Russian agent: who gave US uranium to Putin, Trump or Hillary?

Russian agent: who gave US uranium to Putin, Trump or Hillary?

by Jon Rappoport

January 16, 2017

Putin controls 20% of US uranium production. That fact is established. But how did it happen?

Now that we know Trump is a hard-core Russian agent who has been undermining America on behalf of his secret twin brother, Vladimir Putin, it stands to reason Trump was the one who gave 20% of US uranium to the Russkie leader. Right?

I mean, why wouldn’t he? All that uranium was up for grabs, it was there, and Trump somehow engineered the deal. I’m shocked the Washington Post and its CIA pals haven’t reported the story by now.

Anybody who passed that much US uranium to our eternal enemy, Russia, would have to be a secret agent working undercover for the Kremlin. No doubt about it.

Therefore, Trump…

Oh, wait a minute, my mistake.

Oops.

The Clintons were instrumental in making the uranium deal.

For proof, let me go to the irrefutable authority on all news in the known galaxy, The New York Times. They’ll settle the issue.

On April 23, 2015, the NY Times ran a story under the headline: “Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal”.

The bare bones of the story: a Canadian company called Uranium One controlled a great deal of uranium production in the US. The company was sold to Russia (meaning Putin and his minions).

So Putin then possessed 20% of US uranium production!

From the Times: “…the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.”

From the Times: “The [Pravda] article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company [Uranium One] with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.”

“But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.”

“At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that [Canadian] group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One. [Uranium One controlled 20% of US uranium.]”

Frank Giustra…a mining financier, has donated $31.3 million to the foundation run by former President Bill Clinton…”

“Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal [to sell Uranium One to Putin] had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.”

“As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.”

“And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.”

“At the time, both Rosatom [the Russian energy agency] and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.”

“…the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.”

—The US State Dept. had to sign off on the deal giving Putin control over US uranium. Hillary headed up the State Dept. Much money from Canadian mining executives, who owned the American uranium, who obviously wanted the Russian deal to go through, found its way into the Clinton Foundation. The Foundation concealed these donations.

If you’re Putin and you’re sitting in Moscow, and the uranium deal has just dropped this bonanza into your lap, what’s your reaction—after you stop laughing and popping champagne corks? Or maybe you never really stop laughing. Maybe this is a joke that keeps on giving. You wake up in the middle of the night with a big grin plastered on your face, and you can’t figure out why…and then you remember, oh yes, the uranium deal. The US uranium. Can we give our girl Hillary a medal? Can we put up a statue of her in a park? Does Bill need any more hookers?


Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)


So there it is. By all standards of current mainstream news “logic,” Hillary Clinton is the Russian agent. She and her crooked husband and their Foundation are working for Mr. Putin.

Therefore, Putin didn’t order the hacking of the DNC, Hillary, and Podesta emails and send them to WikiLeaks. No. He never would have torpedoed his own secret agent, Hillary Clinton.

Again, I’m just applying mainstream news “logic” to see where that “reasoning” process goes; and where it goes is: a) the Russians didn’t hack; and b) Hillary Clinton is their secret agent.

Cue the James Bond theme.

Ask yourself: if Trump had been instrumental in turning over 20% of US uranium to Putin, how many decibels of mainstream-news screaming would be assaulting the public day after day after day?

But Hillary and Bill were instrumental. How much screaming do we hear now?

Zero.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

10 comments on “Russian agent: who gave US uranium to Putin, Trump or Hillary?

  1. Eleanor Hjemmet says:

    Any chance these abysmal details will provide protestors ammunition to get actual remediation for the radiation sickness and damage to Native American land from the huge open pits left behind from years of mining uranium on reservation property? I,m hoping shame would be a bargaining chip. https://intercontinentalcry.org/uranium-mining-and-native-resistance-the-uranium-exploration-and-mining-accountability-act/

  2. JoAnn Dolberg says:

    Every analysis of Hillary that I have read ends with same conclusion that all of us have of her: she is a psychopathic personality, no guilt/no conscience, selfish/takes what she wants, will not accept responsibility for her words or actions/master of “blame game,” arrogant/thinks she knows it all, lies, cheats, steals, uses people and events for personal gain, has no loyalty to anyone but herself. I think she is demon-possessed.

  3. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    If one of these is a Russian agent, the evidence clearly points to Hillary, the accuser of Trump.

  4. Dana Doran says:

    The same people who promoted Hillary Clinton for President are the same people that control the media and how loudly it screams and about what. I remember reading a news article about this years ago and it seems to me that when Hillary signed off on the sale of the mine it was to a Canadian company who simultaneously became a Russian holding – it looked like a Canadian deal, so that there could be a plausible deniability for all politicians – oh, we didn’t know the company was being sold to Russians! If it wasn’t disclosed, that would be fraud. At the same time, us common folk know that any contract induced by fraud can be unwound…..however, it doesn’t appear that our “government” is interested in keeping our natural resources – even uranium that will be sold to Iran.

  5. AC says:

    If you found out that Hillary Clinton was a Soviet deep-cover subversive, trained in Russia, would you be at all surprised?

  6. Mike Thorpe says:

    This should be headline news, but that ain’t gonna happen! …”approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. ” We’d all love to know who the other slimeballs were who profited from this treason along with the Clinton scum. Any names, Jon??

  7. From Quebec says:

    Hahahahaha! The MSM will soon be irrelevant. They wont be able to lie anymore.

    TRUMP PRESS SECRETARY: ALTERNATIVE MEDIA, BLOGGERS TO BECOME PART OF PRESS CORPS
    Corporate Media Freaks Out At possibility of Breitbart, Infowars Being Allowed To Ask Questions
    http://www.infowars.com/trump-press-secretary-alternative-mediabloggers-to-become-part-of-press-corps/

  8. demetrius13 says:

    I’m looking forward to when this all comes to light!

  9. binra says:

    See that a script is being played out – with a front end for ‘mainstream consumption’.
    See that your life is scripted – with a front end of personal narrative ‘control’.
    The personal script operates within a collective script as fragmented personae operate within defined self-rejection and denial.

    The surface reality is associated with ‘control’ and within the script of denial – control operates narrative ‘reality’ assertion as a coercive deceit. What it cannot hide – or hide from – it redefines in invalidating terms of rejection and denial. It’s world is thus bipolar as the experience of struggle its own reflected shadow – as the basis for a uni-polar ‘victory’ – that is never going to arrive because – “wherever you go – there you are!” – and thus death is the underlying effect of uni-polar dominance – for the ‘control’ of the fantasy self is the private gratification of eradicating the shadow or rejected self.
    The successful substitution of who you are by what you are not – is your death – because you are life – regardless the mental-emotional identity investment in a private capacity of control (power).

    At a family event recently a 5 year old made a game of taking an oldie by the hand to ascend the stairs to wave through the bannister rail – and get a response from many below – and then repeat and repeat – calling on other oldies – when they were worn out. The 5 year old was given appreciation through this game in which she seemed to be controlling us. But there was a free willingness to join in supporting her initiative.

    Power games are much more complex – but the agreement to play them is the making of a script of rules and definitions masked in deceits that work to keep them hidden. Rules might include
    1. Power is the only game – all other games are given the only meaning they have in serving power agenda.
    2. Power is not a game – but reality is made in its image and no other reality shall intrude.
    3. The threat to power of any rival or competing perspective justifies attack, now or later after playing the game of pretending to ally with or support.
    4. Without enemies there is no game and so they must be propagated and nurtured by hate in the superficial guise of self-justification.

    But any sense of control over life is a game we are playing within our self – and for our own reasons – or explorations of being. The rule ‘do as you would be done by’ speaks of the Law of Mind – for as you believe and accept yourself doing – so will you experience yourself done by.
    And so the would-be controller is ‘subjected’ to control. Action/reaction. But BELIEVING in his or her OWN power and trapped in its ‘mind’ as the reality of attack as defence. It’s a loop.
    The fragmentations of a split mind play out the wish of self-specialness – without which we fear our selves NOTHING – or forever trapped in pain of conflict.

    In my script-world – those who pursue open, rabid aggression are like trained dogs under a sense of power to do so – they are backed and supported by whatever hacks their mind to use them. They may believe they are ‘protecting’ but the hacker operates inside or beneath the mind of belief.

    The intent to hack the mind of others can ONLY result in opening one’s own to be so hacked. Power over other is the illusion of loss of power – presenting itself as power. Because it is not truth – it MUST deny truth in order to seem to be. But such denial is totally dependent on that which it denies in order to seem to exist. A fake is substituting for the true – while accepted as currency.

    If Consciousness can focus within fragmentation and fear – and experience itself in such terms, it can also awaken to such a focus instead of mesmerically persisting within it, and shift focus upstream, as an expansion of perspective – of In-sight and Re-cognition – as a freedom of being – rather than programmed by fears of loss of freedom.

    So whoever seems to do whatever – there is a re-integrative purpose available – upstream to the game of war – operating a different script regardless what the props were used for before.

    The Reveal of ‘fake news’ is that of assigning one’s own ‘secret’ mind to the ‘Other’ and yet obviously so. Crying ‘wolf!’, is a story of how abuse of trust results in loss of voice – for no one heeds or attends a persistent liar.

  10. hstngg says:

    The winner is Hillary of course. She will do anything for money. This video though makes me question if she is still around.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s