Technocracy vs. the creative force

Technocracy vs. the creative force

by Jon Rappoport

January 22, 2018

“The individual is not a poker chip in a game. He isn’t a marker or a cipher or a symbol. The individual is an independent creative force. More energy is expended on denying that creative force than the sum required to light all the lightbulbs and run all the machines on the planet.” (THE MAGICIAN AWAKES, Jon Rappoport)

The analysis in this article is based, in part, on the work of Patrick Wood, and his book, Technocracy Rising, which is a major breakthrough in understanding the elite plan for our world.

As you read this article, you’ll notice some Technocratic changes are long-term plans, while other changes are already underway.

Technocracy, in its most radical form, which IS the form on the planning table, would eliminate private property in exchange for “a better life for all.”

Every person would have an energy quota. During a given time period, he would only be allowed to “spend” so much—calculated from how much energy has been used to produce the goods he buys. (The smart grid is a step in that direction.)

Real time tracking would calculate all energy inputs and outputs on the planet.

The tracking of a) energy use by each citizen and b) overall energy production would be the true purpose of the Surveillance State. Not the defeat of terrorism.

Terrorism and wars exist to mount sufficient chaos to “require” the imposition of a “better order.”

Politicians would eventually subordinate themselves to engineers and “computer professionals,” who believe they can create a society that operates like a well-oiled machine. Every person would have a cog-role in the machine.

Obviously, this new system is not meant to compete with any version of free enterprise; therefore, self-determined nations would disappear, and One Planet, under managed Technocracy, would be the only nation. So borders would have to be erased—and this is the ultimate purpose of unlimited immigration, worldwide.

Most people would view this basic sketch of the new world order as pure science fiction.

It is not.

Under Technocracy, every person would have to give up his freedom.

Strive, as an individual to achieve what you profoundly desire? OUTMODED.

Own Property? OUTMODED.

Vote out technocratic rulers? OUTMODED.

Opt out of automation on any front? OUTMODED.

Assert any of the rights in the Bill of Rights? OUTMODED.

Demand the freedom to voice an opinion, judgment, or fact that others might find offensive or disturbing? OUTMODED.

None of this even begins to cover the interior changes that would be made to human beings, through genetic reconfiguration and other techniques.

In other words, this is Huxley’s Brave New World. But as Huxley was writing his novel, the nascent technocratic movement was already underway.

Several French philosophers had already touted the Planned Society based on science, as if the same means for control of Nature’s forces in the physical world should be applied by humans, to themselves. In order to evolve.

All problems could be overcome, as long as humans were looked at as parts in an overall mechanism. Then, formulas would work.

Take all wild cards and jokers out of the deck.

Bring about order.

Call it harmony.

Even call it love…

Huxley, in Brave New World, writes about a future Technocratic society in which the “science” of human behavior, organization, and operant conditioning have triumphed:

“Wheels must turn steadily, but cannot turn untended, there must be men to tend them, men as steady as the wheels upon their axles, sane men, obedient men, stable in contentment.”

“’Fortunate boys!’ said the Controller. ‘No pains have been spared to make your lives emotionally easy – to preserve you, so far as that is possible, from having emotions at all’.”

“One cubic centimeter [of soma, the wonder drug] cures ten gloomy sentiments.”

“The world’s stable now. People are happy; they get what they want, and they never want what they can’t get. They’re well off; they’re safe; they’re never ill; they’re not afraid of death; they’re blissfully ignorant of passion and old age; they’re plagued with no mothers or fathers; they’ve got no wives, or children, or lovers to feel strongly about; they’re so conditioned that they practically can’t help behaving as they ought to behave. And if anything should go wrong, there’s soma.”

In the ultimate Technocratic society, there is no need to deny the creative force within. It’s been conditioned into amnesia.

Therefore, as long as the walls of narrow feeling and perception hold steady, people are content.

If you asked a member of that society whether he missed experiencing and acting on his own creative impulse (or asked many members of this society, now), he would give you a blank look. He wouldn’t know what you were talking about.

Create? Create what?


“What do I want to create?” Far from the madding crowd of Technocracy, that is the question every person should ask.

It opens the door to a new life.

It puts every individual at the center of his own destiny.

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

10 comments on “Technocracy vs. the creative force

  1. rufus says:

    Here’s a tip I’ve learned from experience and some eastern phil. It’s a conundrum. But stressing your “individual” is a sure way to set you up for some misery and failure, while embracing your universal self will result in the individual dualistic self excelling in worldly things. Its called making your mind work for you and not the opposite.

  2. Erika says:

    Many of us are probably the wild hairs up the rear end of the Fringe..IF an extremely abusive misogynistic father couldn’t beat obedience into me…the state won’t…and i bet alot of us are on the same page.

    I now see a larger purpose to why i had the parents i did, and why i CHOSE to step outside my family and peer group as a child despite ridicule, bullying shaming and violence…all this just for being different.

    Now i can say it was a good thing that happened because it made me highly aware in a very personal way that the “authorities” and “systems” are NOT to be trusted, and it actually made me very strong.

    Thank You Jon because i might never would have had this realization without reading your blog.

    • From Quebec says:

      I was also a rebel teenager. Got kicked out of 2 schools and left my parent’s house 3 times and was brought back by the cops when they find me. I could not accept to be told what to do.

      This is probably why I decided to live alone all of my life. I am in my seventies now, and I still enjoy living alone. No one tells me what to do or not to do.

      Now, concerning this article, I do not think that Technocracy will win.

      Look at what Trump is doing right now: Killing the New word Order, bit by bits. He has influenced and motivated people all over the world. European countries now want to get out of the European Union Patriotism is back and is here to stay. People want their countries back. It is up to everyone to say NO to this insanity.

      The NWO and their Texknocrats are few, we are legion.

      We will win and they will lose. I have no doubt about this.

      • Anna Andersen says:

        A difficult childhood that involved a realization authority figures are fallible and often dangerous seems to be very prevalent among those of us who awoke to perceive the Matrix very early in life. A few years ago I discussed this with Fran Shure, one of the founders of my Colorado 9/11 Truth organization and who happened to write a brilliant series for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth analyzing the psychological underpinnings of denial. (Her series is on the A&E website.) Shure, a clinical psychologist, strongly agreed with this observation. Several years ago a physician writing for Global Research described the toughing up as an ability to overcome fear of a sense of dread.

        As for Trump, I would use caution or very cautious optimism to not turn over the resistance to a “leader”. This isn’t about the controversy surrounding one person and, imho, it’s not a good use of our time and energy to debate and argue over someone’s motives. Instead we should keep a wary eye out for worrisome behind the curtain machinations. One example is the Trump administration is mounting a big push to join every other national government on the planet quickly privatizing all public infrastructure, lands, industries, and natural resources. This move leapfrogs over stalled treaties and creates a deeper “economic interdependence” as the globalists term it. What happens when your local roads, highways, bridges, and utilities are sold or long term “leased” to foreign based multinational corporations who decide to require transponder tracking or more for you to access travel and services? How does a local community overcome this if they don’t have the necessary deep pockets to mount a legal challenge? The juggernaut will advance.

  3. John says:

    Also see the recent video “Why Big Oil Conquered the World” by James Corbett, which includes a long segment on the history of the Technocracy movement.

  4. Theodore says:

    Jon, I’ve got two jokers in my back pocket!

  5. kenshohomestead says:

    Reblogged this on Kensho Homestead and commented:
    Now is the time to opt-out. Revolution starts in your own heart! Stop tolerating the insanity, turn off your TV, downsize, discard, get informed!

    And especially, please I beg y’all, take off your rose-colored glasses!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.