Clinton Foundation key to giving Putin 20% of US uranium

Clinton Foundation key to giving Putin 20% of US uranium

by Jon Rappoport

August 29, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

She could be the next US President.

He already was the President.

They’re married.

Cue the dawn sunrise and violins for the beautiful first couple of American politics.

But what about the uranium scandal?

The what?

Before I quote a NY Times piece on this, consider—-suppose, just suppose the beautiful first couple, Bill and Hillary, have been running a parallel operation to the government, in the form of a Foundation that is taking in major chunks of cash from people who want (and get) serious political favors.

Well, current news stories confirm that. We already know that.

But uranium?

Consider this plot line. Follow the bouncing ball.

Putin wants 20% of uranium on US soil. That 20% is owned by a Canadian mining company.

The Canadian executives want to sell it to Putin.

But because uranium is a US “national security” product, various US federal agencies have to OK the deal. One of those agencies is the US State Department.

The State Department is headed up by Hillary Clinton. Her Department says yes to the uranium deal.

The kicker? Those Canadian mining executives, who wanted the sale to Putin to go through, donated millions to the Clinton Foundation.

Getting the picture?

Memory is short. On April 23, 2015, the NY Times ran a story under the headline: Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal.

The bare bones of the story: a Canadian company called Uranium One controlled a great deal of uranium production in the US. It was sold to Russia (meaning Putin and his minions). So Putin now controls 20% of US uranium production.

From the Times: “…the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.”

From the Times: “The [Pravda] article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company [Uranium One] with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

“But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

“At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

“Frank Giustra…a mining financier, has donated $31.3 million to the foundation run by former President Bill Clinton…”

“Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal [to sell Uranium One to Putin] had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

“As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

“And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”

If you’re Putin and you’re sitting in Moscow, and the uranium deal has just dropped this bonanza into your lap, what’s your reaction—after you stop laughing and popping champagne corks? Or maybe you never really stop laughing. Maybe this is a joke that keeps on giving. You wake up in the middle of the night with a big grin plastered on your face, and you can’t figure out why…and then you remember, oh yeah, the uranium deal. The US uranium. Who’s running the show in America? Ha-ha-ha. Some egregious dolt? Maybe he’s a sleeper agent we forgot about and he reactivated himself. And this Clinton Foundation—how can the beautiful couple get away with that? And she’s going to be the next President? Can we give her a medal? Can we put up a statue of her in a park? Does Bill need any more hookers?

You shake your head and go back to sleep. You see a parade of little boats carrying uranium from the US to Russia. A pretty line of putt-putt boats. You chuckle. Row, row, row your boat…merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily…life is but a dream.

Good times.

The Matrix Revealed

Final note: there is a great deal of difference between a major outlet like the NY Times running their Clinton/uranium piece for one day—and pounding on it for weeks and months. In the latter case, they would let loose the hounds, who would probe and push and interview relevant people and get confessions and parlay those confessions up the food chain—blowing the story into an enormous scandal—which it is.

The Times had its hands on a volcanic piece…and they let it drop. Because the ceiling and the limit had been reached. The Times basically executed what’s called a limited hangout, a partial exposure of a story that was getting too hot to suppress entirely.

The limited hangout allows the venting of steam—and then nothing more. In this case, the Clinton camp denies there was any quid pro quo, they assert Hillary had nothing to do with the uranium deal, and the curtain falls.

Thus you have the reality which the major media did expose, vs. the reality they could have exposed. The “could have” part would have changed current history—but it was squelched, and put under wraps.

Tossed on the junk heap.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

23 comments on “Clinton Foundation key to giving Putin 20% of US uranium

  1. Bruce says:

    …and this informative post brings to mind a 1999 tome by Bill Gertz of the Washington Times entitled: BETRAYAL: How the Clinton Administration Undermined American Security. Mr. Gertz has written at least two books making mention of how Clinton/Gore declassified military and nuclear technology thereby enabling sales of strategic information to China. China’s remarkable technological revolution and progress is not the oft touted benefit of totalitarian collectivismt genius, nor even the result of high tech theft. Clinton, Gore and others sold the technology to them. There was no reason at all for China to steal anything.

  2. n3angus says:

    Why does Hillary want to increase refugees 500 % when this is whats happening in Countries that have these refugees ???? Does Hillary want this to happen to your Daughters ????

  3. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    Thank you, thank you, thank you, Jon, for exposing this important piece of a puzzle that will eventually reveal why humanity has been deprived of the benefits from Einstein’s 1905 discovery that mass (m) is stored energy (E): E = mc^2

    The source of energy in uranium is NEUTRON REPULSION in the nuclear core, the same source of energy that powers the cosmos and the Sun from nuclear cores of ordinary stars and galaxies.

    • Oliver K. Manuel says:

      For this, Bill and Hillary could be prosecuted as traitors, although I would prefer to see them and Putin admit their past errors to the world and use their vast talents for the benefit, rather than the demise, of society.

  4. Gimmesometruth says:

    All of the ‘programmed media’ outlets have been given their scripts out of the Master Playbook. Is it a coincidence that the majority shareholder of the NYT Corp. is one Señor Carlos Slim? Further, all of the tech companies have been given instructions to interfere with any, and all, alternate media traffic coming from the Trump side or hackers exposing this conspiracy. The Matrix is truly rigged.

  5. Andreas Antero Ahrens says:

    INDUSTRIAL MILITARY COMPLEX…just google it. 🙂 explains many things

  6. voza0db says:

    The funny part of today’s societies is that no matter the yottabytes of information the herds can access or receive they are conditioned to follow the commands of the herders.

    The majority will continue to vote on Killary, and the rest on Trump… And the OWNERS will continue to reign… Because they are good at this!

    Owners: Morgan, Sachs, Moses Seifs, Rothschild, Rockefeller, Loebs, Warburg (engineered the F.R.S.!) and the Lazards.

  7. Messenger At The Crossroads says:

    And might this – uranium and resource rich property – be why rancher LaVoy Finicum was assassinated? Might it be that this is the reason the Bundy, Hammond, and other ranches in the great southwest USA are threatened with a grab from the Bureau of Land Management in the Southwest? All the while – since January – the ranchers themselves and several reporters are unlawfully jailed on trumped up charges, some in solitary confinement, leaving their wives and kids to run their ranches and fend off the government land grabbers, as well as pursue litigation? Just asking…

  8. JoAnn Dolberg says:

    Yes, absolutely yes! I believe that was definitely the reason the feds moved in; very little was written about the uranium deal at the time, but there were sketchy bits of info right around the time of LaVoy Finicum’s murder by the U.S. government.

  9. Tina says:

    Why would the Canadians & the Americans sell off all of this uranium to the Russians? Are they really that stupid or is there a bigger picture here? Are they stockpiling more uranium than they are selling? Are the Russians so stupid as to think the US and Canada would sell the Russians all that uranium without having a plan b? God these Clintons and their cronies are so disgusting. How much protection do these people really have to scrape the bottom of the barrel like this? I don’t think there is anything they wouldn’t do. Then Hilary gets up and condemns the Alt Right and demonises Putin in a speech about the deep dark dangerous alt right. Well you better believe it Mrs Clinton! I hope I am alive to see the day when these people pay.

  10. From Québec says:

    With all her corruption and crimes, you wonder who will vote for her.

    Well, here are some of the people who will vote for Hillary:

    Stupid Americans Don’t Know Vice President’s Name After Eight Years In Office!

    • burrado says:

      With respect, From Quebec: Red herring. The “stupid” Americans don’t have time to think as they bounce back and forth between their unfulfilling day jobs and their unwinding at home with [choose entertainment], just like the “stupid” Canadians, and “stupid” Quebecers. Red herring. The real problem is the “stupid” rich, like this amoral moron Giustra. I still can’t figure out why these assholes think their “philanthropy” will somehow erase the damage they do in their regular line of work. And he genuinely believes he’s the good guy! Amazing. So if you’re throwing out terms like stupid, I think it’s better to aim them at pricks like Gates and Soros and Giustra. The former class of people have some sort of excuse for being “stupid”. These assholes have NONE. The world would be far better off if these pricks would just do their damage and then FUCK OFF. There seems to be some kind of line these rich cross that inures them to normal moral and rational thought. And he supposedly came from the bottom, the son of a nickel miner. Hmmm…

      • arcadia11 says:

        happy you jumped to the defense of oppressed, suffering fellow humans.

        i would like to add something to your list if i may: when i read ‘stupid americans don’t know vp’s name…’ i realized i could not think of the vp’s name. lol. this has happened many times. i have moved so far away from the rituals and corruption of this group of sociopaths that i find i have replaced them with new memories – that i like much better : – }

        i thought it was a good thing…??

        • burrado says:

          I’m not trying to be too harsh on From Quebec, but I know where he’s coming from. It’s very fashionable to pile on “stupid” Americans here in Canada. But I think it’s 100% misguided and wrong. Stupidity is 100% cross cultural. And then as you pointed out, it’s not even stupidity on their part, but a kind of coping strategy to keep going with life – to keep from totally checking out. Personally, I like the idea of checking out. The money fuckers have screwed up almost everything of value. See Miles Mathis for more on that.

          • arcadia11 says:

            it is especially difficult for people with children – my heart goes out to the parents who have to confront – or deny – the possibilities that could befall them and their children. i am glad mine are grown. and observant.

            checking out is definitely an option. my body, my life, my decision. i don’t have a problem at all with that. but i am holding out, optimistically, for enough of a change to convince that it might be worth sticking around a bit longer. things are moving so fast….

            • burrado says:

              I have to give credit to Jon not only for writing the truth so beautifully and definitively, but also for forcing me to think about my own writing and use of words – which more often than not makes me reach for a thesaurus looking for the right word. This is one of the times I did not and now wish I had, because I should have known “check out” would be read in the suicidal sense by most readers. But that is not the sense I had in mind. I was thinking more along the lines of “bail out”, or “quit”, “walk away”, or “go west”. That last one seems particularly apropos. But apparently, the west is gone. Jon is already there and can probably attest to that.

            • arcadia11 says:

              whoops – my mistake. glad you’re staying : – }

              if you are talking about as far west as california, you’re right. it’s gone. almost.

              i live in california and i truly love it here except for the socialist globalist u.n. charter agenda21/2030 dictatorship, the geo-engineered weather and moonbeam brown (nose) at the helm of the stateship.

              i am contemplating options.

      • From Québec says:

        I just want to tell you, that I didn’t called them stupids. The title of the video did called them stupid, not me.

        As for the stupid rich.that you have mentionned, I would say that If they are rich, it’s obvious that they are not stupid, But surely they are corrupted and evil.

        • burrado says:

          I appreciate your comments From Quebec. And I hope you don’t think I’m trying to be hard on you, just defending an opinion. You have to admit our Canadian cultural fondness for ridiculing our American cousins. But I still think it’s unfortunate and totally wrong. Fortunately most Americans couldn’t care less about what we think.

  11. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    Social insanity has been the unexpected cost of isolating humanity from reality: […]

    Truth is indelibly recorded in exact rest masses of the ~3,000 types of atoms that comprise all matter.

  12. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    Some of the most talented world leaders have been extremely corrupt – Stalin, etc., etc., etc.

    Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely, almost anybody!

  13. Terri says:

    Here is an update of this debacle that involves the Bundy’s and Hammonds. They were right to defend their inherent right to property from the government’s attempt to steal it. They were seeking to educate the people about what was going on. The governments desire to silence them fast makes more sense. Black lives thugs are running around loose with the support of the liberal fascist idiots and these noble men are sitting in prison tortured with solitary confinment and a couple of them, such as La Voy Finicum have been murdered. Absolutely disgraceful!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.