The Individual vs. Globalism

The Individual vs. Globalism

by Jon Rappoport

February 7, 2018

“Global solution” means the individual is cut out of the equation, he doesn’t count, he doesn’t mean anything in the larger scheme of things, he’s just another pawn and cipher to move around on the board.

This is purposeful.

This is the script for the future: create problems whose only solution appears to be collective.

Psychologically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually divert the individual’s attention from his own vision, his own profound desires, his own imagination—and place it within The Group (“all of humanity”).

Propagandize the idea that, if the individual concerns himself with anything other than The Group, he is selfish, greedy, inhumane. He is a criminal.

More and more, this is how the young are being trained these days.

The grand “we” is being sold to them like a cheap street drug. They buy in. They believe this “we” is real, instead of a hollow con designed to drag them into a Globalist framework owned and operated by mega-corporations, banks, foundations, governments, and ubiquitous Rockefeller interests.

And what of the individual, his mind, his unique perception, his independent ideas, his originality, his life-force?

Swept away in the rush toward “a better world.”

I have breaking news. Earth is not a spaceship and we are not crew members. If Earth is a spaceship, it has serious design flaws, because it keeps making the same trip around the same sun every year.

Each one of us does not have a specified function, as a crew member would.

Going back as far as you want to in history, shortage and scarcity in the world that engendered a crisis was either created by some elite or maintained by them, for the purpose of eradicating dissent and fomenting a collectivist solution. Meaning a solution that came from the top. Meaning a solution that reduced individual freedom.

In recent human history, a different idea emerged: severely hamstring government, in order to protect the individual against it.

This idea has had a very tough time. Collectivists have fought it every step of the way.

But regardless of circumstances, the individual can author his own freedom and what it implies. He can discover, within himself, extraordinary possibilities. He can contemplate what it means to create reality that expresses his most profound desires.

And then he can begin a voyage that no one and no group can stop.

Civilizations come and go, rise and fall; the individual remains.

The word “imagination,” when properly understood, indicates that the individual can envision and then create futures that never were, and never would be, unless he invented them.

Imagination is the opposite of “provincial,” “restricted,” “well-known,” “familiar,” “accepted.”

That is its challenge to the status quo.

That is the true threat the individual poses to all predictive systems.

“It’s all just information” is a psyop code-phrase. Ideas, thoughts—nothing is original, nothing is new; we all “share” information floating in the collective consciousness; the individual invents nothing.

Which is the opposite of the truth.

The individual invents everything.

He can’t be predicted when he is himself. He is not a pattern. He is not a system.

He is not anyone else.

He thrives on his own inspiration.

He is not a piece of universe.

He is not a humble servant of Order.

He invents the space and time of his own time to come.

As early as 1961, a brilliant healer, Richard Jenkins, whom I write about in my book, The Secret Behind Secret Societies, explained what was to come. He wrote me a note, which I’m paraphrasing from memory: “People are confusing their own empathy for others with some inflated idea about group-identity. They aren’t the same. People are becoming afraid of their own unique and distinct existence. This is a social fear. A new social contract is being foisted on the population. Either you belong, or you have no rights. This is a totalitarian concept. It’s coming in through the back door.”

Well, now, it’s right there at the front door.

The individual still has a choice. But he has to make it.

Explore his own power, or give it away for nothing more than an illusion of belonging.

Stoke the fires within, or form a diluted image of self, and bow down to The Group.

The “I” is not isolated. He can reach out to others whenever and however he wants to. The question is, is he moving on the ground of his own independence, or is he searching for a group life raft, to which he will attach himself without thought or hesitation?

Beyond economics or politics, Globalism is a system that offers a life raft which is heading toward a machine-future. Disembark and find the great We, a construct of integrated parts, each of which is an individual, in a state of spiritual amnesia.

Happiness there is function and sedation, shadowless, wiped clean of distinctions.

This is the elitist end-game of social justice and equality.

It’s a fake culture.

It’s a grid of artifice, laid over the individual.

Exit From the Matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

9 comments on “The Individual vs. Globalism

  1. will iam says:

    The individual vs globalism thems fighting words to me, er, but isn’t that what the narrative is about anyway?

    (Just when i swore i wouldn’t get fooled again i got fooled again, just like i always do…. hmm must think here!).

    But wait ! what if ‘they’ are no longer around when my attention isnt on ‘them’?
    and if as i say the individual invents everything haven’t i invented them and keep inventing ‘them continuously?

    What if all i need do is stop blaming myself for their narcissism and pay attention to my own life? but then ‘you’ might blame me for all ‘this’ and ‘we’ would all be a part of the big circle jerk just like ‘they’ wanted…in the beginning

    Damn it though, i didnt create them, let us individuals all get together and round them up and teach em! ‘We’ll’ teach em this time thats for damn sure, and then WE can have a world that is free of ‘them’!!

    WE can kick this globalism habit together, one individual at a time, and have the world, just like WE always wanted…. in the beginning

    • will iam says:

      “WE can kick this globalism habit together, one individual at a time, and have the world, just like WE always wanted…. in the beginning”…………hmm.kind of sounds like globalization.

      “Damn it Pogo I have found the enemy and you’ll never believe who the hell it is!!”

  2. Greg C. says:

    When Obamacare first rolled out, the group identity credo was manifest suddenly in every American household. You MUST belong to our system, unless, of course, you belong to another comparable system, e.g., Congress, or the Amish, where the group assumes responsibility for what might happen to you in the future. Suddenly, you are responsible for footing a medical bill right now that exists only in the imagined future, because you are first and foremost a statistic, and an inevitable customer of the medical system. Remember Obama labeling people without coverage “deadbeats”? That sent chills up my spine. It was an excellent rich man’s trick of linguistics.

  3. Keanu says:

    I remember telling my mother about all those ridiculous classes now going on. I was deeply disgusted of the fact people actually believe “Gender Studies” or “Gay and Lesbian Studies” and things like that, to be something that will help future generations. I never felt disgusted of the fact even my mother tells me it’s part of the “New World” and I must live with it, it’s very dishonoring. I remember watching a video of some Youtuber claiming we are heading into a new age. If that’s the case, I suppose “we” are heading in the WRONG direction.

    • Erika says:

      I am wondering if this has to do with the “Age of Aquarius”..remember that song from the 60s?
      Wasn’t Aquarius a homosexual lover/cup bearer of one of the Gods? Named Ganymede or something?

      I am not understanding why the gay/lesbain thing is pushed down everyone’s throat. It is featured almost CONSTANTLY in the movies and TV shows,

      For example i tried watching “Grace and Frankie” on Netflix which was highly rated , and just got overwhelmed by the bad acting and sophomoric dialogue and had to turn it off.
      This was a show about two older male law partners who came out of the closet and left their wives to be gay together.

      I have gotten to the point where i can’t watch American TV anymore
      Is it me?
      It seems like a grab bag of gratuitous violence and soft porn and i find myself watching more and more more sedate BBC shows.

      ..i find the whole transgender thing bizarre. It is like the ultimate self abandonment..the ultimate non-acceptance of yourself, at least to me.

      Apparently this is being engineered but i am not sure why..
      All i know is that today’s kids are making decisions to get surgery to be “in” and “Trendy” which they many deeply regret down the road..

      What a bizarre place the world has turned into eh?

      • henry says:

        Those businessmen who became wildly successful by 1900 used to think that we needed their guidance. We could be trained to grow the crops, run the machines, do the paperwork, but we could not live the way that they did/do. More recently, they have come to the conclusion that this is their planet and with AI and robots, they don’t need us anymore. To them, we are consuming their resources. We must be eliminated. They poison our food, water, and atmosphere to lower our fertility. They are trying to take the planet without exerting the effort to kill us. Encouraging us to choose not to reproduce is just one of their tactics. I know this is old-fashioned but it takes a male and a female to reproduce. So, there is your answer.

      • Natural Woman says:

        I agree with you. I never watch the news. If I want to be entertained, I turn on the old shows from the 1950s and early 60s. Tonight it was The Jack Benny show, and Our Miss Brooks. The current offerings are raucous and distasteful with few characters to admire.

  4. Reblogged this on AfterHollywood and commented:
    Good morning world! When I woke up this morning, I was sincerely thinking about the power of the individual vs. the collective. Read this blog posting by Jon Rappoport, I found it to be eloquent and an inspirational observation of where we are at in 2018.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.