Two more MMR vaccine whistleblowers: they’re suing

Two more MMR vaccine whistleblowers: they’re suing

Where there’s smoke and fire—there’s more fire.

You pro-vaccine soccer moms: pay attention.

by Jon Rappoport

May 6, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

“The bigger the lie, the bigger the truth it is concealing. The truth is what people are afraid to accept.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

The censored film, Vaxxed (trailer), has escaped the claws of the “protectors of all truth.” It has been showing to packed houses all over the country. It relates the specific crime of scientific fraud at the CDC. A whistleblower, William Thompson, confesses that he and his CDC colleagues lied and cheated and omitted vital data, in order to give the MMR vaccine a free pass and claim it had no connection to autism—when it did have a connection.

That’s the purpose and meaning and focus of this astonishing film.

But there is more. There are other whistleblowers shining a light on the MMR (mumps, measles, rubella) vaccine. Specifically, the mumps component of the vaccine and its ineffectiveness.

Their names are Stephen A. Krahling and Joan A. Wlochowski. They’re former virologists at Merck. They’re insiders. They’ve leveled devastating charges against the company, which manufactures the MMR vaccine and sells it to the federal government.

In 2010, the whistleblowers filed a suit against Merck. The suit drags on in court (“UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al. v. MERCK & CO.,” Case No. 2:10-cv-04374-CDJ).

The Huffington Post reports on the charges in the suit (“Merck Has Some Explaining To Do Over Its MMR Vaccine Claims,” 9/24/2014, updated: 11/27/2014):

“…former Merck scientists [claim] that Merck ‘fraudulently misled the government and omitted, concealed, and adulterated material information regarding the efficacy of its mumps vaccine in violation of the FCA [False Claims Act].’”

“According to the whistleblowers’ court documents, Merck’s misconduct was far-ranging: It ‘failed to disclose that its mumps vaccine was not as effective as Merck represented, (ii) used improper testing techniques, (iii) manipulated testing methodology, (iv) abandoned undesirable test results, (v) falsified test data, (vi) failed to adequately investigate and report the diminished efficacy of its mumps vaccine, (vii) falsely verified that each manufacturing lot of mumps vaccine would be as effective as identified in the labeling, (viii) falsely certified the accuracy of applications filed with the FDA, (ix) falsely certified compliance with the terms of the CDC purchase [of the MMR vaccine] contract, (x) engaged in the fraud and concealment described herein for the purpose of illegally monopolizing the U.S. market for mumps vaccine, (xi) mislabeled, misbranded, and falsely certified its mumps vaccine, and (xii) engaged in the other acts described herein to conceal the diminished efficacy of the vaccine the government was purchasing.’”

“These fraudulent activities, say the whistleblowers, were designed to produce test results that would meet the FDA’s requirement that the mumps vaccine was 95 per cent effective. To the whistleblowers’ delight, the judge dismissed Merck’s objections to the case proceeding, finding the whistleblowers had plausible grounds on all of the claims lodged against Merck.”

The whistleblowers’ charges include detailed specifics on how Merck cheated, in order to produce the false conclusion that the mumps component of the MMR vaccine was 95% effective. For example, Merck placed rabbit antibodies into blood samples—pretending these were human antibodies signaling a high level of immune response to the vaccine.

It should be noted that this far-reaching charge of fraud covers years during which Dr. Julie Gerberding was the president of Merck vaccines.

Why does this matter? Because Gerberding, before landing her high-paying job at Merck, was the head of the US Centers for Disease Control.

And while she was the head of the CDC, in 2004, William Thompson, the CDC whistleblower revealed in Vaxxed, warned Gerberding that he had “sensitive” data about the MMR vaccine, and these data constituted a problem for the CDC.

Thompson was obviously talking about the vaccine’s link to autism. Gerberding ignored Thompson.

You could say she doubled down. After leaving the CDC, she became president of vaccines for Merck, the company that manufactures the MMR vacccine, holds a monopoly on it, and sells it to the CDC.

—So when scientists, pundits, government officials, and other “experts” ponder how, at Harvard, a recent mumps outbreak could have affected previously vaccinated students, they’re faking it.

Even within the (false) conventional view of how vaccines work and what they do, the mumps component of the MMR is a dud. It’s been an open secret for a long time.


power outside the matrix


And now two Merck whistleblowers are lowering the boom in court.

The US Justice Department wants nothing to do with this case. Neither does the US Congress. Inside the federal government, there are blind eyes everywhere.

If the government actively pursued the case, among other revelations, the public would witness Dr. Julie Gerberding, former head of the CDC, president of Merck vaccines, being raked over the coals on the witness stand.

That must never happen.

If you think, while the case drags on, there is any effort to curtail the use of the vaccine, or investigate it, think again. The judge in the case has set a timetable which places the start of courtroom proceedings in…

2018.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

12 comments on “Two more MMR vaccine whistleblowers: they’re suing

  1. silverpen123 says:

    I got mumps as a child. Not sure if I had been vaccinated from it. It was in the late 1960’s. I didn’t die or come close to dying, nor any ill effects after. Swollen glands, fever, etc. Time off from school, yah!
    To this day, I am unsure why there’s even a vaccine for it. Just as I am unsure why people get a useless vaccine for chicken pox. I know a few mom’s who had their children vaccinated for chicken pox. Not only did they get a mild case after the shot, but still contracted it later. Useless.

    What I find confounding is when you get mandated vaccines for your child, the doctors always give a phamplet of the risks. They are scarey. So why are parents raising a stink as if this is unknown or being withheld? It’s right there in the literature. Has been for years. I recommend parents to not give children under 1 yrs old any shots if they are not going to be exposed to other children. And certainly not to newborns. And to only get their children inoculated one shot at a time.
    The Hep B vaccine is given to newborns when the risk for exposure is almost 0. If mom has no signs or test results of it, unless people are sharing needless or having intercourse, it’s not an issue. I refused the hospital innoculating my newborns and saved it for many years later when it became mandatory. Once they threatened me with child neglect for refusing the shot for one of my newborns. I assured them I’d deal with that with the pediatrician later. Subject dropped. Most hospital threats are simple bully tactics by an ignorant nurse…and I learned to ignore them and do whatever I want anyway. (The old yes em to death and do what i want anyway, story. Who’s got time to argue?)
    Laurie

  2. ebolainfo says:

    I can get imprisoned for personal use of a mild psychoactive plant but poisoning and even causing the deaths of thousands via defective drugs….nothing.

    “The US Justice Department wants nothing to do with this case”. A truly emphatic declaration of their subservience to Big Pharma!

    The statist demands I inject a faulty medical product into my body however, the same statist lackeys refuse to presecute the manufacturer of this defective medical product that causes harm.

    Refusal to inject the toxin incurs more judicial/statist activity against me than the makers of the dangerous medical product. How truly perverse!

  3. a800lbgrila says:

    So finally the dirty laundry of the elite is being aired out. Lord Monkton was on AJ interview and said that the retired non threatened leading heat convection scientist is about to publish his findings on climate change. This happened as a result of his Monkton debate 3 years ago when the same scientist advocated the bribed/extorted position that its man made. After 3 years of popular data review he’s apparently upset that the man made advocates used a totally inappropriate formula from the start which still doesn’t explain why these egoists stick to their false position and are tripling down on their false assertions. Foundations built on sand and you get sinkholes. LOL This is what came to mind reading this informative article. I also learned the Al Gores propaganda movie must be accompanied by 77 pages of UK court found to be outright lies the movie contains. Lord Monkton has formed a coalition to prosecute scientists that knowingly present false data and personally are enriched by doing so … as in tender, grants, and positions. Maybe he can also do so in forced vaccinations by reviewing the data in a court under penalty of perjury. Funny stuff happens at depos and on the stand when faced with 5 years in prison for lying. Ask Bill Clinton.

    • Angel Scott says:

      We can’t even talk about “climate” without geoengineering. I miss blue skies terribly.

  4. Beverly Allor says:

    Just saw Vaxxed, very powerful. Jail time is too good for the members of the CDC that are involved in this cover-up. This is not an anti-vax movie, it is exposing the fraud in the CDC and pharma companies that have known this vaccine causes autism and autoimmune in a subset of children. There are two well known doctors from the Doctors TV show in this doc and both are very upset. All they are urging is to bring back the single dose measles, mumps, and rubella instead of the combination vaccines. If you vax, do it one at a time. Great documentary, I urge everyone to see it, whether you are pro, anti, or somewhere in between, the government has to be held accountable. Contact your legislators and demand a hearing on this whistle blower case.

  5. Love truth tellers! Thank you, Jon. #Vaxxed #Vaxxedthemovie #CDCwhistleblower #hearthiswell #JusticeOrelse

  6. henry says:

    Have these new whistle blowers spoken with the media yet? Make sure that they let everyone know that they want to live and if they are suicided, they were actually murdered.

    • Cathie says:

      Unfortunately, the newspapers will never cover it. They are bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical companies.

    • Jacqueline says:

      As Catherine states, the media will never cover it…why ruin a good cash cow. This will quietly go through court and result in Merck signing paperwork attesting to its criminal behavior and payment of a huge fine to the US government, as has occurred so many times before with the pharmaceutical firms. My cynicism tells me the only reason this case even made it to court is to extract that hefty fine for the feds…then, business as usual. Seems to be the typical pattern.

  7. From Québec says:

    Today, Alex Jones speaks with Dr. Toni Bark on the dangers of vaccination and how it can affect your child. Very interesting interview:

    LA times: Feds Caught In Deadly Vaccine Trial

    • Terry Schiller says:

      Dr.Toni Bark is intelligent, knowledgeable, articulate, and funny. A good prospective running-mate for Mr.Trump (I wish).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s