Facebook, the CIA, and the Clintons

Facebook, the CIA, and the Clintons

by Jon Rappoport

June 19, 2017

This article recounts key events along a time line that stretches from 1986 to the present. Follow the bouncing ball.

Since Facebook went public with an IPO (Initial Public Offering) of stock in 2012, I’ve been following the trail of its stock price.

In 2012, I wrote:

“But now the Facebook stock has tanked. On Friday, August 17 [2012], it weighed in at half its initial IPO price. For the first time since the IPO, venture-capital backers were legally permitted to sell off their shares, and some did, at a loss.”

“Articles have begun appearing that question Zuckerberg’s ability to manage his company. ‘Experts’ are saying he should import a professional team to run the business side of things and step away.”

“This has the earmarks of classic shakeout and squeeze play… First, [insiders] drive down the price of the stock, then they trade it at low levels that discourage and demoralize public investors, who sell their shares…As the stock continues to tank, the insiders quietly buy up as much of it as they can. Finally, when the price hits a designated rock bottom, they shoot it up all the way to new highs and win big.”

In 2013, I followed up and wrote: “Facebook launched its IPO and went public on May 18, 2012. The opening stock price was 42 dollars a share.”

“In September 2012, the collapsing stock hit a low of 17.55.”

“On October 17, 2013, a year later, after a long climb, the stock reached an all-time high: 52.21.”

“So…Facebook, a company with CIA-front connections, a company that encourages people to offer up surveillance data on themselves [and censors politically incorrect news], goes through a financial transformation. Its IPO price collapses like ice in a heat wave. It keeps trading at its new low prices, scaring lots of investors.”

“They sell their shares. Insiders buy up those shares at delicious discounts.”

“Then, when the insiders have scooped up enough, they begin to move the price. Up. The long climb begins.”

Now, in June of 2017, it’s time to check in again. What’s happened to Facebook’s stock price since the high of $54 a share in 2013?

From October 2016 to December 2016, there was another shakeout that convinced many shareholders to dump their stocks—and of course, insiders gobbled up those shares for themselves. The shakeout took the stock price down from an all-time high of $127.88 a share to $115.05.

Then, once again, the relentless climb resumed. On June 2nd of this year, the stock reached a new all-time high of $153.61.

All in all, quite a ride. From the IPO price of $42, down to $17…and now $150.

Are some of the insiders who have been engineering Facebook’s long-term stock-rise front-men for the CIA?

I ask that question because of Facebook’s CIA connections:

The big infusion of cash that sent Mark Zuckerberg and his fledgling college enterprise on their way came from Accel Partners, in 2004.

Jim Breyer, head of Accel, attached a $13 million rocket to Facebook, and nothing has ever been the same.

Earlier that same year, a man named Gilman Louie joined the board of the National Venture Capital Association of America (NVCA). The chairman of NVCA? Jim Breyer. Gilman Louie happened to be the first CEO of the important CIA start-up, In-Q-Tel.

In-Q-Tel was founded in 1999, with the express purpose of funding companies that could develop technology the CIA would use to “gather data.”

That’s not the only connection between Facebook funder Jim Breyer and the CIA’s man, Gilman Louie. In 2004, Louie went to work for BBN Technologies, headed up by Breyer. Dr. Anita Jones also joined BBN at that time. Jones had worked for In-Q-Tel and was an adviser to DARPA, the Pentagon’s technology department that helped develop the Internet.

With these CIA/DARPA connections, it’s no surprise that Jim Breyer’s jackpot investment in Facebook is not part of the popular mythology of Mark Zuckerberg. Better to omit it. Who can fail to realize that Facebook, with its endless stream of personal data, and its tracking capability, is an ideal CIA asset?

From the time Mark Zuckerberg was a child and attended the summer camp for “exceptional children,” CTY (Center for Talented Youth), run by Johns Hopkins University, he, like other CTY students, Sergey Brin (co-founder of Google), and Lady Gaga, have been easy to track.

CTY and similar camps filter applications and pick the best and brightest for their accelerated learning programs. Tracing the later progress of these children in school and life would be a walk in the park for agencies like the CIA.

When Zuckerberg founded an interesting little social network at Harvard, and then sought to turn it into a business, the data-mining possibilities were obvious to CIA personnel. Through their cutouts, as described above, they stepped in and lent a helping hand.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Facebook/CIA presented an anti-Trump stance, which meant a pro-Hillary stance. Is that a pro-CIA stance? Let’s look at a fascinating piece of history involving the CIA and the other Clinton: Bill.

The source here is the explosive 1995 book, Compromised, by Terry Reed and John Cummings.

According to the authors, Bill Clinton, way back in the 1980s, was involved with the CIA in some very dirty dealings in Arkansas—and I’m not just talking about the cocaine flights landing at the Mena airport.

It seems Bill had agreed to set up CIA weapons-making factories in his home state, under the radar. But because Arkansas, when it comes to money, is all cronies all the time, everybody and his brother found out about the operation and wanted in. Also, Bill was looking for a bigger cut of the action.

This security breach infuriated the CIA, and a meeting was held to dress down Bill and make him see the error of his ways. His CIA handlers told him they were going to shut down the whole weapons operation, because Bill had screwed up royally. A screaming match ensued—but the CIA people backed off a bit and told Bill HE WAS STILL THEIR MAN FOR AN EVENTUAL RUN FOR THE PRESIDENCY.

Of course, there are people who think Reed and Cumming’s book contains fiction, but John Cummings was a top-notch reporter for Newsday. He co-authored the 1990 book, Goombata, about the rise and fall of John Gotti. He exposed US operations to destroy Cuban agriculture with bio-weapons. It’s highly doubtful he would have put his name on Compromised without a deep conviction he was correctly adding up the facts.

Here, from Compromised, is an account of the extraordinary meeting, in Arkansas, between Bill Clinton and his CIA handlers, in March of 1986, six years before Clinton would run for the Presidency. Author Terry Reed, himself a CIA asset at the time, was there. So was Oliver North, and a man named “Robert Johnson,” who was representing CIA head Bill Casey.

Johnson said to Bill Clinton:

“Calm down and listen….We are all in this together. We all have our personal agendas…but let’s not forget, both the Vice President and Mr. Casey want this operation to be a success. We need to get these assets and resources in place and get them self-sustaining and prospering on their own while we have the chance. This is a golden opportunity. The timing is right. We have communists taking over a country in this hemisphere. We must all pull together and play as a team. This is no time for lone wolves…

“I’m not here to threaten you [Bill Clinton]. But there have been mistakes. The Mena operation survived undetected and unexposed only because Mr. [Barry] Seal carried with him a falsely created, high-level profile of a drug runner. All the cops in the country were trying to investigate a drug operation. That put the police in a position where we could control them. We fed them what we wanted to feed them, when we wanted to feed them; it was our restaurant and our menu…now we have to shut it down….

“Bill, you are Mr. Casey’s fair-haired boy. But you do have competition for the job you seek. We would never put all eggs in one basket. You and your state have been our greatest asset. The beauty of this, as you know, is that you’re a Democrat, and with our ability to influence both parties, this country can get beyond partisan gridlock. Mr. Casey wanted me to pass on to you that unless you fuck up and do something stupid, you’re No. 1 on the short list for a shot at the job you’ve always wanted.

“That’s pretty heady stuff, Bill. So why don’t you help us keep a lid on this and we’ll all be promoted together. You and guys like us are the fathers of the new government. Hell, we are the new covenant.”

By this account, Bill Clinton was the CIA’s boy back in 1986, long before he launched himself into his first 1992 Presidential campaign.

That speaks of major planning. In 1992, an obscure governor from a rather obscure state suddenly gains national prominence and vaults to the head of the line in the race for the White House.

Now, consider the role of the CIA-connected Facebook in the 2016 presidential election. Did Facebook’s strategy of cutting off pro-Trump postings/information and instead supporting ANOTHER CLINTON, HILLARY, signal the continuation of a long-running covert CIA op to put and keep the Clintons in power?

Since 1986, have the Clintons been a package deal for the CIA?

Was the most recent incarnation of that deal the Facebook op to put Hillary in the White House?

Most people have a problem looking at log-term ops. They conceive of covert actions taking place along severely limited time lines. That’s exactly what major operatives count on. They can plan in the dark for two or three decades ahead (or longer) and feel they’re in the clear.

And when a little social networking company comes along and needs an infusion of cash, they can step in, help, and, seeing the possibilities, they can help push the stock to new highs and accomplish elite surveillance and censor true information and support their favored presidential candidate—all during the same dozen years.

It’s an easy program.

All sorts of cards can be played from the bottom of the deck.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

21 comments on “Facebook, the CIA, and the Clintons

  1. Dana Doran says:

    Thanks for that Jon, it really explains why Hillary can’t believe she’s not the President. She had every confidence in the CIA…..oops.

  2. Dana Doran says:

    Thanks, that explains why Hillary can’t believe she’s not the President!

  3. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    Yup….

  4. Michael says:

    Your beating a dead horse; and that’s all old news.

    Here’s a lead…tass.com/defense/952119

    Ask Mr Trump why this has happened, ask him why Hillary’s agenda and the NeoCon stageplay is still selling tickets in Syria?

    Why is the US shooting down the guys that are killing the terrorists. You know ISIS, and the assholes who are using chemicals on Syrians; and the now sleeping wid da fishies head-chopper in chief Abū Bakr al-Baghdadi, may the worms enjoy his putrid carcass.
    BTW did you know the American pilots are using white phosporus in Syria; that’s a chemical weapon ya know.

    Do you realize this is an escalation…how long before Russia has to make a hard decision and shoot down a rogue US Jet. And then what?

    And your writings about Lady Gaga, Brin and that jew SOB Zuckerberg.
    Who care?…hmm

    Investigate or be fake news. Have you lost your edge…getting tired. The fight ain’t over yet old man.

    • arcadia11 says:

      lol.

      maybe there never was a fight here, michael. your astuteness is exceeded
      only by your haute couture. (your shirt
      is totally cute)

      • From Quebec says:

        lol,, From the guys who take their news from the leftist hateful MSM who hates Trump as much as they do. Get used to it folks, TRUMP WON.

        Keep it up Jon, you are doing a great job, The best investigator on the Internet
        And do not get offended by these brainwashed comments. dedicated to making you feel bad.

        • Michael says:

          […]

          Really…that’s the best you can deduce from what I say.
          You think I want Trump impeached, huh. No I want him to finish what he started.
          I want him to remain president, because that is what he is, but, I want his feet held to the fire for what he started.

          Main stream media; I don’t go there.

          But you are mixed up in the crazy theater of Megyn Kelly and Alex Jones world…as I heard it stated hear, “Monkeys throwing fecal matter at each other.”

          Your problem is: you are are as fanatical on the right, as the crazy maxist left are on their position. Both; neither of you know anything of what is going on in the world. The real shit.
          You see the veneer, and are religiously attached to your position. I don’t know if you were paying attention, but I was for Trump, in the beginning. I gave him a chance. But he changed.
          He has done good things. the exit from Paris is great.

          But is the US completely disconnected from the three “T’s” (TPP, TIPP, TISA), no it isn’t… and your not paying attention little monkey.

          Why the escalation of arms sales, military budget increases, and aggression to other sovereign nations. Why the pandering to the Neocons. You can’t see a pattern; you just throw shit at me because I don’t hold your one -sided position.

          All this Comey, Flynn, Russians under the bed bullshit, is smoke and mirrors, for what reason? Because the left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing. There is a reason for it, it is a pych-op to keep the brain dead like you and the left throwin shit at each other. Mean while, American pilots are shooting down the good guys. And Russia is growing impatient at a hegemonic US. How long do you think they will hold that patience? And they not alone. China, India, Pakistan, Brazil, many power house grow impatient.

          You see Trump as the soap opera star, the lead in the apprentice. POTUS as a part to be played in the world. Flat tires on back roads…

          I see him as a world leader, a diplomat for the west, who made promises. Who must try to undo the escalation towards world war. To try to undo what previous aministrations have done to the world. Go anywhere in the world, stick a pin in the map and you will find some place the US has fucked up, and those people are not happy about it.
          Trump is not a president that will put his life on the line for what he believes. And that troubles me.

          He voiced his opinions about the absolescence of NATO, the craziness and the cult mentality of CAGW. he just help cut the ribbon on a new NATO building bond and determined to kill Russia.

          The removal of jobs to other nations. The draining the swamp and so on; all righteous indignation.
          We now have new varieties of creatures in the swamp, more exotic types of creatures. And the big banks have him in there pocket. He has made deals to save his own ass after his term as president. He owes a lot of money to European banks; German banks. Will that make him pro EU?

          Because believe me the insane left are working in their crazy little workshop on an Anti-Trump for the next president. He won’t get a second term, not because he doesn’t deserve it, because the left hate him so much. And are already organizing.

          America policing the world, but hypocritical to the facts of it’s own sins.

          Donald Trump is the President of the United States, he was voted legally into power. There is nothing wrong with that…but Trump needs to be held accountable.
          And the intelligent can’t because of monkeys like you, throwin shit at each other, and anyone who voices a logical argument against his nepotism or cronyism, or hypocracy, or blindness, or politics, or lies. And he does lie.

          Jon is not the best investigator; he is one of many investigating real news. There are others better than he, James Corbett at the Corbett Report, far exceeds what Jon Purports.
          But Jon has an agenda, I suspect, and that is not objective. That is not the real truth.
          That is fallacy to say look, Kathy “I’m totally fucking insane” Griffin is wanting to cut the president’s head off. But fall-out from the illegal missile strike in Syria, killed civililians in a nearby neighbourhood, and some of them were children is ignored.

          Invanka: Daddy, daddy, the babies the babies. Assad’s a monster. Bomb him dad.
          Trump: Don’t worry honey bunches, I’ll get em..America won’t stand for baby killers.

          Look Jon says, big pharma is selling opioids, like candy; Trump drops the MOAB on the Taliban who wish to irradicate poppy fields and Trumps troops are guarding them, for whom?

          I suspect Jon has made a deal with AJ and I think it’s ruining his rep. Lrt’s face it AJ is getting really highly strung, playing mind games with zombies. Even though it is financially of benefit. And suspect he has financial problems since I see the the site is up for sale. Was offered for sale.

          I personally have bought all his products; they are great, I highly recommecd them. I have not enough time to spend on them.

          How many do you have shit for brains? How many have you bought? How do you think these words get on this page…hmm.

          So many invade here with there little word bite, “Good job”, “Nice article!”, “keep up the good work.” mean while the man’s eating cat food. Buy his products ya cheap bastards.

          But still I will confront him…and liars like you.

          • From Quebec says:

            You are lucky that I do not own this website, because I would ban you.
            Insulting Jon like you do daily, shows who you really are. A brainwashed know nothing idiot..

            Do not bother responding, I wont read your clueless comment.

            • Michael says:

              To/From Quebec…

              You’ll read my comment, you’re a french woman for god sakes…

              Oh yes you will, I know your type…you see I am married to a french woman; their so passionate, firey. French women. They always read the comments. And your curiosity will make you read mine. I’ll bet the dog on it, and I love my dog and don’t want to lose him. Of course you can write me back if you didn’t, and I’ll be proved wrong.

              I’m not bothered by censors like yourself. That’s the problem with this left/right thing, no one listening, no talking. Censoring each other. Throwing insults.

              Ban me would ya, see that difference between me and you, I believe in freedom, and I wouldn’t ban you, even though I disagree with you, because I learn from people like you. You think I insult Jon, lol. You’re a shallow one. 

              You idolize people; Donald Trump and Jon Rappoport. You see them above yourself. I see them as equals. 

              I’ll tell ya story:

              “In fact, back in 1997, when the Donald Trump version of the tale was still relatively new, Trump’s office was actively denying its truthfulness of the story:

              The implausible story making the rounds at Toronto doughnut shops is that somebody’s newphew’s friend’s cousin, Joe, was driving down Highway 401 in his pickup truck when he spotted a white stretch limousine, with its hood up, on the shoulder.

              Joe, being a good Samaritan, stopped to help. Within minutes, he got the limo running and a grateful driver asked for Joe’s card so he could send him a little something.

              “Nah,” Joe said. “It was nothing. I was just trying to be helpful.”

              The driver insisted, so Joe gave him a card and forgot about it. A week later, he got a call from his bank informing him that his $160,000 mortgage had been paid off by Donald Trump, who was a passenger in the limo.

              “We’ve heard the story,” said an irritated-sounding assistant of Mr. Trump’s at his New York office. “No, it isn’t true.”

              There is a lot of urban myth From Quebec, but then there is truth; what you see, and hear, and feel, taste and touch, and what you can deduce and intuit; what with critical thinking you can gain from that logical analysis, and the facts.

              I’m sorry that your mind is so closed to anything other than what you believe…

          • Uh, “highly strung” not only AJ I guess. Yeah, that means you, Mason Boy. Leave Jon alone. He writes what he wants to write and when he wants to write it. He’s been doing that probably from before you were born. I personally glean more from one of his articles than anyone possibly could from your rantings. Maybe you just lack the intuitiveness and foreknowledge to get what he’s saying. Trump? Yeah, sure ya dumb ass. You have no earthly idea and THAT is the truth.

  5. TrishWriter says:

    The Presidential “Selection” process leaves many to feel as though we are generating more freedom with each pull of the voting lever. If the conversation with Clinton is true, however, we have a lot to learn about those who claim to be holy and saintly enough to make laws for us and to control the selection process. How little control we mere commoners actually have; I’m guessing that a major difference between us and Europeans in the Middle Ages is that the Europeans did not believe they were free.

  6. DNomer says:

    I regard this as an excellent contribution to my info on the Clintons / CIA connection, and the info on CIA / Facebook. It is quite difficult to get accurate info on the CIA, since they are heavily invested in controlling the major media, doing false flags, infiltration of truth-seeking groups or potential power groups, disinformation, and such criminal enterprises.

  7. Celene Cross says:

    According to partners in power, Roger Morris and sandy Denton, hope I got their names right, bill clinton was recruited by the CIA in 1968 or 1969 (there was another source but I forgot, different years). Here’s my theory based on the evidence. Bill grew his hair long, like Jim Morrison another clean cut college boy turned hippie, to join whatever operation the CIA was conducting in the late sixties at laurel canyon (see david McGowan whose premature death i still mourn) to discredit the Vietnam anti-war movement. Once CIA, always CIA with few exceptions (Philip Agee, John perkins, mark philips perhaps). Hrc was head of her class at Wellesley and she appears to be Clinton’s damage control more than his wife. She has made bizarre professional choices and I believe in 1974 while working on nixons impeachment she was bragging about becoming First Lady. Sounds like an arranged CIA marriage as does Chelsea’s marriage. The clinton foundation just sounds more like a CIA front company morphed from the clinton global initiative financed by Jeffrey epstein (trafficking by conchita Sarnoff). Trump paid to play. Its like the deep state has infiltrated everything at this point. What DOESNT the CIA have its paws in? And what do we do about it? You can’t survive without being a hypocrite most of the time. I should speak for myself I guess. Anyway, I think hrc has been on the CIA payroll since before she was married to bill. That’s what it looks like to me. If Hillary lost, she was supposed to. Maybe due to health, maybe due to Haiti and her human trafficking and organ harvesting? Maybe she’s dead? I’d love to have a pair of x-ray goggles just for fun and take a peak. Thanks for the X-rays Jon. Maybe hrc wasn’t even let in on the decision made for her to lose. But she sure countered with the trump/russia hacking defense story quickly. Rabbit holes. So many of them.

    • Michael says:

      Very good I like it…stimulating thought. I have thoughts on a similar line.
      The Clintons are a tag team, and she it damge control.

      Interesting to note; Vladamir Putin asked Bill Clinton if Russia would be allowed to join NATO if they applied. Bill said “Why Not” Needless to say Russia was refuse entry.

      This piece on Brin and Lady Gaga, and Zuckerberg and the Camp/s for exceptional kids.
      I suspect this has been going on for a long time; and really when you look at ‘skull and bones’, they are camps for exceptional blue blood kids.

      I am sure they are now being instituted on civic and state levels. There seems to be a rise of new prophets in politics around the world, new visionaries; but I suspect they are manchurian using those vast amounts of data they gain on us as the mold to make a cake.

      How many places like this around the country are there?
      And are they genenetically manipulating the occupants now; since the first child made of four or five parents was born in California fairly recently. How long before it is just the gene rich that are ruling. Since most of the voters can’t arry on a basic political argument.

      Seems the world is turning out to be a mix of Huxley’s and Orwell’s visions. Orwell for us and Huxley for them.

      I like what you wrote…

      • arcadia11 says:

        celene & michael. i like what both of you wrote.

        “Give me just one generation of youth, and I’ll transform the whole world.” v lenin

        it was certainly more than one generation, but with the mind control tech available of late the inbreds are reaping their reward. hopefully, it did not work on a great many.

    • barn moose says:

      “Since Facebook went public with an IPO (Initial Public Offering) of stock in 2012, I’ve been following the trail of its stock price.”

      [..]

      “This has the earmarks of classic shakeout and squeeze play… First, [insiders] drive down the price of the stock, then they trade it at low levels that discourage and demoralize public investors, who sell their shares…As the stock continues to tank, the insiders quietly buy up as much of it as they can. Finally, when the price hits a designated rock bottom, they shoot it up all the way to new highs and win big.”

      Question is, did he profit by his insights, did he invest in the stock?

      Would that be hypocritical (a la Celene’s “You can’t survive without being a hypocrite most of the time.”)?

      Or Robin Hood-ish (“steal” from/with the rich to fund one’s work in exposing them)?

  8. Klaus Schiffler says:

    Just out of curiosity. What type and what names are the weapons the CIA manufactured in Arkansas? And where were or are the location(s) of the plant(s)? Do we have the names of workers employed there? I hope one of them was not Larry Nichols.

  9. nexusxyz says:

    Go look up the legal case Leader Industries versus Facebook. He is a myth and the Hollywood film is an even bigger myth

    https://americans4innovation.blogspot.com.au/2017/06/deep-state-hides-zuckerbergs-evidence.html

    • Oh hell yeah. Thanks for posting. So Fuckerberg could be MK. Totally makes sense and ties with the Clinton’s/Bush’s.

      Have you heard of Cathy O’Brien? She was MK victim allegedly rescued by CIA asset Mark Phillips. In her book, Trance: Formation of America, she really paints a picture of the Clinton’s (and Bush’s, Ford, Cheney and a bunch of less famous criminals) that is hard to erase from one’s memory after reading it.

  10. “Most people have a problem looking at log-term ops. They conceive of covert actions taking place along severely limited time lines. That’s exactly what major operatives count on. They can plan in the dark for two or three decades ahead (or longer) and feel they’re in the clear.”

    Indeed, it’s the long/big picture that they keep on the alter of Satan. “They” are always five moves ahead of the cognoscenti and five gazillion ahead of everyone else. At the end of the day/millenium it’s always “follow the money,” isn’t it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s