The world on trial: will Globalism/Socialism win?

The world on trial: will Socialism/Globalism win?

by Jon Rappoport

February 28, 2018

These words—Socialism and Globalism—are a mystery to most people. What do they mean? Why do they matter?

They matter because, behind the mask, they indicate massive centralized power at the top of the food chain. They aren’t “movements on behalf of the people.” They aren’t “humanitarian solutions to our problems.”

The massive power I refer to consists of governments, mega-corporations, banks, foundations, and technocrats working together, colluding, cooperating, planning a future of control over the world population.

Before he was killed in the shoot-down of Korean Airlines Flight 007 (1983), Congressman Larry McDonald stated: “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control… Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”

Rep. Louis T. McFadden, Congressional Record, 72nd Congress, 1st session, June 10, 1932; McFadden served as Chairman of the United States House Committee on Banking and Currency: “Mr. Chairman, when the Federal Reserve Act was passed the people of the United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here which would make the savings of an American school-teacher available to a narcotic-drug vendor in Macao. They did not perceive that the United States was to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw materials and heavy goods for export. That Russia was destined to supply man power and that this country was to supply financial power to an international superstate—a superstate controlled by International bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.”

THAT is Socialism/Globalism. It isn’t a revolution by and for “the downtrodden.”

To get a flavor of what would happen to the United States under such a system, read on:

SCENE: COURTROOM OF THE FUTURE

THE ROOM IS EMPTY, EXCEPT FOR THE PROSECUTOR AND THE JUDGE.

Prosecutor: Your Honor, is there a representative of America here today?

Judge: No need to look for one. We can proceed.

Prosecutor: Very well. I wish to say that the country known as America was always a fiction.

Judge: Why?

Prosecutor: Because borders are artificial and arbitrary.

Judge: Indeed. Who set them? It was all rubbish.

Prosecutor: Second, why should any separate nation have the right to exist? We now understand we are all one planet, one nation if you will.

Judge: I appreciate you bringing that up. It’s been decades since anyone with half a brain believed we could carve up planet Earth into separate sovereign countries. With one planet, under one leadership, there can be no more wars.

Prosecutor: And third, the fiction called America was designed to maximize individual freedom and the individual’s control over his own life. This is an unworkable and heinous concept. It led to massive inequalities. Now, every citizen is equal and contributes to the whole.

Judge: Of course. I work for you, you work for me, and we work for everyone. “Everyone all together”—that is our framework. Worldwide production of goods and services, and their allotted consumption, are regulated from Brussels. No one stands out.

Prosecutor: Our global leaders in Brussels are unidentified. No names or pictures are released. The cult of personality is finished.

Judge: After all, if you are using the awesome power of artificial intelligence to regulate the actions of seven billion people, why do you need to become known and famous? You’re doing basic organization. You’re a manager, a technologist.

Prosecutor: This thing called America had a document called the Constitution. Jurists constantly referred to it. Over time, it became an annoyance and a major impediment to progress. How can you pay legal homage to centuries-old concepts when conditions are constantly changing and improving? The human mind itself is evolving.

Judge: Putting the Constitution in mothballs was a major victory for us.

Prosecutor: America eventually reached a point where many “special needs groups” made their demands known. That was a signal more extensive government services were required. Why even call the country America? We were a social-justice construct, part of a global phenomenon.

Judge: In order to fulfill needs properly, the great corporations and government had to close ranks and merge. There was no other way. Thank goodness, it was the end of the free market and capitalism and all that clap-trap. Small businesses went the way of the dodo bird. Every person now has a job, and that job is performed under the aegis of the government-corporate nexus, as a civil employee, in service to EVERYONE.

Prosecutor: Sir, I petition this court to officially declare America defunct.

Judge: Motion granted.

Prosecutor: I further request that, since we have progressed far beyond the point of thinking of ourselves as a separate nation, there is no need to mark this occasion with a ceremony. It would be counter-productive. The former capital, Washington DC, is already shorn of its monuments and is basically a National Security Agency data-storage facility. Let us merely notify Brussels that a verdict has been rendered. They will enter it in their computers and that will be the end of it.

Judge: I agree. It is so ordered. Thank you for your service.

Prosecutor: This is my last case. I’ve just received a notice that I’m being assigned as a first-tier manager at the new Utah public works complex.

Judge: Congratulations. What are they doing there in Utah?

Prosecutor: Building a huge training facility for UN peacekeepers. It’s a ten-year project. Quite remarkable. It will house several hundred thousand people from all over the world.

Judge: Marvelous. We must keep the peace…

You could say this scenario is science fiction. And for the moment, it is. But for how long? If you’re old enough, think back to what life was like in America 35 years ago, 50 years ago. And then think about what life in America is like now. Tremendous changes have taken place, on many fronts. If a person living in the US 50 years ago were suddenly rocketed into 2018, he would be staggered by what he saw and heard.

This is how the future happens. To the people living through it, the changes, year by year, seem incremental. But they aren’t.

Unless the freedom and primacy of the individual survive, the courtroom scene above could happen—and most people would take it in stride.

Make no mistake about it, the individual IS the target. He is the unpredictable wild card in the deck. The technocratic planners know their algorithms don’t work when there are too many independent individuals. So they must rub them out and make them willing “units” on the planetary chessboard.

I write for the individual. I always have, and I always will.

My daily articles, at bottom, are meant to educate and empower the individual; and my three Matrix collections are a much further leap in that direction.

The fundamental power of the individual is creative. This power is rarely, if ever, tapped in the education system. Why? Because the power is all about the individual being able to create the future he most profoundly desires.

Many, many individuals doing just that would crack the foundations of the Globalist/Socialist plan.

Individual creative power IS the vaunted “philosopher’s stone” the ancient alchemists were seeking; that power IS the goal of centuries of struggle to liberate the individual from monarch and priest-class tyrannies; that power is what the founding of the American Republic was all about.

Because that power is what freedom is for.

Freedom is the platform and the space from which the individual launches his best and deepest vision. He makes that vision fact in the world.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

21 comments on “The world on trial: will Globalism/Socialism win?

  1. The reds can’t win unless they kill the host and thus themselves.

  2. Columcille says:

    Great article, this will help me explain to some folks how Socialism isn’t the solution to our problems. I was a major Anarchist (which is socialist) for years until I realised that by attacking the State (which I still believe can be somewhat oppressive) we were the useful idiots of the globalists. I realise now that the State may put oppressive pressure onto us in one fashion, but it prevents the full weight of the global governance from bearing down on us because our sovereignty means these globalist-minded elites and “technocrats” have a harder time controlling us.

    • flyinggabriel says:

      Terms like Anarchist and Socialist have numerous definitions now depending on the context, but I’m currently hard pressed to see it as one and the same. Strictly speaking Anarchism is simply the absence of government. An Anarchist manifests his ideology in various ways from confrontation with government and activism, to seeking an ever higher degree of isolation and freedom from it’s oppressive influence.
      What’s interesting about socialism of the Marxist variety, is that in his mind it served only as an intermediary, in order to dismantle capitalism on the way to full blown communism – a transitional stage.
      That places them near opposite ends of the spectrum. True Anarchism is still an expression of the individual, Socislism is still the imposition of the collective.
      But I kind of get your point – The nation state does stand as a bulwark against global communism and is the essential in this current paradigm. I would hope however, like Marxism, that it’s a transitional state. It’s undoubtedly better than global communism – but history shows it’s still oppressive – and relies on the “consent of the governed” – well, half of them anyway. Once this consent is acquired, it becomes “might is right” under arbitrary lawmakers.

      • Michael Burns says:

        flyinggabriel you said…

        “Strictly speaking Anarchism is simply the absence of government. An Anarchist manifests his ideology in various ways from confrontation with government and activism, to seeking an ever higher degree of isolation and freedom from it’s oppressive influence.”

        In the strictest sense: ‘Anarchist’ (Greek) is with-out ‘rulers’, ‘not government’. And leans and lends greatly in the self-governing. As in the politics of one.
        And non-interference of others and their beliefs. To be an anarchist is to be apolitical.
        Granted the term has be debauched today to suit the modern political climate.
        But we are speaking strictly, right?

        • flyinggabriel says:

          Congratulations on finding a political motivation I didn’t think I had. Strictly speaking, I think we’ve just submerged into the rock-hard substrate of semantic argument. But if you want further admissions of my “politics of one” provide a list of words with both their contemporary and historical meanings you would like me to choose from and I’ll elaborate. But then again, to have an opinion at all means I abdicate any claim to anarchism it would appear. Perhaps the only true anarchist is one who remains silent – strictly speaking. If self-governance is a political stand – find me a real anarchist, I would appreciate hearing his silence.

  3. paschnn1 says:

    Re-posting @ Russia Insider.
    This should be REQUIRED READING for “Snowflakes/”Millennials”

  4. kenshohomestead says:

    Reblogged this on Kensho Homestead and commented:
    Exactly as I see it, only written much better than I could do! Thank you Jon.

    Please read on, folks, and take off those rose-colored glasses

    .

    “Before he was killed in the shoot-down of Korean Airlines Flight 007 (1983), Congressman Larry McDonald stated: “The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control… Do I mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.””

  5. AfterHollywood says:

    Reblogged this on AfterHollywood and commented:
    You think Hollywood is nuts? Think about the possibilities of this happening. Or is it already here?

  6. johnbarleycorn12 says:

    Reblogged this on John Barleycorn and commented:
    Our present situation summed up quite nicely.

  7. From Quebec says:

    Make no mistake about it, the individual IS the target. He is the unpredictable wild card in the deck.
    (Jon)

    That is exactly what Trump is: The unpredictable wild card in the deck. This is why they will do everything possible to get rid of him.

  8. Mark says:

    For centuries the world has been governed by a sort of loose feudal system. Globalization is a coordinated attempt to tighten it up and make it official. Anyone who has followed the money trail behind the 3rd Reich, for example, will find that the trail leads to many of the very same families and organizations that are now behind globalization. The UN, and other groups like it, are ‘fronts’ for those families.

    “Power from any source tends to create an appetite for additional power. Power coming from wealth tends to create an appetite for political power and vice versa. It was almost inevitable that the super-rich would one day aspire to control not only their own wealth, but the wealth of the whole world.” – Cleon Skousen, author of The Naked Capitalist, a review of Dr. Carroll Quigley’s book, Tragedy and Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time

  9. flyinggabriel says:

    George: “Oh yeah, they’re gonna talk to you, and talk to you, and talk to you about individual freedom, but they see a free individual, it’s gonna scare ’em.”
    Billy: “Mmmm, well, it don’t make ’em runnin’ scared.”
    George: “No,… it makes ’em dangerous.”

  10. Jon

    As usual an excellent prognosis of symptoms. I prefer the label “Zionists and Zionism” in place of Globalists and Socialism. Zionists bankrolled (and made staggering sums of money from) Russian “communism” (sic).

    Causes are a bit more tricky. I consider them in my latest article https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2018/02/25/prophecy-prediction-and-consensus-view-preconditioning-for-spirited-souls/:

    “…Significant changes to my original (2014) conceptual title were made with the additions “consensus view” and, I must say rather ambiguous, “spirited souls”. Consensus view somewhat echoes another archived “to be written” memo, contritely titled “Attitude”. One note and single line “a bad attitude is good” confidently anticipates intentions, which, of course, clearly subliminally emphasises the power objective belying propagandas. Even so there is a correlation I haven’t discussed yet. Consensus view directly impacts obtuse reasoning. In fact, so much so, it beckons the hard to confirm question; did obtuse reasoning pre-empt consensus view or was it the other way round? This is, I might add, a question committed conspiracy theorists invariably fail to address and one of the pivotal arguments I use against most so-called “alternative” views.

    I note just about all views either respond to relative ignorance or general superstition (deliberate or otherwise). Others will parasite off different consensuses whose varied appraisals of content boils down to the same equally acrid mulch that lends favour to official decorum. In addition to the syndrome, I have also observed that if one “camp” says “yes”, the alternative instinctively emphatically responds “no”. Considering this “us” versus “them” dichotomy, it seems entirely plausible for me to at least “determine” that a sole basic planner might be scripting an “ongoing without end” (mock) contest. Currently this is fought between “that which is official” (good) and “the antipathy towards anything official” (evil). Doubtlessly my theoretical planners’ will (desire) would be (perhaps posthumously) advanced by pyramidal structures in precisely the same manner (and possible extension of) the “good government” versus “evil anarchist” visceral war that has been expressed through the ages….”

    Best
    OT

  11. The Prescient Minority says:

    Socialism will go the way of Communism. Europe is completely screwed economically. Interest rates are rising from 5000 year lows. European countries will simply be unable to service their debt at higher interest rates. And then the Government Debt Ponzi scheme will be laid bare for all to see. When investors believe that a government will not be able to repay their bonds at maturity then that leads to no bids at government bond auctions. It will be devastating for the people when their government no longer has the money to provide all the social services that they depend on. The next four or so years will be very tough on Europe.

  12. Freespirit says:

    BOTH will WIN

    Capitalism for the already Wealthy and Powerful, Zionists and Freemasons,such as ,but not limited to the House of Rothschild, House of Windsor and the Vatican via their massively wealthy CORPORATIONS, Banks International TRUSTS and Institutions and with all of their “USEFUL managerial IDIOTS” and Socialism/COMMUNISM for the rest of us.

  13. BlueyBlogger says:

    Well, I’m not supposed to, but here goes.
    Way before this planet was formed, whatever you may believe, or think happened when it was formed, it was just mathematics in motion, ok?
    Mathematics just so happens to be equivalent to Early Semitic Ancient Hebrew, not today’s Hebrew….the True Hebrew!
    Only one language procedure contains Maths, i.e. Sound = Vibration = Light = Maths = YHWH.
    ‘Nuff said…!!

    • flyinggabriel says:

      Just one question.
      Why is it that you’re “not supposed to”
      I’d really like to know if that’s ok.

  14. Ronnie Varkevisser says:

    IN THE END NATIONALISM WILL WIN BECAUSE GOD HAS SET OUR BOUNDRYS AND WE MUST RESPECT THAT , THAT IS A BIBLE PRINCIPLE THAT YOU MUST LET YOUR OWN RULE OVER YOU AND NOT SOMEBODY ELSE , AND THAT COUNTS FOR EVERY BODY , SO YOU WILL HAVE RESPECT FOR LIFE AND YOUR BROTHER ! IF OTHER PEOPLE KILL EACH OTHER BECAUSE OF HATRED OR WHAT EVER REASON IT HAS GOT NOTHING TO DO WITH US , WE MUST STAND TOGETHER AND LIVE LIFE AS GOD HAVE INTENDED IT FOR US TO BE JOHN 10:10 THE THIEF COMES TO KILL STEAL & DESTROY BUT I HAVE COME THAT YOU CAN HAVE LIFE AND HAVE IT MORE ABUNDANTLY . BUT THE DARK AND SINISTER FORCES THROUGH THE SECRET SOCIETYS WOULD HAVE NONE OF THAT , AND OUR OWN PEOPLE WHO ARE BLINDED BY MONEY OR THE OATHS THEY HAVE PLEDGED TO THESE ORGANIZATIONS ARE THE PROBLEM AMONGST US OUR “OWN” THAT HAS BETRAYED US WITH THE RELIGIOUS MAN OF ANY CULTURE FOR THAT MATTER FOR WITH RELIGION YOU CAN JUSTIFY WAR AND THAT IS WHAT THE DARK FORCES USE TO DESTROY LIFE ON EARH DOESN’T MATTER WHAT RELIGION YOU ARE CONNECTED TO . BUT THANK GOD THAT WE ARE NOT FROM THIS EARTH ANYMORE , BUT WE AS A PEOPLE HIS PEOPLE MUST STOP THE DESTRUCTION , BY GETTING ALL THESE FRAUDS FOR LEADERS OUT OF THE GOVERNMENTAL POSITIONS THE OCCUPY AND GET PEOPLE IN CHARGE THAT KNOW THE LOVE OF GOD AND THAT KNOWS HOW TO BE LED BY HIS SPIRIT SO THAT RIGTHOUSNESS CAN WIN AND PREVAIL .

  15. John Barlicorn says:

    I agree most of the time with John, but this time maybe not. I always thought that becoming one nation with no religion will once and for all stop all wars on earth. What good is a nation or religion or border or land if all they bring is suffering?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.