England’s failure in the war on cancer: lunacy on parade

England’s failure in the war on cancer: lunacy on parade

by Jon Rappoport

May 2, 2017

“In the long, long run, the medical cartel is Globalism’s most important component. It pacifies populations through poisons called medicines. And the propaganda wing of the cartel is so successful that citizens, watching the news at night, seeing men in white coats descending from a plane into a Third-World country, ready to treat people suffering from starvation and sewage piped directly into the drinking water, believe this is a humanitarian mission—as if drugs or vaccines could cure starvation.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

How would you assess these outcomes? The drugs failed to prolong life for more than a few months. The drugs were highly toxic and harmed the patients. Prior clinical trials of the drugs showed no appreciable benefits, but the drugs were released for public use anyway.

World pharmacy news reports a stunning study: “Analysis of the drugs that were approved for use by the NHS Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) in England has shown that the fund was not good value for patients and society and may have resulted in patients suffering unnecessarily from toxic side effects of the drugs.”

“In a study published in the leading cancer journal Annals of Oncology, researchers led by Dr Ajay Aggarwal, academic clinical oncologist at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (UK), and Professor Richard Sullivan, director of the Institute of Cancer Policy, King’s College London (UK), looked at 29 drugs that had been approved for use through the CDF in January 2015 for 47 specific cancer conditions (or indications).”

“Of these [cancer] indications, only 18 (38%) were based on clinical trials that reported a statistically significant benefit from the drugs in terms of patients’ overall survival; the (median) average overall survival benefit was 3.2 months, ranging from 1.4 months to 15.7 months.”

“When other factors such as quality of life and toxic side effects of the drugs were considered as part of criteria developed by oncologists to measure value to patients, the majority of the drugs failed to show any evidence of meaningful clinical benefit. In fact, the researchers say the benefit to patients in ‘real world’ situations was probably even less than that found in the clinical trials, since clinical trial participants are carefully selected, have fewer other health problems and tend to be younger than patients not included in trials.”

The inferences from this great failure are clear. People in important positions wanted the drugs to be released for public use, regardless of the fact that they were destined to fail, as evidenced by prior clinical trials.

Benefits (profits) for the drug companies outweighed any interest in the welfare of the patients.

The researchers in the project had to keep busy doing something—and if that meant imposing highly toxic drugs on patients, because useful treatments were not forthcoming from the drug companies—so be it.

It adds up to reckless disregard, indifference to human life, and a willingness to torture patients (with the toxic drugs) to squeeze out a few statistically meaningless “survival” numbers on charts.

Those researchers actively leading and participating in the British grand experiment could see the handwriting on the wall (failure to alleviate suffering), but it didn’t matter: to them, the patients weren’t humans.

These are the same arrogant “watchdogs” who condemn natural health treatments as dangerous and irresponsible.

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

12 comments on “England’s failure in the war on cancer: lunacy on parade

  1. Sue says:

    The U.S.A. isn’t doing any better…

  2. bcphlip says:

    It’s probably safe to say that 98 percent of all medicine doesn’t cure anything. At best they alleviate symptoms. It’s more about squeezing the wealth of the middle class out of their children’s hands for a fee more months of poor quality life.

  3. ecovortx says:

    The terms active and and inactive used in pharmaceuticals never really made sense to me. One day while standing at my sink and it dawned on me that “active” and “inactive” are not medical terms but legal terms. The “active” ingredient is approved by the FD&A to treat a symptom and the “inactive” ingredient comes from this “inactive” ingredient list. […]

    Balance, harmony, clarity, CommUnity Joy….1and1is1.

  4. From Quebec says:

    It is so easy to prevent and cure cancer.

    It is known that viruses, bacterias and cancer cells, cannot live in a body where the pH level is slightly alkaline, they can only live in an acid pH level.

    Unless the body’s pH level is slightly alkaline, the body cannot heal itself.

  5. No one has identified the ROOT CAUSE of cancer correctly yet, Jon.

    Coupled with “symptoms reduction/prevention” “cures”, how could anyone be “surprised” by this?


    • Churchill says:

      Radiation, chemicals (like chemo drugs), other drugs (read side effects), acidity, oxygen deprivation. ACA was founded well over 50 years ago. They have taken in billions upon billions of dollars and all they have is “don’t smoke”. Cancer has been cured decades ago and in numerous ways

      • Incorrect.

        The root cause of cancer is carbon fossil fuels. Extraneous organic matter interferes with cellular RNA, which is managed by the chromosomes. Because DNA adjustments can only be TRULY interpreted in the atomic layer, there clarity would become evident. Organic carbons are desperately hard to separate at that level and that is why the cellular mutation process is corrupted.

        Providing there is no “cause” to trigger irregular cell growth (tumours), the body will appear “normal”. Triggers (growing tumours) are numerous and varied and include certain types/doses of radiation. Certain types/doses radiation also has the effect of killing off “weaker” cells and this will see the dramatic reduction of tumours as cell “guidance systems” work out the problem internally.

        There are a number of organic limiters too, such as a “tea” made from the Soursopp plant, cannabis oil, etc., etc.. None of these “rid” a body of “cancer”. The other approach is to alter the body’s “environment”. An absence of acids (amino’s are acids!) and fatty sugars make it almost impossible for tumours to “grow”. This is NOT removing “cancer” though.

      • Sue says:

        Churchill, I guess someone should have warned you about the Oz. He claims to be smarter than Einstein, and also gives some of his background on his blog as follows:

        “I describe myself as a “Cosmic hinge” as the coming together of all entities, not necessarily via “genetic” connection, but by virtue of being selected by Prime Source. Being the emmissary of Prime Source, I am a universal judge. That judgement is committed to the balance of all things. My last incarnation was 19,000 years ago as iXosanna. If I have a genetic predisposition, it is through the Zetas that protect my crown shakra, an active dragon soul (none less than the magificent spendour) and an inner water being of Annunaki stock (possibly a mer-being)”

  6. IMNAHA says:

    Looking at the BIG PICTURE, pharmacology and the medical mafia are just one aspect of our overlords/ gods(with small ‘g’) agenda to curb their definition of overpopulation and create a technocratically mind controlled populace. Thus far they have been fairly successful. The largest control mechanism they have is the Central Banker Warfare business model which has been reducing the REPRODUCING slave/serf numbers down for multiple millenia. Were it not for wars wiping out generations of male sperm donors our global pop would be over 10 billion which is a bitch of a number of people to control.
    Bottom Line: If you find a contradiction in anything from the ubergov you are struggling under a false premise. Wake the eff up and connect the dots. THIS IS THE DISCLOSURE THAT “THEY ” HAVE BEEN HOLDING FROM US AND IT IS STARTING TO HAPPEN HERE AND NOW!!

  7. The NHS gets a very poor rap but when you look at the founding in 1948 after the 2nd WW alongside full employment and free education in a country pretty devastated by the bombing it was amazing. That it has taken the ruling class 70 years to decimate it is also pretty miraculous.

  8. profits before people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.