Collectivism and engineered perception

Collectivism and engineered perception

by Jon Rappoport

July 18, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

The primary feature of The Group is: its members look at events indirectly; they look at events in accordance with what they think other members are seeing; they don’t look at or judge an event through their own eyes or minds.

This method of seeing is, in fact, empty. It’s a fantasy. It’s like passing around an unknown object, from hand to hand, and describing it as you believe everyone else will describe it.

You are always listening for “an echo effect” before it happens.

And you claim the echo effect is what you perceive.

It’s a rank absurdity.

It creates a foundation of zeroes, in all areas of human life.

High-IQ idiots will tell you this is the only way society can operate. Why? Because they no longer know what a free and independent individual is. They no longer know what it means to see things as they actually see them. And when they vaguely sniff out a free individual, they recoil in horror.

In the early days of the American Republic, as the two-party system developed, certain men saw that it was moving toward collectivism.

In phase one, it was evolving into polarized opposition, with neither side actually expressing clear and direct perception. It was an engineered A versus B, with each side saying whatever it could, in order to win popular support.

And beyond that, it was a PRETENSE of polarized opposition. Behind the scenes, both parties, and the men who owned them, were simply building up the power of centralized government—and figuring out how to appeal to the population on the basis of “shared consensus” and “the greatest good for the greatest number.”

In other words: “how can we get the masses to think they’re all perceiving the same thing, the thing we want them to perceive?”

John Adams, in the early days of the Republic, saw it correctly and saw it exactly:

“There is nothing which I dread so much as a division of the republic into two great parties, each arranged under its leader, and concerting [organizing] measures in opposition to each other. This, in my humble opinion, is to be dreaded as the greatest political evil under our Constitution.”

Even more tellingly, George Washington laid the system bare as he struggled to extricate himself from it: “…party disputes are now carried to such a length, and truth is so enveloped in mist and false representation, that it is extremely difficult to know through which channel to seek it [truth]. This difficulty, to one [a person], who is of no party, and whose sole wish is to pursue with undeviating steps a path which would lead this country to respectability, wealth, and happiness, is exceedingly to be lamented.”

Thomas Jefferson, who on a number of occasions registered his acceptance of political parties as inevitable and natural, broke ranks in this very personal assessment: “I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men…where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction [to a party] is the last degradation of a free and moral agent. If I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go at all.”

Exit From the Matrix

One of the great tools of collectivism is political correctness.

—All political correctness is based on a crooked notion of greatest good, AKA least harm, to the greatest number of people. It isn’t based on direct perception at all.

It’s an effort to convince people to limit their own actions and words, based on what effect they might have on others. These “others” are never allowed to speak for themselves, before the politically correct rules are made.

These “others” are an invented fiction.

These others are nudged into being on the premise that they will be victims, who are disturbed by a potentially infinite number of actions and words.

These victims will perceive harm to themselves before it happens.

They will register a possible future “echo effect” now.

As lambs to the slaughter, they will provide a justification for collectivist thought and existence.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

6 comments on “Collectivism and engineered perception

  1. Arthur Lloyd says:

    Donald Trump is a FREE INDIVIDUAL. This country hasn’t experienced “ONE” as a leader in almost a century. This is why there is such controversy in him becoming President; The electorate do not know a FREE INDIVIDUAL when they see one..

  2. Great article, Jon.

    I personally argue the problems began with the constitution or [else] government couldn’t falter [in its duty to the sovereign whole – the people].

    “Part four” after should be released at the end of the week. Here’s excerpt (which is vaguely topical) giving you a plug:

    “Something really dramatic would be welcome because humans are hooked on drama. I know of individuals that have devoted their lives to reliving popular television soap operas in their minds, whilst generally behaving like couch potatoes with opinions in all other ways. International political stakeholders merely bring this addiction out in the open. Imagine how boring it would be without bombs and baddies. They, the buffoons, have managed the impossible and this doesn’t say a lot for populations at large. Television fantasy has been transmogrified into reality. I always try to give credit where credit’s due, but the couch potatoes deserve a big round of applause too. Regular visitors here will have noticed brief review of Sydney Lumet’s insightful movie, “Network” in “The Mindset of Psychosis” ( Without Jon Rappoport, I would not have heard of this movie. I recommend readers check out his excellent work for humanity (

    “Network” demonstrates that even back in the 1970’s people were beginning to cross over; the signs were there. TV had been popular for less than two decades and already audiences were considering defection. Now circumstances are much clearer. There are either prisoners of false reality or those that have broken free, minds intact. One of the very first questions I ask new acquaintances is, “Do you have a TV?” I am heartened by the surprisingly high numbers that have overcome their dependence on false paradigms engineered by hypocritical spinners of evil. Many of those I have interviewed either do not have television sets or avoid commercial programming like the plague.

    That’s a big feather in the cap for liberty, but there is still much work to be done. The bastards have us cornered with their responsible (sic) “information” streams on all sides. I have found most mighty thinkers have been brainwashed in some fashion. This is because information exchange is subject to peer review and that oversight has been contaminated by TV and numerous other mechanisms the Illuminati use to influence the way minds collaborate. Fortunately Jon Rappoport and a few other modern day sages not only recognise this, but also reveal the who’s, how’s and why’s in painstaking detail. The Memory Hole ( is an excellent resource for American current affairs and PPJ Gazette ( attracts some fine, genuine articles about matters of conscience.

    In tune Americans know their statue that once oversaw the Twin Towers mocks liberty. No wonder; it’s French. It is no coincidence. The Rothschild’s epicentre was in Paris and they benefited commercially from the end of slavery (sic), the gift was the least they could do. But France is in the news again only minutes after England (not Scotland) pulled out of the European Union. “Bombs and baddies” ISIS is allegedly behind the latest attack, but more on that shortly. The operation or psy-op (a trendy expression Israelites bandy around) has been used to punctuate terms for a new Marxist-fascist European Union (EU) to be: the phoenix that will rise stronger than ever from the ashes.

    Out-of-tune readers need to understand the only true democracies are constitutional monarchies (presided over by all-too-rare monarchs that are conscientious instruments of power and not slippery, divisive, arbitrating governments). Therefore, all republics, whether backed by constitutions or not, are undemocratic. The very reason republics came into being was to manage recalcitrant populations in the interests of commerce to squarely benefit land owners (a euphemism for corporate “slave masters”) to the detriment of the plebeians.

    Giving everyone identical portions of land would go some way to level the economics playing field, but, without privilege, strongest oppressors would become the new de facto controllers of the way things are until manipulating intelligence was able to establish social control measures. Therefore, the elites are behind the manufacture of classes systems geared to shutting out brains and brawn. Islamic fundamentalism is an aspect of that fantasy painted by the same basic brush. ISIS and other militias are props used to give make-believe the tingle of reality.

    Historically it needed (English) Oliver Cromwell’s Commonwealth failure and the hastily implemented Bill of Rights to ballast a workable republic concept rigged to reward advantage ( France funded American “independence” (another sorry act of buffoonery) and both became unconstitutional dictatorships in 1789. Though some herald America’s constitution as a work of art, it was created to produce what we see today and what will be in place tomorrow. Kangaroo courts presiding over rogue justice have always been the plan. Those that abolished constitutional monarchy needed to confuse the people into believing things were fair when they were anything but….”

  3. Wrusssr says:

    Breaking News : Tennessee Medical Office Stops Vaccines Because ‘They Cause Autism’

  4. Peter Grafström says:

    Collectivism is also that a large number of people, grassroots, who have small resources, join forces to have a chance to counter the effect of an extremely powerful and crooked oligarchy. Libertarians pretend not to see that aspect. They want to shrink the state, thus eliminating the possibility of a national bank independent of the oligarchy and capable of bolstering development for the benefit of the masses. In order to make full use of it there has to be strong government.
    Western Europe and Japan had something like that in mind in the 70s
    Charles de Gaulle, Giscard d’Estaing and Helmut Schmidt and earlier french and german planners wanted to develop the less developed parts of the world for peace and mutual gain. Bolstered by OPEC, the european currency EMS would then take over the role of the dollar and IMF system. The angloamerican oligarchy responded with the Iran revolution and used the deliberately caused hostage crisis as an excuse to deploy its military to the region openly threatening Europe and Japan to cutoff the oil supply.
    The angloamerican elites are antidevelopment and ordinary people need strong representation to counter that. There probably is no room for widespread enlightenment of the kind Jon discusses. I get what he wants to communicate but the majority will never be shepards. And if they would develop more of individualism it might not be the kind Jon likes so he would be prone to correct them using collectivism….

  5. binra says:

    Before you extrapolate to ‘group’ consider the ‘relationship’. As the concept of a relationship is NOT the relating or living communication being shared. So the concept of the group.
    The collective expression of infinite individuality is a synchronicity – and the conformity or fitting into ideas of ‘self’ as derived from the ‘couple’ or the group, or society. While ultimately this conformity is life-denying – for a relationship is only as alive as the life being brought to it – and if a conformity to a consensus reality denies such life – there is a hollow automaton in substitution for life – BUT the capacity to learn to balance within relationship is the creative expression of it.
    An unrelational ‘individuality’ may be psychopathic – if ‘otherness’ has never been recognized as a gift of self-knowledge and acceptance or love.

    Balancing the self, the other and Life is what Jesus points to in the two commandments ascribed to him but actually representing a core realisation. Life with an L being used for G-d because “God” has been so abused as a weapon and a masking of hidden and un-owned hate. Any form can be used to mask ‘hidden’ meanings.

    The core foundation that embodies Sanity is not manufactured by any act or thought or imagination – being Cause of the capacity to imagine, think and act. And so a false foundation is a false framing of true Cause – such as separation trauma with which we are all familiar – which is of course also the framework of ‘mind-control’ instead of mind-focusing freely.

    Taking some of a Good Idea and going forth in righteousness is the getting of an identity AGAINST evil – and this is a deceit by which to hide fear and hate and yet mask it in the distortions of relationship and communication that then ensue.

    You are your own Matrix!
    But in your participation within deceit your in effect playing a kind of Pokeman Go! until you tire of it – for it can Never Be completed. How can you know if your are aligning truly or against your unique signature vibration of being – (your individuality)? By honestly feeling for dissonance in body, emotion and mind and noting what such dissonance is symptomatic of. But you can only be and grow the current level of integrity you have available to where you are at – by living From and As it.

    The exclusive identification in an imagination seared or scorched into your unconscious and subconscious by overwhelming imbalance of terror and rage given Total Reality and therefore justification, is like a wound up spring that has set the complexity of the world of war… to operate a defence against knowing who you are.
    Your Creation cannot be ‘re-Given’ but you can release any other ‘gift’ you have given and so received so as to re-Member and be re-Minded. That Creation is Itself Creative is in the image of its Creator – for there is no limit of closed system upon the Infinite in Expression. Yet the idea of limits or closed off ‘mind’ is obviously a part of a much greater pallet through which to experience.

    While negatively defined – the self is always seeking NOT to have certain experiences – or seeking other experience as a sense of power and protection from the hated or unwanted experience. But it is not enough to declare ‘there is nothing wrong with me’ while a core sense of dissonance operates to displace it onto ‘Them’ or ‘others’ or ‘World’.

    Lack of self-acceptance cannot but manifest as self-sabotaging thought and deed, or leak out as hatred in a cold and loveless ‘analysis’ of others – no matter what appeals its makes to ‘reason’ or ‘love’.

    Whatever your particular imprinted conditionings – and however they arose or came to be – they are the path through which to be restored to a free willingness. Not as ‘something you have to do’ – because your past is re-enacting itself in your day anyway, so being in the desire and awareness for the joys you otherwise discard – along with the rationalisations or beliefs by which you trash yourself or stay small so as to stay hidden, is a shift of focus away from the maintaining of your narrative continuity within the ‘matrix’ of a world deduced from fear, hate, rage and powerlessness.

    There is no way to overcome the world – because it is not there to be overcome – unless you are creating that experience by buying into the belief. Ultimately the meanings you encounter are those that come forth from your own Word or definition – but one can only uncover what is ripe or ready to be uncovered and reintegrated.

    Seekers think to find or add unto themselves. It is the opposite. be found, and be true founded in the capacity to abide in the true of you – even though the mind a -tempts to take over as a power unto itself. Put it down, rejoin the dance and leave it behind.

    Of course this calls for the acceptance of true and the releasing of false. Where your heart is invested in the false, heartbreak is met. Rage is felt. But if you are free willing rather than will-denying – then this is where you allow the sting of hate to be given up as foundation for power that you do not want. That is why it is false. Because YOU do not want it and so it is not given power to run your life. Hence the uncovering to what Is your Life!

  6. binra says:

    No edit button here!

    “The collective expression of infinite individuality is a synchronicity – a̶n̶d̶̶ BUT the conformity or fitting into ideas of ‘self’ as derived from the ‘couple’ or the group, or society – is a construct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.