CDC “vaccine science” hides giant conflict of interest

by Jon Rappoport

July 5, 2018

If you wanted to buy a product…

And the main safety-researcher of the product was the company selling it to you…

Would you automatically assume the product was safe and effective?

But you see, that’s the just the beginning of the problem. Suppose the company’s research was cited thousands of times in the press, as the authoritative standard of proof—and anyone who disputed that research was labeled a conspiracy theorist and a quack and a danger to the community and an anti-science lunatic.

Would you begin to suspect the company had awesome media connections? Would you suspect some very powerful people were backing the company?

This is exactly the situation with the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Read these two quotes:

The government’s Vaccine for Children Program (a CDC organization) purchases vaccines for about 50 percent of children in the U.S.” (The Atlantic, February 10, 2015)

“The CDC currently spends over $4 billion purchasing vaccines [annually] from drug makers…” (Health Impact News, October 24, 2016)

However, the CDC is also the gold standard for research on the safety and efficacy of vaccines. It turns out an unending stream of studies on these subjects. And the results of those studies are dutifully reported in the mainstream press.

Do you think, under any circumstances, the CDC would publish data showing vaccines are ineffective and dangerous? They’d be cutting their own throats.

“Well, we spend $4 billion a year buying vaccines from drug companies, but guess what? These vaccines are often dangerous…”

Every time you read about a CDC study on vaccines, keep this obvious conflict of interest in mind.

When, in 2014, William Thompson, a long-time CDC researcher, publicly admitted he and his colleagues had buried data that would have shown the MMR vaccine increases the risk of autism, he was throwing a stick of dynamite into the whole CDC operation. He was also saying, in recorded phone conversations, that the CDC was lying about vaccine safety in other studies.

This is why major media refused to cover or investigate Thompson’s claims. This is why they spread a blanket of silence over his revelations.

Thompson was threatening a $ 4-billion-a-year enterprise.

The CDC is both a PR agency for, and a buyer from, Big Pharma.

Speaking of PR, would you like to see an example of how the CDC promotes the yearly flu vaccine by lying egregiously about flu deaths in the United States?

In December of 2005, the British Medical Journal (online) published a shocking report by Peter Doshi, which created tremors through the halls of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), where “the experts” used to tell the press that 36,000 people in the US die every year from the flu.

Here is a quote from Doshi’s report, “Are US flu death figures more PR than science?” (BMJ 2005; 331:1412):

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.”

Boom.

You see, the CDC has created one overall category that combines both flu and pneumonia deaths. Why do they do this? Because they disingenuously assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu.

This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes.

But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus.

Therefore, the CDC could not say, with assurance, that more than 18 people died of influenza in 2001. Not 36,000 deaths. 18 deaths.

Doshi continued his assessment of published CDC flu-death statistics: “Between 1979 and 2001, [CDC] data show an average of 1348 [flu] deaths per year (range 257 to 3006).” These figures refer to flu separated out from pneumonia.

This death toll is obviously far lower than the parroted 36,000 figure.

However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of flu deaths plummet even further.

In other words, it’s all promotion and hype.

“Well, uh, we used to say 36,000 people died from the flu every year in the US. But actually, it’s closer to 20. However, we can’t admit that, because if we did, we’d be exposing our gigantic psyop. The whole campaign to scare people into getting a flu shot would have about the same effect as warning people to carry iron umbrellas, in case toasters fall out of upper-story windows…and, by the way, we’d be put in prison for fraud.”

The CDC must turn out a steady stream of outrageous lies about the need for vaccines. If they didn’t, they’d have no way to justify the billions of dollars they spend every year buying the vaccines from drug companies.

Since the sold-out major media won’t connect these dots, I and others need to.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

13 comments on “CDC “vaccine science” hides giant conflict of interest

  1. MrDuncmck says:

    thanks jon ! another great lesson in logic and reason . the lions share of incoherence in the world would come crumbling down if logic and reason were incorporated into the protocol of mind . no logic =matrix

  2. NaturalWoman says:

    Thank you, thank you, Jon. Those of us aware of this vast scam sometimes have difficulty presenting what we know to the uninformed in a simple, easy-to-follow way that they can grasp. This brilliantly and succinctly does just that. I’ll be passing it along.

  3. Rian says:

    Our media is worse than Hitler throwing out jewish propaganda in WW2. In fact, media outlets should post/ be required to post a disclaimer “views being shown represent our sponsors, and are as scripted as WWE.” Haha.

  4. You’re right, Jon. And the cheerleaders for “the flu shot” are numerous, from your doctor, to their office staff, to the pharmacies. Scare tactics all.

  5. Tim says:

    “Most Ignored and Most Far-Reaching Supreme Court Ruling Yet: Anti-Trust Law Hollowed Out”

    http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2018/07/most-ignored-and-most-far-reaching-supreme-court-ruling-yet-anti-trust-law-hollowed-out.html

    Hello, Jon:

    have you been following that story? It will probably be used in the health care system, since apparently, lies are a-ok now, & anti-trust law is history.

  6. You haven’t entered the rabbit hole, Jon.

    ‘Blame game” doesn’t help matters.

    ALL sciences “judge” symptoms or effects of existence and, therefore, cultural priorities drive “highest bidder” mentality.

    Is the apple “pulled” or “pushed” to the ground?

    Best
    OT

  7. gunther says:

    Good that somebody picks up on that.
    But be aware, this is a dangerous topic. Search Andrew Wakefield or Vaxxed to find out more.

  8. sundancer55 says:

    It’s been a “dangerous topic” since the polio scam in the 1950’s and 1960’s. But we must trudge on in order for truth to some day emerge.

    The biggest thing to know about science is that it’s for sale, always, to the highest bidder and the outcome of the science is only dependent on the buyer. Been that way for a looooong time.

    • sundancer55 says:

      I heard about this on the “news” (Fox and Friends) Saturday morning. I’m not shocked because I had heard that this was coming (I live in the USA). However, this is what is called totalitarianism in a country, and it would shock me if the people of Australia stand for this – or should I say it would shock me if they take this sitting down.

      As far as I know, the UN doesn’t “run the world” just yet, so Australians need to revolt against this or move. I would think the revolt would actually be easier for most of them.

      They obviously have a gubmint system which buys into the flawed science, for one reason or another, but usually the reason is money, power and control.

  9. Calilo says:

    Reblogged this on Babble On… and commented:
    Show me the math that says a fully vaccinated population is healthier (defined including absence of chronic disease, rather than soley absense of infectious disease) than an unvaccinated or undervaccinated population. Because isn’t that the number we all what to know, that is that vaccine policy has led to a healthier population?

  10. 83% of Vaccines Are Made in China
    …And Americans are expected to take them without question
    Infowars.com – February 17, 2015

    https://www.infowars.com/83-of-vaccines-are-made-in-china/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.