Hillary Clinton and Official Science: meet Ms. Matrix

Hillary Clinton and Official Science: meet Ms. Matrix

by Jon Rappoport

October 10, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Note: This piece is not about Hillary’s performance at the debate last night, which was, to put it mildly, an empty suit on parade. An endless string of clichés and vague generalities. This is about a cardinal covert threat she poses as a potential leader.

“Government science exists because it is a fine weapon to use, in order to force an agenda of control over the population. We aren’t talking about knowledge here. Knowledge is irrelevant. What counts is: ‘How can we fabricate something that looks like the truth?’ I keep pointing this out: we’re dealing with reality builders. In this case, they make their roads and fences and buildings out of data, and they massage and invent the data out of thin air to suit their purposes. After all, they also invent money out of thin air.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Hillary Clinton made a failed attempt, in 1993, to put together a national health insurance plan. It would have codified the diagnosis and treatment of virtually all medical conditions. It would have created a monopoly on medical “truth.”

Clinton, like all champions of centralized power, recognizes that government control of science is essential. This control involves partnerships with mega-corporations like Monsanto. Clinton’s former Rose law firm has indeed represented Monsanto.

To say Clinton is in bed with Big Pharma would be a vast understatement. Wherever official science translates into control and profits, she is there.

You have concerns about the safety of vaccines? Clinton wouldn’t budge an inch to consider your concerns. She looks at you as part of the “bucket of losers” she refers to in describing Bernie Sander’s supporters—whether or not you’re actually in that camp.

In a sense, she is a useful idiot for elites who shape science of all kinds as a weapon against the populace.

As you read the following backgrounder, keep in mind that wherever official science lives, Hillary is a champion—unthinking, remorseless, dismissive of populist concerns, and clueless about actual truth—


Since 1987, one of my goals as a reporter has been to educate the public about false science.

Between then and now, I have found that, with remarkably few exceptions, mainstream reporters are studiously indifferent to false science.

They shy away from it. They pretend “it couldn’t be.” They refuse to consider facts. They and their editors parrot “the experts.”

Official science has a stranglehold on major media. It has the force of a State religion. When you stop and think about it, official science is, in a significant sense, a holy church. Therefore, it is no surprise that the church’s spokespeople would wield power over major information outlets.

These prelates invent, guard, and dispense “what is known.” That was precisely the role of the Roman Church in times past. And those professionals within the modern Church of Science are severely punished when they leave the fold and accuse their former masters of lies and crimes. They are blackballed, discredited, and stripped of their licenses. At the very least.

Totalitarian science lets you know you’re living in a totalitarian society.

The government, the press, the mega-corporations, the prestigious foundations, the academic institutions, the “humanitarian” organizations say:

“This is the disease. This is its name. This is what causes it. This is the drug that treats it. This is the vaccine that prevents it.”

“This is how accurate diagnosis is done. These are the tests. These are the possible results and what they mean.”

“Here are the genes. This is what they do. This is how they can be changed and substituted and manipulated. These are the outcomes.”

“These are the data and the statistics. They are correct. There can be no argument about them.”

“This is life. These are the components of life. All change and improvement result from our management of the components.”

“This is the path. It is governed by truth which our science reveals. Walk the path. We will inform you when you stray. We will report new improvements.”

“This is the end. You can go no farther. You must give up the ghost. We will remember you.”

We are now witnessing the acceleration of Official Science. Of course, that term is an internal contradiction. But the State shrugs and moves forward.

The notion that the State can put its seal on favored science, enforce it, and punish its competitors, is anathema to a free society.

For example: declaring that psychiatrists can appear in court as expert witnesses, when none of the 300 so-called mental disorders listed in the psychiatric literature are diagnosed by laboratory tests.

For example: stating that vaccination is mandatory, in order to protect the vaccinated (who are supposed to be immune) from the unvaccinated. An absurdity on its face.

For example: announcing that the science of climate change is “settled,” when there are, in fact, huge numbers of researchers who disagree. —And then, drafting legislation and issuing executive orders based on the decidedly unsettled science.

For example: officially approving the release and sale of medical drugs (“safe and effective”) which go on to kill, at a conservative estimate, 100,000 Americans every year. And then refusing to investigate or punish the agents of these drug approvals (the FDA).

For example: permitting the widespread use of genetically modified food crops, based on no studies of their impact on human health. And then, arbitrarily announcing that the herbicide, Roundup, for which many of these crops are specifically designed, is non-toxic.

For example: declaring and promoting the existence of various epidemics, when the viruses purportedly causing them are not proven to exist or not proven to cause human illness (Zika, Ebola, SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, etc.)

A few of you reading this have been with me since 1988, when I published my first book, AIDS INC., Scandal of the Century. Among other conclusions, I pointed out that HIV had never been shown to cause human illness; the front-line drug given to AIDS patients, AZT, was overwhelmingly toxic; and what was being called AIDS was actually a diverse number immune-suppressing conditions.

Others of you have found my work more recently. I always return to the subject of false science, because it is the most powerful long-term instrument for repression, political control, and destruction of human life.

As I’ve stated on many occasions, medical science is ideal for mounting and launching covert ops aimed at populations—because it appears to be politically neutral, without any allegiance to State interests.

Unfortunately, medical science, on many fronts, has been hijacked and taken over. The profit motive is one objective, but beyond that, there is a more embracing goal:

Totalitarian control.

On the issue of vaccines, I’ve written much about their dangers and ineffectiveness. But also consider this: the push for mandatory vaccination goes a long way toward creating a herd effect—which is really a social construction.

In other words, parents are propagandized to think of themselves as a kind of synthetic artificial “community.”

“Here we are. We are the fathers and mothers. We must all protect our children against the outliers, the rebels, the defectors, the crazy ones who refuse to vaccinate their own children. We are all in this together. They are the threat. The enemy. We are good. We know the truth. They are evil.”

This “community of the willing” are dedicated to what the government tells them. They are crusaders imbued with group-think. They run around promoting “safety and protection.” This group consciousness is entirely an artifact, propelled by official science.

The crusaders are, in effect, agents of the State.

They are created by the State.


They live in an absurd Twilight Zone where fear of germs (the tiny invisible terrorists) demands coercive action against the individuals who see through the whole illusion.

This is what official science can achieve. This is how it can enlist obedient foot soldiers and spies who don’t have the faintest idea about how they’re being used.

This is a variant on Orwell’s 1984. The citizens are owned by the all-embracing State, but they aren’t even aware of it.

That’s quite a trick.

One of my favorite examples of double-think or reverse-think is the antibody test. It is given to diagnosis diseases. Antibodies are immune-system scouts sent out to identify germ-intruders, which can then be wiped out by other immune-system troops.

Prior to 1985, the prevailing view of a positive test was: the patient is doing well; his body detected the germ and dispensed with it. After 1985, the view was suddenly: this is bad news; the patient is sick or he is on the verge of getting sick; he has the germ in his body; it does harm.

Within the medical community, no one (with very few exceptions) raised hell over this massive switch. It was accepted. It was actually good for business. Now, many more people could be labeled “needs treatment,” whereas before, they would have been labeled “healthy.”

While I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., in 1987-8, I wrote the FDA asking about a possible AIDS vaccine. I was told the following: every person given such a vaccine would, of course, produce antibodies against HIV. That is the whole purpose of a vaccine: to produce antibodies.

However, I was informed, patients receiving this vaccine would be given a letter to carry with them, in case they were ever tested for HIV [antibodies] and came up positive. The letter would explain that the antibodies causing the positive test were the result of the vaccine, not the result of “natural” action inside the patient’s body.

In other words, the very same antibodies were either protective against AIDS (good) or indicative of deadly disease (bad).

This was the contradictory and ridiculous and extraordinary pronouncement of official science.

It carries over into every disease for which an antibody test is administered. If a vaccine against disease X is given, it delivers immunity, because it produces antibodies. But if a diagnostic test for disease X reveals the presence of the same antibodies, naturally produced in the body, this is taken as a sign of illness.

Extrapolated to a more general level, the Word is: synthetic medical treatment is good; the action of the body to heal itself is incompetent.

This is a type of superstition that would astonish even the most “primitive” societies.

It no longer astonishes me. I see it everywhere in official science.

From the medical establishment’s point of view, being alive is a medical condition.

The most useful politicians—as far as official science is concerned—are those who automatically promote its findings. Such politicians are lifted into prominence. They are champions of the Science Matrix. They never ask questions. They never doubt. They never make waves. They blithely travel their merry way into new positions of power, knowing they have enormous elite support behind them. When they need to lie, they lie. They are taught that those who question or reject official science are a tiny ‘demographic’ who can be ignored during election campaigns. ‘Don’t worry about them. They don’t count.’ These politicians are never in the trenches with the people on issues of health. Petitioning or pleading is futile.

—end of backgrounder—

The Matrix Revealed

Hillary Clinton is a perfect example of the political juggernaut in action, vis-à-vis official science. If she had the intelligence to examine this science below the surface, why would she spend a second doing so? What advantage would it give her? Doubt is not on her radar.

She is Ms. Matrix. Like other politicians of her ilk, she is eager to represent, and front for, official science, because she thirsts for power, and little else matters. She is all forward motion in her quest for a crown.

Her advisors tell her, and major media tell her, and pollsters tell her, and colleagues tell her, and friends tell her that there are only a handful of issues she must address, in order to win the prize.

Why would she possibly think she needs to stop and look into how “science” is being shaped and invented to control populations? After all, that is her goal, too. Control.

In the Matrix, the plan is universal collectivism, in which all citizens are atoms of a giant molecule. Many lies need to be told in order to make that dream/nightmare come true. If some of those lies are about science, so much the better. People believe in science.

A politician like Hillary Clinton considers lies from only one angle: “Is the lie working, and can it help me?”

That is how any agent operates.

I’ll leave you with this quote from an introduction I wrote to my collection, The Matrix Revealed:

“Think about the agendas behind universal vaccination, climate change, universal psychiatric treatment, GMO food, and other ‘science-based’ frauds. They all imply a false collectivist model, in which individuals give up their power in exchange for ‘doing good’ and becoming members of the largest group in the world: ‘disabled’ people with needs that must be addressed and satisfied. Instead of supporting the liberation of the individual, the controllers want to squash it. Why? Because they fear individual power. It is forever the unpredictable wild card. They want a society in which every thought an individual thinks connects him to a greater whole—and if that sounds attractive, understand that this Whole is a fiction, intentionally faked to resemble a genuine oceanic feeling. The elite Whole is ultimately a trance-like fiction that will slow down time to a crawl, and shrink space to a sliver, and focus attention on a single mandate: wait for the next instruction from above, content in the knowledge that it will benefit all of humanity.”

This program has many agents.

Some of them are famous politicians.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

17 comments on “Hillary Clinton and Official Science: meet Ms. Matrix

  1. Toni Volk says:

    I don’t get why you don’t put a Facebook and Twitter button on your posts. I always like your reports but it’s a big hassle to spread the news without some help from you. And I rarely have time to go to your website just to share your messages. Toni Volk

  2. Oliver Manuel says:

    Thank you, Jon. You are right. Life is a cosmic process powered by energy (E) that Einstein (1905) discovered, Aston (1922) measured, then Weizsacker (1935), Bethe and Backer (1936) hid from the public: http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2332-2519.1000113

  3. Greg C. says:

    “Settled Science” is the telling phrase that admits that power politics shapes our understanding of truth. Settled? Like there was an election, and the theory in question won? No, even that would be too above-board. Settled, as in – you’d better go along with this, or your career will be settled. Settled, as in – it’s too late to question it, we’ve already poured the factual concrete, you’ll just have to live with it. Goes hand in glove with progressivism – never look back, never question how you got here, and never, ever, retrace your steps and take a different path. Just keep going. One day we will look back and laugh at how ridiculous this age was.

  4. I wonder if you’ve ever seen the film “The Spartan” starring Val Kilmer?

    In it there’s a great scene where Kilmer, who still thinks he works for a rational organisation that makes decisions based on intelligence (i.e. the government), is asking a Secret Service agent about what he’s just been told is a cover story:

    “But how do they fake the DNA?”

    “They don’t fake the DNA; the issue a press release!”

    It’s a great story about one man’s awakening to the prison he’s been raised in – a prison, for your mind.

    Free Your Mind.

  5. mrcamillon says:

    George Carlin said it best. In America we have owners. They own everything. These people have billions of dollars. How much money is enough money.

    • Sam Fox says:

      George also talked about “…a big club; AND YOU”RE NOT IN IT!!” Video of the whole thing is at YouTube.

      Good thought Thanks.


  6. voza0db says:

    Hello 😉

    “I wrote the FDA asking about a possible AIDS vaccine.”

    “HIV causes AIDS” DOGMA in now (again) at full speed “chemotherapy is the CURE” mode!

    Some British “scientists” are spreading the word of a “possible CURE”… Like priests, that they are, the CURE arrives by a VACCINE (of course) and a chemotherapy drug by the name VORINOSTAT!

    I guess they are not mixing AZT with VORINOSTAT! It would be a nice CURE COCKTAIL!

    We must wait to see what is going to be the excuse given for the fact that although “cured” the cured must remain on HAART, or at least LAART (low blablabla!)

    Because in the end PROFIT is the GAME, and a CURED HERD is NOT PROFITABLE!


    Be 😎

  7. Excellent post, Jon.

    However, some words of caution. Creeping into international politics is the alarming ever increasing deficit between “what they do” and “what they say”. If it is in the “solutions arsenal” Trump should make damned sure he honours his promises, and not just the “convenient” ones.

    I think what you’ve brought up transcends the mundane day to day politics of Clinton and the “thought” of “hell on Earth”, because we’re there already and have been for some time,

    My latest article on Ozzie Thinker go into detail; a lot of detail and gives you a social plug too.



    • Sam Fox says:

      OT, Hill seals us into the hell you mentioned, Trump is a way to reverse course.

      We KNOW that Hbeast will be an extension of 0, like 0 is an extension of GWB & the NWO POTUSes he followed. With Trump, it looks like we at least have a chance.

      You bet! Trump best keep his word. I’ll join a recall movement if he doesn’t.


      • Sam

        I have said and maintain the position:

        “Were Clinton to be “elected” it will herald hell on Earth, whereas Trump will restrict Hades only to within the shores of America, more or less.”

        Therefore, by rote, he’s got to be the best option, but never try to convince yourself hell is heaven without experiencing it. There is only ONE thing that Trump needs to do to completely change the “framework” of the New World Order. That is BANISH the illegal organisation that goes by the acronym AIPAC and deport all of its members (whether that means revoking “citizenship” or not) PERMANENTLY. That act alone would incur a greater sense of permanent retribution than trumped up “so called” 9/11. Next act, he can repeal most of Bush/Obama legislation from “Patriot Act” onwards.

        The Donald has made it clear that his tongue is sewn “water tight” to the Zionist rectum and that means it’s “game over red rover”. Sorry to be the bringer of bad tidings…..


  8. Sara says:

    I wonder if you will ever address one of the biggest myths of official science? That “space” exists, the ISS is actually up there going around the earth at 17,000 mph, and the earth is a spinning ball hurtling around a warm Sun that somehow lights up a cold moon enough for us to see details with our naked eyes.

  9. Figglesworth von Braun says:

    Certain dogmas of science persist, despite being proven false. The mythical Na/K ATPase is an example. Gilbert Ling proved in the 60’s that a membrane pump (invented to explain why there is more potassium inside of a cell than outside) is thermodynamically impossible. He treats the cell as a fixed-charge system, much like and ion-exchange resin. All you need to know why there is more potassium inside the cell is that the aspartic and glutamic side-chains of the proteins have more affinity for potassium than for sodium. This is a fact.

    In his 600 page Association Induction Hypothesis, you can see the data from dozens of experiments which support his theory.

    The membrane pump theorists would not give in, probably out of fear of embarrassment, having taught this idiotic idea for decades. They will eventually admit that the membrane hypothesis is a unicorn, but only after so many biologists die off.

    For more information visit http://www.gilbertling.org.

  10. Theodore says:

    Chicago Man Charged with Knowingly Transmitting HIV

    He transmitted the virus to 3 women


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.