5G: Harmful effects of a new technology

5G: Harmful effects of a new technology

by Jon Rappoport

March 26, 2018

* See “5G Radiation Dangers—11 Reasons To Be Concerned,” by Lloyd Burrell (twitter), at electricsense.com. Well worth a read.

* Of course, read Patrick Wood’s (twitter) instant classic, Technocracy Rising, which explains the hidden agenda of Globalism in the 21st century. Patrick’s blog is here.

“Along with the 5G there is another thing coming — Internet of Things. If you look at it…the radiation level is going to increase tremendously and yet the industry is very excited about it… they project 5G/IoT business to be a $7 trillion business.” — Prof. Girish Kumar, Professor at Electrical Engineering Department at IIT Bombay

5G, the latest and greatest method of faster wireless transmission, is coming on with a storm.

Governments are promoting it as if the future of humanity depends on it. It MUST BE implemented.

When governments and corporations see technological daylight up the road—and big money—they run toward it joined at the hip. Consequences be damned.

And now, 5G.

A few of the many corporations involved include Samsung, Intel, Qualcomm, Nokia, Huawei, Ericsson, ZTE. This is a global operation, and many governments are backing the push.

And the consumer gets what? The ability to watch the reruns of Law&Order he’s already watching? His current TV reception isn’t good enough? The appliances in his home will all be connected to Internet and talk to each other and spy on him and record his energy use, in conjunction with smart meters, for the Greater Good.

Somehow, you really need your toaster connected to the Internet? You want that? You can’t get along without that?

UNDOUBTEDLY, A KEY PART OF THE 5G PROGRAM IS, EVENTUALLY, MASSIVE NUMBERS OF DRIVERLESS CARS ON ROADS ALL OVER THE WORLD. This is the plan. Cars are connected and talk to each other. Humans play no role in this. The Technocratic Internet of Things decides how, at any given moment, to regulate traffic flows. Humans learn to be passive.

AND WITH THE INTERNET OF THINGS, THE TECHNOCRATIC ELITE WILL BE ABLE TO INSTALL ENERGY-USE QUOTAS AND CEILINGS FOR EVERY PERSON AND EXERT TOP-DOWN CONTROL ON THE PLANET.

“Mr. Jones, this is the voice of your house speaking. You have reached the assigned limit of your energy use for the month. Try to get along without energy until next month’s allotment comes online…”

At electricsense.com (5/12/17), we learn about the purported “upside” of 5G:

“5G and IoT [Internet of Things] promises to connect us in our homes, schools, workplaces, cities, parks and open spaces to over a trillion objects around the world. It promises cars that drive themselves, washing machines that order their own washing powder and softener plus of course super fast downloads and streaming.”

“According to Fortune.com 5G will support at least 100 billion devices and will be 10 to 100 times faster than current 4G technology. (4G was already about 10 times faster than 3G).”

“It’ll bring download speed up to 10 Gigabits per second. This would let us have an entire building of people send each other data in close to no time, thus improving productivity.”

Now, electricsense.com takes us into the disaster of 5G:

“5G will utilize smaller cell stations (and the technology of beamforming) that’ll scramble/unscramble and redirect packets of data on a no-interference path back to us. This could mean wireless antennas on every lamp post, utility pole, home and business throughout entire neighborhoods, towns and cities.”

“Thousands of studies link low-level wireless radio frequency radiation exposures to a long list of adverse biological effects, including:

• DNA single and double strand breaks

• oxidative damage

• disruption of cell metabolism

• increased blood brain barrier permeability

• melatonin reduction

• disruption to brain glucose metabolism

• generation of stress proteins”

“Given that 5G is set to utilize frequencies above and below existing frequency bands 5G sits in the middle of all this. But the tendency (it varies from country to country) is for 5G to utilize the higher frequency bands. Which brings its own particular concerns…”

“The biggest concern is how these new wavelengths will affect the skin. The human body has between two million to four million sweat ducts. Dr. Ben-Ishai of Hebrew University, Israel explains that our sweat ducts act like ‘an array of helical antennas when exposed to these wavelengths,’ meaning that we become more conductive. A recent New York study which experimented with 60GHz waves stated that ‘the analyses of penetration depth show that more than 90% of the transmitted power is absorbed in the epidermis and dermis layer’.”

“The effects of MMWs [millimeter waves] as studied by Dr. Yael Stein of Hebrew University is said to also cause humans physical pain as our nociceptors flare up in recognition of the wave as a damaging stimuli. So we’re looking at possibilities of many skin diseases and cancer as well as physical pain to our skin.”

“A 1994 study found that low level millimeter microwave radiation produced lens opacity in rats, which is linked to the production of cataracts.”

“An experiment conducted by the Medical Research Institute of Kanazawa Medical University found that 60GHz ‘millimeter-wave antennas can cause thermal injuries of varying types of levels. The thermal effects induced by millimeterwaves can apparently penetrate below the surface of the eye’.”

“A 1992 Russian study found that frequencies in the range 53-78GHz (that which 5G proposes to use) impacted the heart rate variability (an indicator of stress) in rats. Another Russian study on frogs whose skin was exposed to MMWs found heart rate changes (arrhythmias).”

“5G will use pulsed millimeter waves to carry information. But as Dr. Joel Moskowitz points out, most 5G studies are misleading because they do not pulse the waves. This is important because research on microwaves already tells us how pulsed waves have more profound biological effects on our body compared to non-pulsed waves. Previous studies, for instance, show how pulse rates of the frequencies led to gene toxicity and DNA strand breaks.”

This is just a sampling of 5G’s disastrous effects. There is much more.

“AT&T have announced the availability of their 5G Evolution in Austin, Texas. 5G Evolution allows Samsung S8 and S8 + users access to faster speeds. This is part of AT&T’s plan to lay the 5G foundation while the standards are being finalized. This is expected to happen in late 2018. AT&T has eyes on 19 other metropolitan areas such as Chicago, Los Angeles, Boston, Atlanta, San Francisco and so on. Indianapolis is up next on their 5G trail due to arrive in the summer [2018].”

It’s full steam ahead for 5G on planet Earth.

Profits, top-down control, new technology—why bother with extensive health studies?

Once the effects on the population take hold, doctors will make diagnoses of DISEASES that seem to have nothing to do with 5G. They’ll call it Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, or a variety of blood disorders, they’ll look for THE VIRUS, and they’ll develop new drugs…


power outside the matrix

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

28 comments on “5G: Harmful effects of a new technology

    • Karen Favazza Spencer says:

      Unintended consequences that will generate profits will be disease and disability that result in misdiagnoses and increased use of pharmaceuticals from infertility and birth defects to dementia and cancers.

      The devil is in the details. And that is d*** important.

      Shutting down 5G is the responsible behavior.

  1. From Quebec says:

    This could mean wireless antennas on every lamp post, utility pole, home and business throughout entire neighborhoods, towns and cities.”(Jon)

    Well, you have guns in the USA, how about shooting every antennas on lamp post, utility pole, home and business throughout entire neighborhoods, towns and cities?

    Why not? Show them you do not want them. Kill these wireless antennas…lol…

    Show them that you are the boss here.

    Well, desperate times call for desperate measures

  2. Apparently there are studies and plenty of the them, ignored, of course.

    “Long buried by Germany’s government, a report offering a rare window on 878 Russian-language science papers (1960-1997) was finally translated, with updates, into English. Long-term studies on Soviet workers repeatedly charted chronic debilitation from weak EMFs – including pulsed microwaves that have been commercially ‘repackaged’ for today’s telecoms.”

    https://theecologist.org/2017/jan/12/krakows-bold-step-curb-electromagnetic-pollution-reflects-growing-evidence-harm

  3. Not So Free says:

    Catherine J. Frompovich has written extensively on 5G dangers and radiation dangers (i.e. microwave) in general.

  4. bleak's-blog says:

    I’ve been watching this. You are so right… they NEED this. Why? I’m guessing to run the highly sophisticated AI facial mapping/recognition and God only knows what the hell else mind control “apps” they got up their snake skins. The ruse that 5G is needed for IoT and self driving cars is just the surface.

    That is my theory/conjecture but it is not only plausible, it is a fact that every little thing we do is being documented, stored and evaluated. Is not the latest Facebook/Cambridge Analytica scandal/disclosure evidence? “Psychographic Targeting?” I haven’t been on ciabook in years but that doesn’t mean they didn’t use my stuff even with my “legal” warning and “privacy” settings ha ha.

    https://www.wired.com/story/the-noisy-fallacies-of-psychographic-targeting/

    Trump recently killed the Qualcomm/Broadcom deal and I’m sure many “MAGA” trumpets were glowing with enthusiasm. “See, just look what our president did. He is bringing back jobs to the USA and protecting us from evil communists. He is #MAGA! Oh yes.” Yeah, sure he is. He/they killed it because it is so important to their plan of “full spectrum dominence of planet earth” (see Chemtrails, HAARP etc by Elana Freeland). They are covering all the bases; foreign corporations are harder (but not impossible) to control therefore the less chance of whistleblowing, hacking etc. Again, just my theory and conjecture but based on the propensity and preponderance of more more more control.

    Also of note is the recent death of a pedestrian by driverless Uber car in Arizona. I am sure Uber etc will brush this off as a “freak accident” or whatever and carry on as usual. I know I ain’t gettin in one of those things anytime soon.

    […]

    • petergrafstrm says:

      Yes cybernetic applications is one motive no doubt. One openly discussed reason is for automatic monitoring of young infants and of (old) peoples health and whereabouts. Saving the cost of human personel. But also offering quicker response in the event of the target loosing orientation and irring about. The EU has published reports where extremely low power technology is discussed. It must be noted that 5G and further developments do offer the opportunity for much lower rf intensities than with earlier versions. Whether that opportunity is exploited or not is a matter of whether people take an interest in the details. If the high power towers communicate via local links and not directly with the internet of things, it would be possible to operate on much lower power levels than today, when mobile phones held close to the skull may produce very strong low frequency magnetic fields inside the brain. Presumably the main reason for biological damage from communication technology.

      • bleak's-blog says:

        Thanks. Some hidden motives are implanting thoughts and commands individually or en masse to small segments or whole populations. This allegedlly is made possible by aerosol/chemtrail spraying which contains the nanotech we are all breathing. I believe this will only work on the most clueless and it is possible to transmute the signals if one is aware that he/she is being nefariously manipulated from the outside.

        I doubt that the majority will pay any attention to the details.

        • petergrafstrm says:

          There is no way to communicate remotely with nanoparticles inside peoples bodies. Implanting thoughts would probably require some kind of receiving implant.Like having a mobile phone hardwired inside.
          If chemtrails are used for some kind of communication it would be for refraction of radiowaves so they might reach a bit longer.

          • I’ve also heard/experienced the desiccant effect, which apparently by keeping the humidity from the atmosphere it helps with transmissions. Causing drought to deliberately kill trees which also cause obstruction to radar has also been speculated This would also explain some of the insect decline I’d think. Lots of theories flying around, too f’ing annoying we get no transparency!

          • bleak's-blog says:

            What are radios but receivers made of circuits. What is nanotech but tiny machines/circuits. Why implant when they can force us to inhale? It doen’t take a rocket scientist (I just had to) to see the implications and patterns. I see them anyway.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanoradio

            Hey, I’m just sayin, OK? Concur all ya’ll want to with each other but I know that a lot of people have been workin 24/7 for a lot of years on “stuff” and we don’t have a clue what they are workin on, do we. Isn’t that what this article is all about, inventions? Biotech used for ill purposes in this case, but inventions nevertheless.

            Nanotech manufacturing has been around hard since 1997. See Zyvex Corp founded by Altsys software founder Jim Von Ehr in Dallas (Plano actually, a suburb). I’ve been following them since Aldus Freehand bit the dust and was subsumed by Adobe.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_R._Von_Ehr_II

            Someone who’s opinion I trust told me that I give some people too much credit and I told him he doesn’t give some of them enough. Know your enemies and you won’t be the victims of a surprise attack. That is somewhere in the Art of War I know it is. Well… we’ve been attacked now for 10,000 years. Do ya think that maybe we’re losing the war because of ignorance and naivete? I do.

            • petergrafstrm says:

              I got this argument about nanoradio by somebody before and looked up the references he offered. I found that in all cases the nanoradio used an antenna of several cm’s. Just like conventional implants. This was expected since the laws of physics makes it unavoidable when the nanoradio is to have remote communication. If it only needs to have microscopic reach it needs less antenna length. When they leave out such details you should be suspicious.
              The efficiency of an antenna is dependent on the third power of
              Size/wavelength or worse and useful wavelengths for remote communication from inside the body are at least several cm’s
              But appart from antenna, the power is a problem. Tiny nanosized objects are likely to have very little power. Normal implants, such as for example for rfid may be powered from an external transmitter, but that requires an efficient coupling so we’re back to the dilemma with a macroscopic antenna. In conclusion forget about nanotech when seeking explanations for remote communication with the brain.

          • bleak's-blog says:

            @petergrafstrm I concede that a bunch of nanotubes in a human body will not a nanoradio make and that a lengthy antenna would be needed. I didn’t think of that and your logic is sound. Howevah… what is the goal of nanotech if not to create microscopic smart machines that could be programmed to *assemble* into a radio including a transmitter, receiver, and body-length antenna?

            Bill Gates is working on nanotech vaccines (hmmmmmmmm). Ray Kurzweil is working on nanotech as well and that is probably an understatement. I would guess that nanoradios are something that has crossed both their minds.

            Transhumanists; can’t live with em; pass the GMO radio soy nuts.

            “We are the Borg! Resistance is futile!”

            https://www.organicconsumers.org/news/bill-gates-funds-covert-vaccine-nanotechnology
            https://singularityhub.com/2016/04/19/ray-kurzweil-predicts-three-technologies-will-define-our-future/

            • petergrafstrm says:

              Sure, with a fully developed nanotech-robot assortment only the fantasy would be the limit. But I know these cybernetic applications have been running for over fifty years, so it works without nanorobots. Of course the technique has gone through phases and now may have more capacity. In 1994 an american engineer was interviewed by Walter Bowart and said the Cia obtained a new type of electronic implants and started using them around 1988/89. The year when many people began to complain about being subjected to mindcontrol and other weird harassments. Those implants were incapsulated in a material which mimics bone when xray-ed so they are invisible for xray screening when inserted in and among the vertebrae. Or near the scull.

  5. kadicha says:

    ​So, how long do you want to live?? Anyone over 30 is a societal loser, anyway, right? We are going to die younger and younger, so who has time for shopping? Just like good ol’ fluoride, it has to be controlled mass injection with no option. I’ve spent 40 years lowering my exposure to toxic chemicals from fluoride to wi-fi and pharma-bacteriacides, but this last (FINAL??) assault on overpopulation is not avoidable. We are all going to be “cooked” from the inside out very efficiently and soon our individual consumption of anything will be algorithm controlled​ from Germany, where they avoid such things as mandatory injections, fluoride and their own Dr Jekyll GMO pharmaceuticals. One last note: At the other end of the earth, this very day I visited a Govt. Services Centre in a small seaside town of 35,000. ALL of the employees were sporting headpieces straight out of Dr.Who, which had myriad flashing colours around the metal perfectly positioned radiation skull injectors explained to me as allowing supervisors et al to know what was being transmitted each way………

    Namaste from Downunder

  6. The Watchman says:

    Jon, good article. Glad to see that you are covering 5G. I have seen very little coverage on this topic, even on the alternative news sites other than at Activist Post, where Catherine J. Frompovich covers it quite well. Since Nothing New Under the Sun 2016 – https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/
    is aware of the dangers, Catherine’s and your articles will continue to be linked in our daily news links! Hope you do more.

  7. petergrafstrm says:

    The article doesnt mention powerlevel/intensity.
    Quantity matters.

  8. usnveteran says:

    The ‘National Capital Region’s April 5, 2018 Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) Testing’:

    “Beginning November 30, 2019, participating wireless providers must improve geo-targeting of alerts even further.” …

    https://www.montgomerycountymd.gov/OEMHS/WEA-FAQ.html

  9. Lamberth says:

    “Internet of Things decides how, at any given moment, to regulate traffic flows. Humans learn to be passive.”
    And this all started with the traffic light over a hundred years ago…

  10. Tony says:

    Thanks Jon for covering the 5G dangers; keep doing so. This page has a load of useful contacts to email various US Health and Safety agencies* to register concern. Please use them and forward on to others!

    http://www.parentsforsafetechnology.org/stop-5g-spectrum-frontiers.html

    ——
    *Actual ‘health’ and ‘safety’ may not resemble the picture on the box

  11. Right. If technology is advancing, the consequences should be taken in serious consideration. Employment will also go down eventually.

  12. Jim Loomis says:

    Did you know that programmers, paid for by the large communication companies, etc, have prevented me from pulling up on my computer anything relating to 5G?
    I WAS able to put it into my Verizon Cell phone BUT cannot get it to come up on my HP Computer.
    The file is: 5G: Harmful effects of a new technology / The Crazz Files
    By Jon Rappoport

  13. Sarah J says:

    So may I ask why people are not protesting in the streets? Why do we allow big business to destroy us..for profit ? Or is this simply another ploy for population control ?! God help us all !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.