Culture wars: a child’s “medical right” to change gender in the Brave New World

Culture wars: a child’s “medical right” to change gender in the Brave New World

by Jon Rappoport

February 22, 2018

“Gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is the dysphoria (distress) a person experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were assigned at birth.” (Wikipedia)

“Technocracy is shaping a new world based on twisting morality into pseudoscientific ‘facts’ that demand compliance. It’s a hoax on a grand scale.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

Government programs to teach the issue of gender in schools are gaining steam. “Fluid-gender” is the artificial construct used to promote these programs.

For years, I’ve been warning about the fabricated use of medical labels as a pretext for “protecting the rights of the child.”

The op goes this way:

Shift a decision about morality into a decision about the right to obtain medical treatment. For example, claim there is a disorder called Gender Dysphoria. Claim many children suffer from it.

State that gender reassignment is the treatment that cures the disorder.

State that every child has the “right” to choose the treatment—AND parents who oppose it are illegally restricting their children.

Breitbart reports on a current case: “Parents of a 17-year-old girl lost custody of their daughter for opposing her wish for transgender medical treatments.”

“Judge Sylvia Sieve Hendon of Hamilton County, Ohio has allowed the girl to be taken into the custody of her grandparents – who support her medical transition – allowing them to make decisions that will further along her physical transition to the opposite sex.”

“The parents reportedly continued to call their daughter by her given name, rather than a male name, and refused to consent to hormone treatments that were recommended by her medical team. The girl claimed she became suicidal as a result of her parents’ refusal to accept that she wanted to transition to a male.”

“’We think the grandparents are the ones who have an open mind and will … make this sort of decision best for the child’,” said attorney Paul Hunt, who represents the court-appointed guardian ad litem. ‘The parents have clearly indicated that they’re not open to it’.”

“According to the news story, the parents argued their daughter was not ‘even close to being able to make such a life-altering decision at this time’. A county prosecutor, however, claimed the parents were opposed to their daughter transitioning to become a male because of their Christian religious beliefs.”

A court decides the parents are not in charge.

The parents are denying their child the right to obtain a “medical treatment.”

Therefore, the State must intercede.

Here is another case that goes much further. The basis of the decision is so insane that most people are unwilling to think about it—the criminality is so egregious it paralyzes the mind. AND AT THE BOTTOM OF IT, THERE IS A PRESUMPTION THAT A PERSON WHO IS IN NO WAY INTELLECTUALLY OR MORALLY OR EMOTIONALLY OR SPIRITUALLY CAPABLE OF MAKING A CHOICE ABOUT PERMANENLTY MUTILATING HIMSELF/HERSELF IS, IN FACT, GRANTED SUCH A “CHOICE” BY SOCIETY.

Yahoo 7 News, Australia, reports (9/16): “A four-year-old who identifies as transgender has begun to transition before their first day at school, hoping to complete the full transformation by 2017.”

“While the child is the youngest on Australian record to change their gender, the New South Wales government has revealed ‘hundreds’ of other children are being referred to the state’s hospitals for gender dysphoria.”

“The four-year-old is reportedly being supported throughout the transition by the education department, and is part of the Safe Schools program.”

Yes, the Safe Schools program. Safe for whom?

Deputy Secretary of School Operations Gregory Prior made this announcement at a budget hearing, which presumably means the four-year-old child’s parents are receiving public funds for the sex change.

No mention of how the parents of the four-year old came to their “medical” decision. No mention of the “discussion” with the child that led to this decision.

The New South Wales government doesn’t just stand aside; it supports this madness.

A four-year old. He/she comes up with this idea (gender change) out of the blue? He/she expresses it to his parents?

He/she is supposed to understand the medical procedures and the consequences?

The doctors go along with this?

“We have a four-year old coming in today to begin a sex-change.”

“Good. The team will be ready.”

Not a flicker of doubt.

Here is the Wikipedia definition of gender dysphoria: “Gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is the dysphoria (distress) a person experiences as a result of the sex and gender they were assigned at birth.”

Assigned? This is supposed to be some sort of arbitrary labeling that is handed to an infant?

This whole social program has gained so much steam that many people are paralyzed—they refuse to express outrage. They refuse to point out the obvious. They knuckle under. The criminally delusional parents who go along with (and urge and initiate) sex change for their own children consider themselves enlightened. They’re in a trance, and they feel good about the trance.

“Yes, our four-year old is undergoing gender transition and we think it’s wonderful.”

What coaching did these parents engage in with their very young child to push along this insanity?

A boy put on his mother’s dress one day, and then the parents sat down with him and engaged in a deep conversation?

A four-year old is now the ruler of his/her own fate?

This is legalized genital mutilation and torture, undertaken as a “proper medical procedure.”

The doctors should have their licenses stripped, and they should be sent to prison. They should share their cells with the government officials who support this crime.

On some level, medical sex change for children is an outgrowth of the obsession about children being “special.” Ultra-special. The child’s wisdom extends to all sorts of insights he/she has about life.

A child does have a free and open attitude toward life, but this has nothing to do with making decisions that have enormous consequences for him/her. And the word “consequences” hardly begins to describe the surgical mutilation.

“What has become of our society?” The answer is clear. There are masters and slaves. The slaves are going along. The masters are psychopaths. But that leaves a lot of middle ground, where parents, educators, and bureaucrats are willingly cooperating in destruction. It’s not simply a lack of courage. It’s self-induced brainwashing.

“This is freedom. Freedom is a good thing. What could be more free and innovative than a child deciding to change his/her own sex at the age of four? We’re creating a better world.”

The parents’ eyes are bright. Their smiles are wide.

And if medical sexual mutilation of a child is gladly permitted, what isn’t permitted? What “voluntary” or mandated medical procedure would be ruled out as too grotesque?

For example, shouldn’t we support, in glowing terms, mass sterilization of women through vaccination campaigns that covertly create future miscarriages? After all, in the Third world, where such efforts have already been made (Kenya), overpopulation is a problem. We know it’s a problem because, decades ago, Henry Kissinger said so.

In Australia, where this four-year-old child is about to go through sex change, every doctor in the country should stand up and refuse. They should say, “Look, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, we see what your decision is, and we can’t even begin to describe how we feel. Don’t look to us for help in committing this horror on your child. If we hear of any doctor who goes along with your plan, we’ll publicize his name and, if necessary, physically remove him from the country. We’ll see to it he never practices medicine in Australia another day in his life.”

As for the parents of this four-year old, they’re lost. They’re lost to themselves and their child. They’re in a hell of their own making. And they’re fashioning a worse hell for their child.

And they don’t even know it.

They’re “progressive” and proud of it.

They’re leading their child to surgical genital destruction and, through drugs, the permanent derailment of his/her endocrine system.

It’s “scientific and medical,” so it must be a good thing.

The program of child gender change is also an attack against society at its most basic biological level. The goal is destruction.

Behind it are decades of preparation in the form of so-called moral relativity: every group and person has their own definition of right and wrong, and these views are all equal. No one has the right to challenge another’s moral position as inferior.

There must be placid acceptance.

Eventually, this leads to accepting that a four-year old is capable of understanding, and making choices about, his/her own sexuality. No challenge. No moral outrage.

This is on the order of accepting and facilitating euthanasia.

For centuries, societies and civilizations have struggled to define and embed moral truth in their cores. This has never been a pure process, but it has taken place, at great human cost.

We are now seeing a reversal of that struggle. Now, monsters can ensure that physical mutilation is placed on a pedestal. It is given special protection, as a right. The very, very young, who have no idea what this is all about, are coerced into agreeing to “procedures” that violate every shred of sanity and goodness and innocence and decency.

This is evil.

And its purveyors are in the public square, touting their own humanity.

The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

28 comments on “Culture wars: a child’s “medical right” to change gender in the Brave New World

  1. trishwriter says:

    Thank you so much, Jon, for writing about this insanity. The psychiatric community has seemed to embrace this nonsense. These “progressives” don’t stop to think about the harm that these children-run-amok are causing on our environment. I saw a PBS documentary on this trend a few months ago and it was sickening. Girls who wish to pretend to be boys must take testosterone treatments each week. EACH WEEK! Some post their treatments and their “transition” on YouTube. Yes, this is a huge boon for the pharmaceutical companies, but it also provides much more pharmaceutical waste for our water supply. No one seems to mention any environmental damage from these drugs.

    One of these girls on the documentary was 21 and had been taking testosterone for years. She said on camera that she just wanted to stop testosterone. But what would that mean, of course?!? What kind of freak would she be if she no longer pretended to be a boy? The individual health effects of this are atrocious–no matter if she stops or not, she’ll probably never be able to conceive.

    Two things come to mind about this documentary: Not one doctor questioned any of this. They were all about drugging the kids, cruising toward the genital mutilation as soon as possible, NO MATTER HOW YOUNG THE CHILD! Another fascinating aspect was that there was only one parent shown who in any way rebelled against this craziness. He would not sign for his daughter to change her name and pretend to be a boy. Of course, he was painted as a fundamentalist Christian, which the PBS audience has been brainwashed to believe equates to crazy. No worries, though, eventually the dad came around, we were told at the end of the documentary. We were not shown any quotes from the daddy, but supposedly he changed his mind and let his daughter live out her sexual fantasy.

    I also read that a similar documentary was produced in England and that a doctor who did question this craziness was completely removed from the documentary. Not that there is no “diversity” in this torture, but really, what a way to get the upper-middle-class white kids to stop breeding, with the blessing of their parents. The choice always seems to be “either you support your child in this endeavor or the child will commit suicide.” The parents buy it–hook, line, and sinker. Stopping your genetic line via physical mutilation and pharmaceutical torture seems much better than having your kid commit suicide.

  2. John Barlicorn says:

    Crazy new world we live in. I don’t like trans…anything, but I will tolerate their way of living. They are born that way, with a hormone disbalance and their way of living is real for them, just as our is real to us. Most of them will trans to the other side eventually and that’s fine, but they should be at least 18 years old. Child at 4 doesn’t even know what a penis is, nor sex. Doesn’t know anything, it has IQ of 45 and doesn’t know his body nor the world, not a thing. At least 18 years old, then they can do whatever they want with their body parts.

  3. Dylan says:

    I’m a bit on the fence with regard to transgenderism. I believe it truly does happen naturally and probably always has done, but that it was and is rare. Same-sex attraction happens in nature and in humans (I’ve read estimates between 5% – 10%) so it doesn’t seem implausible that a brain may be mapped such that it considers its gender expression different than that of it’s body’s physical attributes.

    I watched one video in particular where I don’t believe the parents in any way gave the message to their female child that they’d have preferred a boy, yet as soon as the child could talk, would insist that ‘she’ was a ‘he’. Video here: watch?v=yAHCqnux2fk

    So, I don’t believe ALL transgender people are the product of some insane combination of vaccines, metals from “solar radiation management” (aka chem-trails poisoning), chemicals/hormones/additives in food, the hellacious diet most (at least in the U.S.) people eat and feed their kids, etc., etc., (ad nauseum).

    However, that said, I also have come to the conclusion that this is a fad, a trend, that many youngsters are just following in an attempt to know and define who they are (since most kids are so peer- and culture-attached that they have no solid sense of self and identity), In my opinion, most of this trend is a pop-culture-approved search for that ‘missing piece’. Case in point: my own niece has decided to take testosterone and have her breasts removed. The pre-transition counselors have somehow missed any connection between the attraction to so radically change/redefine herself and the fact that she was raised by two very depressed, anxious parents and she herself has been anxious, awkward and depressed most of HER short life.

  4. Theodore says:

    When are the mooslims — with their Female Genital Mutilation tyranny on girls — going to have their Reformation? They’re exactly 500 years behind.

    When are the bleeding heart liberals — with their Gender Reassignment tyranny on children — going to have their Reformation? They’re exactly 101 years behind.

  5. Annie says:

    It is even worse. In New Hampshire, the live free or die state, the progressives kept pushing votes on a measure to outlaw conversion therapy for children who believe themselves to be gay or transgender until it passed. It is now illegal in New Hampshire for parents get their own children non-invasive therapy to try to resolve sexual and gender identity issues while they are under 18. At school children are being encouraged to “explore” sexuality and gender at an age where they too young to understand what that means. Then they are encouraged to take drugs to “help them transition” from one sex to the other. Even people who are against surgery on children are in favor of the drugs – claiming that the effects of the puberty blocking and/or hormone treatment drugs are harmless and completely reversible so there is no reason to not give them to children. Where are they getting this information? Puberty blockers have horrible side effects including premature osteoporosis. Hormones have permanent effects including sterilization.

    I believe that there are a few gender dysmorphic individuals out there, and once they are adults they should be allowed to do whatever they want to their own bodies. But just as we try to protect our children by making selling alcohol and cigarettes to minors illegal selling sex change drugs and surgery to minors should also be illegal.

  6. Timothy Hanley says:


    Regarding the subject of this article, have you looked into The Yogyakarta Principles plus 10 (YP+10)?… “a universal guide to human rights which affirm binding international legal standards with which all States must comply.” Their website is

    An excellent book on this subject is “The Global Sexual Revolution: Destruction in the Name of Freedom” by Gabrielle Kuby.

    Below is a paste from the homepage, which is self-explanatory. The genocidal onslaught against humanity, procreation and the family unit, and all ecosystems, has as its ultimate objective the merging of human consciousness (of those humans left remaining who haven’t been exterminated) with artificial intelligence and robotics, as you are undoubtedly aware.

    Thie agenda demanded by The Yogyakarta Principles and its adherents must be blown wide open. And you have the expertise and visibility to do just that.

    Please write an article on The Yogyakarta Principles, including the gender-bending chemical compounds that are put in practically everything we consume.

    Thank you,

    Tim Hanley

    begin paste of home webpage at

    The Yogyakarta Principles plus 10 (YP+10)

    Additional Principles and State Obligations on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, Gender Expression and Sex Characteristics to Complement the Yogyakarta Principles.

    The YP plus 10 was adopted on 10 November, 2017 to supplement the Yogyakarta Principles. The YP plus 10 document emerged from the intersection of the developments in international human rights law with the emerging understanding of violations suffered by persons on grounds of sexual orientation and gender identity and the recognition of the distinct and intersectional grounds of gender expression and sex characteristics.

    The Principles are presented here in English and can be downloaded here.

    The Yogyakarta Principles

    In 2006, in response to well-documented patterns of abuse, a distinguished group of international human rights experts met in Yogyakarta, Indonesia to outline a set of international principles relating to sexual orientation and gender identity. The result was the Yogyakarta Principles: a universal guide to human rights which affirm binding international legal standards with which all States must comply. They promise a different future where all people born free and equal in dignity and rights can fulfil that precious birthright.

  7. Reblogged this on amnesiaclinic and commented:
    Spot on, Jon.
    The next thing – you can allow your child to ‘marry’ his mother. Of course, that follows dressing up in her clothes.
    Just think of the wonderful opportunities for banquets, cakes, presents etc.
    Oh, really, they’re already doing this amazing bridal service in Australia with all the trimmings?

  8. Erika says:

    first of all i would like to point out the real hidden issue.
    This is about IDENTITY.

    What is a person?
    Are they just a body?
    Just a skin bag of chemicals with neurons firing in a random manner?
    What are YOU?

    IF the person IS the body, then that is all he or she or now it, is.

    Ask yourself WHY gender has become the primary target of total identity.
    Could it be they are distracting from something deeper?
    Really, ya think?

    On another note, what the heck is wrong with letting a child reach the age of MAJORITY before THEY take that power into their own hands?
    So now the law will help you mutilate you body to be trendy, but you still can’t vote until 18 WTF is wrong with this picture…

  9. Michael Burns says:

    There was a lot of talk a decade to decade and a half ago, about synthetic chemicals; chemicals manufactured from petroleum getting into the food chain.

    Frogs changing sexes–male to female–hemaphoditism, some with no sexual organs at all.

    Farm pesticides, industrial chemicals and over abundance of estrogen in waste water flowing to wet lands.

    Atrazine is a prime candidate–in fact there is proof that it does cause a change in sexes in wetlands compared to the norms–too many males, or females.
    Frogs have been on a decline for decades.

    This chemical world we live in, its a wonder we have not more of this sort of thing.
    But why is it so prominant in the last five years?

  10. IMNAHA says:

    This just another colonialist, multipurpose, social, biological engineering of species homo sapien sapiens. It accomplishes several things:
    1 it’s potentially a huge profit center for the overlords see: (
    2. Potentially it could lower or erase the age of consent.
    3. It reinforces the concept that humans are just animals (albeit genitically engineered animals) and are imperfect, ergo technology must therefore “perfect the species”.
    4. It reinforces the concept of the medical/technocratic priesthood.
    5. It confuses and demoralizes humans who hold personal belief systems regarding the individual and society.
    6. I’m sure I’ve missed a few so feel free to add on a reply if you wish.

  11. Not So Free says:

    Any parent, doctor, judge, or any other adult who orders/allows sex re-assignment chemicals or surgery for a minor should be brought up on felony child abuse charges.

  12. floridaborne says:

    You said it all in 3 sentences:
    “This is legalized genital mutilation and torture, undertaken as a “proper medical procedure.” The doctors should have their licenses stripped, and they should be sent to prison. They should share their cells with the government officials who support this crime.”

    The same people, who agree with the fact that genital mutilation on females in middle eastern countries is reprehensible, condone an abomination foisted upon children who have no idea what they are agreeing to. Hypocrisy at its worst!

    I know of children who cross dressed as 5 year olds but it was only a phase. Children go through phases. Any sane adult with common sense should know this.

  13. Lee says:


    If there is NO abnormality with genitalia I do not believe a child should be supported in making a decision that involves hormonal or surgical treatment until they are an adult and have the right to independently make this choice themselves. There should be a blanket law for this no different to the legal age for say driving a car.

    Providing support for a child up to this age for their choice to choose what clothing they like to wear, all good, so what. Why don’t these movements just support the choice for someone to dress up in what makes them feel good – no harm done. Educate people to accept an individual’s right to adorn however they see fit. And if we eventually see some people choosing to walk on their hands and feet because they feel they are a dog/cat/horse, so be it – individual freedom of choice.

    BUT WHEN A CHILD IS BORN WITH AND SUSTAINS ATYPICAL GENITALIA this is a malfunction and would require intervention; likewise, for example, a cleft palate needs surgical intervention. When I looked into atypical genitalia it became clear that surgical intervention would be appropriate; finding an appropriate surgeon being the biggest dilemma.

    The 4yr old in Australia most likely has atypical genitalia and the media are capitalizing on it via the transgender narrative.

    • Annie says:

      I don’t agree. If the child is a genetic male and the surgery is to fix their male genitalia to make it function better as male genitalia or the child is a genetic female and the surgery is to fix their female genitalia to function better as female genitalia that’s one thing. But too many doctors and parents try to use the excuse of atypical genitalia to try to change genetic boys into girls because it is easier to “fix” their genitalia to look like a girl instead of a boy. Talk about gender dysphoria! This is worse than what Jon is talking about because many of these children are “fixed” and their testes and penis are removed while they are still to young to give any input whatsoever. When you’re talking about surgery to turn a genetic male into a physical female shouldn’t you just wait and let them make the decision when they are old enough to understand? It is their body.

  14. Jon

    As you are aware I don’t share your views on “responsible tyranny” vis-à-vis “designate children”. Even so, I find this an important article and will create a link in my latest writing project (pushing 12,000 words!!) “Prophecy, Prediction and Consensus View – Preconditioning for Spirited Souls?” on

    It will be published on Saturday.


  15. Louis says:

    Utterly incomprehensible

  16. EJ says:

    About five weeks after fertilization a human embryo develops a bi-potential gonad.
    If a Y chromosome (male) is present it orients to be a testes.
    If no Y by the 13th week it becomes an ovary.
    If Y showed up the body parts will be “male.”
    No Y and the parts are female. And that’s that about that.
    No queer chromosome, no transgender chromosome.

    That’s that about that…

  17. INGAORAMA says:

    Reblogged this on Ingaorama and commented:
    If this shall be “the free will of child” then how come that it has nothing to do with the childs free will when it is born and is let go in to circumcision? Then it has nothing to do with the free will..Parents and children care takers are those who have the responsibility over the child till it is 18 year old so this is the parents who have been brainwashed by the medical mafia who again is ruled by the z-elite. It is also part of it making a human evolution jump into trancehumanic-making us all to “it”..not “he” or “she”..and this is much bigger agenda behind this all than we see at first glance..Sadly to say most people are so brainwashed that nothing stick to their brain of a common sense 😦

  18. joel says:

    I was born with problems from my DES. poisoning…Tiny amounts of estrogen mimicking chemicals sterilized me before i was born….More commonly there was “gender confusion”. That thankfully didn’t happen to me, but i have become aware of all the gender bending chemicals out there. BPA or just all the plastics in our food and water. I scraped my organic apple the other day and a nice layer of wax came off the skin…Was it organic wax? Our bodies get confused.
    To me it is obvious; we are owned by Dow and other chemical manufacturers.
    No big leap for me to say, EUGENICS.
    Our sick and depraved masters are now writing legislation to go along with the massive damage that they have brought forth upon all of us.
    Take a look at the Georgia Guidestones or how about the murals in the Denver Airport.
    This is happening, face it, grock it, and then know that this world is Not just a lovely place where all kinds of things are possible. The earth is stage that fosters and supports psychopaths and we are here to learn specific lessons…Are you a master or a slave? and then how do you manage your role as such?
    Also, the powers that shouldn’t be, have this idea that they must rebel against all things natural. Make everything into an abomination. This is their big thing. So if you were born male why not be female? To them, the sick Babylonian, Luciferians everything should be ruined.
    The swastika becomes a symbol of Hitlerian tyranny, when before it meant quite the opposite.
    If their God is Baphomet, breasts and dick and all, we can see where this is all going.
    never mind

  19. Sink Chicken says:

    How many Y chromosomes does a man have again?

  20. Mimosa Hostilis says:

    This seems to be one possible origin responsible for this so-called gender Dysphoria or hysteria, craze, fad or whatever it is that’s currently sweeping the world. I don’t think it’s because there’s a billion more people living now or because there’s mass communication everywhere and we’re all plugged in. These eugenics chemicals are almost everywhere and have been around a long time. New ones are being made all the time.

    If this horror show continues unabated then the human race won’t even be recognizable in 80 years. Right now it’s just humans but wait until they start selling us animals. It’ll be natural of course, they’ll say.

    The only wise thing to do if one wants to leave this cess pool culture we’re in the midst of behind, is to go the other way. And to go all the way. And then eventually start something else. Maybe this makes sense to someone besides me?

  21. Reblogged this on Anchor Of Promise and commented:
    We thought the transgender war was only something that affected our own teens within this generation. We also thought it was only a family issue. Not any more. The court systems, the educational system, the government, and the health system are now all involved in one capacity or another to do one thing – to take away parental control and give our children what they think they want, a new gender identity. How far will they go? Read this Jon Rappoport’s post and your jaw will drop.

  22. psychedelicthoughtsbag says:

    I say reasons for which one may wish to identify with a certain gender and cease themselves of the other are a rather personal matter. I feel it can never be right to coerce people to do or not to “change” their gender just for the reason that we call morality. I mean, what would you do if you were born with a penis or other male organs yet you were assigned to the female gender at birth and even given a female name? Would you live as a girl with a penis?
    I hold it that a person reserves greater rights to their own wellness that anyone else does. I feel (we) take the idea of morality too far, we abuse it.

  23. studenttraveller2017 says:

    Hey! Great post ☺️ if you have time check out my post on whether sex education limits young peoples understanding about gender and sexuality! Thanks 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.