YouTube cartoon videos programming toddlers for trauma and destruction

YouTube cartoon videos programming toddlers for trauma and destruction

by Jon Rappoport

November 13, 2017

Play very close attention to this one. It’s boggling.

A reader recently sent me a note which alerted me to a form of programming I’d never heard of. The links he sent introduced me to what is a very widespread phenomenon on YouTube. The technology involved is beyond my limited understanding. Some of you will be able to clarify the “situation.”

While Google and YouTube are engaging in censorship of political content, they are allowing a packaging of cartoons for very small children. While Momma works around the house, her toddlers can sit, mesmerized, and watch long-form collections of cartoons.

But in these cartoons, there is disturbing content, to say the least. Ugliness, violence. All presented in a repetitive cheery tone.

Supposedly, some of this content is created by random algorithms. From what I’ve seen so far, I find that hard to believe.

Here is the reader’s note. Read, follow the links, and see what you think:

The article about Google’s “Youtube Kids” program is entitled “Something is wrong on the internet”. (note: Lot’s of good stuff in the article but then the author makes the conclusion that it is “all capitalism’s” fault.)

Example video: (Look at the number of views on this one video alone. They are making money off of the ads that Google inserts into the video. It could also be that not that many humans (children) watched the video. It could also be bots watching the video, too.)

Giant Lollipop Ice Cream Candy Johny Johny Yes Papa Nursery Rhymes Songs for Kids Children Toddlers

Note: the song — “5 finger nursery rhyme” — is in tens of thousands of videos — just the video portion is changed up. Note also that the title of the video is a “keyword salad” — based on someone or some software analyzing real-time search trends on YouTube. The videos are packaged as 30min, 60min — for the mother that needs a break.

Note: the original “5 finger nursery rhyme” nursery rhyme video was supposedly monetarily successful (the creator got a cut of the ad revenue)… so, others came in to knock it off. The Gamification Economy.

Here is another example:

Cute Kitten Cat Colorful Learning Color Video For Kids Finger Family Nursery Rhyme Song

—end of reader’s note—

If you’re shocked, send out the links far and wide.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

29 comments on “YouTube cartoon videos programming toddlers for trauma and destruction

  1. tubes of sewer says:

    But I thought the internet was all full of chocolate fountains and unicorns.
    The comrades of the tube know what is best, why I bet they even wear white coats.
    Kulak thoughtcriminals who don’t subscribe to hive mind group think won’t last on tube but everything else is good to go.
    There are even xxx videos if you sign up and no one would ever lie about their age to sign up.

  2. mobiuswolf says:

    Creepy, but I think my “shocked” button must be broken.

  3. Ramses Reyes says:

    I caught on to this trend rather quickly. I always screen what my child watches, 6, I don’t allow him to spend too much time in front of a screen however whenever I do let him watch a cartoon I always check to see if they are age appropriate. I discovered quite a few disgustingly inappropriate videos on Youtube, so much so that my son is not allowed on the platform to watch anything. Parents always need to keep their guard up.

  4. Theodore says:

    Liberals ‘Drag’ Children Into Early Sexualization

    Rainbow Snatch goes undercover to reveal how children are being indoctrinated into fetish lifestyles

    Millie Weaver | – November 13, 2017

  5. elliottjab says:

    Reblogged this on elliottjab and commented:
    The exposure of this so is more proof if the attempted seep of globalism..COSERVATIVE PARENTS – YOU NEED TO WAKE UP if u are using this

  6. elliottjab says:

    Hideous beyond the pall. I know this is tougher but it’s past time to go back to good coloring books n crayons; and very old cartoons… Which can have suspect commentary/conotation as well. J
    Thanks Jon – your service is so appreciated.

  7. Jennifer says:

    Give me Mr. Rogers any day! When you can’t even understand what is being sung, how do you expect your kids to speak correctly.

  8. From Quebec says:

    This world has gone insane.

  9. From Quebec says:

    Drag Queen Festival In Austin Promotes Early Sexual/Gender Confusion

    • woody says:

      Neighbor’s kids one day came into the backyard, placed flat stones in a row and sat on them. When I came and asked what were they doing, they said they were riding a bus to downtown, and pointed the “driver” in “front seat”. I would say, that simple toy built collective imagination.

      BTW, what happened to those various toy science kits for kids you could mail order up to the 1980′? Pool of future chemists, astronomers and music composers narrows with youtube/google “click here” philosophy. Apple smart phones are smart because those who invented them were smart. If 3 years old kid can master its usage with ease, then it should be called dumb phone.

      Conflict of interest disclosure: author raised with wooden toys.

      • honestliberty says:

        My soul is overwhelmed with sorrow for these children. It is also overwhelmed with anger at these parents. I have a 3 year old son. He is wonderful and joyous. I try so hard to not be consumed with anxiety for what kind of person he will turn into when he grows, as his mother would set him up for failure just to spite me, all the while pretending it was me who was the problem.

        I see this child abuse taking all forms, and sadly many males are subjecting their children to these parasitic self-destructive methods. ugh.

        Sorrow. Anguish. I’m not pleased that I feel this way but is there a stronger word for how foul this type of treatment is of children?

  10. artemisix says:

    Disturbing for sure, psychologically unbalanced and detached from life. Responsible parents should not give their kids a phone until at least 15, and never let them watch a screen alone before then either. Well that is what i did, it still will be fascinating for them, because it appears to be part of the culture and humans try to be a part of that instinctively……Teach them, there is ART and there is Propaganda. This is NOT ART. It does not offer anything, and is not life affirming in any way. It is manipulative and life disparaging, if anything. Art comes from the heart and soul. The person or THING that made this has neither. LOVE your kids, Keep it away from your kids for as long as you can, and teach them the difference beforehand. They will have to make their own choice after that.
    You cannot live their lives for them.

  11. truth1 says:

    I really wish I could say I was shocked, but the truth is that I’ve seen it all and nothing can surprise me any more. Disgusted? Yes! Shocked? Not possible! Parents are all dumbed down idiots. We are doomed.

  12. DNomer says:

    What you see is that cheap 3D and what is sometimes called ‘2 1/2 D’ using programs like After Effects has replaced the old 2D hand drawn cell animation for these cartoons. The animation quality is below junk — this could even be disturbed young people doing the animation. But the real problem is the motivation and ideas in the cartoons — this stuff is beyond gross, and thoroughly demented. Anyone who even slightly cares about their children would not let them feed on crud like this.

  13. There are two ways of looking at this, Jon.

    Society is drawn by iconographic schisms. I find that a bad thing. It polarises ineffective judgement. You read the book, not the cover.

    My latest article says it in a different way (and to a certain degree brings attention to your alarm call).

    “It is interesting that Oklahoma and Waco (which set the precedent for legitimised “law enforcement” murder of any American citizen) saved [then President] Clinton’s bacon. It shows me “the people” have no say or formal influence on what is “in the interest” of “wider society”. That is the “programmers’” exclusive right. A good example of elite manipulation of public opinion can be seen in analysis of the (ridiculous) “gay plague” branding campaign. Whereas an overburden of industrial pollution and chemical pesticides “caused” HIV in Africa, there has been barely a mention of it anywhere, ever. I shall focus on “Big Oil” in a future article provisionally titled “Coming Clean on Cancer”. To resoundingly dampen the free love heyday, throughout the early 1990’s British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher ran regular government sponsored television adverts that symbolised promiscuous sex as guaranteeing participants’ “horrible deaths”. Presumably similar libellous techniques were used in other corners of the first world….

    There is actually quite a long history behind changing attitudes. Chronologies (were they to be read and digested) would go a long way to diffusing the sheer insanity that currently embroils the paedophilia “outrage”. Attitudes have, in some ways, remained the same but it is reflective contingences employed that have radically altered. Perhaps making the adolescent discovery tour “theoretical” has helped induce mesmerised masses. People’s inability to focus on anything in isolation (thus perpetually basing existence on generalities) appears to be the most devastating symptom of the “TV age”….

    Nevertheless, those that deceive and act spitefully are rewarded for personal dishonour. That’s the “program” for all society; all societies. Scripted reality versions profit from denying conscience, of course, so true spirituality must be forbidden at all cost regardless of cultural persuasion. Frankly, this in consideration, it is impossible to function in society today without being unfaithful. Ancient, traditional rites of passage have gradually been replaced with risk/reward (I’ll call them) “holographs” supplied by the “goggle box” and other mechanisms of influence. Sexuality is now almost universally framed as something “obviously” (sic) illicit. Thus, most things sexual might arguably judgmentally parry with actions like smoking and the consumption of drugs/alcohol. For the young, relationships have been reduced to “intrigue” which opens the door to cruel, vindictive power plays. Consideration of blackmail as the first option in negotiation persists into adulthood…..”


    • Friggin word press, we’ll see if this posts..
      Ozzie, I’m confused. You appear to be an apologist for pedophiles.
      What is this supposed “outrage” you felt necessary to emphasize. Are you saying it’s an unjust outrage?

      I ask because based on another post in another article by Jon, it appeared as though you were at the very least attempting to blur the lines of what is an acceptable age of consent. Do you hold the sentiment that these elitist adults who prey on pre pubescent children are not doing anything wrong?
      Because if you think it’s normal and healthy to be attracted to children who haven’t developed sexual organs to maturity, you are a sick fucking Savage. If it’s not that bad and your basically in the realm of attempting to justify people like Quentin Tarantino and his barely pubescent party girls, you’re still a sick fuck.

      So what is it bub? I sincerely hope I’m misinterpreting your words but I don’t think my reading comprehension is that limited, even when exposed to your loquacious rants

      • Wow, what eloquence. I’d call you a “dick head”, but I don’t stoop to the gutter. Given your comment, you are never attempted to read the article or your lack of IQ inhibited your comprehension. I do hope the world is rid of people like you soon, so conscience is allowed to flourish.

        • call me a dick head. Good. I am! To the weak willed and lusters of children- and deservedly so.
          As everyone on here knows who has ever read my responses, when I misstep I apologize. I have no shame in admitting I am wrong.

          So what is it Ozzie? Answer my questions so we can all know where you stand, with your lengthy esoteric philosophies. Lord knows I’ve read enough now to fill an encyclopedia. Therefore, I’ll repeat:

          “1. What is this supposed “outrage” you felt necessary to emphasize.
          2. Are you saying it’s an unjust outrage?

          I ask because based on another post in another article by Jon, it appeared as though you were at the very least attempting to blur the lines of what is an acceptable age of consent.

          3. Do you hold the sentiment that these elitist adults who prey on pre pubescent children are not doing anything wrong?”

          Have you done so much acid that your synapses are fried? Your writing reeks of it.
          But whatever, let’s pretend I haven’t just offended you.
          Will you answer my questions regarding your stance on pedophilia? I’m very interested to see exactly where you stand on the line of where consensual sex is not technically consensual given the disposition of the youth involved?
          Does puberty matter to you?
          Or is it age? Because that is just ambiguous definition for control by the controllers (which to a matter of degree I can agree).
          Or is it is up to the discretion of the adult who is attempting to engage in sexual relations with the minor (which is what I think your attempting to justify).

          I’m genuinely intrigued…regardless of my obviously (and purposefully) aggressive tone.

          However, all this aside I will say this: if you espouse that adults should be able to have sexual relations with pre-pubescents or newly pubescent children…. THEN FUCK YOU. YOU ARE SCUM! Please tell me I completely missed the boat with you.

  14. milkshakesuds says:

    They dont call tv shows programs for nothing.
    Ive always been fascinated by the red hammer test. For those of you who have never heard of it
    I think it applies here. What seem like harmless mathematical equations actually influence seemingly unrelated thoughts in a majority of people.
    When i watch a television generally and news specifically, I know that the ticker messages and flashing lights in the corners of the screen are having a subliminal influence on me. When my wife watches one of her soaps, the numerical identifier of that particular station is rotating in the bottom corner of the screen distracting me and competing with the televised content, (what for?)
    It was the red hammer test that made me realized there was more to what I was watching than what I was consciously aware of.
    Now for these programs and our children.
    Oh my.

  15. lisa sperling says:

    I have read, in an article on sodomy, and heard in you tubes, that when children are sodomized, over time, as adults, they exhibit dark circles under their eyes. This cartoon is making it appear that dark circles are a “look”, a fashion, when in reality, based on what I have read, dark circles under the eyes is the result of sodomy of children, dark circles under the eyes last through adulthood. Also, the victims can develop as adults, hernias.
    See how insidiously clever these satanists are, to disguise the effects of sodomy as a fashion, so people don’t pay heed to children with dark circles as being unusual or indictative of sodomization of children!

    Freemasons’ Secret Key is SODOMY !!! (Jeremiah Weeps) – YouTube
    Video for jeremiah weeps youtube sodomy the hidden key▶ 17:26 /watch?v=5be8_ySasug

  16. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    Always go for the kids…..

  17. felixpinturacorporal says:

    Quick note. I babysit my 4 grand kids and we watch YouTube mostly. There are some videos marketed for children by adults dressed up as super heroes. Some of those videos are innocent fun but some sneak up sexual content in their videos. I will look up the vids and give you more precise info. I know they use keyboard salads.
    Thank you for all the work you do.

  18. Gwen says:

    Yes , and how about those daddy finger songs I don’t get them , sounds wrong lol

  19. Theodore says:

    YouTube Promises To Stop #ElsaGate / Softcore Snuff Film Entertainment

  20. Theodore says:

    YouTube’s autocomplete tool shows users ‘profoundly disturbing’ child sex results when they search for ‘how to’ videos

    Creepy suggestions include ‘how to have s*x with your kids’ and ‘how to have s*x kids.’

  21. Aravinda Priyadarshana says:

    If your kid is watching unwanted videos on youtube… this article –

  22. ajschacht says:

    Creepy and very enlightening

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.