Hillary, email free pass, Benghazi

Hillary, email free pass, Benghazi

by Jon Rappoport

July 6, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Little-known fact: Hillary Clinton is a Quantum Physics genius with a specialty in Time Manipulation.

We’ll get to that in a minute. But first, FBI Director Comey’s absurd exoneration of Hillary in the email scandal. The law states, of course, that gross negligence in handling and transmitting classified materials is enough to warrant prosecution for a crime, and it can carry up to ten years in prison. (Federal Penal Code, Title 18, section 793[f].) The quality of the intent behind the negligence has nothing to do with the law. Good intent, bad intent, neutral intent. All irrelevant. Comey knows that.

His statement about the diligent and exceptional investigation by his people at the Bureau is fluff and window dressing. It all came down to his recommendation to his boss, the Attorney General. And there Comey revealed his own intent:

Hillary is too big to fail.

She was grossly negligent. The FBI confirmed that.

But Comey said that because Hillary showed no intent to cause harm, she should walk. Baloney. Again, intent is irrelevant, according to the law, which states:

“Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.” (Title 18, section 793[f], Federal Penal Code)

That section of the law was written to cover gross negligence. It’s the only standard. Period. Got it? That section of the law was written for the express purpose of setting aside the question of intent behind the negligence—so that intent couldn’t be used as an excuse for not prosecuting.

This whole stage play is a backwards farce. First of all, the decision about whether to prosecute is, guess what, at the discretion of the Attorney General, not the FBI. Who cares what the FBI recommends? Especially in public, in front of television cameras.

Does a city DA automatically mirror the cops’ recommendations when he makes up his mind about prosecuting a suspect? No. The cops hand over their evidence, and the DA makes his call. Take the case to court or not.

Attorney General Lynch’s statement, a few days ago, about following the FBI’s recommendation is ridiculous. It’s like saying, “They’re doing my job for me. I’m not here. I’m a non-entity.”

The fix is obviously in. The players in the farce (Lynch and Comey) performed their roles so badly they should have been doing dinner theater in Florida. Maybe the half-awake senior citizens would have bought their act.

“Hi folks, I’m Jim Comey, FBI Director. We found a ton of gross negligence in the Hillary case, but we decided not to prosecute. It’s not our job to decide that one way or the other, but we thought we would decide anyway. We’re as honest as the day is long.”

“Hi folks, I’m Loretta Lynch, Attorney General. I spoke with Bill Clinton the other today at the airport, and the family’s fine. Everybody’s fine. I’m supposed to decide, ha-ha, whether to prosecute criminals, but in this case, I’m letting the FBI decide. You want to know why? Because if Comey laid out his ton of gross negligence and then said it was up to me, everybody would have realized I should prosecute her. So we let Comey act as cop and prosecutor. You know, so we could get the whole thing over with, in a few minutes.”

Comey lays out the evidence, which is a slam-dunk for prosecution, then publicly recommends no prosecution, while at the same time he interprets federal law. And he interprets it as falsely as possible. I guess he’s an appellate judge, too. Cop, prosecutor, judge. Triple play.

Why didn’t they just cart out a giant Disney character to announce Hillary was free? Goofy or Pluto.

So now let’s move on to Hillary herself, and her career of getting away with everything under the sun.

—Recall her Benghazi testimony before Congress? She said, at this point, what difference does it make?

It’s not just that she brushed off the whole thing, it’s the time scale. It’s as if, in her mind, she was being grilled a few decades after Benghazi happened. She’s saying, it’s history, why should we revisit it?

She was on to so many other things, she couldn’t be bothered to look back on what was, for her, a dead issue, something a historian might decide to write about. Benghazi was way, way back there. A dim memory that couldn’t possibly have any meaning left in it. Why should we talk about the Trojan War here today, in front of an investigating committee? I have other things to worry about. My upcoming campaign for the Presidency. My husband, because he can always cause trouble for us. My advisors, who could screw up. You never know. But Benghazi? Nothing. If I had anything to do with it, you’ll never prove a connection. Let’s not sit around kidding ourselves. You know and I know nothing is going to come of this. What difference does it make at this point? People don’t understand my psychology. I’m two steps into the future at all times. When something is done, it’s done, and since I’ll never pay for any hypothetical crimes, who cares? It’s just public masturbation on the part of my enemies. They’ve been after me for a long time. They’ll never catch me. We invaded Libya and we won. We destroyed the country.

And now she says: The email scandal? My God, that’s such old news. Are we still on that subject? Can’t you people find something else to talk about? That’s settled. It’s filed under “unintentional mistakes may have been made but there were no adverse consequences.” It’s as distant a memory as Monica and Bill, and Bill and his women. Whether I defended him as a loyal wife and a put-upon victim, or whether I actively punished those women; it’s simply another imponderable, and historians will take it up and hash it over one day when I’m long gone. Who cares? What difference does it make at this point? The same is true of the Clinton Foundation. Whether our donors were granted favors is simply a matter of speculation, and therefore it has no force, no power as an issue. The mere coincidence or correlation of money and favors adds up to an unprovable hypothesis. Isn’t it obvious? There is no smoking gun. There will never be a smoking gun, so let’s put that one to rest, too. As a piece of imponderable history. What else do you have? My support, at one point, for the invasion of Iraq? Another ancient war. It happened. It’s over. Iraq now presents a new set of problems. Let’s deal with those. Wall Street money? Pharmaceutical money? Do you want to dig into that? All I have to say is that I will never allow campaign contributions to influence my judgment. You people just don’t understand the concept of time. Once a thing is done, it’s in the past. It could be five minutes ago or a century, but you can never bring it back. What difference does it make? I’m looking ahead to the Convention. And with my nomination in tow, I’ll launch a very active campaign against my opponent, Mr. Trump. I’m quite confident I’ll win the election, and when I’m the next President, everything I’ve ever done will truly be erased, because the American people will have decided it makes no difference. The people and I will concur on that point.

The Matrix Revealed

What difference does anything make? As President, when I issue a decision, it’s done. We’re on to the next piece of business. I’m the person I am tomorrow. I’m never the person I am today or was yesterday. The way time passes, how quickly it moves, depends on the point of viewer of the observer. Well, my point of view is constantly refreshing itself. I share this trait with people like Bill Gates and George Soros. They invest in the future. The act of putting money to work now is irrelevant. It only matters what happens to that money tomorrow. Space and time are relative, and my process dictates that my actions only have meaning when we see their consequences—by which time I’m already engaged in more important actions, so what difference does it make how the past turned out? The future already exists in an ideal form, and in the future I’m already President. Can’t you people see that? All you have to do is see it and admit it. Then things will take care of themselves. When you do see it, you’ll understand that whatever we’re talking about now makes no difference. Consider Mr. Trump’s slogan, Make America Great Again. Again? He wants to reinstate the past. But the past is gone. From my perspective, the past never was. The issues we argue about with reference to the Constitution are misguided. What Constitution? I go farther than claiming it is a living document. How could it exist now when it was purportedly framed in some purportedly ancient period? We fool ourselves when we search for what it was. We write what we write and say what we say and do what we do and legislate what we legislate in the ever-changing now, which is the future. Therefore, if we say there is a Constitution which is being updated, what we really mean is we’re inventing it out of whole cloth as we move along. Like money or debt, we’re inventing it out of thin air. So what difference does it make? Likewise, what difference does it make what I will do during my Presidency? I will always be out ahead of that. I hope this statement is clear to the Committee and, therefore, we can terminate this proceeding. You’re following along behind me, and I’m leading you. How else could it be?

What difference, at this point, does it make?

What possible difference?

So, Mr. Chairman, I feel better, now that I’ve gotten that off my chest. I feel refreshed. I’ve clarified how things stand, and how the universe of time and space works. I’m in the future, and all of you are in the past. I already know what you couldn’t know. Naturally, therefore, you’ll look to me for guidance. It’s logical, and if there’s one thing I stand for, it’s logic. I believe we’re done here.

Well, you’re done. I’m just getting started.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

24 comments on “Hillary, email free pass, Benghazi

  1. tvfmontana says:

    Seems no one is above the law unless your name is “Clinton”. FBI — Folsom Naval Reservist is Sentenced After Pleading Guilty to Unauthorized Removal and Retention of Classified Materials


  2. freereel says:

    I wonder if Hillary is herself another PsyOp directed at the American people. She is so obviously corrupt, criminal, and dishonest that she’s a caricature of a villain. Either they are running her to help elect Trump as a Controlled Opposition safety valve to make people feel like they still have a voice, or, even worse, they are running her to win…to force us to democratically ENDORSE such corruption. Either way, her public presence as one of “our leaders” is designed to humiliate us and wear us down. They want us to say “Yes, yes, of course she’s a criminal; yes, yes, of course she’s above the law; that’s just how it is; don’t rock the boat; she’s the best we can hope for; she’s what we deserve.”

    • artemisix says:

      I think you are correct. First came the black guy , now the woman president. What are the odds? Why now? Getting rid of net neutrality will be Her main job. Obama was to pass the TPP and keep the war and oil going. I hope i am wrong.

  3. RAW says:

    Brilliant breakdown of the facts… seeing through eyes clearly…

  4. Thomas Shaw Jr says:

    Jon, I think it went a little something like this:

    In order for what we see playing out to happen, Hillary Clinton has to have power over the FBI and in this case power equals information. I think she has the dirt on every elected representative both R & D. I think she has informed the FBI and in doing so the GOP that if she goes to trial, she will spill the information with her very first utterance.

    What information could make every Congressman and Senator, every elected official for the past 15 years, whether or not they are still in office, back off after Comey’s irrational conclusion? I think it is very much the following:

    “The United States Government in collusion with Israel and Saudi Arabia perpetrated the 9/11 attacks and the murder of United States citizens.”

    Hillary has essentially told them “If I go, I will take you all with me!” Only establishment insiders would have direct knowledge or be culpable. Thus, establishment politicos on both sides prefer she is not prosecuted. Thus we will see and hear only marginal, non-establishment figures comment on her and Comely in a vigorous, negative manner. Those that attack her the strongest and loudest, likely know the least.

    This is also why Trump poses a mild but real threat to both political parties. Of all the things he is, he is not an establishment insider. […] Almost everything we see going on now is a cover for or distraction from what the Republicans got away with in 2001. Pay back is a bitch and all roads lead to Rome.

    • artemisix says:

      I do not think Trump is a threat to the system that spawned him. He is meeting with the Koch brothers and Soros…. His daughter and Hillary’s are besties. No way he is a real threat. All his life he has said whatever he needed to to get what he wants. He is still. He is just part of the plan. real threats get zero airtime. That is how you know.

      • From Québec says:

        I really feel sorry for people like you, who don’t take the time to go and get some real good informations on the Net.

        Your coutry’s only hope is TRUMP. Trump versus The New World Order.

        I hope there is not too many people like you, because, if so, Hillary will win and she will destroy America and destroy the whole World.

        Please wake-up before it’s too late.

        I know you won”t bother watching this video…it has too much solid documentation that proves you wrong.

        Donald J. Trump: The Long Road to the White House (1980 – 2015)

        • artemisix says:

          Dear Quebec , have you never heard of controlled opposition? This is an old tactic, Malcolm X has a great quote about it, The fox and the wolf…….It seems clear to me this is what is happening from the getgo. Hitlary and Chump are friends from way, way back, you do know this?

          • arcadia11 says:

            an offering, for what it is worth –

            you cannot reason with a fanatic. in their world anything and everything is justifiable,
            as the end justifies the means. the end, in this case, is that the person they
            are backing is selected. i don’t think these people truly believe that their candidate is
            going to save the country, they are simply rabidly entranced by the personality of
            the candidate and it becomes a MUST-HAVE and anything that does not align with
            this idolization is regarded as oddly inferior.
            at which point, people have just given up true hope – abandoned reason and sanity to hero/
            personality-worship. they feel unable to ‘grow’ themselves so they put their energies
            into growing someone else. a fear-based reaction, so it is very understandable
            and pardonable.
            the craving is for larger-than-life comic book characters who reflect some trend in the
            prevailing culture that they find appealing. the candidates/president are merely
            reflections of the population majority at any given time. so in the corporation of
            america it should not be thought ironic that, in what may be the last ‘presidential
            election’, the ‘choices’ we are faced with are: violence and porn.

            the president is not elected by vote – it is selected by those behind the government.
            the president does not make decisions, even in its personal life. it carries out orders.
            the president agrees to further globalism/zionism.
            controlled opposition is the watchword.
            all presidential candidates know this.
            most people know this. but when they lose hope and reason even erstwhile educated
            persons fall prey to “we must must must see that this candidate is elected, even though
            we may not like him/her, otherwise the other person will be elected and we will be in terrible
            trouble.” it is always the same chant – that now inspires nausea. it seems that too few get to
            the next step of “i will not engage in the acceptance and furtherance of irreparable corruption
            through the deceptive ritual of voting”

            that’s it : – }

            • artemisix says:

              You do have the gift of insight, and i feel you are correct. Not really Happy about it, but , in the majority of the public, I too see that this is so. Still, the game is afoot, and i also feel an element of chaos entering the arena. There is still hope.

          • artemisix says:

            You do know , that 2 months BEFORE Trump announced his candidacy, Hillary had a meeting with the media, The heads of networks, Rachel Maddow and a hundred other news models. She took their money and asked them to promote Ted Cruise and Donald TRUMP, BY NAME. As indeed they have. The next day Bill Clinton called Trump and “encouraged ” him to run. Pity me all you want, I have delved far deeper into Trump and this whole situation than you. Clearly you just stopped with the propaganda and your own wishful thinking. . I WISH he could do something too, but he is in NO position to. His character is far too weak. He will do as he is told. Believe me, i hope i am wrong. Until the future comes we cannot know.

            • arcadia11 says:

              artemisix –
              lol – i’m not too crazy about it either,
              but i agree with you about hope. though i
              feel that we have much more than hope
              going for us. incalculably more. it seems
              the tide has turned. the world is being
              inundated non-stop with truth and new ideas
              of what can be.
              creating sparks in the universal mind.

              i don’t believe that mr trump was ever meant to
              actually ‘do something’ . he was meant as nothing
              more than junk food filler.


            • NellieAldrich Rockfell says:

              Who attended this media meeting besides MSNBC and Hillary, if the head of the DNC, and members of CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN were in attendance, and if this meeting is the one held at Podesta’s home, then it can be quickly discounted. Although what you state could be a possibility no matter a meeting or not, as most Presidential candidates look to be just puppets doing someone else’s bidding, including Hillary.

  5. AROL (@aliciaarol) says:

    Awesome article!!!

  6. Art Patriart says:

    I think Thomas Shaw nailed it. Also, she used a personal server to avoid a public record of all the dirty work and wars for Israel going on now. Libya was used as an arms depot for IS and others to overthrow Assad. Putin had other plans. […]

  7. NellieAldrich Rockfell says:

    Well now if Comey is not following the law as the FBI head, what’s all this say about Loretta? One things for sure, the next person who is prosecuted that has a Security clearance on Security issues can use this in a court of law to get off, and if he doesn’t get off because they have no intent to do harm right, then we know for sure that there is no Just Us. The present administration needs better fiction writers, there’s no doubt about that. BTW, intent was clear, evidently Hillary sent an email on her private server to Jacob Sullivan that said, “If they can’t, turn into paper w no identifying headline and send nonsecure.” There’s intent right there. Now they got the server problem fixed before they had to send it nonsecure, but she had the intent of sending classified unsecurely, did they overlook that one? I think it’s more likely there overlooking everything Hillary did that was in a negative light, not just intent, because in many cases like arms sales she actually pushed for it, Hillary took money from foreign governments to do their bidding and she accomplished the feat of selling arms to foreign governments, paid for a job well done, and this is Presidential material, the present administration is making the US of A the laughing stock of the entire World.

    • Eileen Kuch says:

      The truth is ,, and I just got this off Jeff Rense himself, that the 100+ emails Hillary Clinton sent via her insecure private server all contained classified materials, including those with above top secret Special Access Programs, and that hackers (one from Romania) did get into that server and read some of this. The Kremlin certainly has this material, and President Vladimir Putin has threatened to release them to the entire world.
      Despite what soon to be ex-FBI Director James Comey, AG Loretta Lynch, or Hillary Clinton herself have said, this exposure will have destroyed these three, along with Bill Clinton. And, in answer to those who said that Trump isn’t speaking out enough against this utter criminality, they’re dead wrong. Trump has already lambasted the Hildebeast in no uncertain terms for her utter corruption, criminality and perversion of the law. Jeff Rense, an expert in this matter, said outright that people who either vote for Hillary or not vote at all will be helping to elect her and destroy this nation.

  8. artemisix says:

    I am SO curious as to what Bill said to Loretta Lynch……Must have been something juicy. Threat, bribe, or both? This is Hitler level systemic corruption.

  9. I think these are interesting times, Jon, in as much as “some” are “beginning” to wake up. Therein lies the conflict, do we awaken “truthfully” or as ones that “vaguely accept” the status quo? The status quo is double standards; not just by “protecting” those in power but also in so much as what’s deemed historically “valid”.

    My latest Ozzie Thinker singles out “Jesus” as the metaphor, but Clinton would have done just as well:


    As you are aware I run another blog and a recent (off topic) post there focuses on human character. It becomes plainly obvious how Clinton “got away with it” upon serious evaluation of what makes “us” tick. The powers laugh at our mild protestations.



  10. visgoth says:

    I am shocked shocked that the FBI is this corrupt not I am not. It was corrupt from when it was the BI days at it’s inception. What a choice we have the lesser of two lesser.

  11. Defiant says:

    What scares me is that the Liberals will still vote for Hill Clinton. They don’t comprehend that EVERYTHING she’s done to the Right (which they openly revel in) she’s doing to THEM too! She doesn’t care what party they’re in! We are ALL fodder for her and her cartel to nosh on while they sell us out to our enemies!

    I can’t remember a time in my life when the government was so openly corrupt.

  12. jerseycynic says:

    c. 2009

    Secretary Clinton, it is a pleasure and it is an honor to welcome you here to the Council on Foreign Relations. Madam Secretary, I trust you will not take it the wrong way when I say, break a leg. (Laughter.)

    SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY CLINTON: Thank you very much, Richard, and I am delighted to be here in these new headquarters. I have been often to I guess the mother ship in New York City, but it’s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be doing and how we should think about the future.

    “It’s good to have an outpost of the Council right here down the street
    from the State Department. We get a lot of advice from the Council, so
    this will mean I won’t have as far to go to be told what we should be
    doing and how we should think about the future.”


  13. Mushtaq Dean says:

    Let us not distrust the decision of the FBI as the people here are not brain-dead so they won’t show discrimination between people of connection.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.