Flashback: creating a genetically altered human

by Jon Rappoport

November 27, 2018

(To join our email list, click here.)

Combing through my files, I came across a piece I’d written in 2011 about genetic alteration. But my piece referred to experiments done much earlier, in 2001.

Given what happened in 2001, one can only imagine how far scientists have now gone in tinkering with DNA—openly, and in secret.

From The Telegraph, Sep.27, 2001, “Boy’s DNA implanted in rabbit eggs,” written by Roger Highfield:

“Scientists in China have inserted a boy’s DNA into empty rabbit eggs and grown hybrid embryos, it is reported today. A team at the Sun Yat-Sen University of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, are trying to overcome a practical limitation…In some of the 100 or so successful transfers to a rabbit egg stripped of chromosomes, an embryo developed to the morula stage, [which is] the compact ball of cells that forms after about three days of development. For stem cells to be isolated, the embryos must be coaxed into developing further.”

Also in 2001, there was another, far more ambitious experiment:

BBC Online (May 4, 2001): “Scientists have confirmed that the first genetically altered humans have been born and are healthy.”

“Up to 30 such children have been born, 15 of them as a result of one experimental programme at a US laboratory [the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science of St Barnabas in New Jersey]…”

“Genetic fingerprint tests on two one-year-old children confirm that they contain a small quantity of additional genes not inherited from either parent.”

“The additional genes were taken from a healthy donor and used to overcome their mother’s infertility problems.”

“…The additional genes that the children carry have altered their ‘germline’, or their collection of genes that they will pass on to their offspring…[Note: This means the new abnormal configuration of genes will spread out into the general population, over time, with unknown effects.]

“Writing in the journal Human Reproduction, the researchers say that this ‘is the first case of human germline genetic modification resulting in normal healthy children.’”

The superhighway into a genetically designed future isn’t just a science-fiction fantasy. Stones on that highway have already been laid down.

This is how the op proceeds:

Out front, scientists say they are curing infertility and other medical problems by genetic alteration—and many scientists believe this is the only purpose of the work. But behind that, something else is happening:

Wholesale gene alteration to invent different and new types of humans.

This is the technocrats’ Holy Grail. A society in which different classes of humans are assigned to different levels of work and living.

Lee Silver, an eminent molecular biologist at Princeton, has written a book, Remaking Eden (1998), about the future of gene science in society. This is how he views the future just over the horizon:

“The GenRich—who account for ten percent of the American population—[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class…”

“Naturals [who aren’t genetically altered] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.”

“Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.”

“Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme.”

As shocking as Lee Silver’s assessment is, it’s mild when put up against the pronouncement of Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:

“Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.”

That’s quite an “innovative” definition of scientific responsibility.

And note that Gregory Stock is also talking about new “life forms” that are combinations of biological and technological elements—bio-machines.

Give the current state of genetic science, and the inflated claims of competence, you can be sure that many thousands of hit-and-miss experiments are being carried out. It’s trial and error. One can only imagine some of the grotesque “errors.”

Behind all this is the assumption that human beings are deficient; they need alteration; as composed, they are woefully insufficient to take their place in the new world order.

Which is why I’m posting this piece—because we are seeing yet another vector in the attack on The Individual. As I’ve maintained for the past 35 years, there is nothing wrong with the individual, except his reluctance to recognize his own power and his own capacity to envision his best future and pursue it with commitment.

In full bloom, the individual is not only adequate, he is dynamic and majestic.

Understanding this is the “adjustment” we need to make.


The Matrix Revealed

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

8 comments on “Flashback: creating a genetically altered human

  1. NaturalWoman says:

    Madness. Once the genie is out of the bottle, it can’t be undone. Just like with GMO corn. Pollen from it travels a great distance, making all corn damaged and organic corn almost impossible. We do not have the wisdom to be doing this. And companies should not be able to just go ahead and inflict it on us without our permission.

  2. trishwriter says:

    “Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.”

    Sure, we have “personal liberty,” after years of brainwashing in government schools, and after years of watching the “choices” on television that the powers-that-shouldn’t-be allow us on television and on the internet.

    “Naturals [who aren’t genetically altered] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.”

    I first heard about “naturals” on National Propaganda Radio a few years ago. The story was about how a naturally conceived and grown child may fall behind a more technically conceived and grown child, and this may happen in the next ten or twenty years. The idea being, of course, that if you really care about your children, you may just have to accept a little bit of gene editing, and perhaps a technological implant or two. It’s all about the children, of course, at least in the early part of the sales pitch.

  3. truth1 says:

    Yeah, we humans were such a poor design. I ‘m being sarcastic, of course. Regardless of their said reasons why these genetics are being tampered with, I would say this is a case of propaganda to suggest we are not as good as we could have been in our design. Its God’s fault, ya know! Yep! and I guts me a good used UFO with low mileage (only 3 million miles. A lot of life left in it, yet) that I might be willing to sell to anyone interested. Call me! 1-800-sucker.

    And yes, mother nature is flawed, too. she’s lost and confused and out of control. All we need to do is follow that soon to appear “messiah/prophet/whatever.” Do I hear god by chance? and a “race of space aliens” will guide us, will guide us toward “enlightenment.” (its real name is extinction).

    So like a good horror movie, they take us on a scare ride and then offer a chance to get off the ride and join them in their bliss (torture and death). I don’t believe half of what I read or hear because I know most of it is there to push us in certain direction. Some of the details might not be that clear yet, but we are being misled and lied to, to see if we have any brains at all left.

    Genetics can lead you to water but it can not make you drink. Genetics is not the reason for our failure as these lab leaks would have us believe. The Marvel of the human creation is that it guides itself. It can become brilliant, or become as stupid as a cancer cell. All the smoke and mirrors in the world can’t change that. Genetics can not alter choice or free will. It must break their hearts to know this.

  4. From Quebec says:

    Behind all this is the assumption that human beings are deficient; they need alteration; as composed, they are woefully insufficient to take their place in the new world order.
    ———————————————————

    The problem is the so called Elites who want to create a New World Order that nobody wants.
    Screw them.

    Those people are crazy lunatics.

    Let us get rid of these demon possessed scientists. It should be easy, they are few, we are legion.

    • Rastafari says:

      Nobody want a new world order? lol, have you looked around lately? most that i know love it and support it with all their heart. new devices. smart everything. phones. pads. watches. earpieces. screens. devices in stores when paying. the evil being taught in schools, who cares? injections of who knows what (they’re in a line at walgreens to get the shot). they go to the doctors. they take the tests.

      who are “those people” that are crazy lunatics? your neighbors. your fellow churchgoers. etc.

      they are few, we are legion? who is “we”?

  5. Sue says:

    This is where belief in, and support of, experiments on animals have taken us. Millions of innocent beings are tortured yearly in laboratories before the ghouls in white coats decide to trot their latest “success” into public view, expecting approval from the masses. They even do bizarre sexual torture of animals, for which there is no valid explanation, demonstrating that the perpetrators are really mentally ill.

    Remember Russia’s two-headed dog graft? It’s still hailed in “scientific” circles as a great innovation. How about Baby Fae, (who had excellent odds of surviving with traditional surgery), the baboon heart transplant experiment performed by Leonard Bailey? The news headlines blared “Baby Dead, Operation A Success!” Did anyone stop to think “Wait, why is the news media PRAISING this disaster?”

    And behind the scenes, there was no anesthesia for the young baboon (to ensure a “drug free” heart) and quite possibly not for the human baby (it was revealed many years ago in an article in Parade magazine that some doctors were denying anesthesia to infants undergoing surgery because, they said, babies don’t feel pain like adults do. Similar to the vivisectionist claim that “animals don’t feel pain like humans do”).

    Unnecessary Fuss – YouTube
    http://www.youtube.com /watch?v=B6W_hL_gyJo

  6. Jon

    FYI going back even further to the 1990’s, there was an “alternative” article of an incident in America about a man who was allegedly attacked by an unidentified “kangaroo like” creature, Apparently it was injured before scarpering off. According to the report, blood remains were tested to reveal it was “part human”……

    Food for thought?

    Best
    OT

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.