The Illuminati goal of abolishing private property: reborn in Globalism

The Illuminati goal of abolishing private property: reborn in Globalism

by Jon Rappoport

April 11, 2017

There is a direct line from Adam Weishaupt’s secret society, the Illuminati, which he formed in Bavaria in 1776, to Karl Marx, and onward to the modern Globalist agenda.

One of the key shared ideas: the abolition of private property.

Many people hold a negative view of Weishaupt, the Illuminati, and especially Marx, and so it fell to Globalists to couch their ideas about property in more acceptable terms.

That feat (one of many attempted) was expressed, in 1976, by Carla Hills, US Trade Representative and a key member of the Rockefeller Trilateral Commission. Hills is credited as the principal architect of the Globalist NAFTA Treaty, which has destructively affected the US and Mexican economies.

Patrick Wood, author of the classic, Technocracy Rising, unearthed Hills’ brief statement on private property. I’ve broken it up into three parts, so I can comment after each mind-bending point.

Carla Hills: “Land, because of its unique nature and the crucial role it plays in human settlements, cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.”

Her use of the term “human settlements” is curious, as is her reference to “crucial role it [land] plays.” Is she trying to take us back to an ancient period in human history, when people were first abandoning nomadic existence and turning to agriculture and fixed communities? It appears so. She wants us to think of land in terms of “oh, look, we can stop wandering and live here, and this space of soil will play ‘a crucial role’ in our future.” It’s been centuries since private ownership of land became a reality. But Hills doesn’t like acknowledging that. And through her use of “human settlements,” she also wants us to believe that the ancient concept of an entire community moving on to land to live is the only valid view. An individual staking a claim to land or buying it is verboten. It’s a corruption of the natural order. I assume Hills wasn’t living on a kibbutz or in a commune when she wrote her statement, but we’ll leave that problem for another time.

Hills asserts that private ownership of property isn’t ordinary and can’t be thought of that way. Individuals shouldn’t “control it.” And the free market causes problems. Well, of course, the free market causes problems, if you assume that no one should own more land than anyone else. And yes, private ownership, based on hard work, is inefficient, if that means some super-government can’t take land away “for the public good.”

Hills stops short of saying government should own all land, but that’s where she’s going.

She continues: “Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes.”

Social injustice, that familiar theme. Some people might own more land than others. That’s not right. That’s unjust. There should be no reward for hard work and intelligence. No. Instead, there is only planning from above. The wise demi-golds, who have our best interests at heart, can decide all the uses to which land is put. They can own huge tracts of land themselves, because they are gods. But the rest of us must submit to the development schemes they lay out. Only bitter clingers, who actually work for a living and strive and make their own way in the world, believe in private property. They’re for social injustice. They don’t want to give way to Greater Sharing.

Finally, Hills states: “Social justice, urban renewal and development, the provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole.”

Kinder and gentler vision. Just launch a plan to give EVERYONE a decent dwelling and healthy conditions. That’s how land should be used and thought of. No more private property. EVERYONE, of course, includes people (in unlimited numbers—no ceiling) who come here from anywhere in the world. And they come because here they get justice. They should get free housing. They should get “healthy conditions.” No problem. Everyone gets a 20-foot by 20-foot square box to live in.

What could go wrong?

Carla Hills is couching her statement to avoid the heavy philosophy and militant threat and totalitarian thrust of the Illuminati and Marx, but she’s on the same page. She’s “sustainable” and “green” and “kind” and “thoughtful” and “caring.” She’s perfect for self-styled liberals and the virtue-signaling Clueless.

She’s part of the tradition that wants to take down the individual spirit and stuff it in the collective.

I know many people (and I’m sure you do, too) who have worked hard, bought land, built a home, raised children, who would nevertheless applaud Carla Hills’ statement. They’ve succeeded in compartmentalizing their minds. It never occurs to them that if the Globalist dream came true, they would wake up one day with their homes and property ripped out from under them. If they think about it at all, they think they can have it both ways. They can continue to live as they’ve been living, but somehow, at the same time, social justice will be served.

They’re in a dream. It’s so pretty.

There is no iron hand, no Lenin, no Marx, no Stalin. All 400 million or so people in the US have lovely little free cottages nestled in valleys, and it’s spring, and the trees are flowering.

Down a country road, in his wheelchair, comes arch-Globalist George Soros, cackling and humming and talking on the phone to his broker. He’s flanked by bodyguards. Perched on nearby hills, snipers are in position, just in case a threat develops.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

29 comments on “The Illuminati goal of abolishing private property: reborn in Globalism

  1. The Agenda 21 aka renamed Agenda 2030 not only calls for the end of Private Property Rights as “Unsustainable” but the end of Country & Suburban living with most of the American Heartland off limits to Humans (except the Elite). Humans will be forced to live in Metro Zones near Light Railway lines, stacked & packed into tiny 10′ by 20′ Coffin “Living” Units inside Giant Vertical Towers under 24/7 Surveillance both Indoors & Outdoors.
    Welcome to; The New world Order

    • futuret says:


    • Bramble says:

      I read somewhere that the predictive programming movie “The Hunger Games” showed us what the Illuminati intend to do with all that empty land. They intend to use it as vast hunting grounds like the Normans did, releasing humans to be hunted like animals, just as they reportedly do to sacrificial children on elite estates in Belgium, Bohemian Grove, and elsewhere.

        • Bramble says:

          Beware of these Bunkers! They are a Globalist Scam. They will persuade you to buy them, launch their Fake Apocalypse WW3 to drive you into them, lock the door & throw away the key. The Globalists have NO INTENTION OF LIVING IN BUNKERS. They have already bought vast estates in their secret hideout country of “ANDINIA”, with its plentiful pure aquifers of fresh water and natural resources, where they plan to watch WW3 unfold in comfort & safety ABOVE GROUND, served by kidnapped European slaves. Even Merkel has reportedly bought an estate not far from George Bush’s, Ted Turner bought 11,000 acres in the 1990’s, Sylvester Stallone, even European royalty. We should pay them all a visit. “Surprise!” we’ll say, “So it’s HERE you all are! Aren’t you glad to see us?”

          • Bramble says:

            Even Bunker Builder Ron Hubbard’s Scientology cult has won official acceptance in Argentina, so it would be interesting to discover how much land he has purchased there, on behalf of his “Scientology College of Argentina”.

  2. kimbelsmom says:

    It’s interesting you brought this up after the airline debacle. I’ve actually heard people saying the airport passenger who purchased a ticket for a seat (his property) should have moved for the amount of money offered and if not, was hard to be sympathetic toward because he was now “disobeying federal law” which grants pilots the right to refuse service to anyone after payment has been accepted and the exchange has taken place. But that Federal Law makes all of those passengers who remained in their seats and didn’t volunteer to be criminals, too, for buying a seat and choosing to keep their seats as well and only by lottery are they not also criminals. But since this guy lost the random lottery, he gets forced out by hook or crook. It’s a law which is very Hunger Games-esque. So, we see the public in some cases using the same rationalization as Donald Trump in his eminent domain cases where he feels that whatever his value or even his calculated “over” value of someone else’s property should suffice to entitle him to someone else’s property once offered. I also heard that it wasn’t the airline’s fault but the aviation patrol’s fault for what happened to the man who lost the police state aggression lottery. What did they expect the aviation police would do? Ask nicely under no threat of harm or theft that this man give up his rightful property and the man would just give it up for someone else who was NOT threatening to harm him physically? No, of course not! They knew that it was by forceful measures that this man would be removed. Anyway, we are coming to this point in history when it is not only our land but our jobs (in healthcare, for example) or our time or whatever, all belong to the state ultimately. We’re all saves and more and more people are just slinking back in fear of the masters, of breaking the LAW (this is Democrats and Republicans that respect laws over rights, natural or otherwise) which they hold in regard or esteem even if the law is unjust and advocates theft or slavery, and telling everyone to slink down, too, or crawl or beg or get out of the seat or off the land. It’s all OPP, paying for it doesn’t even make you a squatter anymore. Our payment is more like a fine for trespassing. We’re all trespassers waiting for the hammer to come down on us and right the wrong we’re doing for existing. We’re an afront to mother nature for existing. We don’t have a right to exist and we should pay and suffer and apologize for not just dying like we should. Take the drugs and die like you’re supposed to! Maybe I’ve been reading your fictional works too long but it all seems quite clear to me. This is not something happening in the future. It’s already happening now.

    • Terri says:

      Its disgraceful anyone can justify barbarism, isn’t it. This is why I always say the constitution was written not to just protect us from government over reach but from mob rule and the peasants who are filled with envy, violence and disrespect for others.

      If what you are saying about some obscure federal law is true, than that law is unconstitutional, unlawful and illegal, repugnant to the Constitutions and therefore null, void and without effect. Those who pass and seek to enforce such a law are traitors and commit sedition and insurrection against our Republic. Those include cheerleaders for the police state, they should be shipped to the mid east or china or north korea since they like fascism so much.

  3. Bramble says:

    Superb analysis!

  4. middleway says:

    “All pigs are equal – but some pigs are more equal than others.” – Orwell

  5. Tim says:

    Corporate property rights ownership will be unaffected. Collectivism is for increasing corporate property holdings and rights. Collectivism for privatization. For corporate ownership.

  6. Oliver Manuel says:

    Thank you, Jon, for using your considerable talents to show the public, all humanity now lives in slavery:

    My research mentor, the late-Professor Paul Kazuo Kuroda, risked his life after WWII, by

    Secretly retaining a personal copy of Japan’s successful atomic bomb design to

    Show the public how an unholy alliance of frightened world leaders and self-seeking scientists

    Started fabricating an altered awareness of reality, i.e., consensus scientific models to

    Isolate humanity from the reality of a Benevolent Higher Power that

    Produced life from highly radioactive debris of a supernova exploding here five billion years ago, and

    Sustained life’s evolution into human form with inalienable rights to self-governance today.

    1. Kuroda’s secret:
    2. Altered awareness: (p. 173); and
    3. False science:
    4. Reality/Truth:

  7. Vivian Warkentin says:


  8. Harold Smith says:

    This is why the communists are always pushing the concept of property tax, especially on residential property, which is now completely out of control in many U.S. states.
    Think about it, from “land” comes food, water, shelter (and even air); everything humans need to exist.
    If people can own land and be self-sufficient, i.e., “off grid”, they are less dependent on “government” and therefore less subject to statist oppression.
    This is why Satanist Karl Marx made the “abolition of private property in land” the first tenet of his communist manifesto.

  9. From Quebec says:

    We want your cash, your house, your phone, your life (we want your soul)
    your thoughts, your emotions, your love, your dreams
    your checkbook, your essence, your sweat, your screams
    your security, your sobriety, your innocence, your society
    your self, your place, your distance, your space………………..

    Adam Freeland – We Want Your Soul

  10. truth1 says:

    In the USA property rights have been eliminated since the late 1960s, when property taxes were introduced. So now you house/land can be taken for simply not paying your “rent.” So what is the argument? They are gone We lost them, Game over. Its now Global planation.

    • bob klinck says:

      Few land properties actually generate money income, so requiring payment of land taxes in money makes land property ownership precarious. Sadly, many people have bought into this mercenary view of residential property by regarding a house not as something to be lived in but, rather, as something to be “flipped”.

  11. Howard Lewis says:

    ie., ALL fir the British Empire.

  12. raygreninger says:

    Go to youtube and search for the Bo an Rocko show with Steve on property taxes. You will discover that the property tax is an excise tax that assumes your property is in commerce. Remember, an excise tax is a tax on a government granted privilege. This is the nature of the income tax. Since a right, the right to make a living and the right to own property, can not be taxed how is it your home, compensation and land are taxed? Because what you think is government is actually a corporate extortion racket.

  13. Sam Nelson says:

    What the New World Order seems to want to install is a system like the system in England 1300-1900, i.e., debtors prisons, landowners as the authorities their right to own land making them so, the enslavement of people to the company store and the corporate owners. Meaning, the entitled eat with silver spoons to avoid the plagues and hope to live forever while the rest of us wallow in our waste and filth and hope to be one of the entitled.
    I swear, the world is a killing place, every god damn living thing looking to kill something else, such horror and injustices.

  14. Jon,

    I believe it is very clear that the ideals of the Illuminati are completely represented by today’s mass Medias. They are architects of distortion.

    The links between Weishaupt and Marx are spurious indeed, in my opinion. Though, undoubtedly, both played “roles” in facilitating wider “globalism”.

    In fact, Marx ridiculed and destroyed communism. Two mid 19th century British activists should be household names, but both are about as “well known” as… I discuss a few of the virtues of Louisa Sarah Bevington and James Tochatti in an old article of mine with a “paranormal” feel ( The diligent would be wise to delve deeper. Those that champion the task will be horrified by what they discover.


  15. RoibeardH says:

    At least they own the breathing air and tax it. But below the line, the people elect these guys into power.

  16. Laura says:

    Great article! In California we’ve had Prop. 13 since about 1978 which put an end to out-of-control property taxes and saved homeowners a lot of money for decades. Carla Hills types have been outraged and trying to take down Prop. 13 ever since it was enacted. Ordinary people owning a home (or a business) is viewed by globalist types and their voting minions as some sort of crime to be punished by more and more punitive taxes that pay for things not related to property ownership, business, or improving communities, but instead pay for things we do not want like public schools largely filled with the kids of illegal immigrants which turn out more liberal voting minions (45% of CA’s property tax goes to public schools with much of that wasted), with the added “bonus” of making homeownership less and less affordable, more and more impossible. An average homeowner whose home is worth $600,000 is paying about $9,000 a year in tax, which is almost like paying rent on top of the huge mortgage payments. I don’t know how people do it! And according to the socialists in power, that’s nowhere near enough tax! It is outrageous, insane. Like the old Ten Years After song said, “Tax the rich, feed the poor, till there are no rich no more.” Then what, who pays for everything then? Thank you, Jon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.