What Globalists say; what they really mean

by Jon Rappoport

July 12, 2018

(To join our email list, click here.)

“[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force. International banks and multinational corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in advance of the political concepts of the nation state.” (Zbigniew Brzezinski, 1969)

This famous quote from one of the world’s leading Globalists could have been written more truthfully. For example: “We must do everything we can to eliminate the reality of separate and individual countries. In this regard, breaking down borders with massive waves of immigration will go a long way.”

And what about Brzezinski’s remark that corporations and banks are acting in ways that are “far in advance” of the nation-state?

Perhaps this is what he means by advanced concepts: Corporations are empowered to set up factories in Third World hellholes, where they employ workers at starvation wages, with no environmental concerns or controls. That’s step one. Step two is exporting the goods made in those far-off places back to First World countries without paying tariff-penalties.

Yes, that’s what Brzezinski and other elite Globalists would call “enlightened economics.”

To call this free-market capitalism is a gross misnomer. The free market is pushed to the side. Basic capitalism, in which an entrepreneur builds a domestic business and sells his goods, has nothing to do with this kind of engineered international corporate expansion. The corporate Globalist state is a different animal altogether.

“I believe that if you go and ask a chief executive of a Goldman Sachs or a BP, and they answer you honestly … they want monopolies, they want government subsidies, they want preferences – they’re not interested in free markets.” (Ian Bremmer, The Daily Telegraph, 7/10/10)

Any doubt on the question of Globalist goals is answered by David Rockefeller himself, in his Memoirs (2003): “Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

Rockefeller’s phrase, “a more integrated global and economic structure,” vaguely suggests some kind of fairness, in which loser nations would be promoted into upper tiers of business relationships.

But no. “Integrated” actually means the world is made to fit the ambitions of global corporations—these behemoths can roam anywhere, set up shop, and produce their goods, without regard for smaller producers of the same goods, who suddenly find themselves edged out of the market.

“Integrated” also means “never having to pay tariffs.” Tariffs level the playing field. A level field is the last thing Globalists want.

In the current trade wrangle between China and the US, Globalists are essentially saying: “See, you’re upsetting the system. Now both China and the US will be laying on tariffs. It’s much better to eliminate tariffs altogether—which was the way we ran things until recently…”

No, the way things were being run allowed China to export far more goods to US than the US was exporting to China. That imbalance has been quite damaging to the US economy.

So, although Globalists ignore the concept of separate nations, and cheerily chirp about mega-corporations running “the worldwide economy,” in fact whole nations are hurt by this practice; some nations more than others.

This is no accident. In order for Globalist control of the planet to win out, the US has to be brought to heel. Dismantling the power of its economy has been a major operation, for decades.

Globalists say “integrated world economy.” They mean: “mega-corporations win a rigged game.”

Globalists say “advanced political concepts.” They mean: “no tariffs.”

Globalists say “nation states are outmoded.” They mean: “open all borders” and “control all markets from above, at the level of mega-corporations.”

Guess who the “disaffected youth” demanding open borders are unknowingly working for?

The richest people in the world.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


(New piece up at my OUTSIDE THE REALITY MACHINE blog entitled
“Sacred shapes and decimated minds”)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

23 comments on “What Globalists say; what they really mean

  1. Reblogged this on AfterHollywood and commented:
    This is a crucial blog posting, and I suggest that you read it. Why? It will explain more than anything else, why President Trump is in office, and it also tells why America is so divided. There is something significant that happened at NATO. Did you see it? Oh, what exciting times! I’ll have more to say about this in my next post.

  2. futuret says:

    AS ALWAYS JON WE LOVE YOU FOR YOU ARE A TRUTH SEEKER AS MANY OF US ARE, AND ONCE AGAIN THANK YOU FOR AN EXCELLENT POST.

    https://ca.finance.yahoo.com/news/ivanka-trump-apos-chinese-made-041020687.html

  3. michaelzfreeman says:

    And guess who are some of the biggest corporations of this ilk? Corrupt pharma companies. This all seemed to start with I G Farben.

  4. Abe says:

    Brzezinski, what a POS!
    Brzezinski said that “in earlier times, it was easier to control a million people, literally, than physically to kill a million people” while “today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people.” To the NWO, who are heavily into eugenics and depopulation, it is no big deal to kill a million people. Their plan as laid out in the Georgia Guidestones is to reduce the world’s population to 500 million, a much “manageable” amount.

    • Tom_12 says:

      ” Their plan as laid out in the Georgia Guidestones is to reduce the world’s population to 500 million, a much “manageable” amount.”
      With “management” of the food chain and military might it will be a piece of cake. Food will kill slowly, pharm will profit and the military will have an easy task to manage what’s left.

    • truth1 says:

      Good post. In fact, today, its just as easy to kill a billion as a million, especially if they have been primed already lots of contaminants and toxins. Throw in a shut off water company, and stop trucking in food and your looking at a week or two at best before they are all dead. big weapons are a big absurd overkill. You just let nature take its natural course. From “Genocide 101.”
      Also “50 Ways to Commit Genocide” with DVD included. I-AM-agone books.com. Get it while you’re still alive.

  5. The corporations have been going to countries where the labor was cheap. Now they want even cheaper labor so they bring in migrants who will eventually compete with the domestic population for jobs thus driving wages further down with the added benefit of destroying the founding peoples of each nation. Win, win for the rich, loose, loose for all others.

  6. Robert says:

    “No, the way things were being run allowed China to export far more goods to US than the US was exporting to China. That imbalance has been quite damaging to the US economy.”

    This is true because the fact that China is exporting far more goods to the US is because the Globalists have destroyed the industrial base in the US by offshoring the jobs to Asia to increase their profits. This decrease the tax base in the US. Under the Globalist stooge, Obama, the US national debt rose exponentially by US$10 trillion in 8 years to US$20 trillion.

    The US is a military super power. China cannot force the US to buy consumer goods the US does not need. World trade is conducted on a willing buyer and willing seller basis.

    So also why blame China for the US trade deficit when the US refuses to sell high tech goods to China to offset the export from China? Without the consumer goods from China, the shelves at Walmart with be empty and inflation will hit the roof, ala Venezuela.

    Trump is not as a good businessman that he thinks he is because under his cavalier style his companies went bankrupt four times.

    By raising tariffs for US$200 billion of Chinese goods which the US pays with green papers, Trump is cutting his nose to spite his face. The shelves in Walmart will be empty while China can divert the US$200 billion of consumer goods to Iran, Russia, Middle East, Brazil and Venezuela in exchange for oil.

    • Tom_12 says:

      ” Under the Globalist stooge, Obama, the US national debt rose exponentially by US$10 trillion in 8 years to US$20 trillion.”
      I don’t think we can blame all this on Son of Lolo. This problem has been brewing full till when the Great Liberator was at the steering wheel, Ray-gun.

    • truth1 says:

      Yeah, we are pretty much screwed blue!. And I didn’t even get a kiss after. Boy am I peeved!

    • From Quebec says:

      Trump is not as a good businessman that he thinks he is because under his cavalier style his companies went bankrupt four times. (Robert).

      Do you know of any other billionaires who survived four corporate bankruptcies and thrived in the aftermath? You probably don’t. He is still a multi-billionaire?

      Trump is a genius businessman. He learns fast from his victories and his defeats.

      What separates the winners from the losers is how a person reacts to each new twist of fate.
      Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war. (Trump)

      .

      • Sunshine2 says:

        Well said. I once heard that in order to be an expert at something you must make every mistake you possibly can. If you’re not falling down you’re not doing anything! Only the brainwashed think failing at something is bad. The point is as you said, learn, adapt and keep going. POTUS is constantly under attack.

  7. Tom_12 says:

    ““[The] nation state as a fundamental unit of man’s organized life has ceased to be the principal creative force.”

    The level of arrogance in this statement is mind boggling. I realize that Zbig was just the “mechanic” in the Globalist Shop but besides Cheney and Kissinger he is a person I would just love to send straight into the Sun in a paper bag.

    The author of “Political Ponerology” had a brush with this devil when he came to the US.

  8. The Watchman says:

    Another great article, Jon
    Linked as usual at
    https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

  9. truth1 says:

    Jon: “And what about Brzezinski’s remark that corporations and banks are acting in ways that are “far in advance” of the nation-state?”
    T1: I know, I know, I know! I got this! Satan is way ahead of us in thinking, planning, strategy and control and power, too. But Brezinski is not allowed to say that or the devil would kill him. . . .and he knows it
    😉 😛
    So he says: “corporations and banks.” I’d say that, too, if I were him.

    Jon: “Perhaps this is what he means by advanced concepts: Corporations are empowered to set up factories in Third World hellholes, where they employ workers at starvation wages, with no environmental concerns or controls. That’s step one. Step two is exporting the goods made in those far-off places back to First World countries without paying tariff-penalties.”

    T1: Oh, That was going to be my second choice. Of course , the tarriffs will not lower our taxes in any way, except for a few token pennies. And of course, embarking on a noble mission like this will take years to bring back jobs and factories to the USA, which means . . . Hell might, indeed, freeze over first and we all die in the mean time. So what I am saying between the lines is, ||| We are screwed blue, no matter how you look at it ||| You did not see what was between those lines and I did not say a thing.

    In other words, there is not way that we can fix anything at this point. Its gone too far for that. I suppose I should have put on my rose colored glasses and took one of those blue pills first. I’ll do better next time . . . if there is a next time. Ya never know. But I am sure Aliens will get here first. That will be good for a laugh. But don’t take them too seriously. They are new at this comedy thing.

    Jon really nailed it here, though, as follows:
    “To call this free-market capitalism is a gross misnomer. The free market is pushed to the side. Basic capitalism, in which an entrepreneur builds a domestic business and sells his goods, has nothing to do with this kind of engineered international corporate expansion. The corporate Globalist state is a different animal altogether.”
    And how!

    David Rockefeller: “characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

    T1: David left out something. He had to do that. The devil was right behind him all the way. They are good friends, ya know.

    Jon: “Integrated” actually means”: T1 stepping in now: it means we are all slaves doomed at the hands of maniacal pathological terrorists, I mean, Globalists. God help us all now! Have you bought life insurance yet? I’m too poor to do so 😉

    Jon: “Guess who the “disaffected youth” demanding open borders are unknowingly working for?”

    T1: I got this one, too! I probably watched too many episodes of the Church Lady on SNL back in the late 80s:
    They work for Satan, as do all the left!

    Do I get a prize for this? Oh, don’t bother. I already know the answer.

    • Thisizwhack says:

      Truth1 Actually, there is a way out, it’s called ending The Federal Reserve! The banking cartels/crime syndicates are intentionally destroying USA, Inc. The last two decent presidents we had were murdered/assassinated for wanting to print/issue our own money. Lincoln was only successful for a small window of time..and you know what happened to JFK. Bringing an end to The Fed wouldn’t be an end all to our problems, but it would certainly be a step in the right direction! Nevermind cutting off the head of the snake, I say crush it!!

      • Theodore says:

        it would make for a good thriller movie to watch a dramatization of how that would actually be achieved.

        the US prez declares a national emergency and temporarily puts the US banking system under federal control — to keep the current system running while congress writes new banking law. Simultaneously, the master persuader prez (a Trump like figure) convinces Wall Street traders to not tank the stock market.

        army personnel are called in to keep the banking system computers running and the ATMs working and paypal working.

        perp walks? or, exile? public hangings?

        as long as the electricity is still flowing, could such a righteous coup d’etat like that actually be pulled off?

        what kind of “dead man switches” would the bankers turn on?

      • truth1 says:

        Your suggestion is praiseworthy but our last chance, if we ever had any, would have been the put down of George Washington in regards to Shay’s rebellion and the Whiskey rebellion. We lost those somewhat possible odds. Sheep are hard to convince of what a proper course may be. they don’t have enough brains to figure it out and wait for someone corrupt to suggest something. and they always do. We could have refused to fight WWI, but we did not. We could have boycotted WWII, but then MacArthur would have made a slaughter somewhere and that would stop it all and off to WW2 we would go. We allowed them a standing army, always the biggest threat to the security of a nations’ people.

        Venice has perfected the art of using some of its allies against a rebel nation like Napoleon. Our biggest down fall was the manifestation of mass production industry, which created so much wealth and power. I see it sort of like a dam.If you let a big dam builds up hug amounts of waters, you can generate lots of power. and if ya wanted, you blow the dam up and flood the valley for at least a few hundred miles. When the dam industrial power or military power builds up too much reserve.It can flood over a nation and wipe it out. The trick is not not to build a dam in the first place. Some call it Collectivism. Its always deadly.

  10. For me, Jon, your focus on the symptomatic “window dressing” denies root causes.

    I have at last published “Inheritance, the Prodigal Son and Interest in “Interest””. Here’s an excerpt that expresses my opinion:

    https://ozziethinker.wordpress.com/2018/07/13/inheritance-the-prodigal-son-and-interest-in-interest/

    “….Before I discuss inheritance, it is important to review something much more primordial. We take friendships for granted. They just happen. Or do they just happen? Our first friendships are with family or extended family. Managing relationships with our family members teaches us how to distinguish friends from enemies. These teach us politics (affairs of the people). They teach us who we can influence and who we will let influence us. A trade of sorts is communicated. Eventually we form close knit groups of likeminded kindred spirits. Perhaps not directly considered such, we are all elitist in the way we resolutely preserve our group cultures. When stretched out into the wider community and beyond, we expand into other political networks. Some present revolutionary, but not conflicting ideas. These see us progress, in some cases. Some ideas are so common they become universalised. Politicians naturally capitalise on, exploit and manipulate these phenomena.

    Eventually draconian laws are destined to twist what was original goodwill into all kinds of overt tyrannies in order to elevate elite elitist cultures. Laws have always been the basis for kingdoms. Under this principle, every king has ruling power. However, without friendships there would be no alliances to back the laws and politics that founded them would be rendered superfluous and obsolete. No king could rule. In addition, under these conditions, though commerce would be possible, other than as a tool of oppression, inheritance could have no functional purpose. It would also mean people would be forced to discover the truth if they were motivated that way. They could no longer rely on friends’ redigested second and third hand opinions that sounded right.

    As it stands “Inheritance” is one of the golden keys to open Pandora’s Box. In a distant era populated by long forgotten customs and attitudes, it was exclusively the domain of the elites. At that time land was free, commoners outside metropolises were largely ungoverned and there was no sense of ownership (per modern standards). Individuals congregated into clans and these became long standing settlements which then saw homesteads passed down from generation to generation. But there was no registered ownership. If some place was occupied and sympathetically unavailable, sound conscience determined it was off limits. When the “universalisation” of deeds of ownership tied to symptomatic inheritance of chattel began is hard to calculate. In “western society”, I would argue that the abolishment of “slavery” (social security) led to the effective enslavement of man. Inheritance then evolved to become a quasi-version of the “frills” of slavery. “Rights” would be proscribed by authorities unless aspects of commoners’ common law were considered relevant (to seamless elite governance of slaves). In this case any reflectively worthy laws were drafted as supplants to legislated corporate manifestos. It goes without saying administrators of guidelines were systemised lackeys incapable of virtuous judgement. Finally, courtesy of banking and insurers, everything could be “valued” and that “worth” represented by tokens of interest (whether that is gold/silver bars, coins or promissory notes)…..”

    Best
    OT

  11. Rose Butske says:

    That’s why they hate Trump so much because he wants the wall and close all borders. They want these illegals to vote for them and then they get back the government!

  12. How about this ? … “It may seem unbelievable but this is what Globalists do. They have carried out a campaign over at least the last 50 years and/or at least since the end of WW2, to radically change human beings. Remodel them into compliant and enslaved “global citizens”. I myself circa 1993, stated in answer to a question “I believe myself to be a global citizen“; the reader must realise what crucial evidence that really is.” Read more: https://blog.michaelzfreeman.org/globalists-have-been-trying-to-fundamentally-change-human-behaviour/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.