Anti-logic: the education plague

Anti-logic: the education plague

by Jon Rappoport

March 4, 2017

In all times and places, logic is never taught to the masses. There is no intention to do so.

Now, in our “egalitarian society,” education carries with it great PR pretension, a fakery that outflanks any other period in history.

Therefore, graduating students wrongly believe they know how to think.

In my latest collection, Power Outside The Matrix, I include a long audio tutorial, Analyzing Information in the Age of Disinformation, which is all about carrying out deep investigations of major official scenarios/stories, and discovering how and where these official structures can be penetrated, taken apart, and unfolded, so all their flaws and deceptions are exposed.

This training is meant to remedy the deep hole people find themselves in, when they go up against entrenched (or even alternative) “knowledge.”

For example, there is a particular logical fallacy I call: “this means that.”

It runs rampant throughout society. The fallacy bleeds into the reasoning process, into notions of self-worth, into people’s need to identify themselves with an “acceptable” position.

Take the concept of manmade global warming. For many people, affirming this as a reality means:

“I’m defending the sacred quality of life on Earth, I’m helping the planet, I’m exposing the nasty crimes of big corporations, I’m acknowledging and shining a spotlight on the selfish and petty actions of the masses, I’m in the vanguard of recognizing that this issue represents the greatest threat humankind has ever known, I’m transcending ‘profits over values’, I’m envisioning with others a better world, I’m aligning myself with the best international scientific minds, I’m experiencing the sensation of having a larger mission in life.”

This—manmade global warming—means all that.

Therefore, how do you approach rational discourse on the subject of manmade warming?

You don’t.

There is no logic to be found. There is only “this means that.”

The concept or idea or symbol of manmade warming is so fully packed with sentiment, it resists all attempts at entry.

Here is another example: “America must field a powerful military force all over the world.”

For many people this means: “US wars are good and righteous wars, support our troops, admire the representations of war in sports, praise large American corporations, vote for a ‘tough President’, winning is everything, expand the Pentagon budget, develop a kick-ass attitude, love technology in all forms and degrees, obey and agree with institutional authority, assume that bigger is always better.”

“This means that.”

Therefore, a rational discussion about the wisdom of deploying the US military all over the planet is impossible. The amount of packed sentiment is a suit of body and mind armor.

In the case of manmade warming, examining the science behind the hypothesis becomes completely irrelevant. To even begin to look at it feels like an act of betrayal to the person who has “this means that” firmly in place.

Nothing in the person’s education has ever challenged his reflexive hard-wired “this-that” formulation. A breakthrough has never been made in the area of logic.

Instead, education has, at best, skated across the surface of “this means that” and left it undisturbed.

With some degree of accuracy, one could say that all the other traditional logical fallacies—ad hominem attack, straw man, vague generality, circular reasoning, appeal to authority, etc.—spring from “this means that.”

When I attended college in the 1950s, it was my good fortune to have a logic professor who could analyze and separate a thousand angels dancing on the head of a pin—and at the same time, maintain his great and natural charm and sense of humor.

Our conversations outside of class were moments of excitement. They were also rugged mind workouts.

His parting shot to me, as I was about to graduate: “Know what you don’t know.”

Some 20 years later, when I began a career as a reporter, that piece of advice came back to me.

I was prepared to do investigations, because I could make assessments of what I didn’t know and therefore needed to find out.

I could evaluate sources, who would often try to deploy logical flaws to derail me.

One of the great delights of reporting is discovering that the story you’re working on isn’t the story. The story turns out to be something else entirely.

That was the case in 1987, when I got down to writing my first book, AIDS Inc (note: AIDS Inc is included as bonus in Power Outside The Matrix). People were coming at me from every direction, feeding me their half-baked theories about what AIDS “really was.”

They seemed to believe that, because they were departing from the conventional wisdom on the subject, they must be right.

Encountering that odd notion of self-entitlement stood me in good stead, from that time forward.

When I eventually arrived at the bottom of the AIDS story, I was shocked to see it wasn’t at all what I predicted it would be.

It’s astounding how many logical steps people are willing to skip over, when they have a “this means that” cooking in their heads.

Like a foreign traveler visiting a bizarre museum, I’ve encountered many varieties of sophistry over the past 30 years.

Logic isn’t the be-all and end-all. But it is, in the largest sense, an ever-expanding method you can use to probe deeper and deeper into an argument, a line of reasoning, and engage with the basic assumptions that underlie a position a person is occupying.

It’s as if you’re learning a story backwards, moving toward the beginning, where all the secrets are.

And chances are good that you will eventually encounter some form of the abiding “this means that,” hiding like a horned toad under a bush.

He’s there, he’s quiet, he’s waiting, and when you turn a branch away from a shadow, he stares at you and you know you’ve arrived at the nexus:

the unyielding stubborn source of confusion and illogic.

And sometimes, on good days, you can get the horned toad to tell his story. His real story. All the way through. And you can see him regain his lost sanity.

That’s an experience not to be missed. You’ll remember it for your whole life.

Here are the contents of my collection, Power Outside The Matrix:

power outside the matrix

These are audio presentations. 55 total hours.

* Analyzing Information in the Age of Disinformation (11.5-hours)

* Writer’s Tutorial (8.5-hours)

* Power Outside The Matrix and The Invention of New Reality—creative techniques (6.5-hours)

Then you will receive the following audio presentations I have previously done:

* The Third Philosophy of Imagination (1-hour)

* The Infinite Imagination (3-hours)

* The Mass Projection of Events (1.5-hours)

* The Decentralization of Power (1.5-hours)

* Creating the Future (6-hours)

* Pictures of Reality (6-hours)

* The Real History of America (2-hours)

* Corporations: The New Gods (7.5-hours)

I have included an additional bonus section:

* The complete text (331 pages) of AIDS INC., the book that exposed a conspiracy of scientific fraud deep within the medical research establishment. The book has become a sought-after item, since its publication in 1988. It contains material about viruses, medical testing, and the invention of disease that is, now and in the future, vital to our understanding of phony epidemics arising in our midst (and how to analyze them). I assure you, the revelations in the book will surprise you; they cut much deeper and are more subtle than “virus made in a lab” scenarios.

* A 2-hour radio interview I did on AIDS in Dec 1987 with host Roy Tuckman on KPFK in Los Angeles, California.

* My book, The Secret Behind Secret Societies

(All the audio presentations are mp3 files and the books are pdf files. You download them upon purchase. You’ll receive an email with a link to the entire collection.)

This is about your power. Not as an abstract idea, but as a living core of your being. This is about accessing that power, expanding it, and using it.

On this road, there are no limits.

That’s what Power Outside The Matrix is all about.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

8 comments on “Anti-logic: the education plague

  1. truth1 says:

    You are so correct in teaching kids to think and reason. But perhaps as important if not more so, is that every wise person will usually have a bitter experience of treachery and betrayal that cause them to reevaluate the world they live in and what it really is. Getting screwed by law, or school or a lover or spouse, a friend, an employer, but not little events. Some major rotten corruption is needed, a damn good kick in the teeth to wake someone up. I had a few of those. One at age two that made me a different child, my mother says. A religious fallout that turned out to be totally false. It was bitter for sure. Some have a string of let downs, none of which were major but enough to collectively make you very uncertain of anything from some point onward.

    Why question anything when nothing seems to be wrong? Its only when the data don’t match the theory that we question the theory. Now some intuitively know that questioning can lead to trouble and so they run from questioning. Some can not bear to not question and so they advance into dangerous territory, What results is a revolution (revolation/revalation) of the mind.

    And by the way, mind control programming works by creating many fears in a victim, and those fears are made into separate personalities that prevent questioning and prevent disobedience . . . for a time, till the mind’s barriers break down with age and start to let walled off memories slowly come into consciousness and start the revlolution of the mind.

  2. Oliver Manuel says:

    You are right, Jon, modern education is about controlling creative minds of students rather than showing them how logic can yield a joyous life of continuous discovery.

    Why? All tyrants are powerless and live in fear of the truth (reality).

    By 1 April 2017, I hope to publish a paper celebrating the centennial birth of the late Dr. Paul Kazuo Kuroda, my research who risked his life to keep frightened world leaders from hiding the source of energy after WWII that promised mankind powers beyond the dreams of scientific fiction [See last paragraph of Nobel Lecture of Francis William Aston on 12 Dec 1922].

  3. Terri says:

    picture one of the peanuts gang bowling another one over as they say
    THAT’S IT!!!!@@@@$$##&&!!!

    this is why I have never had a real conversation with any of my genetic relations, or many others, for that matter.

  4. Tim says:

    Here’s a ‘dis means dat’ thing:

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

    ‘What are you hiding!” is the kind of ‘this means that’ illogical response, if a person brings up the fourth amendment.

  5. D and J Oldfield says:


  6. IMNAHA says:

    If anyone wants a REAL TAXING logician’s task they only need to attempt to deconstruct the history of the 20th century, especially the wars and revolutions. Truly this must be what is like to walk through a minefield. Starting with ferreting out the TRUE identities / genealogies / affiliations of the important players,then onto what really happened according to the media of the day which of course had it’s own agendas. It’s always gratifying (in a puzzle solver way) to run into contradictions which lead to reexamining assumptions. IMHO you can’t logically grok the present without having an ACCURATE picture of it’s historic progenitor.

    An example: The recent Ukranian “revolution” was funded by the U.S.via Victoria Nuland who worked under H.R.C. Ms. Nuland should actually be titled Mrs Kagan as she is married to Robert Kagan who sports credentials of the CFR, Neocons, and MSM among others. So, in what geographic area of the world did the Khazars (progenitors of 90% of the “Talmudic” Jews of the world ) come from? Answer: Ukraine and the Caucasus’, (though it wasn’t called that at the time.) So, what were the Kings of the Khazars (a fierce warrior tribe that moved West into eastern Europe about 1100 years ago) called? Answer: KAGANS. Well blow me down!

    • Kieron says:

      And Kagan is a version of the name Cohen, I do believe. And Cohen comes from kohen, “priest,” plural kohanim. The puzzle is maddeningly slow to be put together and I don’t like the picture that’s emerging.

  7. fauxscienceslayer says:

    “The best way to control the opposition is to run it ourselves” ~ Lenin

    I had the great fortune to work my way thru a decade of full time and nighttime college, taking Philosophy, Psychology, Astronomy and Geology courses before finally completing engineering, with professors who taught Traditional Scientific Method. It takes more training in Thermodynamics to get an undergraduate degree in engineering than a
    PhD in meteorology or climatology, making it easy to spot the false Alarmist/Luke debate.

    “Mommie, Can We Play Obombie Truth Origami” at FauxScienceSlayer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.