Hacking elections: Trump vs. Bill Clinton: not even close

Hacking elections: Trump vs. Bill Clinton: not even close

by Jon Rappoport

March 30, 2017

On the one hand, we have unverified claims that Russian hackers stole emails from the Democratic National Committee and passed them to WikiLeaks, who released them.

Supposedly, the contents of the emails were so embarrassing, they helped sink Hillary Clinton’s campaign.

We also have unverified claims that thousands of websites and blogs somehow operated under Russian influence, during the campaign, on behalf of Trump and against Hillary.

But imagine what major media would have done to Trump, if the following events occurred:

IMAGINARY EVENT ONE: The Russian government contributed money to Trump’s campaign.

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED: In a new article, former CBS investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson writes: “If you’ve watched politics a little while, you may remember the scandal broken by The Washington Post in 1996. The Post reported evidence of China directing contributions to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) during the presidential contest between Bill Clinton and Republican Bob Dole—a violation of US law.”

If Trump was embroiled now in what Clinton was embroiled in then, the press would go over-the-top insane now.

IMAGINARY EVENT TWO: A foreign-born Trump fundraiser is actually convicted of illegally raising campaign money.

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED: Sharyl Attkisson writes: “Taiwan-born Maria Hsia, a fundraiser for Clinton Vice President Al Gore [in 1996], was convicted of illegal campaign fundraising.”

Substitute a Trump campaign worker for Maria Hsia, and the press would go over-the-top insane now.

IMAGINARY EVENT THREE: A Russian-born Trump supporter is convicted of trying to give major money to Trump.

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED: Attkisson writes: “Eventually, Taiwan-born Charlie Trie was convicted of improperly attempting to give large donations to the Clinton’s legal defense fund.”

IMAGINARY EVENT FOUR: A Russian national is convicted of violating election law after he gives large donations to Trump.

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED: Attkisson writes: “Taiwan-born Johnny Chung was convicted of violating election law after making large donations to the DNC (which were later returned).”

IMAGINARY EVENT FIVE: A Russian fundraiser for Trump, who actually works at the US Dept. of Commerce, is convicted of campaign finance fraud.

WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED: Attkisson writes: “Chinese-born John Huang—a DNC fundraiser and Commerce Department official in the Clinton administration—was convicted of campaign finance fraud.”

If the press treated Bill Clinton then the way they’re treating Trump now, given the actual crimes committed on behalf of Clinton by Taiwanese and Chinese nationals, reporters and editors and their allies would have called for Clinton to be encased in a tube and shot off in a rocket to Mars, never to return.

But Clinton served out his term in office. There was no widespread scandal. The impeachment proceeding involved him lying about sex with Monica Lewinsky, not criminal campaign activity. In Democratic circles, and even in the press, many people still revere Clinton as a major statesman and philanthropist.

But don’t worry.

The press isn’t biased.

They have no covert agenda.

Of course not.

All is well.

power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

12 comments on “Hacking elections: Trump vs. Bill Clinton: not even close

  1. flyingcuttlefish says:

    J.R. – Judicial Watch just released a bunch of new e-mails from Huma.
    In the first set (of 3) on p. 32 of the PDF

    Anne-Marie Slaughter shows herself as a big vaccine pusher globally using State Dept. and diplomats to push Rx policy.
    The mail shows how these vaccine promoters force “health” policy on foreign nations.

  2. n3angus says:

    Evelyn Farkas says President Trump needs to tell the American People if he received a Bunch of Money from the Russians to bail him out of debt and if thats possibly bribing leverage by the Russians and that is this at the heart of the Russian issue … listen to her @ 2:40 , https://youtu.be/cVGp2FZmVA4?t=2m40s

    Does she know something more than what this reporting shows here is the question in a article that needs to be asked ? Not addressing this Now and getting this issue resolved in a manner that “ Defuses “ the Image the Democrats are creating of the Possible influence Russians might have over President Trump will give the Dems control in the Midterms !!!!

    So with Trumps dealings with Russian affiliates , which cannot be denied as the Guardian article shows and are just International and Domestic Business operations , its becoming obvious that the Democrats are planning to use this Russian narrative as a wedge issue and string it out until the Midterms to take control of the House and Senate , and then Impeach Trump on some Trumped Up Charge that they can create if they control both Houses , so Trump better get on it and do something fast !!!!!!!!

    • From Quebec says:

      President-elect Donald Trump said Wednesday at a news conference that he had no business relations with Russia, except that “I guess I sell condos to Russians.”

      Trump was responding to questions on allegations that Russian agencies hacked Democratic National Committee emails.

      “What do I have to do with Russia? You know the closest I came to Russia, I bought a house a number of years ago in Palm Beach, Fla.,” Trump said. “There was a man who went bankrupt and I bought the house for $40 million and I sold it to a Russian for $100 million including brokerage commissions. So I sold it. So I bought it for 40, I sold it for 100 to a Russian. That was a number of years ago.”

      Earlier Wednesday, Trump tweeted, “Russia has never tried to use leverage over me. I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH RUSSIA – NO DEALS, NO LOANS, NO NOTHING

  3. Bunny says:

    Well congress just made it easier for the hackers..now your ISP can collect and sell your personal information to the highest bidder…including your social security number. This is what republicans do, everything is for sale, and then they wrap themselves in the flag, and wave their bibles, while being the most unethical people on the face of the earth.The Dems may be bad, but no one is as sheer, unmitigated evil like republicans.

  4. From Quebec says:

    CNN Investigates Russian Salad Dressing

    • From Quebec says:

      Following this video, someone at infowars posted the following comment:

      Sean Spicer should casually mention the phrase *Russian roulette* during his next press briefing. If, we’re lucky, some of the mainstream media will investigate and end up blowing their own heads off in the process.


  5. S. Englert says:

    Political partisanship and duplicity among the corporate-owned media is another reason its no longer credible. MSM has repeated the Trump-Russia conspiracy claim so often that those with fleeting memories have all but forgotten about the Clintons, their political crimes and corrupt foundation.

  6. Mike Shine says:

    SOP. Whatever you’re guilty of , accuse the other side of. See Marine Le Pen deal with BBC accusations of Russian ties: https://youtu.be/SeEHQhARESU

  7. It may well be another Trump “blame gamer”, but a good article nonetheless, Jon.

    The deeper question is WHY was Clinton impeached for the reasons he was impeached and the rest swept under the rug?

    Forgetting Israelite surveillance systems in the Whitehouse, did impeachment strengthen “Globalism” but allowing Bush/Cheney to get off scot free for war crimes amongst other things?


  8. DanC says:

    Ha ha,

    Do a search on Bill Clinton and “walking around money”

    It’s an old tradition among democrats in the South where pastors and other community leaders are given money to spread among the poor and uneducated in their areas, in return for their vote for the local and state democrat candidates.

    Has been happening since the 19th century, but Mr. Clinton was known as a master of the practice (well, actually, the candidates do it through 3rd party operatives to keep the practice away from themselves personally, but Clinton’s organization in Arkansas during his gubernatorial days was noted for being particularly effective)

    The good ole days of analog vote fraud 🙂

  9. Theodore says:



    “We’re looking at a potential constitutional crisis from the standpoint that we used an extremely strong capability that’s supposed to be used to safeguard and protect the country,” he said. “And we used it for political purposes by a sitting President [Obama]. That takes on a new precedent.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.