Globalists interviewed: they admitted they controlled the government

Globalists interviewed: they admitted they controlled the government

by Jon Rappoport

March 2, 2017

This is a bombshell. It’s a crucial piece of history that has been ignored by mass media.

I’ve published this interview before. Here I want to make new comments.

First of all, David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission was born in 1973, in part because the Globalist plan to ensure “free trade” (no tariffs paid by predatory mega-corporations) had run into a glitch.

That glitch was President Richard Nixon. He began laying tariffs on certain goods imported into the US, in order to level the playing field and protect American companies. Nixon, a substantial crook in other respects, went off-script in this case and actually started a movement to reject the Globalist vision.

After Nixon’s ouster from the White House, Gerald Ford became president, and he chose David’s brother, Nelson Rockefeller as his vice-president. It was a sign Globalism and free trade were back on track.

But David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Brzezinski, wanted more. They wanted a man in the White House whom they’d created from scratch.

That man was a peanut farmer no one had ever heard of: Jimmy Carter.

Through their media connections, David and Brzezinski vaulted Carter into the spotlight. He won the Democratic nomination (1976), spread a syrupy message of love and coming together after the Watergate debacle, and soon he was ensconced in the Oval Office.

Flash forward to 1978, the second year of Carter’s presidency. An interview took place.

It’s a close-up snap shot of a remarkable moment. It’s a through-the-looking-glass secret—in the form of a conversation between a reporter, Jeremiah Novak, and two Trilateral Commission members, Karl Kaiser and Richard Cooper.

The interview concerned the issue of who exactly, during President Carter’s administration, was formulating and controlling US economic and political policy.

The careless and off-hand attitude of Trilateralists Kaiser and Cooper is astonishing. It’s as if they’re saying, “What we’re revealing is already out in the open, it’s too late to do anything about it, why are you so worked up, we’ve already won…”

NOVAK (the reporter): Is it true that a private [Trilateral committee] led by Henry Owen of the US and made up of [Trilateral] representatives of the US, UK, West Germany, Japan, France and the EEC is coordinating the economic and political policies of the Trilateral countries [which would include the US]?

COOPER: Yes, they have met three times.

NOVAK: Yet, in your recent paper you state that this committee should remain informal because to formalize ‘this function might well prove offensive to some of the Trilateral and other countries which do not take part.’ Who are you afraid of?

KAISER: Many countries in Europe would resent the dominant role that West Germany plays at these [Trilateral] meetings.

COOPER: Many people still live in a world of separate nations [!], and they would resent such coordination [of policy].

NOVAK: But this [Trilateral] committee is essential to your whole policy. How can you keep it a secret or fail to try to get popular support [for its decisions on how Trilateral member nations will conduct their economic and political policies]?

COOPER: Well, I guess it’s the press’ job to publicize it.

NOVAK: Yes, but why doesn’t President Carter come out with it and tell the American people that [US] economic and political power is being coordinated by a [Trilateral] committee made up of Henry Owen and six others? After all, if [US] policy is being made on a multinational level, the people should know.

COOPER: President Carter and Secretary of State Vance have constantly alluded to this in their speeches.

KAISER: It just hasn’t become an issue.

SOURCE: “Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management,” ed. by Holly Sklar, 1980. South End Press, Boston. Pages 192-3.

Of course, although Kaiser and Cooper claimed everything being manipulated by the Trilateral Commission committee was already out in the open, it wasn’t.

Their interview slipped under the mainstream media radar, which is to say, it was ignored and buried. It didn’t become a scandal on the level of, say, Watergate, although its essence was far larger than Watergate.

US economic and political policy run by a committee of the Trilateral Commission—the Commission had been created in 1973 as an “informal discussion group” by David Rockefeller and his sidekick, Brzezinski, who would become Jimmy Carter’s National Security Advisor.

Shortly after Carter won the presidential election, his aide, Hamilton Jordan, said that if after the inauguration, Cy Vance and Brzezinski came on board as secretary of state and national security adviser, “We have lost. And I will quit.” Lost—because both men were powerful members of the Trilateral Commission and their appointment to key positions would signal a surrender of White House control to the Commission.

Vance and Brzezinski were appointed secretary of state and national security adviser, as Jordan feared. But he didn’t quit. He became Carter’s chief of staff.

Flash forward again, to the Obama administration.

In the run-up to his inauguration after the 2008 presidential election, Obama was tutored by the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Four years before birthing the Commission with his boss of bosses, David Rockefeller, Brzezinski wrote: “[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.”

Goodbye, separate nations.

Any doubt on the question of Trialteral goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Patrick Wood, author of Trilaterals Over Washington and Technocracy Rising, points out there are only 87 members of the Trilateral Commission who live in America.

Obama appointed eleven of them to posts in his administration.

For example: Tim Geithner, Treasury Secretary;
James Jones, National Security Advisor;
Paul Volker, Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee;
Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence.

Here is the payoff. The US Trade Representative (appointed by Obama in 2013), who was responsible for negotiating the Globalist TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) treaty with 11 other nations, was Michael Froman, a former member of the Trilateral Commission. Don’t let the word “former” fool you. Commission members resign when they take positions in the Executive Branch of government. And when they serve in vital positions, such as US Trade Representative, they aren’t there by accident. They’re operatives with a specific agenda.

Flash forward one more time. Trump, who squashed the Globalist TPP treaty as soon as he was inaugurated, has been busy making staff appointments. Patrick Wood writes (2/6/17):

“According to a White House press release, the first member of the Trilateral Commission has entered the Trump administration as the Deputy Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs, where he will sit on the National Security Council:

“Kenneth I. Juster will serve as Deputy Assistant to the President for International Economic Affairs. He will coordinate the Administration’s international economic policy and integrate it with national security and foreign policy. He will also be the President’s representative and lead U.S. negotiator (“Sherpa”) for the annual G-7, G-20, and APEC Summits.”

Juster’s duties will take him into the heart of high-level negotiations with foreign governments on economic policy.

Keep your eye on Mr. Juster. Will he take actions in line with Trump’s avowed anti-Globalist stance?

Or will Juster work as one more covert Trilateral operative in the center of American decision-making?

If the answer is “covert operative,” does Trump know this? Does he condone what Mr. Juster will do?

Or is this a case of secret infiltration, on behalf the most powerful Globalist group in the world, the Trilateral Commission?


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

36 comments on “Globalists interviewed: they admitted they controlled the government

  1. groet says:

    Hello Jon,

    As a follow up on your DNA vaccines analysis I send you the following reference.

    I am curious what your evaluation will be. I will tell you mine if you like.

    http://thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(15)00239-1/abstract

    Groet, Jan

    Groet,

    Jan Ligthart

  2. sean says:

    I would bet Mr Juster will continue to be Mr Juster.

  3. roger says:

    It is absolutely undeniable that this planet is intertwined with everyone, on commerce. We need each other more than ever. We cannot exist without a global economy.

    • Aron says:

      A global economy we have. I don’t think that is being disputed by most living in the real world. The question is the degree to which each nation has control over their own economy and internal affairs. Each nation has the right to make their own decisions about how and what they trade with other nations, how their society is structured, etc., without the overpowering influence of globalists lurking in the shadows and pulling the strings in favour of the mega corporations.

    • Michael Burns says:

      What?…cannot. What were you born yesterday…from your picture you look like an older fellow in the autumn of his life.
      You can’t remember the world before Johnson.
      You can’t remember the world before the Neocon Trilateralists.
      You can’t remember that it was Europe before it bcame EU.
      The minute you say cannot…I get Irish.
      BTW I don’t need you at all, if you fell of the end of the planet, right after I post this I couln’t care less…We?..hah…cannot?

  4. Dana Doran says:

    Time will tell, but that ol’ saying may apply here, “keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.”

  5. henry says:

    The coup is removing those who can change course (Flynn, Milo, Sessions) from Trump’s team. That will leave the insiders who will persuade Trump to continue the unconstitutional government control of the US.

    Reagan was surrounded by snakes. He might have been able to handle them if they didn’t have him shot. John Hinkley was the brother of a direct report of the CIA Director/Vice President Bush. Reagan mental capacity declined after that.

    • From Quebec says:

      I’m a bit confused here. I read that “Kenneth I. Juster was introduced by Michael T. Flynn.

      Washington, D.C.) – President Trump’s National Security Advisor Michael T. Flynn today announced the following additions to the National Security Council senior staff.

      “I’m incredibly excited about working with this talented group,” Flynn said. “With their diverse backgrounds in in business, law, technology, government, the military and the Intelligence community, they bring a wealth of experience and fresh ideas to the table. K.T. McFarland, Keith Kellogg know they’ll make great contributions to this Administration and to their country.”

      White House National Security Advisor Announces NSC Senior Staff Appointments
      https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/02/02/white-house-national-security-advisor-announces-nsc-senior-staff-0

  6. marysong says:

    Juster sneaked in. Trump under horrendous amount of pressure from within too apparently. Our Pres. Is one strong and fearless man.. Pray he can endure it all without getting sick.

  7. UZA - a peoples' court of conscience says:

    Name them and shame them; thank you

  8. Tommy Tunes says:

    Why you see the Globalists control our lives !!!!!!

  9. IMNAHA says:

    …or is a case of Trump (the fox) guarding the hen house(U.S. sovereignty)?

    • 22sojourner says:

      So you’re suggesting we should let Rockefeller, Hillary, Obama, Oprah, Soros, globalists regain control?

      Well, not when ya put it that way … huh?

  10. From Quebec says:

    “We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years……It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”
    ― David Rockefeller

  11. Jim says:

    So, David, when is it that us poor commoners begin to die?

  12. Gary Corseri says:

    Another first-rate keeper from Jon Rapport–one of my favorite (I almost wrote “Progressive” here) writers! In fact, Rapport goes beyond the silly labels: “progressive,” “Democrat,” “Republican,” “socialist,” “communist,” whatever. He’s a truth-teller and he probes! He defines the terms, looks behind the screens, invites readers to think and draw their own conclusions. He’s one of our best journalists working today–in any of the media. He’s also a fine, creative wordsmith. Thanks for your probing and revelatory work, Jon!

  13. Raymond Babcock says:

    There is not a horse that can not be rode. Nor is there a rider who can not be thrown.

  14. Excellent reminder of Holly Sklar’s piece. These are great comments. Trump needs We The People which is how he styled his campaign. He says openly he needs us. It is true. Feet of those who are controlling him to fire by naming names. He will have nothing to take to wrestle the snakes with if we don’t keep shining a big new LED light in their eyes. Trump can kick the cans over, the rats can run, but entangled minds are real and we are smarter in that realm than the smug sniggering Mind Kontrol designers known by Trilateralist committee as Skull and Bones Society etc.

  15. DAVID H MENDE says:

    Brezinnski advised Obama.
    $64,000 question.
    Is Brezinski advising Trump?
    I’ve heard the name Kissinger bandied about.

  16. This is one of the reasons why Trump’s “nationalist, America first” agenda is being so violently and vehemently opposed by the media and establishment politicians on both sides.

  17. Chris Williams says:

    Great article but now that I understand what really happened in Watergate, and have a better appreciation of the longer history of corruption in US electoral politics I’m no longer comfortable with the notion of calling Nixon a crook – and certainly not as characterized here a “substantial crook”. There was certainly nothing particularly unique or “substantial” about the corruption in Nixon’s political career when put in proper context. On my reading of that context, I would say far from it. And always referring to this side of him is simply to fall into the trap of accepting the characterization of him created by the real crooks who were his enemies.

    In Watergate, we now know from many great publications, that it Nixon who wanted transparency and adherence to the law. When the shit hit the fan Nixon didn’t even want a pardon! He wanted to fight it out in public and expose all the liars. Yes like all politicians he took money from shady sources and used it for his electoral campaigns. But when you look at this career from his days in Yorba Linda, CA, Nixon went about his public life with a determination to serve America. And while many of the great things he achieved might be said to have been the result of his personal resentment against the elites – is that so bad! At least he never seemed too interested in sucking up to them.

    In exposing Hiss we can see that he also succeeded in exposing for history if not at the time, the extent to which the eastern elite would betray their country rather than expose an actual traitor (and this provided the platform for the efforts of McCarthy which we only now understand in the post Venona decrypts world was absolutely right in his efforts).

    Nixon was robbed blind of the 1960s election by the ballot fixing of the Kennedys – both Kennedy snr and Bobby being far more willing to engage in corrupt practices, including bribing, taping, ballot box stuffing and physical intimidation and violence. He also had Johnson (as corrupt as they come) and Ford (the evidence tamperer) pegged and wedged over their respective roles in the JFK assassination and he kept the extraordinarily corrupt Bush snr (another assassination player via the CIA and Clint Murchison) at arms length.

    So let’s get out to the habit of thinking of Nixon as somehow uniquely corrupt or even in the same league as his contemporaries. He wasn’t – it is the portrait the globalist painted and it is distorted. He deserves better.

  18. Bunny says:

    Time to abolish the Federal Government. It no longer fulfills it’s original intent, represents hostile transnational forces, and should be viewed as a domestic enemy.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s