.

The Washington Times, 9/24/2015, “Pope’s call for immigration leniency unlikely to change debate”:

“The Vatican, for its part, welcomes millions of visitors a year — but allows only a very select few, who meet strict criteria, to be admitted as residents or citizens. Only about 450 of its 800 or so residents actually hold citizenship, according to a 2012 study by the Library of Congress.”

All right. So the Vatican (which is actually a nation) has, what, two or three immigrants?

James Robb, writing at thesocialcontract.com (“How Many Immigrants Does Vatican City Take?”), puts it bluntly:

“What it [Vatican City] does not have is any immigrants. Nor refugees. None.”

What about US immigration? Here’s an overall statement from migrationpolicy.org, “Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States”:

“In 2013, approximately 41.3 million immigrants lived in the United States, an all-time high for a nation historically built on immigration.

“The United States remains a popular destination attracting about 20 percent of the world’s international migrants, even as it represents less than 5 percent of the global population.

“Immigrants accounted for 13 percent of the total 316 million U.S. residents; adding the U.S.-born children (of all ages) of immigrants means that approximately 80 million people, or one-quarter of the overall U.S. population, is either of the first or second generation.”

Got that? Depending on how you want to look at it, the number is between 40 and 80 million immigrants.

So: Vatican immigration vs. US immigration? The math- comparison isn’t hard to make, even for people raised in the American school system.

But of course, the Pope has to take a shot at Trump and the idea of building a wall between Mexico and America. Naturally. Why? Well, Virginia, if you really want to know the naked truth…

The Pope, like his predecessors, wants unlimited immigration because it obviously leads to chaos. That’s why. It’s quite simple, when you boil it down.

The Roman Church, you see, has always thrived in periods of chaos. Tumult. Conflict. Expanding poverty. The Church knows chaos. It’s built to handle it.

Widespread prosperity? No. It’s not made for that kind of future. Burgeoning prosperity is the enemy, before which the Church shrivels.

The Pope, as a contributing member and executive of Globalism, Inc., has the job of spreading poverty and lowered living standards wherever possible—because that is the world he and the Rockefeller Globalists are promoting.

Unlimited immigration is a gigantic con job, dressed up to look like heraldic humanitarianism—and of course the rubes and yokels and wild-eyed kiddie idealists fall for it like sugar freaks at a candy convention. The model is Hope and Spare Change.

Again, the real purpose of limitless immigration is chaos—behind which the heavy Globalist hitters come in and install their kind of order. Tight. Very tight. Top-down. It’s an old formula.

That’s why the Pope speaks about the climate-change agenda as well, which equals, when you strip away the messianic nonsense, lowered energy production for the whole planet. Further grinding poverty, from Nome to Tierra del Fuego.

Do I really have to point out that anyone dressed up in a robe and a tall hat, riding in a bubble, who is infallible and heads up a flock of 1.25 billion people, is suspect?

Moving right along, you might look at this quote from AP/CBS News, 5/17/2014, “Vatican reveals how many priests defrocked for sex abuse since 2004”:

“The Vatican revealed Tuesday that over the past decade, it has defrocked 848 priests who raped or molested children and sanctioned another 2,572 with lesser penalties, providing the first ever breakdown of how it handled the more than 3,400 cases of abuse reported to the Holy See since 2004.”

Yes, and how many cases have gone unreported, or were concealed by the Church? Notice, too, the penalties for the criminal priests: being fired from the job (defrocking), and “lesser” discomforts (lifetime penance and prayer).

The current Pope has spoken out against these crimes, but what has he actually done about them?

Time Magazine, February 11, 2016, “Catholic Church Tells Bishops They Are Not Obliged to Disclose Child Sex Abuse: Report”:

“The Catholic Church is allegedly telling newly ordained bishops that they have no obligation to report child-sexual-abuse allegations to law-enforcement officials, saying instead that the decision to take such claims to the authorities should be left to victims and their families.

“The policy was first reported by a veteran Vatican journalist at Catholic news website Crux, who cited a presentation given by French Monsignor Tony Anatrella.

“Anatrella, a consultant to the Pontifical Council for the Family and the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers, also authored a training document for new bishops released by Church authorities last week, in which similar guidelines are laid out.

‘“According to the state of civil laws of each country where reporting is obligatory, it is not necessarily the duty of the bishop to report suspects to authorities, the police or state prosecutors in the moment when they are made aware of crimes or sinful deeds,’ his document states, according to a citation in the Guardian.”

Really, Pope Francis?


the matrix revealed


Maybe His Eminence should worry about putting his own house in order. Perhaps, safely tucked away inside Vatican City, he’ll have time to contemplate the number of immigrants his City admits versus the number of pedophile priests in his worldwide operation versus the number of victims of those priests.

Then he might come up with a formula suggesting priorities.

Instead of jabbering about a nation in which 40-80 million immigrants already reside.

Don’t hold out hope, though. After the lights go down in Vatican City, I’m sure those esteemed prelates regale each other with stories of the desolate Middle Ages, when Church power really meant something…and how they long and plan for a return to those glory days as partners now in Globalism Inc.

When the masks come off.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

26 comments on “Trump vs. Pope: the cowboy vs. the head of Pedophile Central

  1. ConservativeRightWingStreetDetective says:

    Man, you have hit the old crucifxion nail right on the head! I personally can’t stand to even LOOK at this “jabbering” cartoon Pope, or listen to his cartoon pronouncements. It amazes me that even non-Christians whom I know think he is the 8th wonder of the world, and so wonderful, and so good, and so sweet, and so nice, and so good looking.

    It’s almost as if “THEY” have put something hallucinogenic in the vaccinations and “shots” that they gave us all as children….

    …oh…wait….

  2. Peggy Stackwood says:

    Jon Rappoport nails it…again. 🙂

  3. From Québec says:

    Trump Responds To “Pope Hypocrite” on Border Wall

  4. From Québec says:

    Trump really have the biggest balls in America. I just love this man.

    And, what about this one?

    TRUMP TO EXPOSE 9/11 IF ELECTED!!

    TRUMP 2016

  5. middleway says:

    Take the time to review a blue-blood sixth grade social studies lesson:

    A concept that was ‘Initiated’ thousands of years ago has set the stage for its grand finale.
    As George Carlin said, “It’s a big club,… and you ain’t in it”; and as Bill Hicks said, “It’s just a ride”.
    Sit back, observe and do your best to enjoy the illusory nature of the extravaganza.

  6. Your timing with this, Jon, is impeccable. Do you read my mind?

    I don’t share the Mainstream opinion that every Catholic priest is a paedophile (there’s also a muted campaign against the Rabbis, but we both know all this stems from Israeli moral diktat). My next Ozzie Thinker post “Lies, Damned Lies & Statistics” is substantively scripted (I’ve been busy). Here’s an unedited snippet…..

    “On Facebook I unexpectedly occasionally vigorously jump to the defence of branded paedophiles. Whilst (and as with homosexuality) I am neither pro nor anti the practice, my ambivalence is only moved by oppression. Rabid hordes that champion the attack on underage sex (and that is all it is) are particularly virulent oppressors. No wonder it is the number one priority of the FBI and all law enforcement agencies on the exceptional occasions genuine misdemeanours occur. They love manufacturing misery, but scarcity does not make good law enforcement business and I am reliably informed all (bar none) child pornography on the extranet was originally uploaded for public attention by agents supporting law enforcement interests. Admittedly several items were the product of intercepted private trades, but nonetheless your law enforcers have made the child porn business, FBI included. So when I see the regular attacks on the Catholic Church and, less publicised, Judaic priesthood, I laugh, or perhaps I mean grimace.

    It is amazing how adept these photographers are at capturing the bad side of a pope. Ignorant minions can then quip, “Oh I see. He looks evil. Case closed”. Well, the case is never closed even if I say so and certainly not for that trivia. Several hundred years ago the Catholic Church began periods of inquisitions, first levied against the French Cathars for daring to assert Jesus Christ was an ordinary human being. Later, in the renaissance, they targeted witches. Just as with the modern paedophile witch hunts, all evidence was reliant of eye-witness hearsay. We only have the not-at-all-inhumane practice (sarcasm) of waterboarding used to encourage confessions in the US (no foot stoves yet). Borderline inquisition cases (where a “witch” only had one or two accusers) were resolved with the float test. The trussed accused was lowered into a pond. If she sunk and drowned, she was deemed innocent of all charges. The unlucky ones that floated were judged as witches and burned at the stake. Now there’s justice for you!

    Notably, in the renaissance period, old ladies renowned for their jars of potions lovingly concocted in cauldrons were the target. Their great sin was administering homeopathic medicines to sick people and healing them. The Catholic Church was certainly not going to stand idly by and let that happen. Only Jesus Christ or his appointees were allowed to heal people and, after the confusion of the Dark Ages, the church was all out of healers. So, remember the title of this essay is “Lies, Damned lies and Statistics”. Could, in some cases, numbers of those Catholic priests or Jewish rabbis have been accused by false witnesses offering fabrication because of obstructive behaviour? Could that obstructive behaviour been devoted to sea change against corruption and ill-discipline? Yet, the alternative movements blindly crusade on with their inverted crucifixes and other Satanic symbols empowered by arrogance and sheer bone-headedness. For those “anti-paedophiles” that zealously embrace insanity, the terrible teens’ syndrome of modern times is the consequence of adults (regardless of branding) fighting over territory rights. You’ve lost the debate. Get over it and move on.”

    Best
    OT

  7. bvit says:

    I was just banned this morning from the Guardian for basically saying the same things – but its worth it a thousand times over. This Pope is working a Marxist political agenda cleverly disguised as religion. You’re right on with the statement that they do NOT want things to get better in this country and they will have their agitators working overtime before and after Trump is elected. There’s no way to live with people who do not want the nation to improve – something has to be done.

  8. Tom B. says:

    The pope has engaged in the American political process and as a result, the church that has non profit status in the US should loose that status as other non profits that choose to get political. Is it because he is going against Trump who is not in alignment with the NWO that his organization gets a pass?

  9. bharford says:

    This Pope is Pro rape
    And Anti White, working for Jewry to flood Europe whilst the Vatican had the strictest immigration in the world and is protected by very tall walls.
    In fairness though, more Rabbis and Protestant preachers rape children, as well as public school teachers and admins than priests. The offender rate is about 1.5%. Very small. This comes the the 3 largest insurance companies that insure for these cases

    Imo this Pro rape pope Francis is anti Christ and a Freemason. He should have a vote of no confidence along with many politicians in Europe like Merkel, Cameron et al

    • @bharford

      LOL…where did you get your statistics from? The back of your breakfast box or “police files” (big wink)

      Read my comment above.

      Real, genuine, irrefutable cases of child rape (not “statutory rape” of teens) are EXTRAORDINARILY rare, but the hearsay continues to be championed by those with big “causes” and bigger mouths.

        • Ah now I understand….tittle-tattle for the trite minded.

          • bharford says:

            Call it what you like but what you can’t call it is untrue. Rabbis and preachers are the real child rapists. I won’t even mention school teachers and public school admins….

            • Yes I can and I do call it untrue. When you come up with a SHRED of evidence, I’ll change my view.

            • bharford says:

              AP story and NY Times. They cite the fact that there have been 13,000 credible accusations against Catholic clergy since 1950, but leave off the fact that that amounts to 228 accusations per year, fewer than the yearly average of 260+ accusations against Protestant clergy, according to the 3 largest insurance companies.
              The Protestant number will be even larger when they get the data on other groups not insured by these three insurance companies, but it already exceeds the Catholic number. Talk about a cover-up.

            • So accusations = evidence. There were 100.000’s accusations amassed in the Middle Ages inquisition (ironically, this time, dealt by the Catholic Church). At the time all were regarded “credible”. Today, not so. Evidence is evidence and accusations do not count. Next you will be saying “confessions by torture” are “true”.

            • bharford says:

              Free Republic

              It turns out pedophilia is an incorrect term, and Catholics aren’t responsible for most of it.

              Shockingly, AP breaks out of their typical liberal mold and reports Insurance companies shed light on extent of sex abuse in Protestant churches, that sexual abuse of minors has been rampant. But in their statement, they indirectly say members of the Catholic Church are not the majority abusers.

              AP discusses the raw numbers from three companies that insure the majority of protestant churches in America (Church Mutual, Guide One, and Brotherhood Mutual), and typically receive 260 reports/yr of people under 18 being sexually abused.

              Compare that with ~228 credible accusations/yr against Catholic clerics since 1950 (documented abuse records).

              Together with that information, it is known that the Catholic Church greatly outnumbers any specific Protestant denomination, and the data for Protestant churches is available only for the last seven years. Ever since the first sexual abuse cases had been reported, Catholics have had requirements: 1) police background check done on all volunteers–including priests, 2) a second person be present at all religious functions, and 3) all personnel involved with minors must take routine checks with “Protecting God’s Children”.

              Without a doubt, sexual abuse of a minor is one of the most despicable crimes and sins that man can perpetrate. But predators seem to thrive in an atmosphere where the base congregation is one of the most trusted organizations that exist.

              Philip Jenkins, in his 1996 book Pedophiles and Priests, [[link edited for length]], looked at the problem objectively and dispassionately. Jenkins (who is not Catholic) found that true pedophilia is extremely rare, and perhaps more common among Protestant clergy, and is even more common among married laymen.

              He found that in most sexual abuse cases (under the age of consent), the behavior is actually a variety of homosexuality. This sexual attraction with very young men that combine the charm of boyishness with sexual maturity is actually called ephebophilia. Pedophilia is really a psychiatric term meaning sexual interest in children below the age of puberty.

              Even a book review by William A. Donahue [Review: Pedophiles and Priests] reveals how accurate Jenkins is in his observations over the years. Deal Hudson makes 10 valid points about priestly pedophilia [link edited for length] no one should overlook.

              True pedophilia (Leon Podles/ Clergy Sexual Misconduct: Just a Catholic Problem?) occurs most often within families. Celibacy removes most Catholic priests from those types of temptations, and clergy in churches that do not require celibacy have the same (if not worse) problems.

              But it has been a media target for any child abuse. More so because many enjoy ‘shooting down’ something they believe to be “holier than thou”. But the Episcopal Church has a comparable problem, and some of the worst abuse cases have been in fundamentalist and Pentecostal churches [[link edited for length]].

              Up until the AP report, comprehensive studies were only done on the Catholic Church. The rate for school teachers, residential home-counselors, social workers, or even scoutmasters, never existed because they had no method of accounting for sexual abuse. But the recent AP investigation found more than 2,500 cases over five years in which educators were punished for actions from bizarre to sadistic. (Jacoby/Townhall) rightly states the same sort of outcry that came with Catholic sexual abuse has not existed with public school teachers.

              It seems obvious that the legit but skewed condemnation of the Catholic Church is likely coming from the devil, himself. It’s only logical his first and sometimes only, victim would be the church with the correct answers.

              The problem of sexual abuse seems much bigger than the public will admit. And abuse from church organizations seems to be the minority. Reported sexual abuse seems only the tip of the iceberg. As despicable as Catholic abuse is, it is no where near just a Catholic problem. And finally, it seems as though the public has the wrong impression of who’s responsible for accusations of ephebophilia.

            • Get out of here, ignorant man. The term paedophile stems from the Greek: Paed- = child and phil- = to empathise with, be on the same wavelength (love, as in philosophic love of the mind, learning, life or philanthropic joy of giving – look how Rockefeller abused that term)

  10. Koolz says:

    If you want to know just how deep the Pope Vatican and his so called country run as Occultism then you need to read up and study on what “Jordan Maxwell” revealed through out his life. He opened the lid on everything about the Occult Mysteries and the Vatican.
    yes there completely evil.

    • bharford says:

      The pro rape Pope is a Freemason and a likely crypto j ew, as are his advisors and many cardinals.

      Former Communist leader of the US, Bella Dodd, personally testified to placing 1100 Marxist agents into the priesthood, many are j ews of course, hence the occult practices but it’s not limited to Catholics. Virtually every Protest-ant sect is also directed and run by them

  11. Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
    Ouch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s