The cruel autism trick played on vaccine-damaged children

The cruel autism trick played on vaccine-damaged children

And their parents

by Jon Rappoport

April 10, 2017

I’ve covered this subject in various ways. Here I’m going to use a Q & A format to highlight vital points.

Q: What do people need to know about names for diseases?

A: A disease-label of any kind is something you need to look at the way you’d look at a scorpion on your porch.

Q: Why?

A: Because the label is meant to make you think there is a specific condition.

Q: Isn’t that the case?

A: Not necessarily. For example, autism.

Q: Isn’t autism a specific condition?

A: No.

Q: Why not?

A: Well, start with this. There is no defining diagnostic test for autism. No defining physical test. No blood test, saliva test, urine test, brain scan, genetic assay.

Q: That’s impossible.

A: It’s true.

Q: How can that be?

A: Autism is listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the bible of the psychiatric profession. The definition of autism is basically a menu of behaviors. There is no defining diagnostic test. You’ll find, in the official lexicon, other names for various so-called “developmental neurological disorders,” too. And none of them in the DSM have defining diagnostic tests, either.

Q: What are you driving at? Are you saying autism is some kind of illusion, that there is no damage or problem?

A: Of course not. Of course there is damage.

Q: So what is your point?

A: If a parent applies to the US federal vaccine court, for compensation, because her child was severely damaged by a vaccine, and if she or her doctor calls that damage “autism,” there is almost no chance the government will award her compensation.

Q: Why?

A: Because the government is committed to saying, come hell or high water, vaccines don’t cause autism. But if that same parent says her child developed “encephalopathy”—a generalized term meaning a condition that adversely affects the structure or function of the brain—her chances of receiving compensation increase by a small percentage.

Q: Even if she says a vaccine caused the encephalopathy?

A: Yes. It’s all a word game, and if the parent doesn’t know how to play it, she’ll almost certainly lose.

Q: That’s ridiculous.

A: Indeed it is.

Q: If none of these neurological disease-labels in the DSM has a specific and defining diagnostic test, then why doesn’t the parent just tell the vaccine court, “My child’s brain was damaged by a vaccine”?

A: Because the rules demand that she present evidence that the vaccine caused a known and officially accepted disease condition with a disease label.

Q: But the truth is, the vaccine caused brain damage.

A: Truth is not the goal of the government’s game.

Q: Are you saying there is no such thing as autism?

A: I’m saying there is no conclusive evidence for the existence of autism as a specific condition. Otherwise, there would be a defining diagnostic test for it, and there isn’t. There are various causes for neurological and brain damage. When a vaccine is the cause, it should be called VACCINE DAMAGE, and compensation should be awarded on that basis. Period. Stop the fiddling and game playing.

Q: But the government doesn’t want to admit that vaccines cause severe damage.

A: That’s why they play their word games.

Q: What are some causes for neurological damage?

A: A blow to the head, a fall, almost drowning in a pool, oxygen deprivation at birth, severe and long-term nutritional deficits, toxic pesticides, toxic medical drugs, vaccines.

Q: Why are these and other causes hidden under fancy medical names?

A: Because, for example, for each disease-name, drugs can be developed and sold.

Q: What are some names for neurological disease or damage?

A: Fragile X syndrome, Asperger, Rett syndrome; Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, Intellectual Disability, autism.

Q: Are there overlaps of symptoms?

A: Yes.

Q: Is it possible that any of these could be caused by vaccines?

A: The actual DAMAGE that is at the heart of these disease-labels could be caused by vaccines. Or other factors. Each child must be assessed uniquely.

Q: You’re suggesting that, in a sane world, parents and doctors and government officials would call vaccine damage VACCINE DAMAGE, and forget all the rest of it.

A: Neurological vaccine damage, yes. Because that’s what it is. You can say, “Well, we think this group of nerve cells is affected or that group is affected, or possibly this part of the brain is affected or that part,” but when a vaccine is the cause, it’s vaccine damage, plain and simple.

Q: Any other medical tricks people should be aware of, relating to autism?

A: Yes. Researchers can say they know vaccines don’t cause autism, because there are children diagnosed with autism who have never been vaccinated. That assertion is a hoax. The label and the definition of autism are worthless, to begin with, because there is no specific test that invariably diagnoses autism. Instead, as I keep saying, vaccine damage is real and it should be labeled as such. Then, there is no argument about what is and isn’t autism, or what does and doesn’t cause it. There is just naked straightforward truth.

Q: So when a doctor tells a parent, “Your child has autism…”

A: He’s really saying, “Your child has suffered some kind of neurological damage. We have a general label for it. Autism. The label doesn’t tell us what caused your child’s damage.”

Q: But the doctor wouldn’t admit that.

A: No, he wouldn’t.

Q: Suppose he did admit that. Suppose all doctors admitted that.

A: Then there would be a whole new world. Doctors would be tasked with trying to find out what caused the damage in each child. And in talking to a parent, who was there and saw the radical change in her child after vaccination, a doctor would realize that a vaccine was the cause.

Q: It sounds like the government is leading a parent with a vaccine-damaged child into a blind alley with its vaccine court.

A: That’s right. The parent is seeking compensation to pay for her child’s care. The court is essentially saying, “If you claim your child was damaged by a vaccine and call that damage autism, even though the word “autism” is just a meaningless label, we’ll deny compensation. We’ll deny it because we’ve arbitrarily decided that vaccines can’t cause autism.”

Q: This is pure insanity.

A: Yes, cruel insanity.

Q: Let me see if I can sum all this up. First, we have a meaningless label called “autism.” It’s meaningless because there are no defining diagnostic tests for autism. Therefore, there is no proof that autism is a specific condition, beyond the fact that a child has been neurologically damaged in some way. But most people, and the government, and the medical system, ALL BUY INTO THE IDEA THAT AUTISM IS REAL AND SPECIFIC…AND THEN THE GOVERNMENT TURNS AROUND AND SAYS: A PARENT WHO IS SEEKING COMPENSATION FOR VACCINE DAMAGE, ON THE BASIS THAT A VACCINE CAUSED HER CHILD TO “DEVELOP AUTISM,” WON’T BE COMPENSATED, BECAUSE THERE IS NO PROOF THAT ANY VACCINE CAUSES AUTISM. THE GOVERNMENT IS ESSENTIALLY SAYING: THERE IS NO PROOF A VACCINE CAN CAUSE A CONDITION WHICH HASN’T BEEN PROVEN TO EXIST.

A: Yes, that’s correct.

Q: This is even crazier than I thought it was.

A: You can add in one more factor. There are parents with vaccine-damaged children, and these children have been diagnosed with autism. If you tell these parents there is no proof that autism exists, and their child simply has devastating neurological vaccine damage, they will protest. They’re caught in a situation they don’t fully understand, and they’re determined to hold on to the idea that their child “has autism.” They want that label to be applied to their child. For them, it provides an “explanation” for what happened to their child. They won’t let it go. And THEN, they will go to the federal vaccine court and ask for compensation, not realizing that if they use the word “autism,” that’s doom. The court will deny their claim.

Q: It’s like being caught in a maze.

A: That’s exactly what it is.


power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

29 comments on “The cruel autism trick played on vaccine-damaged children

  1. Dante says:

    The family physicians (pokers) blindly jab away at the children with the monstrous vaccine schedule. As more and more children become a mess of twitches and grunts and hand flaps they simply do not tell them about the vaccine court and refer them to “experts” who then diagnose them with “autism”

    These experts will then prescribe various medications. These meds plainly state that we do not know how this medicine works. It does not work. That is pretty much the end of the road between the medical cartel and the parent of the brain damaged child. Quit your job and dig in, your autistic child will probably outlive you.

    If you do not like the idea of comparing family physicians to Nazis then just ask your Dr. if they are up to date on their adult immunizations. Ask them if their children get the full CDC schedule. Ask them if they tell parents about the vaccine court. Ask them if they would be afraid to speak up if they knew a vaccine was responsible for your childs “autism”

    What would happen Dr. if you spoke up?

    Would the Cartel strip you of your license?

    Would you be plastered all over the news?

    Or worse?

    • Rastafari says:

      The same people who gave you the idea/story/fraud of vaccines, autism, experts …
      Also gave you the idea/story/fraud of “Nazi’s”.

      It’s the very same crowd.

      So, please, for the sake of truth, research the true history of WWII, Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists of the German Third Reich.

      Those Germans, all of them, were devoted to good health, strong families, and medicine that worked. This truth is hidden from us in order to keep the miracle of pre-WWII Germany a secret.

      Here’s a good place to start for recent, unbiased research:

      The Greatest Story Never Told
      http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/#gallery

      Hellstorm – Exposing The Real Genocide of Nazi Germany (Full)

      This (recent & true research) is all relevant in the context of today’s article, because it sheds light on the socio-political foundation for the fraud of modern medicine (modern government, modern schooling, modern media).

      While “Hitler Revulsion” sure seems to be a genetic disease, it is really an acquired deficiency; acquired over years of disinfo, outright lies, endless propaganda and more. Just like revulsion towards “marijuana” cannabis plant, which turns out to be the most useful substance known to mankind.

      I don’t claim to know truth, only that I’m open to looking at anything that seems to be a lie to see if there is truth anywhere around. If it’s true that we were massively lied to about vaccines, does it reason that we also may have been lied to about Hitler, National Socialism (nationalism, putting your own nation first), and what they were up to?

      • Kolo says:

        Well said

      • Greg C. says:

        “Those Germans, all of them, were devoted to good health, strong families, and medicine that worked. This truth is hidden from us in order to keep the miracle of pre-WWII Germany a secret.”

        Why would the Germans hide this truth from themselves? Why would they suddenly turn on themselves in self-condemnation, if they were such a vibrant, strong people? Especially since they had all the internal propaganda working in their favor during WWII, not against them? If such a strong and good force could be so easily defeated by counter-propaganda in the blink of an eye, then there really is no hope for the human race. Be careful what you believe – it will change you. Examine the hidden premises, not just someones assertions about history. History is a story, and many histories are possible by sifting and selecting evidence. When you are convinced by facts to accept one story, it says more about you than the facts themselves. Do you identify with a strong and good people who were so easily silenced? Does it make you stronger or weaker to believe in such a story? It’s been my experience that neo-Nazis are very weak people, looking to join a crowd that believes in unattainable greatness, and who can always find scapegoats to blame for their failure.

        It makes more sense that the masses in Germany were looking for an easy way out – a national dream of greatness that someone would deliver to them, if they would unite in lockstep, and erase all individual thinking and goodness. It’s the same old story, repeated hundreds of times, but some people never learn.

    • Greg C. says:

      Imagine a photo of a doctor holding a syringe with a scared child looking on, with the caption, “Just a little prick.”

  2. When we do have people brave enough to speak up things will change.

    • bob klinck says:

      Haven’t there been some, and haven’t the credentialed ones been summarily smashed? Governments don’t function in accord with the principle of dealing with citizens in an honest fashion. And every lie they tell necessitates application of a mailed fist against protestors because of the legal liabilities that are entailed. In the ranking of eligibility for legislative and administrative protection, non-Masonic ordinary people (“little people”) are at the bottom, while the financial powers–the surveillance providers and architects of society–are at the top. The system is called “our precious demo-crazy”.

  3. marytormey says:

    Even if the vaccines did not do serious harm, the vaccine industry is still stealing from disabled people. Since Bob and Susan Write visited cold mountain harbor, there seem to be an increase in violence against researchers like those at Virginia Tech.

  4. Dana Doran says:

    What a crock of crap…..not your article, the creation of a special court for vaccination injury – that completely removes any liability from drug companies. Wow. Now I feel like I’ve been sleeping under a rock – but that’s your point, right? ..lobbying at its best – it’s amazing what the almighty dollar will do in Congress.

  5. Roy says:

    Due to this iatrogenic injury controversy, I would highly recommend all parents diligently obtain and maintain strong documentation and professional testing of your child’s pre-existing condition prior to vaccinations to use as undeniable evidence to vaccine induced injury. I would also recommend obtaining your medical records immediately after your medical appointments to prevent alteration of your medical records after an iatrogenic injury. I would also recommend having a patient advocate with you during medical appointments, procedures, and hospital stays to have as a professional witness to an iatrogenic injury.

    • Greg C. says:

      Also, look into supplementing with zinc to help protect your kids from the assault on their immune system. If you really must vaccinate, minimize the risks.

    • Terri says:

      Roy, How about not vaccinating and taking healthy children to a butcher/drug dealer/ i mean priest in a white coat.
      Do you have children and if so, why would you be willing to do this? Do you really think legal mumbo jumbo which gives you a case(maybe?) is worth your childs life and well being? If you feel like you need a legal advocate when dealing with someone, is that a someone you should be patronizing and putting a precious life into their hands?

      Real doctors do not vaccinate, and there are more and more of them out there. Classical homeopaths, Ayurvedic doctors, Naturopaths, Doctors of Oriental Medicine, Chiropractors, D O’s etc. Go to the truth about cancer and see many of these brave doctors, including md’s speaking out and treating people for health, not seeking to maintain the functionally ill.

      Dr Burzynski was unlawfully harassed by the Texas medical board and due to the support of his patients and their families, and others, they did not succeed at taking his license so he couldn’t heal people any more. Its all about the money, and the agenda,always.

      Vaccinating anyone is stupid, and no one needs vaccinations. It is bad science and does not confer appropriate or lasting immunity. Its fraud to call them immunizations.
      If you eat well, practice a happy healthy lifestyle, you will have a healthy life. If you like to fill your grocery cart with crap, and fill your mind/spirit with crap as well, you will look and feel like crap. You are what you eat.

  6. Elaine says:

    I like the Q&A format you used here.

  7. Oliver K. Manuel says:

    A Good Grief Group in Petaluma, CA is trying to address this basic social problem:

    http://www.goodgriefgroup.org/

    That grew out of the separation of science from spirituality in 1935:

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Nuclear_Energy_Error7.pdf

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/HIGHER-POWERZ.pdf

    My research mentor, P. K. Kuroda, recognized this error in June 1936, and
    Reaffirmed the danger to society in the ruins of Hiroshima in August 1945.

    Earlier discoveries by Einstein (1905), Rutherford (1920), Aston (1922) and Chadwick (1932) had improved and expanded the spiritual concept of a benevolent, beautifully simple, infinite, and cyclic universe that is alive and dynamic because, . .

    _ a.) Mass (m) is stored energy (E), E = mc^2
    _ b.) The Hydrogen Atom and the Neutron are
    _ c.) The Alpha & Omega of atoms and cosmos
    _ d.) Combine to form atoms of heavier elements
    _ e.) Expand from Hydrogen Atoms => Neutrons
    _ f .) Collapse from Neutrons => Hydrogen Atoms

    Weizsacker (1935) proposed and Chadwick (1935) endorsed instead a quantum mechanical nuclear model that became the foundation of altered awareness or “consensus scientific models“ of reality after nations and national academies of sciences were united under the UN on 24 Oct 1945:

    1. Rulers of nations collected and paid public funds to
    2. Technocrats to hide the abundant power of God in every atom
    3. The public gave up the right to control governments and lived in constant fear

    That is, perhaps, the historical scientific basis for today’s collective social grief and fears.

  8. Lori says:

    Sadly, our medical community treats the symptoms instead of the problem causing the symptoms.

  9. Oliver Manuel says:

    Correction:

    _ e.) Expands Neutrons => Hydrogen Atoms
    _ f .) Collapses: Hydrogen Atoms => Neutrons

  10. Larry says:

    We’re living in a dream world – thanks in large part to TCN: the Total Crap News Networks.

    • Rastafari says:

      Maybe we are living in a dream world because of those who support TCN.
      The watchers and believers.
      Perhaps they are more enemy than TCN.

      Can turn it off. But won’t.

      That is the BIG problem.

  11. Mrs. Siler says:

    Good Stuff!

  12. artiewhitefox says:

    Doctors who give shots that are soft kill will give a name to a collection of symptoms. That is all. People dumb enough will believe the doctors. Those doctors would not have business unless people get symptoms hence the shots. Hence them not taking about Upper cervical Spesific only care Chiropractors. Doctors put bad cracking kinds out there to fool people into thinking Chiropractic is not good so people will come to people in white coats. All, now, Upcspine, Upper Cervical Health Centers or The Spesific Chiropractic.

  13. From Quebec says:

    WOW!

    Federal vaccine court? isn’t that the proof that vaccines are not to be trusted?

    • Theodore says:

      also, it is technically/legally a ‘tribunal’, not a ‘court’. There is no ‘jury of peers’ present as part of the proceeding deciding the outcome. Furthermore, in this particular tribunal, the ‘presiding judge’ is not technically even a judge but rather a appointed bureaucrat, i believe.

  14. CPP says:

    “The Truth About Vaccines” series starts tomorrow (the 12th). Hosted by Ty Bollinger, who did “The Truth About Cancer”.

    Here’s my share link for it: https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com?ref=3acc793e-27ae-4a56-96db-bc7799fecc3a

  15. Jon, I class autism (“standard” or not, indisputably real) as a “syndrome”.

    The reason being is it is an accountable “spectral” reaction to many causes; vaccines undoubtedly being one.

    To cavalierly attribute all causes of autism to vaccines would be dishonest.

    Why “autism”?

    Well, that’s devilishly hard to answer in the scientific sense, because science has no comprehension of how “genetics” WORK. I can say that if the true purpose of “evolution” (sic) was understood, there would be absolute clarity on the autism syndrome.

    Best
    OT

    • DNomer says:

      Yes. One of the interesting things I just learned in Episode 4 of the above docu-series is that acetaminophen, which is commonly recommended by pediatricians in the US to parents who have a baby that screams non-stop from just getting a vaccine or multi-vaccine. This toxic drug does real damage to the liver, including shutting down production of glutathione, which is important for clearing toxins from the system. Acetaminophen is no longer recommended as standard practice BEFORE shooting the kid with the vaccine, but it is still commonly recommended to parents by ‘trained professionals’ in cases of strong reaction.

  16. DNomer says:

    There is a really fantastic docu series on vaccines that just now started online, and anyone can watch it for free at this time. See here: https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/

  17. shell1j says:

    It seems to me that the very reason that Autism-a code word for encephalitis became erroneously listed a a psychiatric mental condition when it is Not a mental condition is because Kanner wrote about it in the early 1940’s. He wrote about the first 11 cases that he observed in the 1930’s when MERCURY was first added to vaccines (1929). It was a strange set of bizarre behaviors to him. Ever since it has remained as a Psychiatric illness. Autism is a whole body illness. It affects the skin, eyes no longer working as a team, joints, bones, gut (Horrid constipation diarrhea cycles), inability to digest properly, hypotonia, and unto 50 Medical illnesses in one child. When we get it out of the DSM-we can perhaps begin to recover large numbers of children as you must heal 1 layer at a time.

  18. ramgbs says:

    How can the Bas…s get away with this?? Are there no intelligent ,caring, fair, logical thinking people representing you? We the people???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s