The Matrix of technocracy: the roots of the conspiracy

The Matrix of technocracy: the roots of the conspiracy

by Jon Rappoport

March 15, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

“The cartels of the world become the cartels of the mind.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

“If you are nothing more than a biological machine, then what you think doesn’t matter. There is no you. Confirming this, deciding this, is the technocrat’s wet dream.” (The Magician Awakes, Jon Rappoport)

Many independent researchers, writers, and broadcasters have exposed the operation called technocracy. I want to give particular thanks to Patrick Wood, whose investigations are essential. His most recent book is Technocracy Rising.

Consider the term “scientific humanism.” The Oxford Dictionary offers this definition: “A form of humanist theory and practice that is based on the principles and methods of science; specifically the doctrine that human beings should employ scientific methods in studying human life and behaviour, in order to direct the welfare and future of mankind in a rational and beneficial manner…Origin mid-19th century.”

Two items jump out from the page: “…in order to direct the welfare and future of mankind,” and “Origin mid-19th century.”

The first phrase obviously refers to a plan. And the plan emerges from being able to study, at a great height, populations and nations—in order to direct their behavior, in order to place them and move them on a chessboard. “Scientifically.”

Free will? Not important. Free exchange of goods and services? Not important. The unique vision and desire of the individual? Not important. Only science is important—whatever that means.

Science/rule by technology/technocracy becomes the justification for control.

For example: “We have studied the amount of energy that can be utilized by humans on planet Earth. Given the results, we will plan how to distribute it most humanely and rationally.”

That’s not science. That’s fake science. Whoever determines what is “humane” isn’t doing science. Whoever presumes to know how much usable energy exists on Earth, despite ongoing technological breakthroughs, isn’t doing science. But no matter. Pronouncements can be made to look like science. On behalf of top-down control.

As the Oxford Dictionary mentions, this kind of program had its roots in the mid-19th century.

Well, Darwin published his hypothesis about evolution in 1859. Marx and Engels published The Communist Manifesto in 1848.

Let me now try to summarize thousands of pages of scholarship in a few paragraphs.

Prior to Marx, Engels, and Darwin, the word “humanism” referred to a tradition of philosophy, knowledge, culture, education, and art birthed by the ancient Greeks—coming forward through Rome to the European Renaissance. It elevated human beings. It tended toward greater freedom, less Church repression.

But then, in the mid-19th century, humanism took a sharp turn. It became identified with “the march of science,” the triumph of philosophic materialism (Darwin), and the complete restructuring of nations and societies according to a social, economic, and political plan that would “benefit all” (Marx, Engels).

Humanism was stripped down to “scientific humanism.”

In succeeding generations, all the way up to today, intellectuals and scientists and technologists have adopted the viewpoint that, since they can see the whole of society from above, and since they can understand its workings in clearer and evermore specific terms, and since they understand the vast field of natural resources, they can and should, quite naturally, and as a matter of course, plan and plot the future of humanity.

Their impulse was, behind the scenes, aided and abetted by a quite different cast of characters, who wanted a new world order, a political and economic management system for the entire planet (now known as Globalism).

This is, in effect, a two-tier operation. At the top are the Rockefeller Globalists; and under them, millions of useful high-IQ idiots who love to play chess with the world population.

The propaganda wing of this operation insists, at every turn: the only “solution” for planet Earth is the group solution. The group, the mass, the collective.

It is unthinkable that The Individual would have anything to contribute.

Well, when you stop and consider it, this is the mantra of today’s collective society: the individual is extinct.

The staging of civilization’s ebbs and flows, victories and defeats, always has the aim of discounting and reducing the role of the individual. Whatever else is intended, that is intended.

I’m not trying to discourage any and every group response—but I am saying, without question, that every major covert op is played in order to eradicate the idea of the individual. This is basic mind control. This is the reason mind control exists: to elevate “group” over “individual.”

Mind control tries to make individuals think of themselves as helpless pieces on the chessboard. Mind control tries to make individuals surrender their free will. Mind control tries to make individuals believe they have no place in the modern world. Rather, they must be part of a group; otherwise, they’re invisible.

If you could walk into a person’s mind, as if it were a post office, and if you could get rid of every letter and package that extolled, or surrendered to, The Group, you would see that person rise to a new height. You would see a renewal on a grand scale.

But introduce a fact or idea that challenges The Group and alarms go off. “Reject that fact! Reject it! It’s false! It has to be false! Maintain stability!”

“Stability being restored. The structure is intact. Standards are being rebooted. Normality is being reasserted. Resume standard operations.”

In Adjustment Team (1954), Philip K Dick wrote:

“You were supposed to have been in the Sector when the [mind control] adjustment began. Because of an error you were not. You came into the Sector late — during the adjustment itself. You fled, and when you returned it was over. You saw, and you should not have seen. Instead of a witness you should have been part of the adjustment. Like the others, you should have undergone changes…something went wrong. An error occurred. And now a serious problem exists. You have seen these things. You know a great deal. And you are not coordinated with the new configuration.

What I call the Reality Manufacturing Company wants everyone to have the same inner configuration.

That is the basis of collectivism at the deepest level.

At the outbreak of World War 2, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) began making plans for the post-war world.

The question it posed was this: could America exist as a self-sufficient nation, or would it have to go outside its borders for vital resources?

Predictably, the answer was: imperial empire.

The US would not only need to obtain natural resources abroad, it would have to embark on endless conquest to assure continued access.

The CFR, of course, wasn’t just some think tank. It was connected to the highest levels of US government, through the State Department. A front for Rockefeller interests, it actually stood above the government.

Behind all its machinations was the presumption that planned societies were the future of the planet. Not open societies. (And “the interests of the US” would ultimately be subordinated to the domination of one-planet, new-world-order Globalists.)

Through wars, clandestine operations, legislation, treaties, manipulation of nations’ debt, control of banks and money supplies, countries could be turned into “managed units.”

Increasingly, the populations of countries would be regulated and directed and held in thrall to the State.

And the individual? He would go the way of other extinct species.

Nowhere in these formulas was the individual protected. He was considered a wild card, a loose cannon, and he needed to be demeaned, made an outsider, and characterized as a criminal who opposed the needs of the collective.

As the years and decades passed, this notion of the collective and its requirements, in a “humane civilization,” expanded.

On every level of society, people were urged to think of themselves as part of a greater group. The individual and his hopes, his unique dreams, his desires and energies, his determination and will power…all these were portrayed as relics of an unworkable and deluded past.

In the planned society, no one rises above the mass, except those men who run and operate and propagandize the mass.

The onrush of technocracy gears its wild promises to genetic manipulation, brain-machine interfaces, and other automatic downloads assuring “greater life.” No effort required. Plug in, and ascend to new heights.

Freedom? Independence? Old flickering dreams vicariously viewed on a screen.

Individual greatness, natural imagination, natural creative power? A sunken galleon loaded with treasure that, upon closer investigation, was never there to begin with.

The Plan is all that is important. The plan involves universal surveillance, in order to map the lives of billions of people, move by move, in order to design systems of control within which those billions live, day to day.

But the worst outcome of all is: the individual cannot even conceive of his own life and future in large terms. The individual responds to tighter and control with a shrug, as if to say, “What difference does it make?”

He has bought the collectivist package. His own uniqueness and inner resources are submerged under layers of passive acceptance of the consensus.

And make no mistake about it, this consensus reality, for all its exaltation of the group, is not heraldic in any sense. The propagandized veneer covers a cynical exploitation of every man, woman, and child.

Strapped by an amnesia about his own freedom and what it can truly mean, the individual opts for a place in the collective gloom. He may grumble and complain, but he fits in.

He can’t remember another possibility.

Every enterprise in which he finds himself turns out to be a pale copy of the real thing.

The deep energies and power and desire for freedom remain untapped.

—Yet a struggle continues to live.

exit from the matrix

It lives in the hidden places of every individual who wants out, who wants to come back to himself, who wants to stride out on a stage.

Freedom and power again. The shattering of amnesia.

In this stolen world.

A new stage play, titled:

The Extinct Individual Returns.

In this new play, dominoes of the collective begin to fall. The stinking structure collapses, a wing here and a wing there.

The vast sticky web called “the people” begins to disintegrate.

A new instructive message appears on screens: “The Collective=Crazy.”

The pseudo-scientific plot to make humans pieces on the grand chessboard, biological machines to manipulate at will, with “inputs” that “elicit predictable responses”—this great plan and great deception eventually becomes a burnt cinder in the annals of failed histories.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

21 comments on “The Matrix of technocracy: the roots of the conspiracy

  1. Just want 2 B the first to say Marx&Engals published “communist manifesto” in *1848*….now, I can go back & read the REST of the piece!….

      • When this post first appeared yesterday, there was a typo, which stated the manifesto was printed in “1948”…. I KNEW that wasn’t correct, but yes, I had to wiki it, to find out it was 1848.
        The post was correct without comment…. And, as a matter of fact, yes, I WAS there. I have ALWAYS been EVERYWHERE. But I’m stupid. Why do you ask?____________?rsvp?____

        • You seemed to be implying, you were little Timmy sitting on Chucky’s lap with a beaming Freddie looking on in approval….

          Ah now I get it; Mr “typo” relying on the “noble” (sic) resource for “truth”. Where would we be without propaganda?

          The ancient ones don’t understand our obsession with linearity. When has always been far less important than what. The past has gone. It is disordered and wrecked. Only the future awaits with the present hovering ever seeking an opportunity to bite us all in the ass.

          • ….yada, yada, yada, blah, blah, blah,….. “Timmy”, “Chucky”, and “Freddie”….????….wtf?….
            What do 1960’s musician Tiny Tim, demigod Chuck Norris, and cartoon character Fred Flintstone have to do with it?….
            Shouldn’t it be >”Mr. Typo”Mr “typo”<….????…. After all, being the supreme embodiment of human perfection, which you so obviously proclaim yourself to be, the GREAT OMNISCIENT Ozzie Thinker is GOD, corretc?…. Sorry it took me 2 days to reply, kiddo….
            You're infatuated with me, aren't you? That's ok, I'm used to it….
            And, btw, where does your citation of "noble" (sic) resource for "truth" come from.
            Personally, I think you have some kind of diagnosable personality disorder….
            You're really weird, dude….
            (and also BTW, the "ancient ones" are a fantasy which exists only in your imagination….)

            • Why would a sycophant be addressed with a capital?

              Ah ha so those with minds have personality disorders; “diagnosable” no less? I was wrong. You are not worthy of the title “moron”?

              Good day…….:)

  2. From Québec says:

    Like Trump brilliantly says: “The Silent MAJORITY is back!”

  3. Kim Broadie says:

    Rappoport goes for the jugular every day. A week ago I downloaded Technocracy Rising from Amazon and have only progressed to the formation of the Trilateral commission and Breszinski’s resurrection of the movement. But Jon’s piece, especially the opening paragraphs reminded me of an old book I started once and never finished. It is called The Counter-Revolution of Science, by Friedrich Hayek. It fires a devastating blow to the technocracy paradigm in precise, unassailable, logical argument.

    • CPP says:

      You might also be interested in a 2006 book, The Ascendancy of the Scientific Dictatorship: An Examination of Epistemic Autocracy, From the 19th to the 21st Century, by brothers Phillip and Paul Collins. They also have many articles published at

      Terry Melanson, the publisher of Conspiracy Archive, has a review of the book on which he opens with this:

      Many of us are familiar with U.S. president Dwight D. Eisenhower’s farewell speech to the nation on January 17, 1961, in which he warned the American public to “guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence” of the “military-industrial complex.” A less known quote from the same speech sets the tone for the Collins brothers’ incredibly erudite tome: “… we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

      • Kim Broadie says:

        Thanks CPP I will check it out. We need grassroots, we need to attack the underlying axiom, flood the media with the voices of individuals. I never heard that 2nd phrase before…Eisenhower knew.

  4. artemisix says:

    Brilliant post…..

  5. From Québec says:

    Well, it’s looking good for Trump tonight.

    Donald Trump has won the Republican caucus in the Northern Mariana Islands, a remote U.S. territory that consists of 15 islands in the Pacific Ocean.

    Trump took home 73 percent of the vote and will win all nine delegates, according to Jason Osborne, who was the executive director of the local Republican Party.

    Texas Sen. Ted Cruz followed behind with 24 percent. Both Ohio Gov. John Kasich and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio made barely a blip — Kasich took 2 percent and Rubio 1 percent

  6. Terry Schiller says:

    After having read Orwell’s “1984” many years ago (before that date), I worried about universal surveillance, which has existed here for some time.

  7. middleway says:

    Excellent piece Jon.
    From a state affording great historical perspective, one of the most succinct and brief summations of the human condition:

  8. Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
    Scary when science and politics decide what is best for us.

  9. CP says:

    Great article, thank you, Mr. Rappoport. Incidentally, a brilliant 2003 documentary available on youtube titled The Net explores the convergence of Technocracy, transhumanism, CIA mind control experiments and the CIA’s hand in creating the marriage of the 60s counterculture with cybernetics and psychedelics. Tied in to the narrative is the remarkable situation of Ted Kaczynski being a young Harvard math genius and a victim of an MK Ultra experiment directed by Major Henry Murray who also happened to be connected to the NY Macy Conferences attended by the CIA and scientific luminaries dedicated to developing scientific methods to predict and control human behavior. The film director discovered a remarkable nexus of characters in on the grand plan of reducing all human behavior to algorithms controlled under a monolithic system.

  10. Interesting piece, Jon, but the reasons might surprise you (does anything coming from ME “surprise” you?)

    I made mention of a shift in the human group energy field on one of my old posts on Can’t remember which one – too long ago. Around 1870 (maybe give or take a decade or two) the human energy field became more compatible with Ciakar (reptilian) reasoning.

    The first attempt at group humanisation (reptilian style) culminated with what is known as the medieval period, with its familiar symbols (the fleur de lys is the most popular reptilian one. It means rebirth and this is symbolised by the lotus flower in certain human cultures) and rituals (such as chivalry).

    Reptilians have two sides. One is gushingly, overtly (holier than thou) humanitarian. and the other is psychotic covert xenophobic (belief in “terrorism” round every corner)..

    In the 1960’s there was a shift to the mantis energy field. I think this was geared to make humans more pliable (and to a degree it has worked), but the negative effect (for the Draco string pullers) is it made humans more resilient, more geared to truth/logic/reason. Right now I see a dichotomy coming through. There hasn’t been a shift of values, per se. I see a cacophony of discordance with the mindset spectrum erupting into regular conflicts.

    I am certain that the Draco are behind globalism as their societies are very ordered and (generally speaking) blindly follow the illusions served up by their “elites”. They can also monitor and tag thoughts, so the “technocracy concept” is in its infancy on the Earth plane.

    Keep thrashing this subject out, Jon. It’s more important than you might imagine.


  11. says:

    Jon, Thanks for the matrix of technocracy article. It is not science and technological science which is used to manage the global energy distribution for instance It is the presuppositions regarding the total amount of available energy resources including the environmental costs together with the pseudo or false scientific approach to solve problems. Many problems for people have been solved properly, but false science is promoting false science supporting global corporations products and strategies and has been suppressing excellent problem solving by independant scientist, inventors, technologists and people operating independantly from main stream science and technology These solutions NEVER get funding and this simply is the policy to let them crave for funding they will NEVER get. Banks invest only in the allowed problem solutions which will generate more revenue, profit, control and growing monopolistic global power. Science has been distorted gradually and intensively up until the root. There is no science other than science used by vested interests. Science has been destroyed. False Science and false technology are the logical result of the suppression by the banksters and the global hidden hand of the available excellent solutions to the problems. They define the very limited solutions space to further only their own interests, not the interests of the people who are in desparate need of effective solutions. They define a reality of solutions which is false, because it is preventing the already available excellent solutions from entering the global market. Competition is a sin in their eyes. They present to the global audience a extremely limited “reality”. Groet, Jan Ligthart

    • Let’s call them the “GREG B.’s”…. That means Global Ruling Elites, & Global Banksters”….
      So we can all blame that guy “Greg B.”…. (HELLO!, to my friend in the Netherlands!)

  12. Mia Manners says:

    When I read this, I know it rings true…I am constantly wondering as to what my place in the world is and how to stand up for mother earth and how to go about that, dreaming of my intuitive imagination stretching across the boards of making a difference. Its good to read, learn, deepen my watch and step by step, remain vigilant to the antidepressants, dead foodstuffs, drugs, chemicals and tel-lie-vision on offer globally through the globalist agenda of mass mono crop manipulation…thank you..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.