The war to destroy Alex Jones, Part One

The war to destroy Alex Jones, Part One

He “employed hate speech and violated community standards.”

by Jon Rappoport

August 7, 2018

(To join our email list, click here.)

(For Part 2, click here)

Rivers of elite revenge are flowing.

THEY are out to get him and drive him into oblivion.

He, and his huge website, Infowars, stand as a threat to the empire they are building, where free speech is a thing of the past and only correct speech that supports THEIR objectives is permitted.

Monday, the coordinated war against Alex Jones escalated along several fronts, within a space of about 12 hours, according to infowars reporter Paul Watson:

CNBC:

“Apple, Facebook, YouTube and Pinterest clamped down on content by Alex Jones Monday.”

“Apple confirmed on Monday that it had removed five out of six podcasts, which includes Jones’ infamous ‘The Alex Jones Show’ as well as a number of other InfoWars audio streams.”

“Facebook and Google made similar decisions later on Monday. Facebook removed four pages controlled by him, while Google removed the official “Alex Jones Channel” on its platform. The YouTube channel for InfoWars, the media company owned by Alex Jones, still remains live. Pinterest also removed the InfoWars board.”

I just saw a report that YouTube has taken down Jones’ channel altogether. That would mean tens of thousands of videos of his past shows are gone from that platform. Here are links you would go to, to listen to his show now:

Live stream: 9am to Noon ET:
http://streams.infowars.com/realnews

Live stream: Noon to 4pm ET:
http://streams.infowars.com/alexjones

Live stream: 4pm to 7pm ET:
http://streams.infowars.com/warroom

Additionally, here:
https://www.infowars.com/watch-alex-jones-show/

There are several reasons for this war against Jones and infowars. One is: he rallied untold numbers of “deplorables” and helped elect Donald Trump.

Another is: over and over, he has described the differences between nationalism and globalism—and he favors nationalism, in particular for America.

The tech giants/social media who are aligned against him ARE CORPORATIONS. Therefore, they can ban Jones and not face the raft of rules they would have to deal with if they were public utilities.

However, there is no doubt these corporations are colluding in restraint of trade, to invoke an old phrase pertaining to trusts and monopolies. They are waging a COORDINATED COLLABORATIVE war against Jones.

In fact, several years ago, major news giants approached social media giants and pleaded for help. The news businesses were fading further into the background. They needed Facebook, for example, to feature their coverage of the news.

The dark side of this collusion was and is: put big alt.-news operations out of business. Delist them. De-platform them. Delete them.

And so it has been happening, and it is escalating now.

Here is where the free-speech angle enters the scene: suppose a member of a favored minority (fill in that blank yourself) launched a podcast mercilessly attacking “traditional American values” and those Americans who support those values. Would Facebook or You Tube lift a finger to stop them? No? Then why attack Alex Jones?

The answer is simple.

This issue is not about Jones engaging in “hate speech” or “violating community standards.”

It’s about whose speech and ideas are favored and whose are opposed.

The solution and the response to the war on Jones (or any number of other so-called conservatives) is: GO DIRECTLY TO THEIR SITES AND BLOGS. DON’T USE SOCIAL MEDIA TO GET THERE.

Go direct.

<a href="https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/08/08/the-war-to-destroy-alex-jones-part-2/&quot; rel="noopener" target="_blank"More coming in Part 2…


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

77 comments on “The war to destroy Alex Jones, Part One

  1. voza0db says:

    They have already starting to use Bitchute!

    I’ve never used these platforms to “speak” in the WWW! A very long time ago I used gmail, but a few years ago (around 8 or more!) they made a huge policy change, and after reading the all crap I STOPPED using gmail and went to another email provider, a local/small one!

    In “my” virtual space I wrote above this reply box:

    “Escreve um pensamento… E não te preocupes com nada! Tens neste espaço liberdade total para escreveres o que te apetecer e como te apetecer! Sem restrições! ”

    “Right a thought… And don’t worry with nothing else! In this space you have total freedom to write whatever and how you want! No restrictions!”

    and then

    “Para partilhar (LIVRE DE FACEBOOK E TWITTER… Em prol da congruência) (Share:):”

    “To share (FREE OF FACEBOOK AND TWITTER… in favor of congruence”

    These are PROFIT driven PRIVATE companies that are using vast Herds of Modern Slaves to boost their PROFITS…

    Only one way to go dear Friends!

  2. Craig R. says:

    Jon, I’m surprised you’d fall for this. AJ is a Zionist Jew controlled opposition agent. He’ll be used by them to capture more of the “Truthers” who have doubted his allegiance. They’ll put him back in the game to further their agenda to destroy America from within. Divide and conquer is what their Protocols of the Learned Elders of ZIon is all about.

    • What evidence do you have that Jones is controlled opposition? I’m not adverse to that thought – I’ve noticed that he tends to rant and rave about things we can’t change, but very seldom give informed discussions about the deeper issues of pending legislation, that could be influenced by his huge audience. But I’ve never seen anything that looks at all convincing about him being a controlled agent, other than the fact that his websites all use Discus to control the comments. Disqus is a known control agent, and there is no good reason to use it, other than censorship, itself.
      InfoWars gives a lot of ways to sign in, but they are all controlled by Disqus, and use it’s algorithm about who will be allowed to post.

      • truth1 says:

        Maggy, my problem with Jones is that I think he tried too hard and overacts. He is not the only one that does that (Glen Beck?) but he is the loudest of the bunch. I would say that every youtube conspiracy channel is “controlled, paid, promoted. its a tactic that has always worked. We got on to the MSM, but we have not caught on well with the youtube “news” outlets yet.

        Most people drastically under estimate the reach of global big money. Its a bigger and more powerful Behemoth than the CIA and the 5 sisters network.

      • chloe says:

        Disqus has dropped all Alex Jones and Infowar channels.

    • No he’s not and you’re an idiot. How much do they pay you to post crap like this.

  3. paschnn1 says:

    I don’t trust Jones. Entertaining and informative? Sure. But as with most “well funded” (lol) “alt media” sites, he’s VERY careful to always use benign and “safe” euphemisms for those most responsible for the depravity/evil/chaos in the world;
    **********
    Quote from “You Gentiles” by Maurice Samuel;

    “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. (Pg 155)
    **********
    “It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.” ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg
    **********

    “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America
    (The Jew, December, 1925, Zinobit)
    **********

    That being said, I wonder if the majority has given any thought to why THIS filth is allowed and doesn’t bruise the sensitivities of these ALL TOO numerous kosher web sites?

    https://youtu.be /uDTq69rFRY8

    https://youtu.be /TDvNCli48o0

    Odd, don’t you think?

    There may be those with opposing views – but before you attack me, realize this; The above words ARE THEIR OWN, not mine, or would you rather simply “shoot the messenger”?

    Others within the “alt” media who are guilty of running interference;

    Stephan Molyneux

    Mike Adams, (a.k.a. “the health ranger”)

    One would be justified in stating that, only THEIR agenda gets a forum. Truth? Not so much.

    Ignorance, cowardice and a rabid need for political correctness has run a dull blade across the throat of this sty.

    Thanks for all you do Mr. Rappaport. I re-post often.

    • kennyalligood says:

      I won’t shoot anything but I agree with your assessment

    • Freespirit says:

      Ironically INFOWARS (Alex Jones) supports Israel.

      He has, hopefully, learned the lesson that, “those who can LIE, STEAL and MURDER for you, (as Israel does), can do the same TO YOU”, as the JEWS whom he supported are, now doing to him.

      He is paying the price for his DUPLICITY : https://youtu.be /Z1IrwxUuz60

      Those Jews are slowly but surely coming for all Alternative sites such as , but not limited to, Russia Insider, especially those sites who/which try to please the Jews, with “Controlled Opposition” or “compromised” articles. WHY, those?-because it is a sign of WEAKNESS, deduced by those Jews and which those Ashkenazi love to prey upon .

      You cannot please a PSYCHOPATH. You can only imprison or destroy
      them.

      Have you all noticed how slow sites such as Southfront and RI or their articles load now.(DOS attacks) Have you also noticed how so many TROLLS are commenting and attacking other commenters now

      NO coincidence

      • Craig R. says:

        It always gives me hope to see others who’ve figured out who America’s enemy is and has been for decades upon decades. Still trying to figure out if Jon is in on the deceit since he’s never touching the subject.

      • Bob Klinck says:

        And have you noticed how the free interplay of commenting has been curtailed in the press? And how for articles that are certain to provoke an expression of popular outrage the opportunity to comment is invariably suspended?

        • Thomas says:

          Oh yes, you are so right. Very bad things are happening now and most surely much worse is on the way.

          • futuret says:

            YOU ARE CORRECT!!! WE ARE IN THE END OF THE LAST DAYS, PRIOR TO THE RETURN OF JESUS CHRIST. THIS WORLD WHICH SHALL END SHALL SEE THE WORSE TRIBULATION THE WORLD AS EVER SEEN OR SHALL SEE AGAIN. IF ONLY EVERY SOUL HAD THE IMMENSE BURNING TO FOLLOW THE TEN COMMANDMENTS, WE WOULD NOT HAVE A MATRIX, NOR THAT THOSE WHO HAVE POWER WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ABUSE AND LIVE THE WAY THEY DO.

  4. marlene katz says:

    If the reason for censoring Alex Jones is because he “helped elect Donald Trump’, then all fake stream media outlets should be censored for pushin Hillary Clinton.

  5. marlene katz says:

    My apple iPad will not let me access the above links to info wars – FYI

  6. Sue says:

    I have always found you credible, Jon. However, I have never found Alex Jones credible. His whole shtick seems to be scare the crap out of people while selling them overpriced junk to protect against what he has frightened them with.

    • odleefs says:

      Ignorance is bliss for you Sue. I care not whether you believe him – censorship itself is the problem not the message and your interpretation of it.

      • we don’t need to get personal. I don’t agree that Sue is ignorant, because that would necessitate IGNORE-ing something. AJ was foundational in shaking me up out of my worldview, but that doesn’t change the reality that he is a fear-mongering egomaniac touting out half-truths. He certainly uses fear to sell products to his listeners, and I have no problem with that. Sue is spot on in her analysis, but that doesn’t discredit Jon’s essay, your accurate assertion of the attack on free speech. In fact, if you read closely what she said, there is nothing in there that makes any claim other than his credibility and MO. It may be not as astute an observation as yours, but it certainly isn’t inaccurate. The guy has been unhinged for over a decade. It has been a progressive decline into egomania.

        That all being said: This is the canary in the coal mine for the individual. This is absolutely about shutting down free speech. This is about shaping narrative and a desperate attempt to control the minds of the population. I also would bet money this is calculated due to the upcoming mid term elections. I would be surprised if independents were listening to him though (you know, the approximate 13% of the population who sways the vote come election time). If anything, his calls for action may help a few more republicans get out to vote, rather than changing anyone’s position. His delivery method isn’t the most attractive to middle of the road types.

        • Michael Burns says:

          Hey cowboy, how’s you summer been so far?

          • Great! And you?
            My shine is really coming into it’s own just in time for the wedding.
            Got a new quad, been hitting up the Colorado back country with the lady, working on the house, shop, garage. You know, busy making shi*.

            Been putting off my website far too long.
            What’s your take on Alex Jones? I haven’t read into his supposed counter intelligence accusations but I suppose I could see him as a plant

            • Craig R. says:

              honestliberty, what’s AJ’s position on Palestine and what does he say about the Jews who run our USG and MSM? Once you determine that you’ll know what AJ is.

            • Michael Burns says:

              Sometimes people need a slap in the face to wake fully, their groggy, not paying attention…the message is important, but their taking and wanderi g and unfocus. Alex Jones wakes them up, abruptly. And so when they do, they first experience rage, mainly at the message. Until they are adjusted to the condition

            • futuret says:

              WE ARE AT THE END OF THE LAST DAYS, AND THE HOLY BIBLE TELLS US THAT IN THE LAST DAYS THE MASSES SHALL WANT TO BELIEVE A LIE. THE HOLY BIBLE FOR THIS IS SECOND THESSALONIANS CHAPTER 2 IN VERSE 2. PEOPLE WILL BECOME ANGRY WE THEY ARE FACED WITH THE TRUTH AND LEAVE THEIR COMFORT ZONES. THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING, WE SHALL ALL BE CENSORED IN SOMEWAY, AS THE MARK OF THE BEAST BECOMES MORE MANDATORY AND PREVALENT AND THE ANTI-CHRIST MOVES FORWARD TO TAKE HIS PLACE AS THE son of satan. THERE SHALL BE GLOBAL TYRANNY NONE LIKE THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN OR SHALL SEE AGAIN. WE SHALL HAVE PEACE AND JUSTICE WHEN JESUS CHRIST RETURNS.

            • honestliberty says:

              Someone else on somewhere I think WUWT, mentioned about the Left and CAGW, as they are backtracking in the whole man made devastation claims but still holding steady that were responsible… Is akin to the five stages of grief. The scientists (regarding the catastrophic claims and crap science) are past anger, denial, and now they are forced to enter the bargaining phase because all the claims have been so wildly inaccurate.
              I’m interested to see how that flushes out, but regarding the information that snacks you in the face, I’m still definitely in the anger phase.

            • Craig, I haven’t explored AJ much as I’ve distanced myself from him in the past years because I have found much higher quality information such as this website, Corbett Report, Passio, Stefan Molyneux, Tragedy&Hope, Sargon, Jordan Peterson, WUWT (for climate stuff), etc..

              I wouldn’t be surprised if he is pro-zionist or zionist funded and yes I do get tired of so many folks too daggone scared to be critical of jews. After all, the powerful ones claiming jewish heritage have been warring against western whites for centuries. That is the main reason Islam is on the rise, because Kalergi & protocols are not hoaxes…which at least got some coverage on his infowards back in 2015:
              https://www.infowars.com/the-kalergi-plan/
              not really any critique of the jews however.

              I’m just not one of those folks that falls into the category of claiming any independent media producer who doesn’t (in my opinion) get everything right, is necessarily an agent or cointelpro.
              Alan Weissenberger or whatever that surfer hippie dude does that and he comes off as a combative, bat-isht crazy loon. I look at the information and do my diligence to verify it the best I can. So far, when I stopped listening to AJ he was batting about .400 or so, but close on the major narratives…I found his attention to detail lacking, especially considering his delivery.

              last, even if he is cointelpro… I’m not totally upset about it because, as I said, without that initial slap in the face from AJ… I wouldn’t have likely gotten where I am today. He’s illuminated enough of the narrative that gave me many directions to explore and without that I might still have been stuck voting for my next masters..

        • I have to say I agree with you. I think they are going after the two biggies not because they are ones most accurate but because they have the biggest audiences, much like the slave-owners used to pick out the biggest, strongest slave and destroy him – it makes it much easier to control the rest.

      • Michael Burns says:

        @ odleefs

        I know Sue…but I don’t know you. Are you a troll?

        Who cares what ‘you’ care about…the comment is valid, and makes complete sense. Yours does not…

        You worry about censorship, living in your internet bubble. You are presented the world exactly like you want it…But chastise Sue because, why? She does not agree with Jones.

        I find that quite funny.

        You understand that the internet and all its substructure was originally designed for the military — it was theirs totally to guide their cold war missiles, and communicate with their cold war allies and missile sites. The internet is a DARPA property. They have never given it up. It was allowed to become a public entity, for a reason.

        It still belongs to them. It is their property. You must understand that there is a idėe fixe with ‘your’ political stance.

        If you go down to the basement of the internet, the powers that be, are playing cards and smoking cigarettes down there, and turn the wheels and gauges to control the pressures. Collecting the garbage people throw out and reading it. Putting wood in the furnace or freezing us out, they are right next to the power box and the water shut off. Censorship on the Internet is a laughable concept indeed why did you ever think it was free? The internet is a country, an a territory of the mind. Owned by very dark characters. It is a huge mind game.

        I find it a good thing that Alex Jones was booted off YouTube, Facebook, Apple, and Pinterest– it gives him credence..

        And, that’s were all the sleepy ones are…he was there for a reason, to wake them up. His brand of communication can be hard to take — the platform is designed like rag mag to appeal to those sleepy ones.

        These websites are cultural wastelands, deserts for real minds, where millions grovel in their own inequity. And bully what they do not understand. Gerbils on a wheel, not thinking, simply impulsing. Satisfying the needs of their narcistic centers — programmed and without any real individual thought and any logic to aid them..

        Small digital probes into their little lives, subservient to the qualms and experiments of the owners. Knowingly willing to be part of the experiment of the great mob. The great, “We are all in this together..”, hoax.

        As Jon Rappoport owns and controls this site, so, Mark Zuckerberg controls and manages Facebook for his masters at the CIA.

        The ministry of truth is not for everyone — Google and its video riding equivalent YouTube service no one. It administrates and RECOMMENDS, it validates and roots out what it deems as being fake, while being fake…it watches, and knows the power of the image in comparison to the word to those who, by really any other standard are illiterate.

        “The medium is the message.”

        If he (Alex Jones) had/has a genuine audience there, on those websites — who like what he has presented. Who understood his message and the reason for his extremes of emotional outburst. Who are inspired by his words — will start their own channel in defiance or… he will be followed back to where he is safer. It will be like watching dandelion grow.

        Think of those who will leave or boycott, those websites that ban him. And the effect they will have on others like them. they will take their friends with them.

        I watch AJ sometimes, but I hate having to favor YouTube to do it. AJ is a shit disturber, and shit disturbers have their place in this war against the dark.

        Anyone of value is on BitChute or SteemIt or Gab, or T&H or Jon Rappoport or emailing or skyping or any other way but Apple, Facebook, YouTube and Pinterest. The herd lives in those places, and those giant corporations control that message. These later entities have gotten far too corrupted in their power to control the message — always. They are on the slide and will end soon. They will implode just MSM.

        The have a limited shelf life.

        Have you noticed that those who use Facebook are always a bit embarrassed to admit that they do use it, they seem to exclaim “I am hardly on Facebook, I rarely use it anymore — every so often I go there — it’s been a while.”

        Because they know that to use FaceBook is just like picking up the National Inquirer, by the check-out and expects to gain knowledge of the news. There is a twisted sort of logic at work here, that they know they are being fed gossip from FaceBook — brings the worse of a person out into the open, for all to see. It is the limited hang-out of the ridiculous and I would have to say, intellectually lazy if not bordering on stupid.

        • “These websites are cultural wastelands, deserts for real minds, where millions grovel in their own inequity” I think you mean they grovel in their iniquity.

        • There it is folks! I should have read this before responding to your last comment. T&H being tragedy and hope by Richard Grove?
          It’s good stuff

        • odleefs says:

          I will cut to the chase and hope that you are asutue enough to figure it out before you write another novella.
          The ignorance is ignorance of the problem at hand The problem is not AJ or his methods or products. The problem is the attack on free speech.

          • Michael Burns says:

            Really Sue was freely speaking — you didnt like my way of freely speaking. I’m Irish I like telling stories. You think we are ignorant here, we have as community known about this problem for a long long time. As a matter if fact, I might venture to say that the room is full to brim with freedom fighting individuals. Who have known about this coming for a long time. In fact it is what this website is about. Now if you quiet and apologize you might learn something. And maybe gain a friend.

            • odleefs says:

              LOL, apologize to whom and for what action? What I said, stands as plain and as right as day- so I guess you didn’t like my way of “freely speaking” either? It plays both ways…
              Logic is a bitch, isn’t it?!? LOL

    • henry says:

      There are limits to free speech. You cannot knowingly lie about someone. You can’t shout fire in a crowded theater — unless the theater is actually on fire. Alex shouts fire but the theater is on fire. Is it not your duty to shout fire if the theater is on fire?

      I find it hard to listen to Alex because he is always so hyper. But this ‘shtick’ as you call it is appealing to many people. If the products that he sells are not valued by his customers then they will stop buying them.

      Infowars has interesting guests and most of the information is accurate. Since the mainstream media has lied to us time after time, Infowars explores ideas that seem far-fetched. Sometimes they are a truth that your overlords don’t want you to hear.

  7. Toni says:

    Jones is known to be controlled opposition, so I feel this rabbit hole goes deeper than free speech.
    The reasons for certain actions are always different than what “they” want us to beLIEve. You

  8. Kathleen Donnelly says:

    Do you not think he has been put there for this purpose all along.. making him look credible to bring out yet another ‘ law’… it just seems too good to be true that he has been allowed a platform in the first place.. ‘doing a job’ … I think.. and the job is almost finished.. ‘ taking control of what you are allowed to say no more free speech..”… Job done.

  9. futuret says:

    I FOR ONE THINK THAT SOCIAL MEDIA IS A SHAM, THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT SOCIAL MEDIA THAT IS SOCIAL. IT IS JUST ANOTHER TOOL THAT CAN BE USED EITHER FOR OR AGAINST YOU. FRANKLY, I RECENTLY COMPLETELY DELETED MY FACEBOOK ACCOUNT AND DO NOT CARE FOR ANY MESSAGES THERE. NOT ONLY IS THERE A WAR AGAINST ALEX JONES, THERE IS A WAR AGAINST ALL OF US, SIMPLY BECAUSE NOT EVERYONE FITS EVERYONE’S MOLD. WE SHOULD NOTE THE MATRIX IS OUR ENEMY:

    http://beforeitsnews.com/v3/conspiracy-theories/2018/2495809.html

  10. paschnn1 says:

    Wow, Mr. Rappaport! You seem to have a well-rounded and educated following. Consider adding a “thumbs up” option as it would look narcissistic of me to reply to each.

    • flyinggabriel says:

      Good suggestion. Although there’s enough evidence to warrant a thumbs down also dontcha think? For balance.

  11. From Quebec says:

    Good Lord, Most of your followers Jon, are brainwashed idiots. Typical Jew haters, worst than ANTIFA. When I read these comments, I really feel sorry for your country. These haters wants censorship and get rid of your First Amendment.

    Infowars is not controlled opposition, it is TOMORROW NEWS TODAY.

    I have been listening to the show for 17 years. They have the best news, best guests, best hosts best articles,.and best products at a good price. Did you know that Jon Rappoport is a frequent guest on Ifowars?

    Infowars is not controlled by anyone.

    Shame on you, Craig R, paschnn and, Sue. Your stupidity will lead you to a Globalist world. You are your worst enemy.

    WAKE the FUCK UP !

    • Michael Burns says:

      Lololololol…ahahahaa. You made my morning.

      Could it be that your soap opera mindset, has become offended.

      I mean Alex and his meladrama are as poignant as, “As The World Turns, or The Young and the Brestless”
      Do you realize that good publicity goes further than bad.
      His audience will probably double over night.
      Now don’t be throwing rocks at me, when you reply…if you reply.

      • From Quebec says:

        You are right Michael, The greatest Soap Operas in this world are the DC Swamp and the MSM Fake news that Alex Jones exposes everyday.

        It is very informative and very entertaining.. I like it. I love it.makes my day.

        • Well it’s been a bit since I’ve been here, been really diving into WUWT.com, love Anthony’s work and his guest posts are incredible, very hard science guys debating.
          They are definitely more left brain dominant, logic types who don’t seem to accept spirit. Anyway…

          Glad to see Queen Quebec is still as senile as ever! I missed you folks!
          Quebec, have you ever considered that ingesting Alex Jones media for 17 years may have warped you’re view of reality? I listened to him for one summer and couldn’t take much more than that. The guy is a great starting point but his quality of material, presentation, and depth is lacking. I am truly grateful for him because he really shook my A** up, but that’s about all he is good for.

          There are so many higher quality journalists out there providing such better context with much better accuracy of research. James Corbett it’s fantastic.
          Jordan Peterson had some fantastic insight, but obviously stops short of conspiracies.
          Tragedy and hope with Richard Grove
          The work these folks have done holds so much more density of quality information compared to the one trick pony of Alex Jones. I mean for Pete sake the guy just went off on Rogan, one of the best podcast interviewer/hosts that has ever done it. And they were supposed to be friends.

          I think you put way too much stock into his work, much to the detriment of your mental health.

          And drop it already with the Zionism backing. It’s a tired ploy of self deception.

          • From Quebec says:

            The guy is a great starting point but his quality of material, presentation, and depth is lacking.(honestliberty says:

            Only a snobbish so-called intellectual would say this. You are like the MSM who do not like Trump style. He is too real for them.
            I happened to like people like Jones and Trump, who tells it like it is. I don’t need the decorum.

        • Michael Burns says:

          I am on your side ya know, I see in a different way that’s all.

          • honestliberty says:

            Michael, to whom was that comment directed?
            I think the three of us have significant overlap: I would assert that you have climbed out the left-right narrative and see the macro scale. I’m claiming that Quebec is obviously still firmly entrenched in that paradigm. Her comments are saturated with aggressive, combative, ad hominem, and narrow perspectives. It’s why I used such strong language to get in my other response.

            Things like this:
            “Good Lord, Most of your followers Jon, are brainwashed idiots. Typical Jew haters, worst than ANTIFA. When I read these comments, I really feel sorry for your country. These haters wants censorship and get rid of your First Amendment.”

            She constantly resorts to petty, unclever insults to valid criticisms of her worldview. She certainly isn’t exhibiting behavior of someone who has worked on consciousness, or awareness I suppose would be a more apt description.
            I’m talking specifically about balance, between emotion and restraint.
            Does her behavior not closely resemble much of how Alex Jones operates? To me, it is a spitting image.
            I’ll give her credit where it’s due, (if Quebec is a she, I assumed that. My apologies if I’m incorrect BTW. )
            Anyway. I have no issue giving credit where it’s due, calling out inconsistency, apologizing when I can accept I’ve offended unduly, and accepting I’m wrong. It definitely happens more than I’d like to admit

            https://youtu.be /hIobB6SATcQ

  12. From Quebec says:

    TWITTER SUSPENDS RON PAUL INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE’S ACCOUNT, ONE DAY AFTER BIG TECH BLOCKS INFOWARS
    The suspensions come a day after Alex Jones, and his podcast InfoWars, was kicked out from several popular media platforms, including Facebook, YouTube and Spotify

    https://www.infowars.com/twitter-suspends-ron-paul-institute-executives-account-one-day-after-big-tech-blocks-infowars/

    Hey you idiots, maybe you also think that Ron Paul is also controlled opposition?

  13. From Quebec says:

    INFOWARS OFFICIAL APP JUMPS TO NUMBER 4 — DOMINATES CNN, NYT, ABC
    Attempts to censor us backfire as Streisand effect kicks in

    https://www.infowars.com/infowars-official-app-jumps-to-number-4-dominates-cnn-nyt-abc/

    • Michael Burns says:

      Streisand was a Jew ya know, gave a million bucks to Bill Clintons foundation. In 2011 she did funraiser for the IDF (Israel Defense Fund). She is a card carrying feminist.
      She is a honorary chairwoman/person/zse/zsa/ or zoe of Hadassah (Hadassah women’s Zionist Organization of America).
      Does that mnatter if the ‘Streisand Effect’ pours all over Alex.

      • From Quebec says:

        Streisand was a Jew ya know.(Michael)

        Who cares? There are bad people in all races and countries.

        As for now, the greatest threat to the World is CHINA.. Does that mean that all Chineses are bad? Of course not.

      • marlene katz says:

        God bless the Jews and all hail the Zionists!s!,, Streisand isn’t the way she is because she was born Jewish. She’s the way she is because she’s a leftard, just like the members of C ingress who are not Jewish. And just like the non-Jewish presidents we’ve elected for the last hundred years.

  14. Sukijopa says:

    I see another Sue has already commented here, so I guess I’d better use an alternate ID.

    I don’t like censorship, but I also don’t believe that Alex Jones’ sometimes hysterical persona is helpful to conveying the message.

  15. From Quebec says:

    DONALD TRUMP JR. REACTS TO INFOWARS CENSORSHIP: ‘REALLY ABOUT PURGING ALL CONSERVATIVE MEDIA’

    https://www.infowars.com/donald-trump-jr-reacts-to-infowars-censorship-really-about-purging-all-conservative-media/

    In the comment section on infowars article, I like what this guy shad to say:

    Darth Cheney • 2 hours ago

    Take AWAY the White House Press Credentials of CNN and give them to INFOWARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    That would be the ultimate kick in the nuts for the DeepState.
    Imagine Acosta’s & Helter Stelter’s crying then……………… 360D Chess move
    Come on Donnie Jr.; make it happen !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    :

  16. flyinggabriel says:

    Pick a subject. Either the danger of political censorship and the rise of corporate fascism – or the relative merits of Alex Jones and Infowars. Dealing with both at the same time is clearly beyond most.

  17. Not So Free says:

    If you can’t defeat your opponent in a debate, just ban him from speaking.
    That is what the left is planning, and doing.
    The sooner we realize that, the better chance we have of beating them.

  18. sundancer55 says:

    Who in the hell would go to Fakebook for their daily news anyway?? People who belong to these “feel good” networking sites are idiots who deserve what they get – censored.

  19. From Quebec says:

    You are so right, Not So Free.

    I have never been on any of these social media sites . When I first heard of a site called FACEBOOK. I knew right away that this was a trap.

    Since I can easily read faces, I believe that everybody could also acquire the same skill.
    When you put your face on the net, it is like if you put your soul for everyone to see.

  20. From Quebec says:

    The best opinion on Alex jones banned is from the Savage nation today:

    The Savage Nation (Tuesday, 08/07/2018) With Michael Savage — Michael Savage August 07 2018

  21. There needs to be a class action lawsuit against these big tech social media giants for colluding to restrain trade and deny American their first amendment rights.

  22. The Watchman says:

    Good breakdown and analysis, Jon linked as usual at
    https://nothingnewunderthesun2016.com/

  23. arcadia11 says:

    staged. planned before infowars hit the internet. jones is an actor albeit a bad one, and a player. the martyr role will suit him.

    don’t cry for alex jones. he loves what he is doing. our time, energy and creativity might be better used on what is important.

  24. RoibeardH says:

    Reblogged this on Awaken Lifeform and commented:
    What happens if you go to bed with big business, instead using offers from the people for the people. Blank despotism can hit you at every moment, especially if governments like to push their narrative as the only one reality.

  25. Are you serious, Jon?

    This is surely a “spoof”. I will say this. Ever since your public relationship with Jones, your content has taken a nosedive. Fortunately old magic still haunts, so you have an audience.

    Some argue Jones was set up with CIA money. I don’t know whether that is true or even if it could be proven. I do know this. He is there because “they” want him there. Of course, if no one is “buying his content”, too many “woken ups” have realised the scam than “they” feel comfortable with, if he losing numbers so fast it looks as though he’s going to bomb, perhaps he’s no longer “viable”? There could be other reasons, of course.

    It would be a real blow to them, because his is the ultimate disinformation source. There’s no one better to confuse minds than Alex Jones. For instance, you will NEVER see me in association with him.

    Of course, if the powers have decided the world is won and there’s no longer any need for “confusion”, well, that punts whole nother scenario…….

    Best
    OT

    • henry says:

      Most people have been cowed into apathetic passivity by the tactics of the money powers. Alex screams and shouts have woken many from their slumber. To the population of American sleepers, Jon has little appeal. But entertainment is a tool that Alex uses to get people thinking. Trump uses the same tactic in his tweets and name calling. It is difficult to get out of the quicksand until you realize that you are in quicksand. Most young American adults don’t realize that they are under attack because everybody that they know is in the same boat. To a dwarf, Alex looks like a giant. I won’t criticize Alex Jones because, overall, he is part of the new renaissance.

      • futuret says:

        I AM DEEPLY “IN LOVE” WITH PEOPLE SUCH AS JON RAPPORPORT AND ALEX JONES, AND OTHERS LIKE THEM. WE CAN NOT HAVE THE SAME PERSONALITIES, BUT WE CAN BE PEOPLE DETERMINED TO STICK WITH THE TRUTH. ONE OF PROBLEMS AS ADULTS, IS THAT WE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE ENTERTAINED IN UNCOVERING, DISCOVERING, AND ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT. ENTERTAINMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PRODUCTION OF DELIVERING THE TRUTH, AND FOR PEOPLE TO EXPLORE. ENTERTAINMENT IS ONLY FOR SMALL CHILDREN. I WOULD LISTEN TO THESE PEOPLE, EVEN IF THEY WERE NOT ENTERTAINING, OR CAN WE NOT JUST BE OURSELVES, AND NOT HAVE TO ADD ON ANY DRAMA. DO WE HAVE TO WEAR COW BELLS EVERYWHERE WE GO??? THIS IS A SAD AND GRIEVING TIME IN HUMANITY, WHEN ADULTS NEED ENTERTAINMENT TO TELL THEM WHAT IN THE HELL IS GOING ON. IF THIS IS THE CASE, WE ARE DEFINITELY LOST AND CONFINED TO THE MATRIX.

    • flyinggabriel says:

      I’ve found Alex to be emotional and to exercise poor judgement fairly regularly, even appear openly confused himself. But a confuser of minds unsurpassed? Not the Alex Jones I’ve seen.
      Confusion is a result, and can only exist in the mind of the confused. It’s either fear or arrogance that then projects it as widespread or universal.
      Of course were “they” behind Jones as you suggest, then his take-down sets a precedent, and any debate about Jones’s character or status becomes irrelevant. For that purpose he’s low hanging fruit and the haters will respond to a dog whistle. They win. You’re next.

  26. There are also big waves, actually tidal waves, in the media field. A while ago  Natural News was banned from FB, YouTube and affiliates, the Health Ranger, Mike Adams, responded with creating his own video channel where he invited every body banned from those social media, committed to reveal the truth, to post their videos here: https://www.real.video. It just launched a few weeks ago and many are posting their videos there now. A couple days ago, they banned all the videos from Alex Jones, accusing him of “hate – speech”. There are some very interesting articles about that and I would like to refer to Jon Rappoport’s article: “The war to destroy Alex Jones” https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2018/08/07/the-war-to-destroy-alex-jones-part-one/

  27. Goldnsilver says:

    I think if Jones hadn’t made things so miserable towards the families of Sandy Hook and their deceased, for example, they wouldn’t have gotten fed up, as many have. Come on, the man is on a continuous rant against so many people, you have to wonder how skewed his perceptions are.

    Besides, with all his reporting, has anyone on his team asked those others why they banned him?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.