Why the FDA should be charged with murder

Why the FDA should be charged with murder

by Jon Rappoport

January 25, 2018

If you worked for a federal agency that was killing people at the rate of 100,000 a year, every year, like clockwork, and if you knew it, wouldn’t you feel compelled to say or do something about it?

At the FDA, which is, in fact, killing Americans at that rate, no one has ever felt the need to step forward and speak up.

Let’s shift the venue and ask the same question. If you were a medical reporter for a major media outlet in the US, and you knew the above fact, wouldn’t you make it a priority to say something, write something, do something?

I’m talking about people like Sanjay Gupta (CNN, CBS), Gina Kolata (NY Times), Tim Johnson (ABC News), and Thomas Maugh II (LA Times).

And with that, let’s go to the smoking guns. The citation is: BMJ June 7, 2012, Anticoagulants cause the most serious adverse events, finds US analysis, (BMJ 2012:344:e3989). Author, Jeanne Lenzer.

Lenzer refers to a report by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices: “It [the report] calculated that in 2011 prescription drugs were associated with two to four million people in the US experiencing ‘serious, disabling, or fatal injuries, including 128,000 deaths.’”

The report called this “one of the most significant perils to humans resulting from human activity.”

And here is the final dagger. The report was compiled by outside researchers who went into the FDA’s own database of “serious adverse [medical-drug] events.”

Therefore, to say the FDA isn’t aware of this finding would be absurd. The FDA knows. The FDA knows and it isn’t saying anything about it, because the FDA certifies, as safe and effective, all the medical drugs that are routinely maiming and killing Americans.

And for the past five years or so, I have been writing about and citing a published report by the late Dr. Barbara Starfield that indicates 106,000 people in the US are killed by medical drugs every year. Until her death in 2011, Dr. Starfield worked at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Her report, “Is US health really the best in the world?”, was published in the Journal of American Medical Association on July 26, 2000.

Since the Department of Homeland Security is working its way into every nook and corner of American life, hyper-extending its mandate to protect all of us from everything, why shouldn’t the DHS investigate the FDA as a terrorist organization?

How many smoking guns do we need before a sitting president shuts down the FDA buildings, fumigates the place, and prosecutes very large numbers of FDA employees?

Do we need 100,000 smoking guns every year? Do we need relatives of the people who’ve all died in the span of merely a year, from the poisonous effects of FDA-approved medical drugs, to bring their corpses to the doors of FDA headquarters?

And let me ask another question. If instead of drugs like warfarin, dabigatran, levofloxacin, carboplatin, and lisinopril (the five leading killers in the FDA database), the 100,000 deaths per year were led by gingko, ginseng, vitamin D, niacin, and raw milk, what do you think would happen?

I’ll tell you what would happen. SEALS, Delta Force, SWAT teams, snipers, predator drones, tanks, and infantry would be lining up and hovering outside every health-food store and nutritional supplement manufacturer in America.

All those fake stories in the press, reported dutifully by so-called medical reporters? The stories about maybe-could-be-possible-miracle breakthroughs just over the horizon of state-of-the-art medical research? Those stories are there to obscure the very, very hard facts of medically-caused death on the ground.

The buck stops at the FDA.

Except in the real world, it doesn’t. Which tells you something about the so-called real world and how much of it is composed of propaganda.

No medical drug in the US can be released for public use unless and until the FDA says it is safe and effective. That’s the rule. The FDA is spitting out drug approvals month after month and year after year, and the drugs are routinely killing 100,000 people a year and maiming two million more, which adds up to a million deaths per decade and 20 million maimings per decade. The FDA and the federal government are doing nothing about it, even though they know what’s going on. This is mass murder. Not accidental death. Murder. A holocaust.

Do you want another citation?

Here are a few horrific quotes. I’ll discuss the source afterwards:

“…appropriately prescribed prescription drugs are the fourth leading cause of death…About 330,000 patients die each year from prescription drugs in the US and Europe.”

“They [the drugs] cause an epidemic of about 20 times more [6.6 million per year] hospitalizations, as well as falls, road accidents, and about 80 million [per year] medically minor problems such as pains, discomforts, and dysfunctions that hobble productivity or the ability to care for others.”

“Deaths from overmedication, errors, and self-medication would increase these figures.”

In other words, the 330,000 deaths per year, the 6.6 million hospitalizations per year, and the 80 million “medically minor” problems per year…all of this stems from CORRECTLY PRESCRIBED medicines.

The quotes come from the ASA [American Sociological Association] publication called Footnotes, in its November 2014 issue. The article is “The Epidemic of Sickness and Death from Prescription Drugs.” The author of the article is Donald W Light.

Donald W Light is a professor of medical and economic sociology. He is a founding fellow of the Center for Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania. In 2013, he was a fellow at the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics at Harvard. He is a Lokey Visiting Professor at Stanford University and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine.

It’s been my policy to quote medical analysts who have mainstream credentials, when it comes to adding up the results of medical-drug destruction.

I do this to show that, in refusing to fix the holocaust, the federal government, medical schools, and pharmaceutical companies can’t claim their critics and detractors are “fringe researchers.”

Believe me, the officials who should have been fixing the enormous tragedy for at least the past 15 years are intent on hiding it.

When you stop and think about the meaning of these medical numbers, one of the things you realize is: this massive destruction of life envelops whole countries.

It not only maims and kills, it brings emotional turmoil and loss to the families, friends, co-workers, and colleagues of those who are killed and maimed: the 330,000 who are killed and the 6.6 million who are hospitalized and the 80 million whose productivity is hobbled or whose ability to care for others is significantly diminished.

If you consciously set out to bring a nation to its knees;

to kill it;

to make it unable to function at any reasonable level;

you would be hard pressed to find a more effective long-term method than exposing the population to the US/European medical-drug cartel.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

26 comments on “Why the FDA should be charged with murder

  1. Theodore says:

    “Retired propaganda master, Ellis Medavoy, once said to me [Jon Rappoport], ‘Find a truly explosive hidden fact and put it in front of a person’s eyes, hold it there, and see what happens. The person will go blank. He’ll go blank because on a barely conscious level, he’s rapidly calculating how many deceptions he’s swallowed about all sorts of related subjects. Then he’ll blink and tell you what you just showed him is impossible…’

    “I [Jon Rappoport] would add: after he says it’s impossible, he’ll actually make excuses for the perpetrator of the crime you’ve just exposed. He’ll give you a dozens reasons to let the perpetrator off the hook. He’ll really warm up to the perpetrator and say he’s a wonderful human being. He’ll spin gossamer and rainbows from here to the moon.

    “It’s quite something to behold.”

  2. David Eirescott says:

    I’m excessively tired of “should-bes” when it comes to these neo-Mengeles.

  3. honestliberty says:

    Does anyone know the timeline surrounding Dr. Barbara Starfield’s death? It says here she died in her swimming pool from coronary issues.
    Was there ever consideration of suspicious activity or is it reasonable because she was 78?
    That happened two years after her interview with Jon.


    I didn’t realize she was dead until Jon mentioned “the late”.

  4. Theodore says:

    “If instead of drugs like warfarin, dabigatran, levofloxacin, carboplatin, and lisinopril (the five leading killers in the FDA database), the 100,000 deaths per year were led by gingko, ginseng, vitamin D, niacin, and raw milk, what do you think would happen?”

    Turmeric! Turmeric! You left turmeric off the list!

  5. elantoh says:

    The medical “practice” is the number three killer of citizens and they are trying for number one 😦

    • binra says:

      What are number 1 and 2?
      If they are heart disease and cancer then you have a significant iatrogenic component in those also.

      Of course death is the no 1 killer hands down. Who is born is born into a world of death (transience). But did all of You come in – or is there the ‘More of You’ that you ‘forgot’ in learning such a world.

      We see that choices have consequences but guilt as the fear of pain and loss leads to hiding choices to escape and assign consequence away from self. How many unconscious choices have already shaped our personality long before we have developed self-reflective thought?

      Awakening responsibility is uncovering what was hidden so as to correct it.
      Vengeful rage wants to uncover an evil away from self and kill it.
      The conflict between rehabilitation and punishment is a symptom of two ‘Masters’.

      The underlying matrix of all of this is not in its symptomatic expressions. But is identifying in (believing you are protected by), a lie (denial of true).
      Denial of true may be compartmentalised under a dissociated mind whose nature is legion. And denial can be redefined and distributed as toxic debt or sin and guilt etc. But the ‘self-protective’ is the belief in power to make safe. What is this ‘power’ but the same lie that introduces/insinuates division, conflict, limitation and loss. Beneath the division and diversion of conflict is that which is denied awareness and is a substitute life for a true receipt.

      Beneath a world of lies is a phishing scam and an identity theft.
      is that how we ‘come in’?

      Whereby we come to believe and protect what we are NOT at expense of who we truly are?
      Is that not the idea of ‘deceiver’? Or idea (thinking) by which we mis-take and mis-identify?
      Look there, if you will.
      The outer reflection is revealing the devices by which a blind insanity projects onto its world of others, so as to protect its ‘mind’. Does this ‘mind’ speak for you? Then why listen to it?

  6. Satanists Rule The World says:

    Gwen Olsen said that when she started as a drug sales rep in the mid-1980s, she was told:

    “Don’t say this, don’t say that, or the FDA will get us.”

    But in 1992, she started hearing:

    “Don’t worry, our people in the FDA will take care of that.”


    “Oh, I mean our friends, our friends in the FDA.”

    This was just after the Prescription Drug User Fee Act had been enacted, which allows drug companies to pay money to the FDA money so they will approve their drugs.

    In 1969, NWO insider Dr. Richard Day bragged to a group of doctors that they had corrupted a lot of the medical research they were reading, and that a lot of what they were doing was wrong.

    The next year, former FDA Commissioner Dr. Herbert Lay was quoted on January 2, 1970, weeks after resigning:

    “The thing that bugs me is that people think the FDA is protecting them. It isn’t. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it’s doing are as different as night and day.”

    47 years later, 78.8% of adolescents and 62.5% of adults said they trusted the FDA. Still a majority, but not universal.


    However, the number of prescriptions filled for American adults and children rose 85 percent between 1997 and 2016. The US population only rose 21 percent.

    It is unlikely this would have happened if people actually knew how pharmaceutical drugs are approved.

    For example, the approval process for Vioxx (which killed 60,000 Americans):

    Even though Merck knew it had a 3-5 times greater risk for heart attacks and strokes than another painkiller, Naproxen, they just said Naproxen was “unusually below par” for cardiac events, which was nonsense but enough for the FDA Commissioner to approve it.

    Lawyer Jonathan W. Emord:

    “The approval of a drug is always a political decision. It’s always made by the Commissioner of the FDA. One person. The FDA is a dictatorship. The Commissioner of the FDA can overrule the scientists, even if they’re 100 percent opposed to approval of a drug if he or she wants to, and frequently they do.”

    The approval panels are stacked anyway, and conflicts of interest are routinely waived.

    Later, even after research showed it was killing large numbers of adults, two weeks before the drug was withdrawn, the FDA Commissioner approved its use in children, having said the research evidence was “anecdotal”.

    Nothing happened to him for doing that. Only when he committed perjury by saying that his wife didn’t have ownership interests in pharmaceutical and food companies when she did was he charged, but he got off and ended up making far more money as a lobbyist for, guess who, Merck, than he did as FDA Commissioner.

    Associate Director for Science and Medicine in the Office of Drug Safety David Graham, whom FDA senior management tried to stop from speaking out:

    They’re serving industry rather than the public. In fact, when a former office director for the Office of Drug Safety criticized me and tried to get me to change a report I’d written on another drug – Arava – he said to me and to a colleague who was a coauthor on this report that “industry is our client.” I begged to differ with him. I said, “No, industry is not the client, it’s the American people, the people who pay our taxes. That’s who we’re here to serve.” He said, “No! Industry is our client.” I ended the conversation by saying, “Well, industry may be your client, but it will never be my client.”

    FDA senior management are not exactly happy with anyone who works there who is not down with their agenda.

    But I’ve been a target of retaliation in the past. You take ten drugs off the market well, no good deed goes unpunished at the FDA. I’ve experienced retaliation with many of those other episodes but not as severe as what I’ve experienced with Vioxx®. This is the first time that my job was actually in jeopardy and where the FDA actually intended to fire me. That was stopped only because Senator Grassley intervened. He put the heat on the FDA and told them, “Lay off. This guy has told the truth. He’s helped America. Whose side are you on?”


  7. JJ says:

    Today’s headliner in The Hill: A weak link in the medical chain exposed: Drug compounding. The callout author is Elena V. Rios, M.D., M.S.P.H., who serves as President & CEO of the National Hispanic Medical Association, (NHMA), representing Hispanic physicians in the United States. Drug compounding is common and increasingly implicated in 100’s of drug-related adverse events, poorly regulated by the FDA, and represents a growing threat to patient safety.


    • Mindy Angel says:

      According to Naomi Klein in her big tome, “The Shock Doctrine” , all these organizations like FDA, CDC, EPA were intentionally set up not to protect not the public, but to protect the criminal corporations. So, I figure charging the FDA with murder ?… apparently this is a swamp that cannot be drained. Where do you start ???

    • trishwriter says:

      Thanks for the link. The article calls for more regulation from the FDA. Considering what a mess the FDA has made in other areas of the medical industry, why would we trust them to help? What is really the core of the problem? Whatever it is, asking a government agency to help will only make thing worse.

  8. tobias white says:

    How can we help start a class action against the FDA and then the medical schools. I think we have had enough, and there is sufficient evidence of wrongdoing throughout. I would forfeit my security for such a cause. It’s over-the-top time.

  9. Headline in the Philippine metrocebu.news; ‘Trust fund to ensure compensation, Treatment of Dengvaxia patients – Poe; – Sen. Grace Poe is demanding a full refund P3.5 billion; –“because when you buy a lemon, you’re entitled to a full refund.“ In truth, not only a full refund, damages need to be awarded to individual families awarded for pain and suffering from the poisoning of their children and deadly to some. I fear the trickle down from any funds awarded solely to the government would cover only the price of a few sacks of rice.

  10. Sue Stiles says:

    Jon, I am having a discussion with a pro-vaccine individual and he is using the following as supportive evidence:

    Is this valid?

    • Jeanne Hensley says:

      No, it’s not. And if you have done your research well you will know that. “Pro-vaccine people, in general, are really not interested in the truth, however. They don’t want to rock their world…..that is until one of their children has very clear convincing damage, or death, from a vaccine. They will continue to believe the lies, overlooking the sheer thousands of papers documenting how wrong they are, not to mention observation. Then there is the fact that all one has to do is read the full disclosure on ingredients of any one vaccine. If that doesn’t make you question what you are injecting into a body then you have to be partially brain dead. If any parent would reach under their sink or go to the garage shelf and grab a bottle of something toxic, say drain cleaner, or turpentine, or any type of generally used cleaner or pesticide, and gave it to their child several times a year, or even ONCE for that matter, they would be charged with at minimum abuse and child endangerment if not attempted murder and their children removed from their care. Yet they do it every single time a vaccine is administered. The person you are conversing with likely does not want to know the truth. It’s very easy to find. Very easy. A logical mind and critical thinker can find where the deceit lies and make sense of it all. It’s easy to read/watch Dr. Humphries, Dr. Tenpenny, Dr Blaylock, Dr. Buttar, Dr. Mendohlson, Del Bigtree, Kent Heckinlively, Jeffrey Jaxen, and hundreds if not thousands more. They don’t make this up, the evidence is very clear. Even the CDC knows it as does the FDA. Read the vaccine inserts, the REAL ones. It tells you all you need to know.

    • CPP says:

      The intro starts with total B.S. right off the bat:

      “A worldwide increase in the rate of autism diagnoses—likely driven by broadened diagnostic criteria and increased awareness—has fueled concerns that an environmental exposure like vaccines might cause autism.”

      It doesn’t take much awareness to notice severely autistic children who are unresponsive to human interaction, who flap and headbang and freak out in response to normal stimuli, who must watch the same children’s cartoon film over and over, even as they are teens and older. And there are endless reports from mothers seeing a child go from normal, healthy, interactive, to being “gone” into this kind of state, losing what language development they had, etc. shortly or immediately after a course of vaccination.

      The problem has mushroomed. There would be scores of severely autistic adults of all ages needing round-the-clock care if this were a consistent genetic disorder and not a recent, environmentally-caused condition. They would be everywhere, known and documented through the older generations and before. They just aren’t there. They never were until recently. These sorts of damaged people were basically unheard of until the last few decades. Some places in the US apparently now have separate mall Santas just to deal with the autistic kids.

      Also, one of the authors is Paul Offit. You might as well have the #1 PR flack for the tobacco industry conduct a study on the health effects of commercial cigarettes.

  11. From Quebec says:

    A Brief History of Rockefeller Medicine (3 minutes)

  12. Not So Free says:

    Not murder- Mass murder.

  13. not to mention mercury amalgam fillings which still have the blessing of the governmental approval organizations and over the long term can cause innumerable ailments, which doctors call things like MS, Parkinson’s, ALS, Alzheimers, etc etc

    https://books.google.com /books?id=ZG9glNfif5YC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false

  14. JB says:

    Money talks here too. Don’t give them any.

  15. These screenshots ware taken before FDA deleted the page

  16. xarrow says:

    not to mention the polio vac causing cancer in millions now SV40

  17. I would estimate figures in “millions”, but other than that, excellent article, Jon.

  18. linda4light says:

    BigPharma is protected by the FDA and their enablers. All, including BigAg need to be prosecuted for Crimes against Humanity.

  19. Heather Hillyard says:

    So how many people would die if we didn’t use medications in this world. It would be a lot more then you are quoting. Do you drink or smoke. If you do, I would like those statistics added to your quotes because more people die from those habits then from medications.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.