Reverse engineering Hillary’s crimes: media have it backwards

Reverse engineering Hillary’s crimes: media have it backwards

by Jon Rappoport

August 24, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

The Hillary email scandal and the Clinton Foundation scandal have been slithering, segment by segment, into public view.

And now we have “pay to play.”

The latest revelation, from the Associated Press:

“More than half the people outside the government who met with Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state gave money — either personally or through companies or groups — to the Clinton Foundation. It’s an extraordinary proportion…Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million [to the Foundation].”

The implication is clear. “You want a favor from the State Department? Pay the Clinton Foundation.”

The National Review gives us the tip of the iceberg:

“Crown Prince Salman of Bahrain wanted a sit-down with Secretary Clinton but was rebuffed; Clinton Foundation executive Douglas Band intervened through [Huma] Abedin to try to find a work-around for the crown prince, who gave donations to the Clinton Global Initiative totaling $32 million through 2010. Donations to the Clinton Foundation came in from the kingdom itself and from the state oil company. Band also intervened to secure a visa for a foreign athlete held up because of his criminal record, doing so at the behest of donor Casey Wasserman, a Hollywood sports-entertainment mogul, whose foundation has contributed between $5 million and $10 million to the Clinton Foundation…”

But let’s put all this in the right perspective. Let’s reverse engineer this. The media has it backwards.

Heading up the State Department didn’t incidentally afford Hillary the opportunity to funnel cash into the Clinton Foundation, in return for granting favors to donors. No.

Head of the State Department was her side job. She was really an officer of the Foundation. And as such, she picked out a plum position that would allow her to expand the Foundation’s coffers: she became Secretary of State.

It would be like the son of a mafia crime boss landing a slot as a judge, so he could rule in favor of his father’s mob associates in court. The judgeship was just an angle, a way of serving the family. The family comes first.

Yes, as Secretary of State Hillary could remain in the public eye—an essential factor for her later run for President. And she could also exercise her passion for making war and wreaking havoc: Libya is a prime illustration. But behind it all, she has been Hillary Clinton of the Clinton Foundation.

Right now, as the latest chapter in the Clinton Foundation scandal is exploding, Bill, her husband, is promising to tighten Foundation rules for accepting donations. He’s presenting a typical mafia ploy: “The Family is getting out of the rackets. We’re going completely legit.”

Sure they are. Bill and Hillary have an itch that can never be scratched. They have to run a racket. They have to pile up money through cons and schemes and payoffs. That will never change.

Hillary convincing Obama to give her the Secretary of State job was a champagne moment for the Clintons. The husband and wife team were in clover. The State Department would become their satellite office for the Foundation, and as such, it would go global and suck in gobs of cash from California to Saudi Arabia.

Annual huddle of the Foundation: “Well, folks, our marketing arm, also known as the State Department, has exceeded all expectations. Everything we’ve been working for, all these years, is coming to fruition. It’s called free money, and we’ve got it.”

What Hillary has done is typical for any clandestine agent: she went undercover; her cover story was, she was Secretary of State; in that role, she achieved hidden ulterior objectives.

Mission accomplished.

Except, as usual, she and her husband did sloppy work. They failed to conceal their operation properly. They wandered off the reservation.

The Matrix Revealed

What’s next? Well, how about the Clinton Global Initiative? What might be discovered during a deep probe of that charity? Now we’re talking about real money: over 2000 projects and 69 billion dollars raised (Reuters, 9/22/11). Who diverted and kept how much of that gargantuan sum? Who used money from that vault to extract favors?

Doug Band, the long-time Clinton associate who pulled off this fund-raising feat, was also, according to reports, the man who convinced Obama to give Hillary the job of Secretary of State. If true, one wonders if Band made the President an offer that was hard to refuse: a financial boon after the Oval Office faded in the rear-view mirror.

Every President needs a nest egg, something to fall back on after rendering public service to the nation.

Why shouldn’t the Clintons throw a few large bags of cash out of a plane winging over Hawaii, as the Chosen One and his family arrive to build their new home on a hill?

It’s only fair.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

23 comments on “Reverse engineering Hillary’s crimes: media have it backwards

  1. Mark says:

    I think you are right on Jon. I look forward to your ongoing articles on the Clinton Crime Syndicate.

  2. mrcamillon says:

    Anyone who can vote for Hillary Clinton to be president of America. These would be ignorant as in low information voter. Or they hate America just like Hillary Clinton does.

    • Tanya Dobbs says:

      Personally, I don’t want to vote for Hillary Clinton but I am not ignorant so you shouldn’t make off the cuff statements like you did. Also, I do not hate America. Your comment makes you sound ignorant. I’m pretty well versed on what’s going on in politics but unfortunately, the choices are repulsive. The problem I have isn’t even Trump as much as it is his running mate, Mike Pence. Only 17% of Republicans support social security and privatization will be back as an issue.Trumps policy advisor, Sam Clovis has stated that cuts are on the table.Pence is also a champion tax cutter and we all know what happens when you do that…your state goes down the tubes. Just check out Indiana, Kansas, New Jersey, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania…all facing massive budget deficits. In fact, if Pence weren’t running for VP, he surely would lose his second term run for governor of Indiana because voters are fed up with tax cuts especially when they don’t work. So Trump isn’t presidential material and Pence is the guy the R’s want and I wouldn’t be surprised if he ended up as the President. Maybe that’s ok with you but I’ll have to suck it up and vote for Hillary. I’m not fooled for a minute that I really have a choice and you shouldn’t pretend you do either.

      • Jacqueline says:

        There are other choices besides the two, so you don’t ‘have to’ vote for the Criminal who likewise isn’t ‘presidential material.’

      • From Québec says:

        Never read such an ignorant comment as yours, Tanya.

        For once in your life time you have a chance to take your country back… and you spit on it. So go ahead and vote Hillary and watch your country die of a painful death.

        I don’t even know why I reply to your post, since I know in advance that it it is a waist of time.

      • arcadia11 says:

        “i’m not fooled for a minute that I really have a choice and you shouldn’t pretend you do either”.


        then why not make a more empowering and moral move of simply walking away from the whole farce? why would you vote? you know you are supporting evil but you are doing it anyway. as long as we support it, fund it, accept it we will have it. and have no right to complain about it.

        • From Québec says:

          Sure you have a choice Arcadia.

          You vote independant, or for Hillary or you don’t vote at all, you can rest assure that you wont have a country soon, you will be invaded with islamists and the New Worls Order..

          You vote Trump, you have a chance to take back your country.

          What is it that you don’t understand ?

        • Ben says:

          Exactly. No point to support evil any longer by consenting via “going along with the status quo.”

        • Tanya Dobbs says:

          Good point I’ll consider.

      • Scott Rasener says:

        I’m from Indiana and I can tell you that Indiana state problem was not tax cuts, it was NAFTA instituted by Bill Clinton and Democrats. It totally wasted the factories and manufacturing base. In the town I’m from (Bloomington) we had RCA, Westinghouse, General Electric, Otis Elevator, and many other high paying companies pack up and move to Mexico just because of that one act by Clinton. Putting another one in the WH that would surly pass the TPP among other evil would be horrible. It CANNOT Happen! We will NOT survive another Clinton WH.

      • Scott Rasener says:

        You don’t know what you’re talking about Tanya, learn some Clinton history. Here’s some for you! I’m from Indiana and I can tell you that Indiana state problem was not tax cuts, it was NAFTA instituted by Bill Clinton and Democrats. It totally wasted the factories and manufacturing base. In the town I’m from (Bloomington) we had RCA, Westinghouse, General Electric, Otis Elevator, and many other high paying companies pack up and move to Mexico just because of that one act by Clinton. Putting another one in the WH that would surly pass the TPP among other evil would be horrible. It CANNOT Happen! We will NOT survive another Clinton WH.

  3. flyingcuttlefish says:

    Bonnie meet Clyde…

  4. Michael T Badeau says:

    Excellent post Jon and I think you hit the nail on the head! With the Illuminati now in charge of the UN and anouncing a net worth of over 800 trillion in gold these cabal working directly under Soros and others are becoming fearless under their false god Lucifer!

    So 2 plus trillion missing the day before 9-11 goes unchecked and now another 8 trillion is missing? Pretty easy to see that this is a pack of dogs commanded by the corrupt Elite 1% or Rothschild’s and company to be more specific! Thanks Jon as usual you are awake and right on…..mike

  5. Very good Jon, but she has done so much more “inadvertent” stuff.

    Do you know of the ancient Jewish prophecy which insists that Gog and Magog must be conquered by “the Messiah” to usher in a new age of universal peace (globalism under the NATO/UN/Pentagon alliance)) or “New World Order”?

    The modern names of those antique country states is Libya and Iran. Irony?


  6. Travis says:

    What happened to Vince Foster?

  7. NellieAldrich Rockfell says:

    Great article, but does anybody have a link showing Hillary was an officer with the Clinton Foundation while Secretary of State, I see nothing on it? I do see where Bill and his daughter were on the Clinton Foundation during Hillary’s time as Secretary of State, but nothing on Hillary.

  8. jmilamdeal says:

    Reblogged this on jmilamdeal and commented:
    The Clinton Crime Family exposed for pay for play. The office of Secretary of State was just a way to funnel cash into the Clinton Crime Family

  9. From Québec says:

    Dedicated to Tanya and arcadia:

    ‘Mr. Brexit’ Nigel Farage Speaks at Donald Trump Rally in Jackson, MS

    Very powerful speech!

    • Tanya Dobbs says:

      A retired City trader and a Manhattan plutocrat, Nigel and Donald are products of the very establishment they condemn. The revolution is led by capitalists. Ha!

      • From Québec says:

        So what would you like Tanya? A Socialist, communist or globalist idiot?

        Capitalism is the only way to go if you consider yourself an individual.

  10. From Québec says:

    Jon Rappoport on the Alex Jones Show yesterday.

    Start listening at: 1:00:34
    Alex talks a bit before of what he wants to share with Jon.

    Alex Jones Show : Commercial Free – Thursday (8-25-16) Jon Rappoport

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.