Actual hacking: Every reporter needs to understand Sharyl Attkisson’s case against the US government

Actual hacking: Every reporter needs to understand Sharyl Attkisson’s case against the US government

by Jon Rappoport

January 31, 2017

Sharyl Attkisson was a star investigative reporter for CBS News. After two decades at the network, she resigned on March 10, 2014.

Among the controversial stories she covered: the Fast and Furious gun-walking program, in which the government “purposely allowed licensed firearms dealers to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers, hoping to track the guns to Mexican drug cartel leaders and arrest them” (LA Times, 10/3/11); the Benghazi attacks and murders; the CDC fraud in grossly overestimating the number of Swine Flu cases in America.

Attkisson now hosts a weekly television news program, Full Measure, for the Sinclair Broadcast Group. She writes at

Attkisson is also engaged in a struggle with the federal government.

Attkisson writes: “I just filed my latest appeal to the FBI’s improper withholding of my FBI file. You may not know it, but every American citizen—even a lowly reporter—is entitled to see his FBI file, if one exists.”

I queried Attkisson about this yesterday, and she replied: “I find it unacceptable that the federal government, and specifically the nation’s top law enforcement agency (DOJ), would be party to improperly—and I believe unlawfully—withholding public and personal materials that we (not they) own.”

For some reason, Attkisson isn’t permitted to see her FBI file. Why? The answer may lie in the government’s role as a hacker. A hacker of Attkisson’s computers.

Attkisson writes at her website: “I have a separate federal lawsuit underway against the federal government over illegal surveillance of my work and home computers by intruders using software proprietary to a U.S. intelligence agency. The intrusions were detected and confirmed by three independent forensics exams in 2013.”

“So far, the government has not cooperated with my lawsuit. For example, without even filing the required motion, government officials failed to show up for a properly-noticed deposition in the case.”

Here, from a press release, are details about the hack of Attkisson’s computers:

“On December, 27, 2014, Investigative Journalist Sharyl Attkisson filed administrative claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act against the U.S. Department of Justice, the U.S. Postal Service, and certain unnamed employees and/or agents of the federal government. Shortly thereafter, a lawsuit was filed in the District of Columbia alleging certain violations of Attkisson’s constitutional rights based on information implicating the federal government in illegal electronic monitoring and surveillance of her home and business computers and phones.”

“As outlined in the claims, three separate computer forensics exams revealed that intruders used sophisticated, remote capabilities to monitor Attkisson’s work. The intruders installed and periodically ‘refreshed’ software used to exfiltrate data, obtain Attkisson’s passwords to various personal and work accounts, access the CBS News computer system, and monitor Attkisson’s audio using a Skype account. Forensics also revealed evidence of U.S. government-related involvement in the surveillance.”

“Through a Freedom of Information Act request, Attkisson learned that the F.B.I. opened a case on her computer intrusions in 2013, listing her as the victim, but the agency failed to interview her in the investigation or even notify her that one had been opened. To date, U.S. government officials have failed to fully cooperate with Attkisson’s efforts to learn about the intrusions, and have failed to fully respond to numerous requests to help provide information necessary to learn the truth. As a consequence of the government’s choice to ignore Attkisson’s requests, Attkisson and her family have chosen the only available option left to them.”

Yesterday, I asked Attkisson: in your opinion, why were your computers hacked?

She wrote: “On the lawsuit over the hacking: The reason I had my computers analyzed in the first place is because government sources had approached me and told me I was likely being ‘surveilled’ due to the reporting I had been conducting, especially some of my CBS News stories that were published online. They specifically mentioned my Benghazi reporting, which I began in fall of 2012. The forensics analyses were able to determine multiple unauthorized remote intrusions of my computers using software (proprietary to a federal government agency) that occurred prior to my Benghazi reporting, however. One such intrusion, for example, occurred in February 2012 (we have the date, time and method of entry) and another in July 2012. Stories I covered during this time period included Green Energy Waste stories that the Obama administration worked very hard to stop from airing on CBS, as well as Fast and Furious reports, among others. Among other details, the forensics exams were able to determine that the intruders not only accessed the CBS system, and used Skype to surreptitiously listen in on conversations, but also examined several files and photos related to Fast and Furious.”

“In addition to two separate forensics exams that I had conducted, CBS hired a forensics company that confirmed the remote intrusions. The analyst informed CBS, among other things, ‘I have definitive evidence that shows commands were run from Sharyl’s user account that she did not personally authorize during the timeframe of concern’ and ‘This history has been deliberately removed from Sharyl’s hard drive’ by a third party.”

—Read Attkisson’s next paragraph carefully. It’s explosive. It indicates Dept. of Justice (DOJ) lying and cover-up:

“A fourth forensics exam conducted by DOJ Inspector General of a different computer (only my personal computer that I asked them to examine in hopes they would recognize the government software, CBS would not give them the CBS computers in question) also confirmed the suspicious activities and that a third party deliberately removed files from my personal computers to cover their tracks. However, this information was omitted from a summary the DOJ IG released, which instead made it incorrectly sound as though intrusions had been ruled out. (The DOJ IG will not lawfully respond to FOIA requests for the documentation showing the investigators confirming the suspicious activities. I know the documents exist because the investigators let me review them during the investigation and briefed me on their findings.)”

“The 2012 intrusion dates I mentioned were NOT the sum total of intrusions—they were two dates we know of during which software was planted in my computers. The software was then used on an ongoing basis to access files, watch my keystrokes, etc.”

CBS agrees that Attkisson’s computers were hacked. Here is an excerpt from an August 7, 2013, article posted at the CBS news site:

“CBS News announced Friday that correspondent Sharyl Attkisson’s computer was hacked by ‘an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions,’ confirming Attkisson’s previous revelation of the hacking.”

“CBS News spokeswoman Sonya McNair said that a cybersecurity firm hired by CBS News ‘has determined through forensic analysis’ that ‘Attkisson’s computer was accessed by an unauthorized, external, unknown party on multiple occasions in late 2012’.”

“Evidence suggests this party performed all access remotely using Attkisson’s accounts. While no malicious code was found, forensic analysis revealed an intruder had executed commands that appeared to involve search and exfiltration of data. This party also used sophisticated methods to remove all possible indications of unauthorized activity, and alter system times to cause further confusion. CBS News is taking steps to identify the responsible party and their method of access.”

“Several months ago, Attkisson had reported suspected intrusions of her computers, including her CBS News work computer, prompting CBS News to hire a firm to look into the hacking.”

My comment: As indicated at the beginning of this article, Attkisson is unable to see her FBI file. The FBI won’t show it to her. This is a breach of law. They won’t show it to her because it would reveal the FBI and DOJ stance on her investigative work at CBS. They didn’t like her work. They considered it a threat. They considered it an exposure of truths they wanted kept under wraps, relating to Fast and Furious, Benghazi, Green Energy Waste, etc.

That FBI file would lend further strength to Attkisson’s claim that the Dept. of Justice has been lying about what they found when they investigated the hacking of her computers.

For example: They found that some of their own people (FBI/DOJ) and/or people at other government agencies had done the hacking.

Major media consider this story “dead until further notice.” But independent journalists all over the world shouldn’t. They should cover it aggressively and keep the pot boiling, and make sure the public understands what is at stake: the right to report actual news, free from government interference and intimidation.

And the right to call government on the carpet, in court, under oath, to account for their crimes.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

14 comments on “Actual hacking: Every reporter needs to understand Sharyl Attkisson’s case against the US government

  1. Sue says:

    Thank you Jon, once again. Only people who have tried to tell the truth in the face of violent opposition know what it is like to be a whistleblower, and who then found out that whistleblowers are not protected, contrary to what the government tells us.

  2. sneezy67 says:

    Well you know ….There is always Hillary….They probably have loads of info on her dealings..Will we ever know the details, I doubt it. Cross-Double Cross …Check this out:…And it goes on and on……

  3. elliottjab says:

    There is no end to the level of chicanery of all the alphabet soups.

    Gawdawful messes – all of ’em.

    RT apparently has ‘unmasked’ more…

    FBI ‘secret rules’ revealed: Massive trove of documents unmask agency’s shady tactics

  4. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    Thank you, Jon, for reporting information that refreshes my resolve to show the public the UN and the UNAS (United National Academies of Sciences) began on 24 OCT 1945 as Stalin’s agencies to deceive and control humanity worldwide.

    See see the discussion following:

    • Oliver K. Manuel says:

      In the futuristic novel George Orwell started to write in 1946, Nineteen Eighty-Four, it appears that

      1. Big Brother is the UN, and
      2. The Ministry of Truth is the UNAS

      Can President Trump now untangle 70 years of deceit disguised as “consensus science?”

      • Oliver K. Manuel says:

        If the best defense is offense, we need a good investigative reporter to trace the impact of Weizsacker’s logical error in the 1935 definition of “nuclear binding energy” on the subsequent course of world history, including

        Hitler’s failure to build an atomic bomb

        Russia’s Sputnik satellite

        The 1960 Presidential election

        Kennedy’s 1963 assassination

        Kissinger’s secret 1971 flight to China

        Nixon’s ending of the Apollo program

        Reagan’s prediction of Berlin’s wall fall


  5. S. Englert says:

    Thanks for the update on Sharyl Attkisson’s fight against government surveillance and threats to the Fourth Estate. I wondered what happened to her case since I read “Stonewalled,” whose title seems increasingly appropriate. Her story is a prime example of Orwellian-style corruption within the police state. Every media outlet in the nation should be covering it, but eerily they are not.

  6. John says:

    Interesting article here relevant to this story:

    I read the book, it was scary. What this government will do to intimidate freedom of the press and freedom of speech today is very frightening. The perception that the government will punish people for speaking out is just as effective as the actual retribution taking place.

    People need to stop living in fear. Evil needs to be exposed. We need to just speak truth and keep showing our fellow citizens the truth.These rats are being fully exposed, we can’t give them one inch, this evil will not stand. We all must keep shining the light upon this tyranny and we will eventually get our freedom and liberty back.

    “The truth is like a lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose and it will defend itself.” St. Augustine

  7. Anon Amus says:

    Thanks for all you do Jon, you truly are the light in the darkness…

    The story goes a bit deeper, as it seems to do, with a recent article from ‘The Intercept’.

    Here is the link for inquiring minds.


  8. kibitzer3 says:

    Excellent reporting. Thank you, Jon, for keeping on top of this story. Sharyl – a true professional – deserves all the help she can get, to expose the corruption in our federal government. We need to help keep this nation from being dragged into the gutter by these s.o.b.’s, and the way to do that is via information, such as you provide. Keep up the good work.

  9. Larry says:

    10 minute Ted Talk featuring Sharyl Attkisson

  10. bob klinck says:

    As a Canadian, I find this story to be amazing. In Canada we no longer have any unequivocally defined rights–not even the right, as born-in-Canada citizens, to have our degrees from major Canadian universities recognized by the government. Administration (largely by persons high on American-intelligence-developed NLP) is essentially arbitrary. And now we have to live with the chaotic emotional ups and downs of a seriously brainwashed Prime Minister. If Attkisson can successfully resolve this issue, then it will awe the rest of our lawless world.

  11. left blank , anonymous says:

    corruption everywhere you look

    harry reid chooses Gloria Navarro for federal judge bench .

    Fed Judge Gloria Navarro tries to hide misdeeds of BLM agents in Bundy Ranch …

    – Feds try to hide misdeeds of BLM agents in Bundy Ranch Standoff
    trial … Nevada District Court Judge Gloria Navarro – Defends Harry Reid by blocking

    Sep 11, 2014 – .. Nevada Senator Richard Bryan – Praises UNLV Boyd School of Law Judge Gloria Navarro

    Cliven Bundy Sues President Obama, Sen. Harry Reid and Judge Gloria Navarro …

    May 11, 2016 –

    Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy sues… Harry Reid and Judge Gloria Navarro Over Plot to Steal his Land.

    Clinton appointed judge stops at nothing to protect corruption

    Clinton-appointed judge dismisses case … –

    Aug 11, 2015 – Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation

    (15-cv-80388 S.D. Fla), a federal judge appointed to the bench by

    President Bill Clinton, coincidentally continually gets cases involving



  12. Onyx Investigations says:

    Very interesting article, Jon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.